logo
Some states seek to bar Jan. 6 rioters seeking office after pardons

Some states seek to bar Jan. 6 rioters seeking office after pardons

Miami Herald28-05-2025

May 28 (UPI) -- It has been four months since President Donald Trump pardoned more than 1,500 people who were involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
Some of those pardoned have found opportunity in the political realm while states and local jurisdictions are considering whether to ban them from working in the government.
In Florida, Jake Lang is running for the Senate seat vacated by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Lang was charged for assaulting officers, among other charges related to entering the Capitol and interfering with the certification of the election.
According to the Federal Elections Commission, Lang's campaign has raised more than $28,000.
Ryan Kelley, a former Michigan gubernatorial candidate, ran for the office after participating in the Capitol riot.
In 2023, Kelley pleaded guilty after being charged for entering a restricted building, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building, knowingly engaging in an act of physical violence against a person or property in a restricted building and willfully injuring or committing any depredation against any property of the United States.
Kelley has not ruled out another run for office. His campaign website is active and was updated on Jan. 22. It outlines his "Blueprint for Michigan" plan that proposes deregulation, energy plans and a program to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion in government.
Jacob Neiheisel, associate professor of political science at the University of Buffalo, told UPI he is not surprised that people involved in the riot have been embraced politically or found their background to be potentially politically advantageous.
"Some people have a very different vision of America and the country has a very complicated history," Neiheisel said. "The country has always had this kind of uneasy relationship with something like political violence because it is a nation that was born from a violent act, a revolution."
Some state and local governments have taken steps to reckon with the aftermath of Jan. 6 and Trump's pardons.
Days after the pardons were announced, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker ordered that no one involved in the attack on the U.S. Capitol is to be hired by the state. Last month, the Chicago City Council followed suit, voting 44-3 on a resolution to reject applicants who were convicted of crimes related to the riot "regardless of clemency or pardon status."
Three states have mulled similar measures.
New York Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal introduced the Restrict Insurrectionists from Office Taking Act in the state senate to bar participants in the riot from serving in civil office. The legislation was introduced on the two-year anniversary of the riot.
"Up to 47 New Yorkers were arrested and charged with their roles in the January 6 U.S. Capitol riots that left five people dead in the immediate aftermath, four subsequent deaths from suicide, and dozens of police officers injured," Hoylman-Sigal said in a statement.
"Our RIOT Act will bar anyone who's acted against the sanctity of our democracy from holding elected office and sends a strong message that violence is incompatible with government service. We must continue to safeguard our democracy from the extremists attempting to destroy it. "
The bill passed the state senate nearly a year ago but has not been passed by the other chamber.
Connecticut took up a similar bill during its 2023 session, barring those who were involved in the riot from being elected to office or from being employed by the state or any municipality. It has not been passed and no action has been taken since April 2023.
A bill was filed in Virginia in 2023 but was never brought to a vote. It has been left in committee and is not expected to move forward.
"It's still going to be a flashpoint," Neiheisel said of Jan. 6. "You're still going to have Democrats talking about how, 'Look, here's evidence that the Republican Party is anti-democratic.' You're still going to have Republicans saying that it was necessary. There are still Republicans who believe the 2020 election was stolen."
"It's not always clear, of course, what that tipping point is where you have a legitimate claim to political violence versus you're just doing it for your own, narrow, personal end," he continued. "That's a legacy that's with us to this day and there are probably more people now than there have been in some time who want to embrace parts of that legacy."
Pardoned rioters are being tapped to appear at political events tied to Republican organizations. Special appearances and speaking engagements emphasize the political capital that Jan. 6 has generated among the Republican Party.
Jeffrey Scott Brown of Laguna Woods, Calif., was among the first convicted for attacking police officers. In 2022, he was convicted of felony assaulting, resisting or impeding law enforcement officers with a dangerous weapon and interfering with law enforcement during a civil disorder.
In March, Brown was invited to speak at an event hosted by a local Republican club.
James Grant of Cary, N.C., was sentenced to 36 months under supervised release after being convicted of civil disorder. He was also invited to speak at a Republican event in March.
"The whole event [Jan. 6] was a strange happening in the sense that there were just so many different ideological persuasions there," Neiheisel said. "If you look at the flags, you look at the symbols, you've got people from all kinds of backgrounds coming together, thinking that is a good idea. They all kind of came together on this course of action from very different places. Some are QAnon conspiracists -- others were some kind of more religiously motivated. There was the presence of some charismatics. It's a hodgepodge of a lot of different things on the American right that came together at one point."
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump shrugs off Musk feud after shunning call with billionaire
Trump shrugs off Musk feud after shunning call with billionaire

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump shrugs off Musk feud after shunning call with billionaire

WASHINGTON – President Trump played it cool Friday morning when discussing his feud with Elon Musk – turning a brief phone conversation with The Post to his polling numbers and a better-than-expected May jobs report instead of directly addressing the strife with his former top ally. 'Nothing catches me by surprise. Nothing,' the president said of the personal attacks launched at him Thursday by the former Department of Government Efficiency figure. 'The numbers are through the roof, the stock market is up, billions are pouring in from tariffs, and my poll numbers are the highest they've ever been. Other than that, what can I tell you, right?' Trump went on in a cheerful tone. President Trump stated 'Nothing catches me by surprise. Nothing,' when asked about his recent feud with Musk. Francis Chung/UPI/Shutterstock The public blow-up between Musk and the president stemmed from the former's complaints about the Trump-backed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is projected to add approximately $3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next ten years. 'He knew the bill as well as anybody,' the president said of the world's richest man. 'The bill is great. It's going to pass, but the bill is great, and it's going be great for everybody, including him. And you see it now. And take a look at what happened today with the job numbers. They're through the roof and the stock market's up already 600 points. 'This is what I do for a living, OK?'

Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"
Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"

CNBC

time31 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"

As absolutely delicious as the personal drama between Elon Musk and Donald Trump is--and as much as it may escalate into everything from robotaxis to SpaceX and national defense--let's not lose sight of the deficit fight that's at the heart of it. Musk's beef with Trump after he was dismissed from service first erupted over the "One Big Beautiful Bill." A "disgusting abomination," Musk called it on X this week. "Shame on those who voted for it." He went on to repost tons of old tweets from Trump, along with current Senate and Congressional Republican leaders, calling out their hypocrisy for criticizing past debt levels and deficits even as they now support a bill that would raise the debt ceiling by trillions and increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Yesterday, when asked about Musk's criticism--which could sink the entire bill, if enough Senate Republicans like Ron Johnson and their constituents turn against it--the president chalked it up to sour grapes over the bill's failure to extend EV tax credits. But Musk insists that's not the case, and few really expected the credits to be continued anyway. No, it seems Musk's real beef, assuming this isn't just a convenient way for him to reposition himself with the broader public, seems to be over the cost of Trump's megabill. But here's the rub. This isn't just any old stimulus act, or grab-bag of political preferences. There is a ticking time bomb hanging over the economy this year, because Trump's first-term tax cuts are going to expire at year-end. The cost of this bill isn't over new stuff they want to do--it's mostly just extending the status quo. That alone costs $4 trillion over the next decade. So while it's a very attractive argument that Musk is making--I'd love to know what exactly he would propose doing instead. Would he prefer that taxes go up on households and businesses next year? Fine, if so; that's the Democratic party's position. But I have yet to hear him embrace that either tactically or philosophically. This is where the issue of "SALT" comes in. It would cost $377 billion over the next decade, according to Heritage, to quadruple the cap--and this would be new tax relief. But again, this is a small percentage of the overall cost. And it could be the difference between Republicans keeping their tiny majority in the House, or not. House Speaker Mike Johnson made this clear on Squawk Box this morning. "If we don't deliver on this [bill], and we don't deliver a little bit on SALT relief, then we're not going to have the House majority," he said. "And if the Democrats take over, they will impeach Donald everything will go to chaos. So this team has to stay in power." He also implied Democrats would deliver even worse fiscal outcomes. But perhaps none of that matters to Musk, who would practically seem to be leading the impeachment drive, the way things are going this week. Perhaps he disagrees that Democrats would be worse for the fiscal situation. Or perhaps he senses that party would now be much more sympathetic to his EV and robotaxi ambitions. Point being, if Musk blows up the budget bill, and takes a hard fiscal line on any subsequent negotiations, the GOP isn't going to turn around and gut Medicare or Medicaid--which it's struggling to pare back at all right now--in order to balance the budget. No, it just means that taxes are going up at year-end. See you at 1 p.m! Kelly Twitter: @KellyCNBC Instagram: @realkellyevans

Netherlands sets general election date after government collapse
Netherlands sets general election date after government collapse

UPI

time42 minutes ago

  • UPI

Netherlands sets general election date after government collapse

1 of 2 | The Netherlands Friday scheduled a snap election for October 29 following the collapse of the government caused by the far-right Party for Freedom leaving the governing coalition. Prime Minister Dick Schoof told lawmakers he will manage critical policies focused on security in a caretaker role until the election. File Photo by Peter Foley/UPI | License Photo June 6 (UPI) -- The Netherlands Friday scheduled a snap election for Oct. 29 following the collapse of the government caused by the far-right Party for Freedom leaving the governing coalition. Outgoing Minister of Foreign Affairs Judith Uitermark announced the election date in a post on X. "In the coming period, I will work with the municipalities and other stakeholders to prepare so that this important day in our democracy goes smoothly!" Uitermark said. Prime Minister Dick Schoof's four-party governing coalition collapsed when Party for Freedom's leader Geert Wilders demanded radical slashing of migration. Schoof indicated in a message to lawmakers he will maintain control over critical policies in the months between now and the October election. "As far as I'm concerned, it's about security, both nationally and internationally, including support for Ukraine and everything that's needed for defense," Schoof said in the statement. The far-right Party for Freedom quit the Dutch government Tuesday, prompting Schoof to submit his resignation to King Willem-Alexander's cabinet. Schoof called the move to quit the government "irresponsible and unnecessary." The current cabinet will stay in place pending the general election to act as a caretaker government. "Schoof showed that he is not the right man in the right place. If you, as prime minister of a cabinet in which the PVV is the largest party, refuse to sign a letter about a stricter asylum policy and a tougher approach to criminal aliens, then you are unsuitable," Wilders said in a post on X. The PVV pulled off a shock victory in the November 2023 election gaining more seats than ever before for the far right. Wilders, an anti-Islamist right-wing politician, tried to parlay the 37 seats his party won into becoming prime minister, but he was forced to abandon that attempt. There are 150 seats in the Dutch parliament. The center-left Labor party and Green Left won the second highest number of seats. Schoof became Prime Minister instead of Wilders, forming a government consisting of the PVV, the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, the New Social Contract and the Farmer-Citizen Movement. That governing coalition was seated in July 2024.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store