logo
Maine seeks delayed enforcement of Real ID as deadline approaches

Maine seeks delayed enforcement of Real ID as deadline approaches

Yahoo01-05-2025

May 1—AUGUSTA — State officials are asking the Trump administration to delay the strict enforcement of a requirement that people show a Real ID or equivalent form of identification if they want to fly commercially starting Wednesday.
But a spokesperson for the Transportation Security Administration, which oversees airport security, threw cold water on the request shortly after it was announced Thursday, telling the Press Herald that the administration plans to enforce the law beginning May 7.
Beginning Wednesday, Americans will need to present a Real ID, passport or other federally recognized identification to fly on commercial airlines or enter federal buildings. Maine officials worry that the mandate will create travel disruptions and airport delays without a phase-in period to give Maine residents more time to comply.
A bipartisan group of Maine lawmakers and Secretary of State Shenna Bellows said Thursday that they are asking federal authorities to phase in the enforcement and begin by issuing warnings to air travelers without a Real ID or other federally compliant identification, without interfering with their ability to travel.
"We are very concerned," Bellows said at a news conference Thursday. "We want Mainers to be able to get to where they need to go."
As of April 1, only 27% of the credentials issued by the Maine Bureau of Motor Vehicles were Real IDs, and it can take four weeks for someone to receive a Real ID in the mail after applying, according to state officials, who were mostly worried about people who don't travel frequently, or who need to travel because of an emergency.
Maine, along with Washington state, has the third-lowest percentage of residents with Real IDs. Only New Jersey (17%) and Pennsylvania (26%) have lower rates of Real ID uptake, according to an analysis conducted by CBS News. Thirty states have compliance rates under 70%, while a dozen states have rates above 96%.
Bellows, along with a bipartisan group of lawmakers serving on the Legislature's Transportation Committee, signed a letter Thursday asking the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the TSA to issue warnings to people who don't have a federally recognized IDs and allow them to travel.
The effort appears to be a long shot. It's not clear whether the federal government is entertaining such requests. And Maine has been targeted for months by the Trump administration for defying the president's executive order on transgender athletes.
Bellows said she has spoken with officials from other states who are also worried about travel impacts beginning next week. But she's not aware of any other states joining in Maine's request for a phased implementation of enforcement, or making their own request.
"Today, Maine is taking a lead role," Bellows said.
TSA NOT RECEPTIVE
A TSA spokesperson did not sound open to Maine's request.
"The REAL ID Act was passed 20 years ago to address security vulnerability," a spokesperson said in a written statement. "This administration and (the) DHS secretary have determined that it's important that we keep the implementation date of May 7, 2025, and that we enforce the law."
Rep. Lydia Crafts, D-Newcastle, said that the TSA has indicated that people without compliant ID may still be allowed to travel, as long as they go through additional security screenings. But Crafts is concerned that such a process would cause longer lines and present a challenge at smaller airports like those in Maine.
"We're concerned about the anticipated volume of extra screenings that may overwhelm TSA's capabilities, causing concerns for both safety and traveler convenience," said Crafts, who co-chairs the Transportation Committee.
States have had about two decades to prepare for arrival of Real ID, which was introduced in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City. But opposition from privacy advocates, including in Maine, has stalled the rollout from its original date of Oct. 1, 2020, to next week.
Maine was one of the last states to comply with the federal mandate in 2018.
Bellows herself helped lead the charge against the Real ID mandate when she was executive director of the ACLU of Maine and a state senator. But in her current role, she has urged Mainers to comply with the requirement, saying some steps have been taken to address concerns about protecting people's personal information.
The request comes as lawmakers are considering a bipartisan bill that would stop the state from issuing any additional Real IDs. That bill, LD 160, sponsored by Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, and five Democrats, was heard April 15, but the committee has yet to take action on it.
DELAYS LED TO COMPLACENCY
Sen. Brad Farrin, R-Norridgewock, said Maine's resistance to Real ID and repeated delays by the federal government have made many residents complacent.
"I kind of relate this to the boy who cried wolf," Farrin said. "I think people got a little complacent. I think we have every intention to comply with Real ID. I just think there's a lot of Mainers, especially those in rural Maine, that have not either taken it seriously, or thought there was going to be another pause."
Bellows said BMV staff have been working overtime to handle a surge of applications as the deadline approaches and other staff have been reassigned to help. But the agency is still not able to keep up with the demand, which means some residents may not get their IDs before they need them for travel.
"We do think Mainers are making a very good-faith effort," Bellows said. "We see it in the lines at the BMV branches, but we only have so many staff, and we can only issue so many credentials."
Bellows encouraged people who don't have immediate travel plans to make an appointment online to skirt the long wait times and obtain the card in the coming months.
She said people with an appointment are usually finished within 10 minutes, while those without one could wait hours.
Standards for a Real ID are consistent across the 50 states and involve a higher level of verification than standard driver's licenses or IDs. An individual must bring proof of identification and citizenship/lawful status, such as a certified birth certificate, two forms proving residency and a Social Security number. Proof of any legal name changes must also be provided, if applicable.
Real IDs, which have digital photos, can be used with facial recognition software. They also require the digital archiving of identity documents such as birth certificates or Social Security numbers.
The Real ID license costs about $9 per year, or $10 for older adults; a Real ID nondriver card is $5 a year; and a passport costs $16.50 per year for the first 10 years and $13 annually after that.
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.
Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.

Atlantic

time11 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

Ukraine Got a Major Battle Victory. Trump Is Not Happy.

Ukraine's drone strikes deep into Russia delivered a humiliating blow to Moscow last weekend. Kyiv's defenders celebrated the attack as a triumph of modern warfare and a warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin. But the extraordinary operation got a different response inside the White House: anger. Donald Trump has openly vented in recent weeks about Putin's unwillingness to end the war. But since Sunday's attack, which hit a series of Russian military airfields, the president has privately expressed frustration that the strike could escalate the conflict, according to three administration officials and an outside adviser to the White House. (They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.) These sources told me that the drone strike has reignited the president's long-held displeasure with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and prompted a new debate in the White House about whether the United States should abandon Ukraine. Throughout the war, Trump has deemed Zelensky a 'bad guy' and a 'hothead,' the outside adviser said—someone who could be pushing the globe toward World War III. Trump privately echoed a right-wing talking point this week by criticizing Zelensky for supposedly showboating after the drone attacks; according to the adviser, Trump was impressed with the audacity of the strikes but believes that Zelensky's focus should have been on Ukraine-Russia negotiations in Istanbul. Trump spoke with Putin yesterday, and, in a readout of the call on Truth Social, the U.S. president relayed the Kremlin's plans to strike back against Ukraine. 'We discussed the attack on Russia's docked airplanes, by Ukraine, and also various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides,' Trump wrote. 'It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace. President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.' Trump did not say whether he had warned Putin against retaliating, and two of the administration officials told me that he has not decided on his next steps. Officials have presented him with options that include sanctioning Russia and reducing American aid to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump told aides this week that he does not believe a summit with him, Zelensky, and Putin—which he once hoped would be a way to bring the war to a close—will happen any time soon, one of the administration officials told me. Trump, who on the campaign trail last year vowed to end the war within his first 24 hours in office, made a renewed push for a peace deal last month. While Zelensky agreed to an immediate cease-fire, Putin rejected the offer and ratcheted up his bombing of Ukrainian cities. That led Trump to threaten to walk away from peace talks, and to flash some rare ire at Putin. The president had hoped that some progress would be made in this week's talks in Turkey, but the meeting was overshadowed by the drone strikes and went nowhere. The White House has said that the U.S. was not told in advance about the surprise attack, which was carried out by drones hidden across five of Russia's time zones that hit nuclear-capable bombers and inflicted billions of dollars in damage, according to a preliminary estimate from the White House. Steve Bannon and other influential MAGA voices have berated Ukraine for the attack and are attempting to push Washington further from Kyiv. On his podcast this week, Bannon blamed Ukraine for, in his view, sabotaging peace talks while potentially provoking a massive response from Russia. 'Zelensky didn't give the president of the United States a heads-up to say he's going to do a deep strike into strategic forces of Russia, which is going up the escalatory ladder as quickly as you can, on the day before your meeting in Turkey?' Bannon said. 'On the eve of peace talks or cease-fire talks, he takes the Japanese role in Pearl Harbor—the sneak attack.' Bannon has conveyed similar messages to senior West Wing advisers, a fourth administration official told me. Keith Kellogg, Trump's Ukraine envoy, warned on Fox News that 'the risk levels are going way up' because the drones struck part of Russia's 'national survival system'—its nuclear program—potentially pushing Moscow to retaliate in significant ways. Trump has not increased aid to Ukraine since taking office again in January, and he has yet to endorse a bipartisan Senate push, led by his ally Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, to impose harsh economic penalties against Russia and countries that do business with it. There have been other recent signs that the White House is distancing itself from Ukraine, too. Yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not attend a meeting of 50 defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels. In the past, the meeting has been an important venue for coordinating military aid for Ukraine. Hegseth was the first U.S. defense secretary to skip the event in three years. The Pentagon cited scheduling issues for his absence. When I asked a White House spokesperson for comment about the drone strikes, she pointed me to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's briefing-room remarks on Tuesday, when Leavitt said that Trump 'wants this war to end at the negotiating table, and he has made that clear to both leaders, both publicly and privately.' In public remarks about the strikes, Putin downplayed the chances of a cease-fire, asking, 'Who has negotiations with terrorists?' But Zelensky told reporters that the operation over the weekend, code-named Spider's Web, would not have been carried out if Putin had agreed to a U.S.-proposed truce. 'If there had been a cease-fire, would the operation have taken place?' Zelensky asked. 'No.' Exasperated with the conflict, Trump continues to muse about walking away from any sort of diplomatic solution. In his Truth Social post about his call with Putin, the president seemed eager to change the subject to focus on ending a different international crisis. 'We also discussed Iran,' Trump wrote about ongoing talks regarding Tehran's nuclear ambitions. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.'

Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill
Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill

Forbes

time12 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Musk Digs Up Trump's 12-Year-Old Tweet To Attack His Policy Bill

Elon Musk directly jabbed President Donald Trump over his policy bill Thursday— in his most pointed attack on Trump himself—over the legislation Musk has previously mostly blamed Republican lawmakers for. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the ... More White House in Washington, DC, on May 30, 2025. (Photo by ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images) Musk reposted a 2013 tweet from Trump that said he was in disbelief and 'embarrassed' Republicans were extending the debt ceiling, captioning the repost 'wise words.' Trump on Wednesday said the debt limit should be 'entirely scrapped' as a provision of his 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which would raise the debt ceiling ahead of its expected expiration date in August. This is a developing story and will be updated.

Watch live: Trump, German chancellor hold bilateral meeting
Watch live: Trump, German chancellor hold bilateral meeting

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Watch live: Trump, German chancellor hold bilateral meeting

President Trump and newly minted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will meet Thursday at the White House with the conversation likely to center on foreign and trade policy. The visit between Trump and Merz comes as the European Union is in talks with U.S. officials on a potential trade deal — and after the president's 50 percent tariff on steel and aluminum imports went into effect. Merz has also been a strong defender of Ukraine amid its war with Russia. Trump too has aired frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks as ceasefire talks have been unfruitful. The president also issued a new travel ban on Wednesday that will affect 19 countries starting next week, including 12 countries with full bans and seven with restrictions. The event is scheduled to begin at 11:45 a.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store