logo
Candidate Forum held for open SJSD Board of Education seats

Candidate Forum held for open SJSD Board of Education seats

Yahoo29-01-2025

A few local political groups hosted an event Tuesday evening, to allow the public to witness policies given from those fighting for two open School Board seats.
Five of the total six candidates will introduce themselves and answer the community's questions this evening as Former Buchanan County Auditor — Nancy Nash acts as Moderator.
The BOE Candidate Forum was sponsored by several local groups who had created a list of questions to ask each candidate.
Sponsors for the forum include:
Buchanan County Democratic Central Committee
Buchanan County Women's Democratic Club
EM-PAC
Persisterhood of St. Joseph
United Democratic Club of Northwest Missouri
Of the six BOE candidates, only three attended and participated in the forum.
Brian Kirk, James Mrkvicka and Cassandra Veale were in attendance.
Jennifer Kerns and Kim Miller had last-minute obligations to attend to.
Ken Reeder was in attendance, however, did not fill out his candidate answer form in time, and was excluded from the forum.
Five candidates have shared their responses to the questionnaire, however, only four are accessible:
Kerns
Kirk
Miller
Veale
Responses provided by candidates originated from the questionnaire, and were related to the District's strength's, DEI initiatives, book bans, Proposition 2 and more.
'It might seem obvious to say that our students are a strength of our district,' said Brian Kirk, a local pastor and candidate.
Mrkvicka, a local veterinarian and candidate, said the District's strength's lie in it's vocational schools, like Hillyard.
A majority of the six candidates supported implementing DEI in schools.
'I think that it's important to create a fair and equitable work environment and learning environment for our students and staff,' said Veale, a nurse practitioner and candidate.
'If we want to live in strong, diverse communities, we need to find ways to make sure everybody is heard, everybody is respected, everybody is included,' said Kirk.
Prioritizing positive academic outcomes were also up for discussion.
'Whatever we can do to increase the amount of staff that is available for these kids, that...especially the ones that aren't, you know, at the level they should be,' said Mrkvicka.
'I think one of the things that we can do to improve our parent engagement and learning is to help provide parents with some resource to educate their kids,' said Veale.
The five candidates who filled out the questionnaire on time, agreed on the bond issue (Proposition 2) to support the construction of a new high school.
The candidates also stated they do not support they elimination of the the Department of Education, as proposed in Project 2025.
News-Press NOW will provide more in-depth reports on each candidate leading up tot he April 8 municipal election.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican-Appointed Judge Hands Donald Trump a Legal Blow
Republican-Appointed Judge Hands Donald Trump a Legal Blow

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Republican-Appointed Judge Hands Donald Trump a Legal Blow

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A federal judge in Massachusetts, William Young, a Ronald Reagan appointee, has ruled that the Trump administration's decision to cut National Institute of Health (NIH) grants—allegedly in response to executive orders targeting gender identity and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies—was "illegal" and "void." In his ruling, as reporting by Politico's Kyle Cheney on X, formerly Twitter, Judge Young ordered that many of the rescinded grants be reinstated. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Anti-domestic violence groups are suing over the Trump administration's grant requirements
Anti-domestic violence groups are suing over the Trump administration's grant requirements

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Anti-domestic violence groups are suing over the Trump administration's grant requirements

Seventeen statewide anti-domestic and sexual violence coalitions are suing President Donald Trump's administration over requirements in grant applications that they don't promote 'gender ideology' or run diversity, equity and inclusion programs or prioritize people in the country illegally. The groups say the requirements, which Trump ushered in with executive orders, put them in 'an impossible position.' If they don't apply for federal money allocated under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, they might not be able to provide rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters and other programs to support victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. But if the groups do apply, they said in the lawsuit, they would have to make statements they called 'antithetical to their core values' — and take on legal risk. In the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island on Monday, the coalitions said that agreeing to the terms of grants could open them to federal investigations and enforcement actions as well as lawsuits from private parties. The groups suing include some from Democratic-controlled states, such as the California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, and in GOP-dominated ones, including the Idaho Coalition against Sexual and Domestic Violence. The groups say the requirements are at odds with federal laws that require them not to discriminate on the basis of gender identity, to aid underserved racial and ethnic groups, and to emphasize immigrants with some programs and not to discriminate based on legal status. The suit is one of more than 200 filed since January to challenge President Donald Trump's executive orders. There were similar claims in a suit over anti-DEI requirements in grants for groups that serve LGBTQ+ communities. A judge last week blocked the administration from enforcing those orders in context of those programs, for now.

Stonewall Columbus Pride March by the numbers: See the 2025 turnout
Stonewall Columbus Pride March by the numbers: See the 2025 turnout

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Stonewall Columbus Pride March by the numbers: See the 2025 turnout

The 2025 Stonewall Columbus Pride March had fewer marchers than in 2024, but more volunteers, according to Stonewall Columbus Executive Director Densil Porteous. More than 18,000 people marched in the June 14 parade, around 2,000 people fewer than in 2024. At the same time, over 500 people volunteered for the event, around 100 more than did in 2024. All told, over 650,000 people attended the weekend's Pride events, resulting in a $7.6 million economic impact for local businesses, Columbus and Franklin County, Porteous said in a June 16 press release. "This weekend offered more than a festival—it was a statement. A mass declaration that LGBTQ+ lives matter, that we will not stay silent, and that in joy we find our collective strength," Porteous said in the release. Porteous said certain companies backing out as sponsors this year contributed to the drop in marchers, but many of the volunteers were employees of companies that had chosen not to march. Several companies, including Anheuser-Busch, Lowe's, Nissan, and Walmart, backed out of supporting Stonewall Columbus' 2025 pride celebrations amid a national backlash to diversity, equity and inclusion policies (DEI). Retreats from businesses cost Stonewall Columbus around $125,000 in lost donations, about a fifth of its expected costs for Pride Month celebrations. Donations from the Columbus community and other partners filled the financial gap left by the companies, Porteous previously told The Dispatch. The corporate retreat from supporting Pride events comes as the Trump administration has threatened companies that have DEI practices with investigations and prosecutions. DEI practices in the federal government were ended on day one of Trump's second term via an executive order, USA TODAY reported. More: Pride fills streets of Columbus as No Kings rallies draw thousands across Ohio, nationwide Breaking and Trending News Reporter Nathan Hart can be reached at NHart@ and at @NathanRHart on X and at on Bluesky. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Columbus Pride March: How many people showed up in 2025?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store