Andhra Pradesh govt evacuates 441 students from border states amid India-Pakistan tensions
Amaravati (Andhra Pradesh) [India], May 12 (ANI): Amid the ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan, the Andhra Pradesh government, led by Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu, has taken proactive measures to ensure the safety of its students and ensure that no Andhra Pradesh student studying in border states feels abandoned or alone.
The state is working with concern and urgency around the clock to bring its students back safely from regions like Punjab, Jammu & Kashmir, Rajasthan, and Gujarat. It is providing them with shelter, food, and support as they travel back to their homes.
As per a release, 441 students have reached Andhra Pradesh Bhavan in Delhi, of whom 158 have already returned to their hometowns in Andhra Pradesh. 283 students are currently staying at the Bhavan. These include 130 students from NIT Srinagar, 120 from LPU University, 16 from Sher-e-Kashmir University, and 10 from Lamrin Tech Skills University in Punjab. An additional 20 students from NIT Srinagar are expected to arrive by Monday evening.
To facilitate their travel, the government has issued 40 Emergency Quota (EQ) letters for train tickets, and food is being arranged for 300 students currently at AP Bhavan. The state is making all necessary arrangements to ensure these students return home safely and with dignity.
Meanwhile, Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu paid tribute to army jawan Murali Naik, who was killed in the line of duty during cross-border firing by the Pakistani forces along the Line of Control (LoC).
According to an official release from the TDP, CM Naidu condoled the demise of the young soldier from Ananthapuram district.
Naidu spoke with Murali's parents, Jyotibai and Ram Naik, and assured them of the state government's support. He praised Murali's invaluable service in the army over the past two years and called on everyone to stand united with patriotism and vigilance.
CM Naidu also urged everybody to observe two minutes of silence in honour of Naik's sacrifice.
As per reports, Agniveer M Murali Naik was injured during heavy shelling from the Pakistan side on Thursday. He was later taken to the hospital for treatment, but succumbed to injuries on Friday morning. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Comparing 1971 India-Pakistan war & Operation Sindoor
Dr. Prashant Prabhakar Deshpande has post-graduated in Economics with a Gold Medal in 1976 and was awarded a Ph.D in Social Sciences from Nagpur University in 2007. Introduction In the aftermath of the Operation Sindoor Congress has been highlighting Pakistan's surrender to India in 1971 Bangladesh war during Smt Indira Gandhi's premiership. However, according to experts, the exercise is futile. According to them, while both achieved their respective objectives, they differ significantly in context, scale, and impact and should be viewed within their distinct historical and strategic frameworks. According to experts, the 1971 war was a full-scale military conflict triggered by widespread human rights violations and a massive refugee crisis in East Pakistan, now Bangladesh, where the Pakistani army persecuted the Bengali population, forcing nearly 10 million refugees to flee to India. In response, India initially provided humanitarian aid and extended support to the Bengali resistance force, the Mukti Bahini. When Pakistan launched an attack on both eastern & western fronts, India declared a full-scale war, engaging across land, air, and sea, achieving a decisive victory, leading to the liberation of East Pakistan and the creation of Bangladesh, leading to a significant territorial and political shift in South Asia. According to experts, Operation Sindoor in contrast, was a precision military strike launched to dismantle terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK) to avenge the massacre of 26 Indian tourists in J&K's Pahalgam on 22nd of April, 2025 destroying 9 terror hideouts using advanced technology, including drones, satellite imagery, and precision-guided weapons. The operation was aimed solely at terrorist infrastructure avoiding civilian or military targets, the objective being to curb terrorism and deliver a strong message to Pakistan without escalating into a full-scale war. After Pakistan's retaliatory strikes, however, India responded firmly that culminated into an agreement to hold fire & military action on May 10, 2025. Comparing 1971 & 2025 According to military experts, comparing the 1971 war with Operation Sindoor is not appropriate, as both had vastly different objectives and contexts. While the 1971 war resulted in the creation of Bangladesh, Operation Sindoor was a limited but targeted military action aimed at dismantling terrorist infrastructure. While the 1971 war reshaped South Asia's political landscape, Operation Sindoor sent a strong message to Pakistan and the terrorist groups it backs, without escalating into a broader conflict. Achievements of Operation Sindoor Operation Sindoor reportedly targeted terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and PoK, resulting in the destruction of two terrorist headquarters, reportedly killing several terrorists, including 2 designated by the United Nations and 8 on India's most-wanted list. Operation Sindoor highlights a shift towards a proactive defence strategy adopted by India, ensuring national security and regional stability. The destruction of terror camps and Pakistani military assets has sent a strong message to adversaries, reinforcing India's commitment to counter-terrorism. India's precision strikes under Operation Sindoor showcased a modern military doctrine targeting terror camps and Pakistani military installations without engaging in prolonged warfare. India's approach focuses on economic dominance, strategic deterrence, and controlled military engagements, underscoring India's long-term vision, ensuring national security without compromising economic growth under the Viksit Bharat Vision. India agreed to the Pakistani DGMO's request to halt firing & military action only after it achieved its objective to destroy terrorist camps, forcing Pakistan's military to plead. India's actions demonstrated its firm stance against terrorism and cross-border aggression. The country demonstrated its military prowess neutralising half a dozen US and China-made fighter jets along with hundreds of Turkish and Chinese drones deployed by Pakistan in addition to destroying 9 terror camps, eliminating 100+ terrorists, including masterminds behind the Kandahar hijack and 26/11 Mumbai attacks & causing significant losses estimated at $10 billion+. Operation Sindoor demonstrates a decisive shift in India's counter-terrorism strategy, aimed at delivering swift and targeted responses, rather than issuing warnings . Reasons behind India's agreeing to Pakistan's request to hold fire & military action According to experts in today's world, military confrontations are not solely about territorial gains but about economic stability, precision strikes, and global influence. Unlike 1971, when full-fledged warfare was the only viable option, today's geopolitical landscape demands calculated actions that align with economic and strategic priorities, according to them. A prolonged war with Pakistan would derail India's economic growth, disrupt Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs), and slow down job creation, negatively impacting the country's development trajectory. As global manufacturing shifts away from China, a prolonged conflict could prevent India from emerging as a key manufacturing hub, securing Beijing's economic dominance. Unlike traditional warfare, modern conflicts focus on precision military operations that weaken adversaries without engaging in prolonged war. Economically fragile and politically unstable Pakistan has nothing to lose from prolonged military engagements. However, China and the US Deep State have vested interests in India's prolonged involvement as: – Pakistan serves as a front for major global powers to sell weapons and destabilize India. – A long military conflict would weaken India's global position, similar to how the West pushed Russia into a multi-year war with Ukraine. Opposition's Nefarious design to play politics on Operation Sindoor Indian opposition parties, including India's grand old party, Indian National Congress, which was in power at the Centre which remained passive after the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, are now pushing for war to: Disrupt the government's economic policies by forcing it into a long military conflict, and; Create public discontent if the government refuses to escalate the war, labelling it as weakness. These parties do not realise or do not want to realise that they are playing into the hands of India's adversary, Pakistan, which has been since long harbouring terrorists, doing a disservice to the nation, discrediting & demoralising the country's Armed forces. Epilogue India's recent military operations highlight a shift towards proactive defence strategies & by destroying terror camps, sends a strong message to adversaries, reinforcing India's commitment to counter-terrorism. According to experts, while the Shimla Agreement signed after the 1971 war was aimed at diplomatic resolution, India's modern defence approach underscores the necessity of military deterrence in safeguarding national interest, considering it futile to compare 1971 war & Operation Sindoor. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
26 years on, Army retraces heroic ascent to Tololing to honour Kargil War heroes
On June 13, 1999, after days of fierce combat under hostile conditions, the Indian Army reclaimed Tololing, a heavily fortified position that gave Pakistani intruders a commanding view of the Srinagar-Leh highway.
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
When a Pak fighter jet shot down Gujarat CM's plane 60 years ago
It was the height of the 1965 India-Pakistan war. And 25-year-old Pakistani Flying Officer Qais Hussain, flying a Sabre jet, was patrolling the tense skies over Bhuj and eastern Sindh. On spotting a civilian aircraft, Hussain sought permission and, once granted, fired at the Beechcraft. Feeling triumphant that he had foiled an enemy surveillance operation, Hussain returned to his base in later, when All India Radio's 7 pm bulletin announced that a plane carrying Gujarat's then Chief Minister Balwantrai Mehta and seven civilians had been shot down by Pakistan, Hussain's pride gave way to shock, disbelief, and a lifelong CM Balwantrai Mehta, pilot Jahangir Engineer, and a journalist were among the eight people killed after their Beechcraft aircraft was shot down by the Pakistani fighter. Almost 60 years after Balwantrai Mehta, known as the father of Panchayati Raj, lost his life in an air tragedy, Vijay Rupani, who had served as the Gujarat CM between 2016 and 2021, died in an air crash in Ahmedabad. The Air India flight to London, carrying Rupani, crashed just minutes after taking off from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport with 242 people on board. All but one perished as the aircraft stalled mid-air and burst into flames upon hitting the a moment to revisit the 1965 tragedy that claimed Balwantrai Mehta's life, a rare and haunting instance when political leadership was quite literally lost mid-air. Balwantrai Mehta is called the father of Panchayati Raj because he led the 1957 committee that recommended democratic decentralisation through a three-tier system of local self-governance, laying the foundation for grassroots democracy in India. (Image: India Post) GUJARAT CM'S FLIGHT INTO THE FOG OF 1965 WARThe 1965 India-Pakistan war, which began in August, had reached a critical point by the UN Security Council on September 22 passed a resolution calling for an unconditional ceasefire, India accepted it immediately. Pakistan, however, delayed its response, finally agreeing to it a day later, on September as international pressure mounted to restore peace, the skies over the subcontinent remained same afternoon, Gujarat CM Balwantrai Mehta was on his way to Mithapur, near the Gulf of Kutch, accompanied by his wife Sarojben, three aides, and two eight-seater Beechcraft aircraft was piloted by Jahangir Engineer, the state government's chief pilot and a veteran of the Indian Air Force and the Royal Air Force. The group took off from Ahmedabad not knowing that they were flying into BALWANTRAI MEHTA'S PLEA IN THE SKY GOES UNHEEDEDadvertisementFlying Officer Qais Hussain of the Pakistan Air Force had taken off from the Mauripur Airbase near Karachi along with Flight Lieutenant Bukhari in US-made F-86 Sabre fighter Bukhari had to return due to fuel issues, Hussain continued towards the border after receiving a report from ground control that an unidentified aircraft was flying near Pakistan's airspace. Amid the heightened tensions of war, the unidentified aircraft was suspected to be on a reconnaissance mission, possibly signalling an Indian attempt to open a new front in the Rann of at 20,000 feet, Hussain was directed to drop to 3,000, the same level at which Mehta's Beechcraft was Hussain closed in, he spotted the Beechcraft marked with Indian insignia. Pakistani ground control instructed him to Beechcraft noticed the approaching Pakistani Sabre and began ascending, waggling its wings, a universal plea for clemency in air the Indian aircraft's distress signal, Hussain opened fire. His first burst tore through the left wing, and the second set the right engine ablaze. Moments later, the aircraft crashed near the India-Pakistan border in the Kutch region, killing all eight people on board, including CM the shooting, I had a sense of achievement and satisfaction that I had completed my mission and destroyed any recce data that might have been collected to open a new war front," Hussain later HUSSAIN LEARNS HE SHOT DOWN A CHIEF MINISTERAfter shooting down the Indian plane, Hussain sped back to the Karachi base."I landed back at Mauripur, Karachi with my fuel tanks bone dry and was greeted by my seniors and other squadron colleagues. Later that evening, All India Radio announced the names of the occupants who had lost their lives in that aircraft...," Hussain then did Hussain learn the full gravity of what had happened, that he had killed a sitting Indian Chief Minister and other civilians. It was a rare moment during an international conflict: a political leader downed in wartime airspace by military misjudgement or perhaps asked his superiors why he had been ordered to shoot down what was clearly a civilian aircraft. The explanation: the plane was dangerously close to the border, and there were fears that India might open a second front in the Rann of YEARS LATER, QAIS HUSSAIN SEEKS FORGIVENESSNearly 46 years later, in 2011, a retired Qais Hussain read an article in a Pakistani defence journal about the 1965 incident where shots fired by him killed 8 civilians, including a high-profile by the past and seeking closure, Hussain tracked down the daughter of pilot Jahangir Engineer, Farida Singh, in Mumbai and wrote her an email seeking the email, Hussain expressed sorrow for his actions but maintained that he was simply following orders in a time of war."I want to tell you that I did not pull the trigger out of malice," he wrote. "It was war. I followed the rules of engagement and carried out the command." He ended the letter with condolences to all eight families who had lost loved ones in the crash."For a moment, I wished I had returned without firing... But I was a soldier. And a soldier must follow orders," Hussain later said in an Farida Singh responded with surprising her reply, Singh admitted the loss of her father had shaped her life, but said she had never felt hatred towards the man who caused it. "I realised that in war, even good people are forced to do terrible things. We were all pawns in a larger game", she Beechcraft carrying Balwantrai Mehta was not the only one; it was one of the four civilian or non-combat aircraft which came under Pakistani fire during the 1965 War. But the loss of a sitting Chief Minister made it rarely repeats with such cruel precision, but it has now claimed Gujarat Chief Ministers twice mid-air, once in war and once in Watch
