logo
Personalized perfume by text? I tried it with this scent stylist

Personalized perfume by text? I tried it with this scent stylist

There's a reason perfume commercials aren't close-up images of the ingredients noted in a specific fragrance. Instead, they're sweeping landscapes, a beautiful man on a galloping horse, a wistful goodbye between two lovers with no backstory. That's because scent isn't simply the notes — say vanilla, sandalwood, tuberose; it's about the feeling they evoke. It's more effective to produce a visceral reaction than provide a technical definition. It makes sense, as scent is processed by the limbic system, the part of the brain that handles emotion and memory. So when Anna Dorn texts to ask me what I want to smell like, she provides some thought-starters that sound like treatments for big-budget fragrance ads: 'like a library in ancient Egypt,' or 'like Persephone rising from the ashes.'
Dorn is a prolific author of three novels and a memoir, 'Bad Lawyer,' where she divulges secrets from her past life as a reluctant lawyer trying to meet her family's expectations. She also moonlights as a perfume stylist, offering scent fittings for clients performed over text message. It's not an established side hustle, but if there was ever a city where it could thrive, it would be Los Angeles.
I've hired Dorn to help me find a new scent, something more adventurous than my current Sephora-grade options. My hope is that like with a romantic match, I'll find something that ticks the boxes, but ultimately has an unspoken variable I'm drawn to. It's a task well worth her $150 fee. The service promises eight tiny vials of custom-selected scents shipped directly to me. The product is included in Dorn's fee, which means she pockets around $70 per session, but to her, it's a labor of love she is happy to spend hours on. My inquiry comes at the perfect time to offer a distraction from working on her forthcoming novel 'American Spirits,' out next April with Simon & Schuster.
As a writer, I'm disappointed I don't have a well-crafted scene to give Dorn as an example of how I want to smell. But Dorn is adaptable; many of her clients are amateur perfume wearers like me. She peels back and asks what fragrances I already own and love. I provide a list: Glossier You, Versace Crystal Noir, Maison Margiela Jazz Club. Scents I've loved for years but I know are just the tip of the iceberg. She asks about notes I'm interested in. I tell her I like the tobacco, masculine energy of Jazz Club. 'I used to think I didn't like floral, but I realized I do when paired with spicier, woodsier notes,' I say. She is quick to reply, explaining she once thought she was too tough for florals. She already has some ideas, which she categorizes as 'baddie florals.'
Dorn's knowledge and love of fragrance comes through in her work, notably in her most recent novel, 'Perfume & Pain.' 'In the beginning, the novel had nothing to do with perfume, I just liked the title — which I jacked from a 1950s out-of-print lesbian pulp novel,' she says, 'but then I started collecting all this niche perfume knowledge and I knew I had to put it into the book. Once the book came out, I had all these new 'fraghead' followers, some of whom have become friends and my perfume obsession just continued.'
Despite her obsession, her Los Feliz apartment isn't a storage unit of scents. When it comes to full-size bottles, Dorn says she only keeps about five at a time, taking to eBay to sell lightly used bottles to make room for new ones. She estimates her collection of decants — the insider term for 2-milliliter bottle samples, which she orders from the website DecantPlanet for between $4 and $12 — is in the hundreds.
I'm intrigued by Dorn's suggestion of 'baddie florals,' but I want to make sure I don't end up with a grab bag of grandma scents. (Think the infamous, but simply too strong for me, Chanel Number 5.) Dorn immediately clocks my concern and deploys more jargon. 'Contemp [contemporary] andro [androgynous] florals, got it,' she replies. I try my best to reply with moody adjectives instead of notes. I hope for something sexy, mysterious and fresh from nature. Something that seems foreign, not simply tropical, but dare I use it in this context, exotic.
'How do you feel about a heady, narcotic, floral? Is that too femme?' Dorn asks me. It sounds aligned with the adjectives I gave, but I'm unsure what narcotic means in this context. 'In the Victorian era they allegedly didn't let virgin women smell tuberose because they thought it would make them spontaneously orgasm,' Dorn clarifies. It feels like a challenge. I tell her I'm interested in tuberose.
Dorn has an idea and texts back quickly to ask if I am open to mainstream designers. In order to maximize her expertise over, say, a Sephora employee, I decide against it. I'm already worried my favorite scent, Jazz Club, which sells at mainstream mall retainers, has become too well known. 'I don't want to smell like everyone else,' I confess. Everyone probably says that.
Dorn's passion project is perfectly timed. Scent is taking center stage in beauty circles — the same way skincare was once the if-you-know-you-know conversation bubbling under the surface of a makeup tutorial, fragrance is where professional beauty critics and the everyday obsessed are having the most nuanced conversations. Dorn thinks the growing appreciation for niche fragrances was born during the pandemic, when she advanced from a lifelong lover of body sprays and soap scents to a reader and commenter on Fragrantica, a fragrance website with its own Reddit-like forums. Post-pandemic, she began frequenting L.A. shops Scent Room, Scent Bar, Le Pink & Co and Beverly Hills Perfumery, befriending sales associates and 'nerding out together.'
She's not the only writer who is applying her love of storytelling and world-building to fragrance fandom. Los Angeles-based Arabelle Sicardi, writer of the newsletter 'You've Got Lipstick on Your Chin,' offers a virtual nose-training course. Sicardi ships participants a box of 40 objects and leads discussions on the properties of each, establishing the 'building blocks' of a scent. If texting Dorn descriptions of scents seemed too abstract for me, a podcast seems like an even more difficult medium to describe scent. Yet New York City-based writers Tynan Buck and Sable Yong have hosted the popular podcast 'Smell Ya Later' for five years.
There's clearly a connection between prose lovers and nuanced noses, and I want to join the club. I think of the phrases Dorn deployed in our text messages and instead of giggling, I'm impressed. I know the pain of finding the right adjective for a situation. I find that I'm less interested in Dorn's mastery of the scents themselves than in the way she conjures them with words and decides how to pair them with real-life situations. My journey has become less about finding a singular scent than developing the confidence to articulate the right scent for the right occasion, celebrating the multitudes we contain rather than putting them all under one aromatic umbrella.
Less than a week after my half-hour text conversation with Dorn, a small package arrives at my door with decants of her eight selections. Each bottle holds about 20 sprays. DecantPlanet threw in three free vials and a signed, handwritten note on the receipt, a touch that further convinces me of the thoughtfulness of scent lovers. Within hours of receiving my package, an email appears from Dorn outlining her selections by name with notes and reference points to my existing collection, as well as a backstory of each brand.
The first scent I try is Moonmilk by Stora Skuggan. I'm intrigued by Dorn's use of 'creamy' to describe its sandalwood. At first, I worry I've over-applied, but as I finish getting ready — arguably my favorite part of any night — the scent settles into an earthy depth I can't place without Dorn's cliff notes but know I like. It's the most abstract of the bunch, inspired by 'liquid deposits in limestone caves,' something I've never encountered and likely never will. True to her narcotic floral promise and tuberose history lesson, Dorn includes Moon Bloom by Hiram Green from the Netherlands. There is no spontaneous orgasm, but it smells like the marriage of the musky scents and warm and spicy florals (called 'oriental florals' by the industry) in my entry-level collection. I like to wear it during the day.
I put my new vials in a little jar on my vanity. They're still foreign to me, so I pull up Dorn's email to remind myself which has 'creamy woods' or 'subtle gin.' Where I once thought having an expected, signature scent was a sign of adulthood and knowing yourself, I see why Dorn opts for hundreds of decants instead of a dozen chic bottles displayed. I'm having a lot more fun with my curated choose-your-own-adventure, building my arsenal of fantasies that are one spritz away.
Lina Abascal is a writer and filmmaker born and raised in Los Angeles. She is the author of 'Never Be Alone Again: How Bloghouse United the Internet and the dancefloor' and director of the award-winning short documentary 'Stud Country.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to Watch ‘RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars' Season 10 Online
How to Watch ‘RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars' Season 10 Online

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How to Watch ‘RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars' Season 10 Online

All products and services featured are independently chosen by editors. However, Billboard may receive a commission on orders placed through its retail links, and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes. Who will take the crown? RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars tenth season premieres on Paramount+ on Friday (May 9). More from Billboard Every Lip Sync From 'RuPaul's Drag Race' Season 16, Ranked You Have to See Light Wire, the Brazilian LED Dance Team That Earned Simon's Golden Buzzer on 'America's Got Talent' Premiere 'America's Got Talent': How to Watch Season 20 Premiere For season 10, the show is switching up the usual formula. This season will not only feature more All Stars than any other season – 18 to be exact – it will also debut an all-new bracket-style competition. This time around, queens will be divided into three groups of six and will compete within their brackets over the course of three episodes. When the group period ends, the three queens with the most points will move on to the semifinals round where they will continue to compete against each other to make it into the Drag Race Hall of Fame and win the $200,000 cash prize. Alongside the increased amount of queens, this season will also features many surprised guests judges, including Wicked co-stars Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo, Chappell Roan, and Sarah Michelle Gellar. Read on to find out how to watch the new season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars for free. Season 10 of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will premiere with two all-new episodes on Friday, May 9. The show will stream exclusively on Paramount+. This season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will feature the largest group of queens in the show's history, including: Acid Betty (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 8) Aja (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 9, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 3) Alyssa Hunter (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Bosco (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Cynthia Lee Fontaine (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 8, RuPaul's Drag Race Season 9) Daya Betty (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) DeJa Skye (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Denali (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) Ginger Minj (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 7, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 2, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 6) Irene the Alien (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 15) Jorgeous (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14, RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Season 9) Kerri Colby (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 14) Lydia B. Kollins (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 17) Mistress Isabelle Brooks (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 15) Nicole Paige Brooks (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 2) Olivia Lux (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) Phoenix (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 3) Tina Burner (RuPaul's Drag Race Season 13) A new season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars will be available exclusively on Paramount+ starting on Friday, May 9. If you're not already subscribed, join today and receive a free trial for the first week to stream Drag Race All Stars and other programs on the platform, including RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars: Untucked. The streaming service costs $7.99/month for the ad-supported, Essential plan. Paramount+ with Showtime usually costs $12.99/month. Get: paramount+ free trial Here What else is streaming on Paramount? Subscribers can enjoy tens of thousands of episodes of hit shows and must-watch movies, including Knuckles, The Good Fight, Mayor of Kingstown, Star Trek: Discovery, Star Trek: Picard, Why Women Kill, and Before I Forget, in addition to NFL on CBS, local CBS stations (with Paramount+ Premium) and 24-hour news with CBSN. Want more ways to stream? Paramount+ is also on Prime Video! You can stream episodes from the current season and earlier seasons of Drag Race All Stars with a free trial from Paramount+ on Prime Video. Get: paramount+ on prime video here And if you're looking for Drag Race merch to celebrate the current season, check out the adorable RuPaul Little People Collector's set, The Official Trixie and Katya Coloring Book and RuPaul's Drag Race Monopoly. $23.95 Buy Now On Amazon $12.69 $18.00 30% off Buy Now On Amazon $34.97 Buy Now on walmart Watch the trailer for the new season of Ru-Paul's Drag Race All-Stars below.

Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview
Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview

Bill Belichick is one of the greatest football coaches of all time. His P.R. instincts leave much to be desired. Beyond entrusting his personal brand to his 24-year-old girlfriend, Jordon Hudson, Belichick has a bad habit of not letting sleeping dogs lie and/or dead horses go unbeaten. Case in point, now reports that Belichick's book publicist assured Belichick that the disastrous CBS interview would be only about Belichick's book. Advertisement The report emerged today, more than a month after the CBS interview aired. And it has reanimated a dormant issue. The article cites an April 9 email from Simon & Schuster's senior director of publicity David Kass to Belichick. Wrote Kass: "I can assure you that the conversation [will be] about the book." Kass also reportedly told Belichick the CBS interview would be a "puff piece . . . designed to make everyone look good and sell books." (Somewhat surprisingly, the new report doesn't blame Kass for suggesting that Belichick wear an old football jersey with a giant hole in the neck to the CBS interview.) Per Belichick was "furious" when the CBS interview strayed beyond book topics. Then there's this: "Sources say Belichick had actually shot down several interview opportunities Kass had put in front of him over concerns the media outlets would use his book promotion as a way to pry into subjects not related to the actual book." Advertisement It's a fascinating development, for several reasons. First, the story is smeared with Belichick's (or Hudson's) fingerprints. Which means that one or both decided to dredge up a dead story, weeks after the fact. Which also means that one or both believed the new story would cause people to say, "Well, now we understand why she weirdly refused to let him answer the basic question of how they met." Second, one or both decided to throw Kass under the bus, both directly and by potentially instigating a stray, conspiracy theory-inducing remark that Kass "once helped Jeff Benedict's Robert Kraft-themed book, The Dynasty, reach the New York Times' bestseller list." Kass is painted as the villain in this, the one who lied to Belichick about what the CBS interview was going to be. Third, Belichick did other interviews in which questions unrelated to the book were asked — after the CBS sit-down. Michael Strahan asked a few personal questions on Good Morning America. Ryan Clark asked questions about Hudson on The Pivot Podcast. (Then again, those questions apparently were scripted to help Belichick undo the CBS-related P.R. damage.) Advertisement Fourth, Belichick and/or Hudson apparently have decided to try to get on their side by spoon-feeding information to the outlet. Given the extent to which had been hammering all things Belichick and Hudson, a subtle quid pro quo that gets to play nice in exchange for current and future information would be a smart move by Belichick. Make no mistake about it. The issue is back on the front burner because Belichick and/or Hudson decided it would be a smart move to point a finger at Kass, weeks after the fact. And it's just the latest time Belichick and/or Hudson have blamed others for their own blunders. He/she/they have blamed CBS for editing the interview to create a "false narrative." He/she/they have blamed North Carolina for not having a sufficient P.R. function in place when he arrived. He/she/they now blame Kass for failing to (wait for it) "do his job" properly. It's always someone else's fault. It's never their fault. And they presumably think people will buy the idea that they're the victims of widespread incompetence and malfeasance.

Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview
Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview

NBC Sports

timea day ago

  • NBC Sports

Bill Belichick keeps relitigating his disastrous CBS interview

Bill Belichick is one of the greatest football coaches of all time. His P.R. instincts leave much to be desired. Beyond entrusting his personal brand to his 24-year-old girlfriend, Jordon Hudson, Belichick has a bad habit of not letting sleeping dogs lie and/or dead horses go unbeaten. Case in point, now reports that Belichick's book publicist assured Belichick that the disastrous CBS interview would be only about Belichick's book. The report emerged today, more than a month after the CBS interview aired. And it has reanimated a dormant issue. The article cites an April 9 email from Simon & Schuster's senior director of publicity David Kass to Belichick. Wrote Kass: 'I can assure you that the conversation [will be] about the book.' Kass also reportedly told Belichick the CBS interview would be a 'puff piece . . . designed to make everyone look good and sell books.' (Somewhat surprisingly, the new report doesn't blame Kass for suggesting that Belichick wear an old football jersey with a giant hole in the neck to the CBS interview.) Per Belichick was 'furious' when the CBS interview strayed beyond book topics. Then there's this: 'Sources say Belichick had actually shot down several interview opportunities Kass had put in front of him over concerns the media outlets would use his book promotion as a way to pry into subjects not related to the actual book.' It's a fascinating development, for several reasons. First, the story is smeared with Belichick's (or Hudson's) fingerprints. Which means that one or both decided to dredge up a dead story, weeks after the fact. Which also means that one or both believed the new story would cause people to say, 'Well, now we understand why she weirdly refused to let him answer the basic question of how they met.' Second, one or both decided to throw Kass under the bus, both directly and by potentially instigating a stray, conspiracy theory-inducing remark that Kass 'once helped Jeff Benedict's Robert Kraft-themed book, The Dynasty, reach the New York Times' bestseller list.' Kass is painted as the villain in this, the one who lied to Belichick about what the CBS interview was going to be. Third, Belichick did other interviews in which questions unrelated to the book were asked — after the CBS sit-down. Michael Strahan asked a few personal questions on Good Morning America. Ryan Clark asked questions about Hudson on The Pivot Podcast. (Then again, those questions apparently were scripted to help Belichick undo the CBS-related P.R. damage.) Fourth, Belichick and/or Hudson apparently have decided to try to get on their side by spoon-feeding information to the outlet. Given the extent to which had been hammering all things Belichick and Hudson, a subtle quid pro quo that gets to play nice in exchange for current and future information would be a smart move by Belichick. Make no mistake about it. The issue is back on the front burner because Belichick and/or Hudson decided it would be a smart move to point a finger at Kass, weeks after the fact. And it's just the latest time Belichick and/or Hudson have blamed others for their own blunders. He/she/they have blamed CBS for editing the interview to create a 'false narrative.' He/she/they have blamed North Carolina for not having a sufficient P.R. function in place when he arrived. He/she/they now blame Kass for failing to (wait for it) 'do his job' properly. It's always someone else's fault. It's never their fault. And they presumably think people will buy the idea that they're the victims of widespread incompetence and malfeasance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store