
Addendum - Constitutional Justification for Sabah's Legislative Competence
Published on: Sunday, April 27, 2025
Published on: Sun, Apr 27, 2025
By: Datuk Roger Chin Text Size: While it is true that 'elections' fall within the Federal List under the Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution—thus placing general elections for Parliament and State Assemblies under Federal jurisdiction—this does not mean that Sabah is entirely prohibited from legislating on electoral matters within its own constitutional sphere. First, under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), the Federal Constitution was amended to accommodate special autonomy for Sabah and Sarawak. These include greater legislative and administrative powers, particularly over matters considered to have local significance. Among these are state elections and the conduct of election campaigns within Sabah itself. The Election Commission (EC) under Article 113 is responsible for conducting elections, but nothing prevents a state legislature from enacting complementary laws aimed at ensuring fairness, transparency, and integrity in the campaigning process—so long as these laws do not regulate the mechanics of voting or counting, which are federally regulated. Moreover, Article 95B(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution expressly provides that Parliament may confer on the Legislature of Sabah the power to make laws with respect to matters enumerated in the Federal List, to the extent that they apply to Sabah. Even without direct Parliamentary delegation, Sabah retains competence over public order, morality, and state government affairs—categories broad enough to encompass laws against electoral disinformation, fake news, and digital manipulation during campaigns. In short - Sabah is not legislating on the conduct of the election itself (which remains federal), It is legislating to protect the integrity of election campaigns within Sabah, This falls under public morality, order, and the right of the State to safeguard its democratic processes, Such legislation supplements, not supplants, federal electoral laws. Given the unique vulnerabilities of Sabah, as outlined earlier, and its distinct constitutional status, it is both lawful and necessary for the State to enact targeted laws like the proposed Sabah Electoral Integrity and Digital Truthfulness Ordinance to address digital threats to its electoral system. Failure to act would leave a constitutional vacuum—and potentially allow Federal neglect to endanger Sabah's democracy. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Rakyat Post
12 hours ago
- Rakyat Post
Anwar Ibrahim Granted ‘'Interim Stay,'' Won't Appear In Court On 16 June
Subscribe to our FREE Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is granted an The three-member bench chaired by Justice Supang Lian said Anwar had shown special circumstances to justify the grant of the application under Section 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. Anwar was supposed to attend a court hearing on 16 June regarding an alleged sexual assault case against his former research assistant, Muhammad Yusoff Rawther, the grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris. Yusoff previously accused Anwar of assaulting him at the latter's home in Segambut in October 2018. Yusoff is seeking general, special, aggravated, and exemplary damages, including interest, costs, and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the accusations and filed a countersuit. Early this month, Anwar's legal team sought to refer to eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution. Anwar framed the case as a matter of protecting the prime minister's office from politically motivated litigation instead of an attempt to seek personal immunity. The court found Anwar's legal questions did not meet the requirements under Section 84 of the Courts of Justice Act 1964 and ordered him to pay RM20,000 in costs, and ruled the trial should proceed as scheduled on 16 June. READ MORE: Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.


Daily Express
16 hours ago
- Daily Express
Anwar allowed interim stay, June 16 civil suit vacated
Published on: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Published on: Tue, Jun 10, 2025 By: V Anbalagan Text Size: The Court of Appeal said Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had shown special circumstances justifying the grant of a stay of the trial. PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has granted Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim an ad-interim stay of a civil suit brought by a former research assistant over an alleged assault. The temporary stay is pending a full hearing of the prime minister's application, which will take place on July 21. Advertisement A three-member bench chaired by Justice Supang Lian said Anwar had shown special circumstances to justify the grant of the application. 'We are of the considered view that under Section 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, we are empowered to make an ad-interim order to preserve the integrity of the appellant's (Anwar) stay. 'Accordingly, the trial in the High Court will be stayed pending the disposal of the stay application,' said Supang. Also on the panel hearing the application were Justices Faizah Jamaludin and Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin. The bench also clarified that parties need not exchange witness statements on Friday (June 13) as directed by High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain last week, given today's decision. The trial of the suit was scheduled to take place before Roz Mawar over seven days between June 16 and June 25 after she dismissed Anwar's reference application on grounds that none of the questions posed succeeded in crossing the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act. In her 21-page judgment, she said the application was misconceived as to the jurisdiction of the courts, and was based on speculative doctrines with no constitutional footing. The prime minister wanted the apex court to rule on whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from the suit filed by Yusoff Rawther four years ago. The suit filed by Yusoff relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 24, 2022. Anwar is appealing to the Court of Appeal against Roz Mawar's refusal to refer eight legal questions arising from the suit to the Federal Court for determination. He is seeking a stay of all proceedings pending the disposal of the appeal. Yusoff, a grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit. Today, before the bench, lawyer Alan Wong, appearing for Anwar, said the appeal against Roz Mawar's decision would be rendered academic and nugatory if the interim stay was disallowed. 'There is no prejudice to the plaintiff if the trial is suspended. He can be compensated in the event that the plaintiff proves his case,' he added. He said the seven-day trial would also disrupt and cause irreversible harm to the prime minister's executive function. 'It is not an ordinary suit but one laced with political motive,' he added. Counsel Rafique Rashid Ali submitted that the appeal on the reference questions was doomed to fail as they were rhetorical and had no basis in Malaysian jurisprudence. He also said the defendant knew the trial dates as they were fixed on June 6 last year. 'Yet he filed the reference application 23 days before the trial was to start through his new solicitors,' Rafique said, adding that his client should have his day in court as the suit was filed in 2021. Lawyers Shahir Tahir, K Rajasegaran, and SM Kavyaasrini also appeared for Anwar while Nurmustanir Nor and Amirul Ar-Rashid Azman acted for Yusoff. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia


Daily Express
a day ago
- Daily Express
Warisan rejects one-stop labour centre
Published on: Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Published on: Tue, Jun 10, 2025 Text Size: 'For over a decade, we've asked for real Sabah representation. Why is the Human Resource Ministry (Kesuma) afraid of letting us choose our own voice?' Wong asked. Kota Kinabalu: Warisan Vice President Datuk Junz Wong rejected the Federal Government's plan to set up a one-stop labour centre in Sabah, saying what the state truly needs is its own Human Resource Ministry. 'Sabah's labour issues are not due to a 20-year delay as claimed, that's misleading. Most local employers already adhere to peninsula standards. Advertisement 'Full federal control of the Labour Department (JTK) could lead to overly harsh enforcement, harming local businesses,' he warned. He also criticised the lack of Sabah representation in the National Labour Advisory Council (NLAC), saying Sabah-based associations had long been sidelined in favour of the West Malaysia-based MEF. 'For over a decade, we've asked for real Sabah representation. Why is the Human Resource Ministry (Kesuma) afraid of letting us choose our own voice?' he asked. He noted Sabah has nearly two million workers but no dedicated state HR Ministry, despite having the highest unemployment and lowest skilled labour rates in Malaysia. Junz questioned the legitimacy of the newly-formed Sabah Labour Advisory Council being co-chaired by both State and Federal representatives. 'If Kesuma is still steering, how is this a Sabah voice?' he asked. Calling for the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) to be respected, Wong said labour matters were federalised only with the condition of state consultation, a condition now often ignored. 'Sabah doesn't just want services. We want autonomy, equity and dignity. Until we are treated as equals, reforms will never feel complete,' he said. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia