
Feds finds Mass. education department fails to protect students with disabilities
Advertisement
Department spokesperson Jacqueline Reis said in a statement the agency has taken steps over the last year to improve its special education supervision, including hiring additional staff and revising policies.
'The Department remains committed to continuous improvement efforts to enhance and refine special education services across Massachusetts and will work to implement the ordered corrective action,' Reis said.
The findings come as the Trump administration scrutinizes federal spending, potentially giving the President and the new Department of Government Efficiency fodder for their critiques of public education — especially in a liberal stronghold like Massachusetts.
Related
:
More immediately, though, the findings serve as validation for a coalition of parents and advocates long-exasperated by the state's special education system. For years, their experiences have run counter to a rosy narrative about Massachusetts' services — one supported by the federal government's own ranking system, which last year
'It was parent input — lots of parent input — that convinced (the US Education Department) to do the investigation,' said Ellen Chambers, leader of SPEDWatch, a Norwood-based advocacy group that organized family outreach to federal officials.
The
federal Education Department
Advertisement
The report divides its findings into three key areas: how the state handles disputes between local districts and parents over student services; how the state monitors whether local districts are identifying all children with disabilities; and how the state oversees the rights of special education students placed at private schools at public expense.
The federal government found the state's dispute resolution procedures lacking, with Massachusetts' Problem Resolution System, which handles complaints alleging schools are districts are not meeting legal requirements for education, failing to investigate claims and issue findings within a 60-day federal time limit. The Problem Resolution System also lacks procedures for ensuring follow-through when corrective actions are required. In other words, even when the state deems a parent's claim substantive, there is no oversight to ensure a district changes its ways.
Related
:
When it comes to identifying children in need of special education services, the federal government found Massachusetts does not have a way to monitor whether local districts are illegally delaying or denying initial evaluations. In particular, investigators warned of schools placing students for prolonged periods of time in less-intensive intervention programs — a remedial strategy that, while supported by research, cannot under federal law be used to put off an evaluation of a child suspected of having a disability. (Often, this strategy is referred to as multi-tiered systems of support, or 'MTSS,' or response to intervention, also known as 'RTI.')
The federal government additionally took issue with a Massachusetts regulation related to Independent Educational Evaluations (IEE). Under federal law, parents who disagree with the findings of school district's special education evaluation have the right to request an independent evaluation at public expense. In Massachusetts, a cost-sharing regulation has resulted in parents shouldering part of the expense regardless of the facts of the case. The federal law, however, requires a local district to prove through a due process hearing that its evaluation is sound in order to win a judgment stipulating a parent must chip in for an independent assessment, investigators said.
Related
:
Advertisement
Finally, the federal government found Massachusetts unable to demonstrate it is effectively monitoring districts' oversight of students with disabilities placed at private schools. In particular, the state has no procedure in place to ensure private schools aren't violating students' rights when it comes to discipline — such as suspending a child for more than 10 school days even when his behavior is a manifestation of his disability. The state also lacks a procedure for a parent to appeal a private school's decision to terminate a student's enrollment, investigators found.
The report calls for several corrective action measures with timelines ranging from 90 days to one year.
Massachusetts is not an outlier when it comes needing to take corrective action. More than a dozen other states in recent years have in some way failed to properly oversee special education services,
Ben Tobin, a special education advocate based in Western Massachusetts and member of SPEDWatch, called the report 'very significant.'
'Families have been shouting from the mountain tops for years,' he said. 'This really shows there's a systemic problem and that the path forward has been laid out.'
Advertisement
Still, Tobin worries that a swiftly changing environment in Washington could derail progress. Would would happen, he questioned, if Trump makes good on a promise to dismantle the federal Education Department — if 'no one is watching the watchmen?'
'No institution is perfect,' he said, 'but the level of detail and time (the Department) took with the probe shows why we need safeguards in place for the kids.'
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Mandy McLaren can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Telegram Messenger's Ties to Russia's FSB Revealed in New Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Telegram messaging app may have ties to Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB), according to an investigation. Independent Russian investigative outlet IStories said it has uncovered evidence suggesting that the platform's server infrastructure is maintained by companies who have collaborated with Russian intelligence services, raising significant concerns about potential government surveillance. Responding to a request for comment, Telegram's head of Press and Media Relations Remi Vaughn said in a statement to Newsweek: "As a global company, Telegram has contracts with dozens of different service providers around the world. However, none of these service providers have access to Telegram data or sensitive infrastructure. "All Telegram servers belong to Telegram and are maintained by Telegram employees. Unauthorized access is impossible. Throughout its entire history, Telegram never disclosed any private messages to a third party — and its encryption has never been breached." In another auto-message sent after reaching out for comment, Telegram said: "Telegram is committed to protecting user privacy and human rights such as freedom of speech and assembly. It has played a prominent role in pro-democracy movements around the world, including in Iran, Russia, Belarus, Myanmar and Hong Kong. "Pavel Durov is the founder, owner and CEO of Telegram. He left Russia in 2014, after losing control of his previous company for refusing to hand over the data of Ukrainian protesters to security agencies. Pavel Durov lives in Dubai and holds a dual citizenship of the United Arab Emirates and France." Why It Matters Telegram has long held a reputation as a secure messaging app, and it is used globally by journalists, activists, and ordinary users seeking privacy. Its founder, Russian-born Pavel Durov, who was detained by French authorities in August 2024, has cultivated an image that the platform protects digital privacy. The IStories report challenges that image by linking the platform to Russia's FSB, which jails individuals critical of the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin. What To Know Telegram's infrastructure is managed by Global Network Management (GNM), a small firm registered in Antigua and Barbuda, which provides the platform with over 10,000 IP addresses, according to IStories. GNM's owner, Russian national Vladimir Vedeneyev, previously testified in a U.S. court that he has employees based in Russia. IStories also found that Vedeneyev serves as Telegram's chief financial officer. Many of these IP addresses were previously owned by Globalnet, a St. Petersburg-based telecommunications operator. IStories reported that Globalnet has connections to the Kremlin and Russian intelligence services, including the FSB. Electrontelecom, a St. Petersburg-based company, also reportedly provided Telegram with another 5,000 IP addresses, according to IStories, which identified the firm as an FSB contractor. Electrontelecom has provided services for the installation and maintenance of "a complex system for transmitting classified information from fixed facilities operated by the FSB's Directorate for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region, which is used to carry out operational investigative activities," it said. The investigation comes days after Russian human rights NGO First Department warned that the FSB had gained access to Russians' communication with Ukrainian Telegram channels, which provide vital updates and reporting on Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. "We know that by the time the defendants in cases of 'state treason' are detained, the FSB is already in possession of their correspondence. And the fact that neither defendants nor a lawyer are named in the main case allows the FSB to hide how exactly it goes about gaining access to that correspondence," First Department said. First Department head Dmitry Zair-Bek said that material from Telegram had already been used as evidence in "a significant number of cases." "On most cases, they have been accessed due to compromised devices. ... However, there are also cases in which no credible technical explanations consistent with known access methods can be identified," he said, Novaya Gazeta reported. "This could indicate either the use of undisclosed cyber espionage tools or Telegram's cooperation with the Russian authorities, obvious signs of which we see in a number of other areas," Zair-Bek added. What People Are Saying Cybersecurity expert Michał Woźniak told IStories that beyond storing decrypted messages, Telegram also attaches a unique device identifier to each message sent on the platform, known as auth_key_id, which can determine where a user is located and reveal their IP addresses. "If someone has access to Telegram traffic and cooperates with Russian intelligence services, this means that the device identifier becomes a really big problem—a tool for global surveillance of messenger users, regardless of where they are and what server they connect to," Woźniak said. What Happens Next Telegram has not commented publicly on the investigation or the allegations. The company is being paid $300 million to roll out Elon Musk's Grok chatbot on the messaging app. "This summer, Telegram users will gain access to the best AI technology on the market. @elonmusk and I have agreed to a 1-year partnership to bring xAI's @grok to our billion+ users and integrate it across all Telegram apps," Durov announced on May 28.

USA Today
40 minutes ago
- USA Today
Press groups push DHS over potential First Amendment violations during LA protests
Press groups push DHS over potential First Amendment violations during LA protests A group of more than two dozen First Amendment and press freedom advocacy groups sent a June 9 letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem over potential First Amendment violations during the protests. Show Caption Hide Caption Australian journalist shot with a rubber bullet in Los Angeles Australian journalist from 9News, Lauren Tomasi, was shot with a rubber bullet while reporting from the protests in Los Angeles. The California-based First Amendment Coalition, the Freedom of the Press Foundation and the Los Angeles Press Club led the letter to DHS. In addition, 27 other press freedom and First Amendment advocacy groups signed the June 9 letter. A host of press freedom and civil rights organizations are warning the Department of Homeland Security that federal officers 'may have violated the First Amendment rights' of journalists covering protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles. In a June 9 letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, more than two dozen organizations expressed alarm over how the events have unfolded. "The press plays an essential role in our democracy as the public's eyes and ears," wrote the groups, led by the First Amendment Coalition, Freedom of the Press Foundation and Los Angeles Press Club. "The timely reporting of breaking news is necessary to provide the public with complete information, especially about controversial events." Others signing the letter include the American Civil Liberties Union, the Committee to Protect Journalists, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), Reporters Without Borders and several unions representing journalists. "A number of reports suggest that federal officers have indiscriminately used force or deployed munitions such as tear gas or pepper balls that caused significant injuries to journalists,' the letter said. 'In some cases, federal officers appear to have deliberately targeted journalists who were doing nothing more than their job covering the news.' LA protests live updates: Over 100 people arrested, mayor says; Newsom, Trump clash The Los Angeles Press Club has documented at least 30 cases of journalists being injured while covering the protests. Several of those incidents were caught on camera. New York Post photographer Toby Canham was shot in the head with a rubber bullet, Australian journalist Lauren Tomasi was hit in the leg and Los Angeles Police Department officers detained CNN correspondent Jason Carroll. The LAPD and the California Highway Patrol have not responded to USA TODAY's request for comment on the injuries. The letter said federal officers are required to uphold the freedom of the press under the First Amendment and referenced court cases that affirmed individuals' right to record law enforcement officers executing their duties in public places and journalists' exemption from general dispersal orders so long as they are not interfering with law enforcement actions. Related: Multiple journalists injured by police nonlethal rounds while covering LA protests It said law enforcement's response to criminal conduct must therefore be 'narrowly tailored to addressing the specific conduct of those individuals.' 'To avoid any further First Amendment violations, please immediately ensure that any federal officers or personnel, or anyone acting under their direction and control, refrain from any unlawful, indiscriminate and excessive use of force against members of the press and public who are merely covering events of public concern in the Los Angeles area,' the groups wrote. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin confirmed to USA TODAY that the department received the letter. 'This is a whole-of-government approach to restore law and order,' McLaughlin said of the collaboration among DHS, the Defense Department and others in the Trump administration to respond to the protests. 'We are grateful to our military members and law enforcement who have acted with patriotism in the face of assault, taunts and violence.' Protests over immigration raids in the city started on June 6 and grew over the following days. President Donald Trump, against California Gov. Gavin Newsom's wishes, ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to the city on June 7. Newsom called the move 'purposefully inflammatory,' and the state sued the administration on June 9. Newsom referred to Trump's deployment of hundreds of Marines that same day as a 'blatant abuse of power' and said further legal action would follow. Contributing: Jeanine Santucci BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@ USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
US imposes sanctions on alleged sham Palestinian charities
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Treasury Department on Tuesday imposed sanctions on five people and five entities across the Middle East, Africa and Europe, accusing them of being prominent financial supporters of Hamas' military wing under the pretense of conducting humanitarian work in the Gaza Strip and around the world. Those sanctioned include the Gaza-based charity Al Weam Charitable Society, which is accused of being controlled by Hamas, along with its executive director Muhammad Sami Muhammad Abu Marei. Turkey-based charity Filistin Vakfi and its President Zeki Abdullah Ibrahim Ararawi were also targeted for sanctions. Charities in Algeria, the Netherlands and Italy were also targeted for sanctions. The department is also targeting a separate charity linked to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, or PFLP. A 2024 Treasury report on terrorist financing highlights how online crowdfunding is increasingly done under the guise of soliciting legitimate charitable donations, making it difficult to identify as terrorist financing. Because the majority of crowdfunding activity is legitimate, 'this status can make it more difficult for law enforcement attempting to investigate potential (terrorist financing) cases with a crowdfunding and online fundraising nexus," the report said.