Rifts in the Tripartite Alliance: ANC and SACP clash ahead of local elections
ANC Deputy Secretary General Nomvula Mokonyane threw out SACP members at an ANC workshop recently.
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers
Tensions within the Tripartite Alliance between the ANC, the South African Communist Party (SACP), and the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) have come to the fore after an incident in Mpumalanga where SACP members were asked to leave an ANC election workshop.
The workshop, aimed at strategising for the 2026 Local Government Elections, has exposed deepening divisions within the alliance.
At the event, ANC Deputy Secretary-General Nomvula Mokonyane issued a directive, asking SACP delegates to leave the workshop, citing that the party would not strategise with a group intending to contest elections independently.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
This move has drawn criticism from senior SACP leaders, who accuse Mokonyane of divisiveness and of breaking the longstanding relationship between the parties.
According to sources, the directive also angered some SACP leaders, and they have accused Mokonyane of also breaking the longstanding relationship the party has had with the ANC and Cosatu.
Sources say there will be talks between the ANC and the SACP that will focus on what will happen to SACP members who were placed in top positions by the ANC, including SACP chairperson and Minister of Science, Technology, and Innovation Blade Nzimande.
SACP national Spokesperson Mbulelo Ndlazana confirmed the incident, stating that the party's decision to contest the local government elections independently is not a reflection of the political relationship between the two organisations.
'Indeed, it is true that certain members and leaders of the SACP were removed from an elections workshop in Mpumalanga. The SACP is aware of this action and has engaged the ANC about it,' Ndlazana said.
He further stated that the alliance was not an election, and therefore, electoral contests do not determine the fate of the political relationship between alliance partner organisations.
He blamed the ANC leadership in Mpumalanga for failing to address the matter before extending an invitation.
'The ANC local leadership committed an error by inviting the SACP into the workshop, given the fact that the SACP is contesting the elections independently.
'The fact that the SACP is contesting the local government elections independently and in its name means its election strategy and plans are internal to it, and this is true of the ANC as well,' Ndlazana said.
SACP General Secretary Solly Mapaila insists that the party will contest the local government elections next year.
Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers
He further said it was normal that each organisation on this particular question worked separately because the two were running different election campaigns.
'This is related specifically to the election programme and not to the political relationship between the two organisations as we historically know it.'
The SACP has met all requirements to contest the elections, as confirmed by the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC).
Cosatu Spokesperson Matthew Parks expressed concern over the growing rift, emphasising the importance of unity within the alliance.
'The unity of the Alliance is paramount to Cosatu. We are undertaking discussions with affiliates, members, and workers on Cosatu's approach to the local elections, more so in light of the SACP's congress resolution to contest state power,' Parks said.
He also highlighted the need for the Alliance to be reconfigured to address challenges and ensure it remains the strategic centre for policy and political discourse.
The National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) has backed the SACP's decision to contest the 2026 local government elections independently.
In its secretariat report at its elective conference in Benoni, Ekurhuleni, the NUM called for the mobilisation of the 'popular front of the left' against the Government of National Unity (GNU).
The ANC has criticised the SACP's decision, arguing that it will split the Alliance vote and benefit opposition parties.
ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula previously questioned the theoretical basis for the SACP's decision, stating that if the SACP wants more influence, it can be resolved through discussions on deployment lists.
SACP General Secretary Solly Mapaila reiterated the party's decision to contest the elections independently, stating that there is no turning back.
'The SACP is going to contest the local government elections; there's no turning back. I cannot reverse this decision; no one in the Communist Party can reverse this decision. It's a decision taken by Congress,' Mapaila said.
mashudu.sadike@inl.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
No ‘other option' — Western Cape MEC Anton Bredell seeks to dissolve Knysna council
The Western Cape government is threatening to dissolve the Knysna council, which has made headlines over political instability and service delivery problems. 'Our options simply ran out,' said Anton Bredell, the Western Cape MEC for Local Government, as he explained why he sent a letter to the Knysna Municipality, informing it that he was considering recommending that the municipal council be dissolved. Bredell made the comments on Thursday, 26 June, during a sitting of the Western Cape Legislature. He was speaking after an earlier announcement of his intention to dissolve the troubled Garden Route municipality, which has made headlines for political instability and service delivery problems. During the legislature's debate on coalition instability in the Western Cape, Knysna frequently came up. After the 2021 local government elections, it was one of 16 hung councils in the province. Initially, the 21-seat council was run by a coalition of the Democratic Alliance (DA) and local party, the Knysna Independent Movement (KIM). But since mid-2022, Knysna has been governed by a coalition of the African National Congress (ANC), Patriotic Alliance (PA) and a local party, the Plaaslike Besorgde Inwoners (PBI). That coalition has resulted in several headlines, including for sewage spills, which prompted health concerns and provincial intervention, and service delivery collapse, which fuelled a political blame game. In May 2025, wards in the municipality were left without water when the town's main domestic water pump broke. This occurred amid a voter registration weekend, which saw a Gift of the Givers tanker attacked during ANC factional infighting. Bredell said Knysna was an example of a municipality that 'doesn't have financial problems, but a municipality that ignores rules'. He said that service delivery collapsed as a result. He said the decision to send the letter of intention to intervene was an 'embarrassment to the municipality, but our options simply ran out'. The intention to intervene According to a media release by Bredell's office on Thursday, the MEC sent the municipality a letter saying he intends to intervene under Section 139 of the Constitution 'due to protracted and ongoing systemic governance and service delivery failures'. Bredell told the municipality he was considering 'making a recommendation to the Provincial Cabinet that the municipal council be dissolved'. The notice allows the municipality an opportunity to respond to the proposed intention. 'This decision to issue a notice of intention to intervene demonstrates the Western Cape Government's commitment to restoring good governance and ensuring that the residents of Knysna receive the basic municipal services to which they are entitled,' said Bredell. According to Bredell, the municipality failed to adopt a diagnostic assessment report along with a support plan. In March 2024, the province issued a 100-page diagnostic report which detailed a range of problems in the municipality: council dysfunctionality, unaccountability among administrative staff, councillors allegedly interfering with by-law enforcement, non and poor performance, and high vacancy rates within the key infrastructure department. The municipality says it has implemented aspects of the diagnostic and support plan. According to the statement, despite various interventions from the province, including emergency water tankers, financial support and technical assistance, 'the municipality has not prioritised addressing its executive obligation failures. Consequently, the situation continues to deteriorate, even with the assistance from the national and provincial governments.' The statement continued: 'The municipality's failure to rectify its lapses in service delivery resulted in numerous directives and notices being issued by agencies tasked with environmental compliance and enforcement.' 'Politics at play' In response, Knysna municipal manager Lulamile Mapholoba told Daily Maverick: 'I can confirm that the letter was received. We are currently in the process of preparing a response within the stipulated timeframe of 10 calendar days. A special council meeting will be convened next week to formulate this response.' Daily Maverick reported in 2024 that community leader Ralph Stander said dissolving the council and having fresh elections should occur in Knysna, as councillors seemed to be taking instructions from political parties situated outside the municipality, rather than from residents. During the debate in the Western Cape Legislature on Thursday, ANC caucus leader Khalid Sayed thanked residents of Ward 8 (the same area where the Gift of the Givers water tanker was attacked) for voting for the party in by-elections this week. As elections analyst Wayne Sussman wrote in Daily Maverick on Thursday, the ANC won 52% of the vote, which was down from 2021's 72%. This means axed mayor Aubrey Tsengwa, who was removed as mayor during a special council sitting on 14 February and then resigned as ward councillor shortly thereafter, will return to council. Sayed said: 'In response, the DA seeks to dissolve the council because they see that the coalition will now remain, to continue honestly addressing the challenges.' Daily Maverick previously reported that new Knysna Mayor Thando Matika, from the ANC, wants the municipality to invest in infrastructure to address the challenges that plague the 'Jewel of the Garden Route'. DM
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Let's have a National Dialogue on ‘revitalised reconciliation' and closing the wealth gap
President Cyril Ramaphosa's announcements on convening a National Dialogue have elicited both enthusiasm and scepticism. The enthusiasts believe the dialogue can engage citizens in 'defining a clear vision and establishing a unifying programme that inspires new national hope'. The sceptics worry that the dialogue will be 'talk for talk's sake', a multimillion-rand generation of hot air. I propose that the dialogue should focus on the socioeconomic dimensions and material substance of reconciliation. It should identify projects and programmes that would close the vast gap between the wealthy and the poor. This is not a radical idea: it's consistent with the National Development Plan 2030. Here's the radical part: the dialogue should not aim to generate more plans for government action. Instead, it should challenge wealthy individuals, communities and companies to take some responsibility for addressing the crisis of inequality. To this end, the dialogue should not be a conversation among the political elite and intellectuals. It should provide a platform that prioritises and elevates the voice of poor communities. Getting the basics right Several countries, including South Africa, have a rich history of national dialogues, conducted in various ways and for different purposes. While some of them have indeed been a waste of time, others have been fruitful. Key lessons can be drawn from these experiences. For a National Dialogue to be productive, the following conditions must be met: The dialogue must have a clear purpose and focus; It must have concrete objectives; It must be designed to generate decisions or actionable recommendations; It must have mechanisms for accountability and implementation with respect to the recommendations; and There must be an agreed-upon process for building consensus among diverse views. These conditions must be established at the outset. Without them, the dialogue will only generate a lot of noise. It will end with a whimper, not a bang. A meaningful National Dialogue is not a tea party, chat room or academic seminar. It is a political means to political ends. The anticipated outcomes must be substantively worthwhile, and the dialogue must be designed to achieve those outcomes. We got it right previously Our own history is replete with examples of dialogues that met these conditions. In the 1950s, the ANC led a campaign to gather the dreams and demands of millions of people, culminating in the adoption of the Freedom Charter in 1955. For decades, the Freedom Charter served as a progressive vision and a mobilising tool in the struggle for a nonracial and democratic dispensation. In the early 1990s, the formal negotiations to end apartheid were accompanied by a multiplicity of dialogues. These dialogues were formal and informal, top-down and bottom-up, within and between political parties, and encompassed large swathes of civil society and the public. The outcome was the interim Constitution of 1993, which marked the death of minority rule. At the same time, there were numerous sectoral dialogues aimed at developing new national policies and laws. Here, too, political parties, civil society groups and members of the public debated ideas for post-apartheid policy on defence, policing, education, health, land and other areas of governance. All these dialogues were successful because they had concrete objectives, they were well designed to achieve those objectives, and they had tangible and enduring outputs. Whither the new National Dialogue? Some of the proposed objectives for the forthcoming National Dialogue seem misplaced. A National Dialogue will not solve critical problems like crime, corruption and poor service delivery. It will not magically unfreeze the deadlocked 'social compact' negotiations in Nedlac. And it cannot solve the government's failure to implement its priorities, policies and plans. Nor, in a well-established democracy, is a National Dialogue the best vehicle for identifying government priorities. These priorities are determined through regular elections that entail a robust National Dialogue and provide a mandate for governance. Through ongoing dialogue in Parliament, the priorities are translated into legislation and policies. Ramaphosa wants the National Dialogue to forge ' a shared vision of what it means to be a South African and develop a new national ethos and common value system'. We will need to be more focused and targeted than this. Our Constitution already provides a shared vision, national ethos and common value system. My point is not that our Constitution, elections, parliaments and other dialogue mechanisms are perfect. Rather, the point is that a National Dialogue will not transcend or overcome the imperfections. A National Dialogue for revitalised reconciliation Thirty years ago we had a tough conversation on reconciliation. The outcomes were inspirational: the new Constitution, Parliament, flag and anthem; the integration of government and liberation armies into new security services; the racial integration of schools and universities; the formal outlawing of discrimination; and much more. The problem is that this conversation died before the job was complete. South Africa remains mired in gross inequality and socioeconomic division, with class barriers still coinciding with race. This is a shameful betrayal of the millions of people who are unemployed, hungry and beset by criminality. The envisaged National Dialogue should revitalise the conversation on reconciliation. It should focus on the material substance and socioeconomic dimensions of reconciliation. The primary objective would be to identify ways to close the gap between the wealthy and the poor. This dialogue should not be a discussion among elites. It should put the poor, the unemployed and the marginalised at the centre of the conversation. It should offer some dignity to people whose daily lives often lack dignity. It should be designed to give those who lack a political voice a platform to speak and amplify their concerns and aspirations. This will have important implications for the venues, timing, languages and facilitation of the dialogue. The dialogue should not be geared towards talking to the government and setting an agenda for government action. The National Development Plan 2030 already constitutes an ambitious and well-thought out plan to eliminate poverty and reduce inequality. Why should we have a National Dialogue about this decade-old plan? The government must just get on with implementation! Rather than talking to the government, the National Dialogue should be organised as a challenge to wealthy individuals, communities and corporations: what are you doing about the crisis of poverty and inequality? What can you do about this crisis? By 'wealthy', I do not mean only the super-rich. If we view 'wealthy' in relation to the vast majority of extremely poor people, then middle-class communities are undoubtedly wealthy. Orientating the dialogue in this way would avoid a lot of moaning and groaning about government failures. It would avoid hot air, pious speeches and intellectualising. It would avoid reiterating points already contained in existing government policies and plans. It would give agency to the poor. It would generate meaningful action and empowering partnerships. Designing and running the dialogue proposed here would be politically and technically more challenging than running a series of conventional conferences and seminars. But a country that organised Codesa and the National Peace Accord structures is surely up to the task. DM
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
The Freedom Charter at 70: A vision betrayed by the ANC?
As South Africa marked the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Freedom Charter, leading voices in South Africa have raised concerns about the ideals enshrined in the nation's founding document, having been hollowed out, replaced by elite-driven agendas and systemic failures that threaten to undo the progress made in the liberation struggle. Seventy years ago, in the dusty streets of Kliptown, Soweto, the African National Congress (ANC) and its allies adopted the Freedom Charter - a bold , inclusive blueprint for a democratic South Africa rooted in the principles of equality, shared wealth, and social justice. The Charter was born from a comprehensive, cross-class, and cross-race consultative process. It embodies millions' hopes for a free, fair, and united nation. Today, as South Africa marks this significant milestone, critics argue that the ANC has drifted far from those foundational ideals, betraying the very values that inspired the struggle against apartheid. The Freedom Charter articulated a vision where 'the people shall share in the country's wealth,' land would be shared among those who work it, and poverty, unemployment, and inequality would be eliminated. It was more than a document; it was a rallying cry-a call for grassroots involvement, gender inclusivity, and racial unity. Its adoption in 1955 symbolised collective resistance, galvanising the fight against apartheid and laying the groundwork for the democratic Constitution of 1996. In the decades following democracy, the ANC claimed to be the custodian of the Charter's ideals. Yet, many South Africans now see a stark contrast between the lofty promises of 1955 and the reality of today's socio-economic landscape. Poverty persists, unemployment remains entrenched, and inequality is among the highest globally. The triple burden the Charter sought to eradicate continues unabated, raising questions about the ANC's fidelity to its founding principles. The political landscape has shifted dramatically. The ANC, once the undisputed leader of South Africa's liberation movement, is now relegated to a coalition partner in a fragmented multiparty system following its failure to secure a majority in the 2024 elections. According to Professor Bheki Mngomezulu, Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy, this marks a pivotal moment but questions the party's direction. 'The ANC has had ample time to realise the promises of the Freedom Charter. Their inability to deliver on key clauses, particularly wealth sharing and land redistribution, reflects a betrayal of those ideals.' ' Many South Africans believe that the ANC has reneged on its promise to implement the clauses of the Freedom Charter. They base their assessment on the condition of their lives and unfulfilled promises made by the ANC in each election.' Mngomezulu drew disparities in the ANC, which holds a view that only two of the ten clauses of the Freedom Charter have not been fulfilled. 'These are clauses three, which says, 'The people shall share in the country's wealth,' and clause four, which says, 'The land shall be shared among those who work it.' However, even with these clauses, the ANC claims it is a work in progress.' He argued that it was safe to say that the question on poverty and other challenges have not all been answered, as people still lived in poverty. Political Economy Analyst Zamikhaya Maseti proposed marking the 70th anniversary by returning to the roots of the Charter and holding the commemorative events in Kliptown itself. 'Kliptown was the site where our great-grandparents gathered under difficult, illegal conditions on June 25–26, 1955, to craft a vision for a democratic South Africa,' Maseti noted. 'Their gathering produced the Freedom Charter, a lodestar for the liberation struggle. Today, we face an equally historic task: rebuilding South Africa born from their sacrifices. A nation now fractured and drifting, desperately in need of repair.' She said that 'holding the anniversary in Kliptown would root it in the moral soil of people's struggles and remove the sting of elitism that often surrounds state-led initiatives. It would strip the dialogue of unnecessary extravagance.' Maseti stressed that 'the original Congress of the People saw delegates arrive by bus, taxi, train-some even on horseback. 'Reflecting this spirit, the proposed R700 million budget for this national dialogue is seen as absurd and morally indefensible I am relieved that the Presidency rejected that outrageous proposal.' Former ambassador Lassy Chiwayo reflected on the nation's current state as the nation comme 70th anniversary approaches. He warns of a dangerous phenomenon. 'Political sclerosis' is a form of institutional rigidity that stifles progress. 'Once, the ANC was Africa's most respected liberation movement- an icon of hope,' Chiwayo laments. 'Today, what has happened to that movement, and what does it mean for our nation?' He described 'political sclerosis' as 'a state of stagnation, gridlock, and paralysis,' warning that 'when our institutions become inflexible, they stop functioning effectively, and progress stalls. The ANC is suffering from a kind of political leprosy that threatens to consume the very ideals it once stood for.' If unchecked,' he warns, 'this disease could lead to the collapse of hope and the end of our dreams for a free, liberated Africa.' Chiwayo urges the movement to shed its sclerosis, embrace flexibility, and reconnect with the core principles of liberation and service. 'Otherwise, we risk losing the very essence of what our ancestors fought for-an Africa free from foreign domination, inequality, and oppression.' Activist and author Kim Heller laments that 'the Freedom Charter lies in ruins in democratic South Africa.' She argued that 'today, the portraiture of the ANC as a devoted and dutiful servant to its citizens has all but collapsed. The party has abandoned its scripture.' Heller critiqued the current elite-driven, VIP-dominated political culture, contrasting it with the grassroots participation and volunteerism underpinning the Charter's formation. She pointed out that the proposed R700 million National Dialogue, led by President Ramaphosa, 'lacks the nation-building spirit and grassroots involvement that defined the Charter and the UDF. It appears to be an elite talk shop, disconnected from the struggles of ordinary South Africans.' Independent analyst Professor Sipho Seepe highlighted that the implementation of the Charter was doomed from the start. 'The ANC adopted a constitution that appreciated past injustices but made socioeconomic transformation difficult,' he stated. 'The architecture of apartheid remains largely intact, and inequality has only worsened, making South Africa the most unequal country in the world.' He criticised the ANC's partnership with the Democratic Alliance (DA) in government, arguing that 'the party has become an empty shell incapable of delivering on the promises of equality and justice, betraying the very ideals of the Freedom Charter.' According to Maseri, the challenge now is to reconnect with those founding principles by returning to Kliptown, the grassroots, and the moral soil of the struggles that birthed this nation. 'The task is to rebuild what was once a beacon of hope and aspiration. Only then can South Africa truly honour the sacrifices made and realise the promise of the Freedom Charter.' When asked for a comment on whether the ANC betrayed the Freedom Charter, the party's national spokesperson, Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri, stated that she would respond by Thursday afternoon; however, she did not do so by the publication deadline. [email protected] IOL Politics
