
Easy home improvements that don't require planning permission
Recent cases covered by major media outlets in Ireland have highlighted the deeply stressful experience of homeowners who have found themselves at the pointy end of a curious planning permission stipulation. These unexpected incidents of broken planning rules, failed retention bombshells and complex cases in play might make you feel that without furnishing a letter to the local authority, you can't swing a flower basket from a bracket.
Even if we escape notice during a questionable development, overlooking planning requirements can potentially create future issues when we come to sell, and the buyer's solicitor notices something in their searches. What can we do outside and inside our homes without running foul of regulations?
The government consumer portal, Planning Permission Ireland, states: 'The good news is that certain types of developments related to houses, including renovations, extensions, and the construction of ancillary buildings like sheds or garages, may be exempt from planning permission under specific conditions.'
Here are a few things you can crack on with this summer, together with caveats to look out for so that you don't find yourself pouting in a press picture.
Indoors
Indoors, you can do just about anything you like without planning. This includes reconfiguring rooms, renovating, decorating, taking down walls (do get a structural engineer onboard) and performing most energy upgrades, including dry-lining.
Indoors, you can do just about anything during a renovation including adding a doorway. You must meet current building regulations and would be wise to engage a structural engineer. Picture: Dulux
Your primary concern for the serious stuff is compliance with the current building regulations, needed and keeping certification where possible for changes you make. Going DIY, this can be tricky, and if and when you have a BER performed, some improvements will not nudge your rating as they don't have a full professional stamp to them. If your home is a protected structure deemed of architectural importance, there may be interior detailing that falls under that protection. If in doubt, talk to the conservation officer for your local authority.
Windows
The walls, windows, roof and doors of your home are part of what is termed its exterior envelope. As the outside of your home is visible in a public setting, it influences its surroundings, and it can impact your neighbours in unexpected ways.
Changing out windows like-for-like, you do not require planning permission unless the house is listed, or you are in a designated conservation area of special interest. If you open the wall and put in a completely new window (unless it's part of an exempted 40 square metre extension), you most likely will need permission.
Velux-style windows (flush with the roof) on the rear roof of a house are usually considered exempt because they don't affect the appearance of the building from public viewpoints. Converting the roof space, the windows cannot sit up like a dormer. New protruding windows on existing walls, like bay windows, are considered an extension and are not permitted development. You're more likely to get permission to the side or back of the house than to the front.
Sheds/garden rooms
If you don't live in it, you can have an aggregated non-habitable addition of up to 25 square metres of outbuildings in your garden (detached). You cannot set up a business in it or keep livestock or poultry in it. If the garage was built when the house was built, this might be excluded from your 25 square metres rider, but check with planning before going ahead. Just ensure you leave at least 25 square meters of outdoor room remaining.
The roof can be a single pitch of three metres or a standard pitch of four metres. It's always a good idea (for the sake of good relations) to confer with your neighbours if the building is at the top of a steep hill and likely to overlook their garden or will be placed right on the boundary.
The exemption does not include any window within one metre of the neighbour's boundary, by the way. Building to the side of the property, ensure you shield the building from view with planting or fencing, or the planners may question the exemption. Keep in mind, it's your responsibility to meet the planning requirements. The supplier/installer has nothing to do with it, but a reputable company should offer advice based on established exemptions. Be wary of dismissive language about 'temporary structures'.
Conservatories/sun rooms
You can put a conservatory up without permission when it is within certain limitations, and in most cases, you should treat it just as you would a standard extension in terms of exemptions. It is regarded as a permanent structure. If you have no other attached extensions, and none were put on the building, you have 40 square metres allowed to the rear of the building (leaving 25 square metres of outdoor space). Going to the side of the building, planning permission is required. Don't just assume that the "front door" is positioned to the front of the house; it's the aspect of the house facing the road in most cases.
For standard extensions and these sun-catchers, the expectations are the same. A common misconception, balconies and roof gardens are not exempt from development, and as a common issue reported by outraged, overlooked neighbours, be warned. You can convert a garage attached to the back or side of your house to domestic use as long as it has a floor area of less than 40 square metres. Get an architect to put their eyes over the plans if you're adding exterior doors and windows facing into a boundary, for example.
Outdoor painting/rendering
Whereas painting your house is not generally an issue (unless it's an extensive mural), changing its appearance with new finishes like render or stone certainly can. If you're lucky enough to be having external insulation or 'the wrap' carried out through the SEAI grant scheme, you might assume this is exempt from planning. Think again.
If, for example, the house is brick or stone-faced and the houses in your estate or on a terrace are largely in the same style, the alteration to a finish will interest the local planning office. Just keep in mind, if anything changes the visual character of your property significantly, ask for a meeting with your local authority before going ahead.
The legalise is that changes are exempt if they are 'constituted works which do not materially affect the external appearance of the structure so as to render the appearance inconsistent with the character of the structure or of neighbouring structures'. The SEAI and your supplier are not liable for this. You are.
Fencing, walls and gates
Fencing and walling is a fertile area of change, and within parameters, there's a lot you can do to enhance protection and character. The fence/wall must be no more than two metres high to the rear and 1.2 metres to the front or forward of the front of the house.
A front gate can be up to two meters in height (don't use industrial palisade styles — local authorities despise them). You can put in a pond, walkways and features to the rear and side of the house, provided that the ground level is not altered by more than one metre above or below the level of the adjoining ground, so lots to play with there.
Porches
Finally, and this is something often overlooked, you can add a porch of up to two square metres to your home without planning permission.
These tiny structures are not only extremely practical for boots, coats, mail and more, but can act as a thermal break between the outdoors and indoor space. This may well influence your BER rating. Ensure your porch is not less than two metres from any public path/roadway and check the maximum height requirement for your choice of porch roof pitch, which will fall between three and four metres.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Rory McIlroy's new driver brings about concern as he shoots second-highest PGA Tour score before U.S. Open
Rory McIlroy might have some serious driver troubles heading into next week's U.S. Open. The 2025 Masters winner missed the cut by 12 strokes at the RBC Canadian Open, shooting an 8-over 78 on Friday, which was his second-highest score in any PGA Tour event for his career. The last time McIlroy shot a 78 was in the first round of The Open in 2024. McIlroy said his round "concerns me," and what professional golfer wouldn't be worried after carding a quadruple bogey as well as one double bogey and four bogeys to go with just two birdies. "You don't want to shoot high scores like the one I did today," McIlroy said, per ESPN. "Still, I felt like I came here obviously with a new driver thinking that that sort of was going to be good and solve some of the problems off the tee, but it didn't." McIlroy's driver has been a point of emphasis since the PGA Championship last month, where it was leaked that he had a nonconforming driver that was unusable after pre-tournament testing. Scottie Scheffler, the winner at Quail Hollow Club that week, also had a nonconforming driver, but his name wasn't publicly known. However, McIlroy was ticked off his name got out there, and he skipped media sessions the entire tournament. He went on to finish T-47th. Before teeing off this week in Toronto, McIlroy admitted being upset that his driver conundrum had been made public. "I was a little p----d off because I knew that Scottie's driver had failed on Monday, but my name was the one that was leaked," McIlroy said in a press conference, via The New York Post. "It was supposed to stay confidential. Two members of the media were the ones that leaked it. "I didn't want to get up there and say something that I regretted either, because I'm trying to protect Scottie. I don't want to mention his name. I'm trying to protect TaylorMade, I'm trying to protect the USGA, PGA of America, myself." So, McIlroy's tee shots were going to be under a microscope this week because he would be working with a new driver, and it wasn't as consistent as it usually is. McIlroy is one of the best drivers on tour, currently ranking first in strokes gained off the tee, while being third in driving distance with an average shot of 319.3 yards. But with the rough at Oakmont Country Club having the ability to swallow golf balls and ruin rounds next week at the U.S. Open, McIlroy's accuracy needs to be much better than it has been. He ranks 170th in driving accuracy, hitting the fairway 51.13% of the time. At least being cut from this week's tournament gives McIlroy a couple more days to figure out his driver before teeing it up at the U.S. Open on Thursday. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The top 5 mistakes people make in a divorce that cost them thousands
Getting divorced can be an expensive experience, but experts warn that many don't realize the hidden traps that can rack up the bills. The average cost of a divorce in the US is a staggering $11,300, with lawyers' fees making up the bulk, according to personal finance site The Motley Fool. However, a marriage split is not just a one-off expense; there are often long-term implications too. Many women in particular are at risk of ending up worse off after divorce – especially if they have taken time off work to raise a family. Yet both men and women can end up regretting financial mistakes made during the sound and fury of splitting up. 'People making such mistakes often regret it long term, because they can be irreversible,' divorce lawyer Bari Weinberger told the Wall Street Journal. Experts argue it is important to be prepared and ensure you are completely informed about your financial situation. These are the top five mistakes they urge those embarking on a divorce to avoid. 1. Heavy spending One of the most common mistakes new divorcees make is splurging right after the papers are signed. Some take their settlements and throw a 'divorce party', or indulge in retail therapy after months or even years of acrimonious legal wrangling. Common post-divorce purchases include new cars that become unaffordable on finance plans. Another mistake is rushing to buy a new home too quickly, according to divorce coach Liza Caldwell. Caldwell tells her clients to wait for their lives and especially their finances to stabilize before buying a new property. Caldwell told the Journal that those rushing a fresh start can end up overpaying, or tie up too much of their money in their home while reducing flexibility elsewhere. However, costly spending mistakes can also occur just before a marriage fails. Weinberger warns that committing to expensive vacations or new joint debts such as a mortgage on a new home can complicate their process of dividing marital assets during divorce. 2. Hidden assets Some spouses will hide assets before they ask for a divorce in order to gain more from the overall settlement. A common tactic is giving money to friends and family on the understanding that it will be returned after the divorce is settled. Florida accountant Mirtha Valdes Martin told the Journal that she has frequently seen small business owners use this tactic to avoid a fair settlement. Martin said that one way to avoid becoming the losing party is to file for divorce first. Those who suspect their partner may be hiding assets can also seek a settlement that includes even division of assets discovered after the divorce is complete. There is also the option to hire a private investigator or a forensic accountant to get to the bottom of any suspicions. Many women in particular are at risk of ending up worse off after divorce New Jersey divorce lawyer Bari Weinberger says divorcees can regret their financial mistakes 3. Emotion bills Divorce can be a painful time but experts warn that allowing your emotions to prolong proceedings can rack up ever larger bills. Maggie Kim, author of the 'Divorce or Die' newsletter, told the Journal that she spent $500,000 on legal fees over a seven-year divorce process. 'Emotions were the biggest reason that my divorce and custody fight took seven years,' she explained. Now Kim tells her readers to draw on support from their friends and family rather than treating divorce lawyers like therapists. You won't feel better 'when you get a five-figure bill later because you spent two hours sobbing in their office — again,' Kim said. 4. Illiquid assets Illiquid assets such as stock options, individual retirement accounts and real estate, can be among the hardest parts of a divorce to settle. This is because by their very nature they cannot easily be turned into cash and split evenly. Selling stocks can stop an investment from growing over time and incur heavy transaction fees. Retirement accounts can also incur heavy penalties if withdrawn before retirement age. Financial advisor Stacy Francis told the Journal she asks divorcing couples to take all of these constraints into account when deciding how to divide their marital assets. For example, if illiquid assets are too big of a sum to be able to give up a claim to them completely, then 'it may indeed be worth waiting until they vest, mature or are able to be sold,' Francis explained. 'Negotiating for structured payouts or even a co-ownership agreement can be a creative workaround.' Maggie Kim spent $500,000 on legal fees over a seven-year divorce process 5. Underestimating expenses Couples who have been together decades can often forget a time before two incomes. Individuals going through a divorce may therefore underestimate how much it will cost to run a household alone again. Major expenses can include housing and health insurance, as well as discretionary spending such as restaurant meals and subscriptions. Rick Jones, a divorce lawyer from Seattle, told the Journal that his male clients can often misjudge the cost of both child support and running their own home. 'Fathers paying full or partial child support don't anticipate the additional cost of having a home big enough for their kids' visits,' he said. To avoid financial pitfalls later on, Jones urges divorcing couples to make realistic budgets setting out what cash-flow they will need to cover their expenses.


CBS News
14 minutes ago
- CBS News
Decomposing body found in alley, Colorado police investigate "suspicious death"
Police in the Denver metro area are investigating what they called a "suspicious death" after a body was discovered in an alley. According to Lakewood police, they were contacted around 5 p.m. Friday when someone discovered the body in an alleyway in the 9600 block of W. Colfax Ave. Authorities said the body was in advanced stages of decomposition and could not be identified, but they believe the person was an adult. The Jefferson County Coroner's Office is scheduled to conduct an autopsy tomorrow to determine the cause of death. This is a developing story. More information will be provided as it becomes available.