
Pilar Viladas Dies at 70; Journalist Chronicled Trends in Design
Pilar Viladas, a veteran writer and editor whose human touch and encyclopedic knowledge of architecture, design and art history gave her work a quiet authority, died on March 15 at a hospital near her home in Southbury, Conn. She was 70.
The cause was amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or Lou Gehrig's disease, her sister Luisa Viladas said.
Starting at Interiors magazine, a trade publication, in 1979, Ms. Viladas's decades-long career traced the whipsaw design trends of the past half-century, including the arch whimsy of the Memphis movement in early 1980s Italy, the gilded excesses of late-1980s interiors, the minimalism of the '90s and the swaggering era of star architects at the turn of the last millennium.
Ms. Viladas was an editor at Progressive Architecture, HG and The New York Times Magazine, and a contributor to Town & Country and Architectural Digest, among many other magazines that documented, with anthropological zest, the totems of privilege and lives well lived. But Ms. Viladas wasn't interested in fads or fetishes, although she noted them with amusement. Her taste was for enduring expressions of good design.
Holly Brubach, a former style director of The Times Magazine, hired her in 1997, after Ms. Viladas had completed a Loeb Fellowship in advanced environmental studies at Harvard.
'It was the era of the starchitect, and all those sleek, slick, glitzy buildings,' Ms. Brubach said in an interview. But Ms. Viladas, she said, 'was more interested in the way people lived and the role design played in their lives — and I don't mean the aerodynamic shape of a chair.'
'It was how people arranged their homes and made a place for the things they loved,' Ms. Brubach added. 'She brought a human perspective to it that I really admired.'
At The Times Magazine, Ms. Viladas covered a who's who of design stars. She wrote about the modernist architect Deborah Berke and the eclectic domestic interiors of Calvin Tsao and Zack McKown. She visited the apartment, at the San Remo, on Central Park West, of the fashion designer Donna Karan and her husband, the sculptor Stephen Weiss. And she chronicled the work of the Pritzker Prize-winning Japanese architect Tadao Ando for fashion designers like Karl Lagerfeld and Giorgio Armani.
Her favorite house, Ms. Viladas often said, was the Houston showplace of John and Dominique de Menil, the Schlumberger oil family scions and art collectors — a low-slung glass and brick house designed by Philip Johnson, with interiors by the fashion designer Charles James. When she visited in 1999, a few years after Ms. de Menil's death, she marveled at the home's 'material splendor — suave modern architecture, jaw-dropping art and serious furniture — and its casual down-to-earth aura.'
Ms. Viladas also wrote about her favorite apartment: 'the impossibly chic London flat' belonging to Ingrid Bergman's character in 'Indiscreet,' the 1958 romantic comedy that co-starred Cary Grant as a man pretending to be married to escape commitment. Ms. Viladas loved the riot of color and texture in the apartment's elegantly proportioned living room (not to mention the film's tart dialogue).
'Because she was so educated, she could recognize intention in design and, for her, that was always good,' said the writer William Norwich, a former colleague at The Times Magazine. 'She was a discerner, and she was a gatekeeper, but she was not a snob.'
The photographer William Abranowicz, who shot the de Menil house for Ms. Viladas's 1999 piece (and for many more of her articles) said of her:
'She trusted you to walk into a space, to feel what she could articulate and to make an image. The other thing I loved about Pilar was sometimes when you did a story with a designer, they would try and steer the story. That's when her teeth came out — and she had some good teeth.'
Maria Pilar Viladas was born on May 6, 1954, in Greenwich, Conn., the eldest of four children of Angeline (Schimizzi) Viladas and Joseph M. Viladas, a marketing research consultant. She attended Greenwich High School and studied art history at Harvard University, graduating in 1977.
In addition to her sister Luisa, Ms. Viladas is survived by another sister, Mina Viladas. Their brother, Jordi, died in 2022.
Ms. Viladas was the author of and a contributor to many design and architecture books, including 'Los Angeles: A Certain Style' (1995) and 'Domesticities: At Home with The New York Times Magazine' (2005).
'I have an idealistic view of design,' she told Whisper Editions, the former art and design auction site, where she was a consultant, in 2014. 'Design is a much bigger idea than how a lamp works. It's a way of looking at the world.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
6 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
46 People Who Were So, So Wrong
This may come as a shock to some, but Mario's Italian. Also, Chinese and Japanese are not the same thing. person forget about the American Revolution? This person forgot other countries exist. How can anyone be this dumb? no. Oof. Do people really think Jesus wrote the Bible? Pretty sure you learn dolphins are mammals in primary school. In case you didn't know, thermodynamics is a branch of physics. The '90s: famously, a time when race-related issues and discussion didn't exist. I'm no Christian, but isn't that one of the most famous parts of the Bible? I think we've failed our children. This person probably should've looked up "cisgender." Sorry to include one from lockdown times, but that time brought out the WILDEST anti-vax rhetoric. Where did this person even learn this??? This parent was really, REALLY wrong about what the slang "salty" means, and should probably get their mind out of the gutter. This parent was also wrong in so many ways. I hope the person who sat down and typed, "it's not like there's a place called Spania full of Spanish *people*" was trolling. You gotta love when someone is so swiftly and completely proven wrong. This person thought Mount Everest was in South Dakota. This person might want to open a dictionary. Along with this person. This person got a little confused about flags. This person was reallyyyyy wrong about what a hamburger was. This person thought eggs were dairy. In case you didn't know..."reed" is not the past tense of "read." Neither is "red." What school did this person go to??? Maybe leave scientific terms to scientists and doctors if you have absolutely no idea what they mean. The person who sent this article may go down in history as one of the "most wrong people ever." This person forgot about other languages. This person needs to take a geography class. Same with this person. Aaaand this person. I don't think this person has ever had a sex ed lesson in their life. Neither has this person. *Ben Wyatt voice* I don't even have time to explain how wrong you are. Actually, it's gonna bug me if I don't... These people were both wrong. The second person here really wanted to look smart, but ended up being dead wrong. ...Yeah, that's not right, bud. Oof. This person was real confused about compasses and directions. This person thought rubber trees were fake trees made of rubber. This person was also have a little trouble with math. This person thought ducks aren't birds. This person thought plants don't produce oxygen. This person made a really head-scratching statement. And finally, this person seemed to think Tesla was founded by Nikola Tesla himself.


Newsweek
8 hours ago
- Newsweek
Pictures Show Chinese Jet Buzzing US Ally From Aircraft Carrier
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A patrol aircraft dispatched by Japan—a treaty ally of the United States—was intercepted by fighter jets launched from a Chinese aircraft carrier operating in the wider western Pacific. Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense and Foreign Ministries via email for comment. Why It Matters China, which has the world's largest navy by hull count—deployed both of its two aircraft carriers in active service beyond the First Island Chain on Saturday. The island defense line, comprising Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines, is in place to keep China's forces in check. In April, Beijing's state media released undated footage showing a Chinese J-15 flying close to a U.S. F/A-18 carrier-based fighter over an undisclosed maritime location. Aerial intercepts—if conducted in an unsafe or unprofessional manner—can lead to midair collisions, resulting in the loss of aircraft and aircrew. In 2001, a U.S. intelligence plane and a Chinese fighter jet collided near China, killing a Chinese pilot. What To Know On Wednesday, the Japanese Defense Ministry reported an "unusual approach" by Chinese military aircraft toward the Maritime Self-Defense Force, stating that a P-3C patrol aircraft had two encounters with J-15 fighter jets—launched from the aircraft carrier CNS Shandong—over the weekend while flying in international airspace over the Pacific Ocean. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet flies alongside a Japanese P-3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8, 2025. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet flies alongside a Japanese P-3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8, 2025. Japanese Defense Ministry In the first incident, which occurred between 10:30 a.m. and 11 a.m. local time on Saturday, Chinese fighter jets were spotted flying as close as 45 meters (147 feet) from the Japanese aircraft at the same altitude, which was conducting an unspecified surveillance mission. The following day, between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m. local time, Chinese fighter jets launched from the Shandong intercepted the Japanese aircraft for a second time, passing in front of it at a much greater distance—900 meters (2,952 feet)—while maintaining the same altitude. One of the photos taken from the Japanese aircraft shows a Chinese fighter jet flying with a missile visible beneath its wing. Another photo shows a jet flying alongside the Japanese plane. The horizontal distance between them in the photos remains unknown. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet flies near a Japanese P-3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8, 2025. A Chinese J-15 fighter jet flies near a Japanese P-3C patrol aircraft over the Pacific Ocean on June 8, 2025. Japanese Defense Ministry While there was no damage to the Japanese aircraft and no injuries were reported among its crew in either incident, Tokyo's Defense Ministry expressed serious concerns, stating that the Chinese fighter jets' "abnormal" aerial maneuvers could lead to an accidental collision. According to an earlier press release from the Japanese Defense Ministry, the Shandong was tracked operating with four Chinese naval vessels in the Philippine Sea on Saturday—341 miles southeast of Japan's southwestern island of Miyako—during an eastward voyage. The press release also revealed that the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force had deployed a P-3C patrol aircraft to monitor and gather intelligence on the Chinese vessels. Two days later, the Shandong conducted flight operations involving its fighter jets and helicopters. What People Are Saying Senior Captain Wang Xuemeng, spokesperson for the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy, said in a statement on Tuesday: "This [dual aircraft carrier deployment] is a routine arrangement included in the annual training plan, aiming to improve the Chinese PLA Navy's ability to fulfill missions. The training complies with relevant international law and practice, and is not targeted at specific countries or entity." Lin Jian, spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said at a press conference on Tuesday: "Let me reiterate that Chinese naval vessels' activities in those waters are fully consistent with international law and international practices. Our national defense policy is defensive in nature. We hope Japan will view those activities objectively and rationally." What Happens Next Such close aerial encounters between Japanese and Chinese military aircraft are likely to continue as China's two aircraft carriers operate in waters near Japan's more remote islands.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
How a WWII submariner took the fight directly to the Japanese
By the middle of 1944, United States Navy submarines had weathered hard times of unreliable torpedoes and a necessary learning process to matured weapons of war, aided by onboard radar. At the same time, their Japanese opponents had yet to fully address the threat that these underwater marauders posed to the ships that brought oil and other foreign resources from their far-flung empire. So fully developed were the American subs that Adm. Chester W. Nimitz, commander in chief of naval forces, Pacific (CINCPAC), had started the year off by adding destroyers to his priority lists, so as to accelerate the elimination of America's principal enemies. Like their German counterparts, the Americans were also operating in wolf packs of two or more, while the Japanese were modifying and arming numerous varieties of other ships, such as minesweepers, to make up their sub-hunter losses. A dramatic example of the situation in 1944 began in mid-June, when three boats from Submarine Attack Group 9, named 'Parks' Pirates' for their commander, Cmdr. Lewis Smith Parks, departed Pearl Harbor to prowl the waters from Formosa to Luzon. They were led by Cmdr. Lawson P. 'Red' Ramage on Parche, followed by Steelhead and Hammerhead. The Massachusetts native graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy as an ensign in July 1931, with his first attempt to get a submarine assignment initially blocked due to an eye injury. His second attempt, in which he memorized the eye chart, succeeded in getting him aboard S-29 in January 1936. He was a radio and sound officer at Pearl Harbor in March 1941, and he was there when Japanese carrier planes raided it on Dec. 7. On June 6, 1944, Parks' Pirates embarked on their first patrol, with modest initial results for Hammerhead: a sampan destroyed on June 9, followed by a coastal oil carrier damaged. On July 29, Hammerhead had to curtail its sweep when it came under air attack, returning for repairs at Fremantle, Australia, on Aug. 17. At 10:30 a.m. on July 30, Steelhead was off Formosa when it sighted smoke, which, upon investigation, revealed an enemy convoy escorted by aircraft. Unable to attack until nightfall, Steelhead maintained contact until 8:15 p.m., when it shot off a message summoning Parche, relaying the enemy's course and speed. Ramage responded at full speed, joining Steelhead at midnight to make surface attacks. The latter commenced hostilities at 3:32 a.m. with a bow spread of six torpedoes that struck a freighter, then a tanker. Steelhead then turned to launch four stern 'fish,' while two flares signaled the Japanese alarm. Ramage had been trying to set up a flank attack at about 3 a.m. when he encountered an escort vessel. Enemy flares revealed three such escorts darting about, two of which were between Parche and the convoy, and one bearing down on the sub. Ramage put his boat into a circular maneuver that brought it astern of the escort, confusing the enemy. 'Parche was now between the escorts and the convoy,' Ramage reported afterward, 'but while this maneuver was going on, the entire [enemy] convoy had reversed its field and now was headed directly at Parche.' Ramage aimed for an oncoming medium freighter, but he overestimated the range and suddenly found himself a mere 450 yards from his intended target. A hard right turn avoided disaster by only 200 yards. Ramage then shot off two torpedoes. His freighter target dodged them, but in so doing it blocked the advance of an escort, preventing it from attacking the sub while allowing it to get off two bow shots, one of which hit the freighter. Five minutes later, Ramage brought Parche into position to attack two tankers. All four of his bow torpedoes struck home on the first tanker, which sank immediately. The second tanker, hit twice, slowed but kept on moving. At this point, Parche was in the middle of a milling mass of cargo ships and escorts, all ships involved behaving more like patrol torpedo boats in their half-blind attempts to ram their assailant. As for Ramage, placing his boat in the center of it all, he too alternated his direction and launched torpedoes as the opportunity offered, while his torpedo crew rushed new ones into place. At 4:43 a.m., Ramage was preparing to dodge two escorts when he saw a small merchantman bearing down on him from the starboard bow, determined to ram. Ordering full right rudder, he avoided collision by just 50 feet, only to find two escorts at either hand and a passenger cargo vessel coming on to ram. Unable to dodge this one, Ramage went for broke and fired three torpedoes in a down-the-throat shot. His first fish missed, but the other two hit, stopping the ship in its tracks. Ramage turned hard left, then fired a stern shot that struck the cargo ship amidships. At 4:42 a.m., it sank. After a look around, Ramage reported: 'There were still several small craft and escorts around, but no worthwhile targets that we could see. I decided to put some distance between us and this hornet's nest.' While Parche was fighting its way into a fiery hell and back, Whelchel and Steelhead were also busy on the sidelines — sending four torpedoes at a troop carrier at 4:49 a.m. and another four at a freighter. Both subs subsequently disengaged, having suffered neither damage nor casualties in the 46-minute melee. A postwar assessment credited Steelhead with the 7,169-ton freighter Dakar Maru and the 8,195-ton transport Fuso Maru. Both subs were jointly credited with the 8,990-ton transport Yoshino Maru. Parche emerged from its solo torpedo duel with credit for the 10,238-ton tanker Koei Maru and 4,471-ton passenger-cargo ship Manko Maru. Both submarine officers were decorated for their outstanding performance that night. Steelhead's commander, David Whelchel, was awarded the Silver Star, while Ramage received the Medal of Honor from President Franklin D. Roosevelt on Jan. 10, 1945 — not so much for the tonnage his sub had destroyed, considerable though it had been, as for the wild way he had achieved it. Asked what drove him throughout the encounter, he simply said, 'I got mad.' Ramage continued to rise up the Navy ranks, reaching the command of Military Sea Transport in Washington and retiring in 1969 as a vice admiral. He died in Bethesda, Maryland, on April 15, 1990, and was buried in Arlington National Cemetery.