logo
Leeds SEND transport cuts 'target the most vulnerable'

Leeds SEND transport cuts 'target the most vulnerable'

BBC News2 days ago

A group of parents said they were worried some children would drop out of education in September when they lose their free school bus.From September, special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) students over 16 will no longer be provided with a free school bus after Leeds City Council decided to cut the service to save £800,000.However, families said they rely on the bus and some parents said they would have to pay thousands and lose work to drive their children to school.Lorna, whose son Josh has Down's syndrome, autism and anxiety, said the policy change would lead to her or her partner going part-time at work.
Under the changes, children have been assessed by the council with some being awarded a Personal Transport Allowance or free bus pass.However, Lorna said the £2,000 Josh had been awarded would "no way" cover the cost.She said: "It's going to have a huge effect. Josh is at a specialist school 11 miles away. He's been on school transport for the last eight years."The only option we're going to have is to take him ourselves. And that's just taken that little bit of independence he has away."The whole thing is targeting the most vulnerable people."
According to campaign group Save Our School Transport, more than 1,000 children will be affected by the policy changes.A Leeds City Council spokesperson said it remained committed to supporting young people in accessing education. They said: "Transition arrangements are in place to ensure continuity for those currently in post-16 education who are receiving transport support under the current policy, unless there is a significant change in their circumstances, such as a change of address, learning setting or medical needs."While there is no statutory requirement to provide transport for learners in post-16 education, the council continues to offer discretionary assistance. "This may include a zero-fare travel pass, Independent Travel Training, or a banded Personal Travel Allowance."Families have the right to appeal any transport award decision."
Ailith is mum to Thalia, who has Down's syndrome. She said she was concerned the policy changes would not meet children's needs."We were assured in conversations previously that the policy would be applied flexibly and that everybody's situation would be looked at and it feels like that hasn't happened," she said.Steph, mum to Lyall, said the £1,000 they had been awarded "doesn't compensate at all".She said: "Lyall found school transport completely overwhelming so I made the decision to drive him to school because we were offered 50p a mile."I've dropped five hours a week at work, which has had a massive financial impact on me."Some children just won't go to school. They are losing education and losing life skills."
Una Summerson, head of policy and public affairs at Contact, a charity for families with disabled children, said school transport was "vital" for attendance.She said: "In some cases it means young people can't continue with their education but often the responsibility falls to their parents and that can mean a parent has to reduce their hours, give up careers. It makes family life much more difficult and adds stress."Some families are being charged thousands for what was previously free provided transport, and this is having a massive financial impact on them when they have all sort of higher costs compared to other families."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK threatens to sue Abramovich over Chelsea sale
UK threatens to sue Abramovich over Chelsea sale

BBC News

time9 minutes ago

  • BBC News

UK threatens to sue Abramovich over Chelsea sale

The UK government has threatened to sue former Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich to make sure the money from the club's sale goes to £2.5bn in proceeds have been frozen in a UK bank account since the sale, with Mr Abramovich sanctioned after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February UK government wants the money to be for Ukrainian humanitarian aid, but Mr Abramovich has said he wants it to go to "all victims of the war in Ukraine".In a joint statement, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: "While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required." They said they wanted "to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible".They added: "The government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion. "We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far".The delay in releasing the funds centres on a disagreement between the UK government and his Abramovich - a Russian billionaire who made his fortune in oil and gas - was granted a special licence to sell Chelsea following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, providing he could prove he would not benefit from the is alleged to have strong ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, something he has cannot access the £2.5bn sale proceeds under UK sanctions but the money still legally belongs to he announced his decision to sell the club, he said proceeds from the sale would be donated via a foundation "for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine", which would include those in Russia. The UK government has pushed back and argued that the funds should only be spent on humanitarian efforts inside Ukraine.A House of Lords committee said last year said it was "incomprehensible" that Mr Abramovich's promise to use the funds to support Ukraine remained unfulfilled, and that the assets remained frozen."This impasse reflects badly on both Mr Abramovich and the government, which ought to have pushed for a more binding commitment," the report said.

UFC's Tom Aspinall moving on from 'retired' Jon Jones
UFC's Tom Aspinall moving on from 'retired' Jon Jones

Reuters

time22 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UFC's Tom Aspinall moving on from 'retired' Jon Jones

June 3 - Interim UFC heavyweight champion Tom Aspinall considers Jon Jones to be retired and wants to move on. Aspinall has not stepped into the Octagon since July 27, 2024, when he successfully defended the interim title with a first round knockout of Curtis Blades. That victory avenged the lone UFC defeat for Aspinall (8-1, 15-3 overall). Aspinall's July victory and Jones' win over Stipe Miocic in November 2024 would appear to warrant a unification bout, but there has been no news in the last seven months and some are calling for Jones to be stripped of his title. Jones hasn't competed in that span. "Jon Jones is retired," Aspinall said on ESPN's "Good Guy/Bad Guy" podcast on Monday. "I want to say God bless him moving forward in what he does with his life and career. We move on. I'm the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world. I'm ready to take on all comers and get this division moving again. Jones (28-1), a two-time light heavyweight champion, who won the vacant heavyweight belt in March 2023, views the situation differently than Aspinall. "The UFC, I and Tom, we all got a lot of stuff happening behind the scenes," Jones said at a seminar in Thailand while filming a reality show, according to The Independent. "They're one of the biggest organizations in sports and right now, Tom and I have agreed to wait for the UFC to make their announcements. So I legally can't really talk about it." UFC CEO Dana White has expressed optimism that the bout would take place. In November, he referred to the potential matchup "the biggest fight in heavyweight history," but, until Jones' statements in Thailand, Jones had not shown interest in fighting the Englishman. The hold-up has delayed most of the bouts between any of the top-ranked heavyweights. "The other guys don't want to fight anybody because they might be next themselves," Aspinall said. "Everybody else is scared to fight. Nobody wants to make the next move. The division is completely stuck. I am sick of the division being stuck. I'm there. I'm active. I'm getting better all the time. Just stick me in. I'm ready to fight all of them." --Field Level Media

'I might not make it': Sarah Jessica Parker on the stress of reading two books a day
'I might not make it': Sarah Jessica Parker on the stress of reading two books a day

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

'I might not make it': Sarah Jessica Parker on the stress of reading two books a day

Sarah Jessica Parker was the subject of some unwanted headlines over the past few weeks after saying she reads two books a day. While speculation of her reading capabilities circulates, the actress continues the challenging mountain of novels she has to get through in order to be a judge for the Booker Prize. The actress is part of a panel of judges for the literary award which announces the "Booker Dozen" of 12 or 13 books on 29 July, its shortlist on 23 September and the overall winner on 10 November. The winner receives £50,000. "I have one by my side now," Sarah Jessica tells Sky News during an interview for her show And Just Like That. "It's been hard these last two weeks because we've been promoting the show and I thought I would be able to read between interviews, but you can read two words. You can read these three sentences, so I'm feeling very anxious about how many books I have yet to read for our next deliberation," she says. The Sex And The City actress compares the workload to preparing to take an exam. "I've not ever felt this behind, including in high school. Like, I really am not entirely sure how I'm going to read the required amount of books by our next deliberation," she says. "I thought about this last night in bed, that even if I stay up every day and don't sleep, I might not make it. So I'm not sure how. I have to not make dinner for anybody, not do anybody's laundry. I have cut out all tasks. So we'll see. It's pretty fantastic, this burden is pretty wonderful." Turning to her spin-off series, she says she never paid much attention to the cultural impact Sex And The City had on portraying women in their 30s on screen without a rose-tinted lens. "I think we're just always wanting to tell interesting stories," she says. "And the rule in the writing room has been, for as long as I've known, the story can only be as far removed as one person from the writer, so every single story told has either happened to a writer or to a friend or family member or colleague of the writer." She says what makes it real is that the show deals with real moments that happen to women as they age, from children flying the nest to navigating the dating pool. "You don't flat line at 50 or 60. People are living pretty colourful, interesting, exciting lives and they have influence and authority. They're trying new things. They're leaving marriages. They're saying goodbye to kids. They're starting new jobs, they're leaving jobs, and they're getting married, they are widows, there's just endless amounts to talk about and it should be," she says. 'It is insane there aren't more shows like us' Her co-star Kristin Davis agrees and states her main hope for returning was to break certain taboos for women now in their 50s. "It is insane that there aren't more shows like us, you know? I'm hoping that there will be," she says. "It's very interesting that somehow women, especially at a certain age, you're just supposed to just vanish. I don't know where we're supposed to be and that just makes no sense." Sex And The City was 'incredibly white', says Cynthia Nixon For Cynthia Nixon, playing Miranda now as a lesbian character allowed the show to explore the challenges that face people coming out later in life and navigating the world they find themselves in. She says although Sex And The City broke taboos for white women in their 30s, she felt the original iteration of their show wasn't as reflective of the real world as it could have been. "The one thing that didn't really sit well with me in the past was how incredibly white the show was," she says. "So, I think to expand the universe of, you know, who gets to be centred in the show has been a tremendous boon. Whether you're talking about people of colour, whether you're talk about queer people, people of different ages. We used to have a wonderfully fascinating lens, but it was fairly narrow. "We've moved in our view of queer people… for so long, if you wanted to put a gay person on screen, one of the ways to make them palatable was to really emphasise their funniness and I think we have many very funny gay characters, but we're able to, I think, have a more well-rounded view of them."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store