How free driving tests could help motorists pass sooner
Free driving tests could be introduced to help learner drivers secure their licences sooner, MPs have heard, under a proposal that would see higher fees imposed on those who fail.
The suggestion comes amid a growing backlog for test slots, which is reportedly forcing people to put their lives on hold.
Labour MP Alex Mayer, who disclosed she failed her own driving test "about five times", told the Commons that constituents are facing waits of up to nine months for a test slot, a situation she described as "utterly ridiculous".
Ms Mayer highlighted that many learners are booking tests regardless of their readiness, as it is "cheaper sometimes to book that driving test time than it is to book a couple of lessons – and that cannot be right".
The MP for Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard told MPs: 'How about we do put up the fee, but we give everybody one free go at it?
'So basically, if you pass your driving test, you get a refund, so that would encourage everybody to only go for it when they really thought that they were going to pass it.
'I think that we could probably make it cost-neutral, and it would free up slots because – as I said – only those people who thought that they were definitely ready would go for it, then offset it by putting up the charges for everyone who fails again and again.
'(It) probably wouldn't have done me any good – I failed my driving test about five times.'
MPs laughed as she continued: 'I eventually managed it.'
Britain's driving test backlog reached a new high last month. Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) figures state 631,472 future practical driving tests booked as of the end of May.
The figure stood at 527,368 a year ago.
Responding, Commons Transport Committee chairwoman Ruth Cadbury described Ms Mayer's idea as an 'innovative suggestion'.
Ms Cadbury, the Labour MP for Brentford and Isleworth, said it 'should be noted' by transport minister Mike Kane, who was in the chamber.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 minutes ago
- The Sun
M6 closed with drivers facing huge rush hour delays & warned ‘avoid the area'
THE M6 has been closed by police over a "very serious incident" with drivers facing lengthy delays. The major motorway is closed for a "police-led incident" between Junction 6 (Gravelly Hill/Aston) and Junction 8 (M5). A spokesman for West Midlands Police said: "We are at the scene of a very serious incident on the M6 and the motorway is currently closed Northbound between Junction 7 and Junction 8. "It is closed Northbound between Junction 7 at Great Barr Interchange and Junction 8 at the M5. "Road closures are expected to be in place for some time, and drivers are advised to find alternative routes." A spokesman for Highways England added: "The M6 in the West Midlands is closed northbound between J6 (Gravelly Hill/Aston) and J8 (M5) due to a Police led Incident. "Emergency Services including West Midlands Police are on scene. "National Highways Traffic Officers are in attendance assisting with traffic management. "Police investigation work is in its final stages. Once complete carriageway clearance will take place and then the road can be reopen." Full diversion for M6 closure Road users for the M6 north are advised to first follow the hollow square diversion symbol on road signs: At M6 Junction 6 take the exit to A38(M), Aston Expressway. Continue along A38(M) southwards and leave at Dartmouth Circus. Take the exit to A4540 westbound, Newtown Middleway. At the junction with A34, Newtown Row, take the exit to A34 northbound. Continue along A34 northbound through the M6 Junction 7. From here follow the solid diamond diversion symbol on road signs: Continue along A34 to its junction with A4148, Broadway North. Take the exit to Broadway North and continue to its junction with A454. Take the exit to A454 westbound, Wolverhampton Road and continue to M6 junction 10 and take the 3rd exit at the roundabout to rejoin the M6 northbound. Road users heading on the M5 south are advised to first follow the solid triangle diversion symbol on road signs: At M6 Junction 6 take the exit to A38(M), Aston Expressway. Continue along A38(M) southwards and leave at Dartmouth Circus. Take the exit to A4540 westbound, Newtown Middleway. At the junction with A34, Newtown Row, take the exit to A34 northbound. Continue along A34 northbound to the signalised junction with the A4041 and turn left onto the A4041. From here follow the solid triangle diversion symbol on road signs: From here follow the solid triangle diversion symbol on road signs: Continue on A4041, westbound, to A4041/A4031 junction. At A4041/A4031 junction, turn left, onto A4031, southbound. Continue on A4031, southbound, to A4031/A41 roundabout. At A4031/A41 roundabout, turn left (1st exit) onto A41, eastbound. Continue on A41, eastbound to M5 junction 1. At M5 junction 1 take 4th exit, onto M5, southbound. 1
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Nigel Farage describes Reform's policies as ‘aspirations'
Nigel Farage described Reform UK's policies as 'aspirations' in a Channel 4 documentary on Wednesday night. Fraser Nelson, the former editor of The Spectator magazine, asked whether the Reform leader could end up in Downing Street after the next election amid a surge in support for the party, which has opened up a significant poll lead over Labour in recent months. The Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates Reform's policies could cost up to £80 billion a year. In recent weeks, Mr Farage has unveiled a string of spending commitments including abolishing the two-child benefit cap and reopening blast furnaces at steelworks in an attempt to win over voters in traditional Labour areas. The cost of Reform's policies has led Sir Keir Starmer to compare the plans to Liz Truss's ill-fated mini-budget in an attempt to win back voters from the party. Mr Farage told the Dispatches programme: 'Most of what I'm giving at the moment is direction of travel…We're going to be careful because too many fixed promises have been made and not delivered.' When asked about his party's immigration pledges, he said: 'All of politics is an aspiration if you think about it… every manifesto, every contract is actually an aspiration because you can never tell - a war could break out all sort of things could happen'. 'I understand that between now and the next election there'll be lots of scrutiny about numbers, about what we say, about what do, but let's make it clear that in terms of direction of travel. We are the party of working people. We want to reward people who are in work. Mr Nelson asked: 'But you accept that right now the figures don't add up, because you say it's not time to make them add up by the next election?' The Reform leader replied: 'Rachel Reeves's numbers don't add up! Now there is a massive debate and argument around the cost of net-zero, I get that. We'll have lots of fights. I need you to do that for me. Well, it could be 30, 40 billion.' Mr Farage's comments open the door to some of his party's manifesto pledges being watered down or abandoned. It comes after Richard Tice, the party's deputy leader, backed away from Reform's pledge to enact £90 billion of tax cuts in 100 days in an interview with The Telegraph earlier this month. Mr Farage said his party must run the councils it won at the local elections well if it is to have a good chance of winning power nationally. He said: 'How we perform will make a material difference to how we're viewed running up to the next general election. Of that I have no doubt.' Mr Farage also vowed to put 'family, community and country' at the heart of everything Reform do if elected. He rejected claims his party is divisive and denied he had ever used 'race baiting' as a tactic. He said: 'I've never done that. I promise you, you go through 25 years of speeches and you won't find it. 'I think if you look at what we say, if you look at [what] we do, which is more important than what you say, in terms of how I operate, who I work with, who rises to the top and takes positions in the party, you'll see we're a very meritocratic organisation… I've been clear on this for 25 years. 'All the political iterations that I've run, the campaigns that I have been part of, I've never wanted anything to do with extremist politics in any way. Ever, ever, ever.'
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
'I don't want to live on benefits, I want to work'
"I don't want to live off benefits all my life."Teenager Kailee Kember-Brown, a wheelchair user, says she has so far applied for more than 40 jobs without from Dover, in Kent, is currently entitled to a top-up to her Universal Credit income because of her means the 19-year-old is not required to look for a job, but she wants one to avoid having to stay at home getting bored. Most of her friends are also in her financial situation could soon be changing too, under government plans to cut the Universal Credit health top-up for under-22s with long-term illnesses or disabilities, currently worth £423-a-month to people like Kailee, as part of their wide-ranging welfare reform proposals.A government consultation on the proposed cut to the top-up for under-22s is due to end on wider reforms, many of which are set out in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, have prompted a rebellion from over 120 Labour MPs, who have signed an amendment calling for the proposals to be Minister Keir Starmer said on Wednesday that he planned to press ahead with the plans despite the criticism, adding that his party was "pretty united" on the need for the government says it will save £5bn a year by 2030 through the cuts to disability and sickness-related benefits also say they want the changes to help those who are "trapped" in the benefits system to find Kailee, whose functional neurological disorder means she feels physically weak and struggles to walk, says she has only heard back from a quarter of the job applications she has sent out. Her disability means she requires certain adjustments from employers, such as accessible facilities and flexible hours to allow her to attend physiotherapy and doctor's appointments.A lot of the jobs she has applied for are with companies listed in the government's Disability Confident scheme, which encourages employers to hire and retain disabled staff, and Kailee says it's particularly "disheartening" when she fails to hear back from them. "When you apply for it and you're like, 'Oh my God, I tick all the boxes,' and then they never get back to you or even look at your CV, it's kind of like, well, what am I meant to do now?"Jane Hatton, who runs a jobs platform for disabled job seekers and only employs disabled staff, says many employers harbour misconceptions that disabled employees won't have the necessary skills for the job or might take more sick days than their non-disabled colleagues."As an employer, if you interview two candidates of equal value in every other respect - one of them is non-disabled and one might need adjustments - [you might be] tempted to go with a non-disabled person," she saysBut those stereotypes are not borne out of reality, she says, adding that prospective employers should support all their candidates with whatever adjustments they may need."The barriers that people face tend to be inaccessible recruitment processes," she says."What we say to employers is that it's about making adjustments so that people can flourish."She also says government schemes like Access to Work (AtW) have not been working effectively enough to get jobs for the disabled people it's designed to have previously acknowledged the problems with AtW and say they will look at how it can be updated. It's one of a long list of issues the government hopes to fix in order to get more disabled people into work, while reducing the benefits Minister Sir Stephen Timms told the BBC he acknowledged that the jobs market was tough for disabled people, adding that the government was "making the changes that are needed to welcome disabled people into employment".One of the biggest concerns for disabled people and campaigners among the government's welfare reforms is the plan to change the eligibility criteria for the Personal Independence Payment (Pip).The benefit is designed to pay for the additional living costs many disabled people face, from travel and transport to home adaptations and proposed changes to Pip is one of the reasons given by many of the Labour backbenchers who have decided to oppose the government's Timms said Pip does need reform, adding that the rising cost of delivering the benefit has been "unsustainable", and that if the government "didn't act then it would end in tears". "I want to make sure that Pip is going to be there in full, uprated properly every year, for those with severe impairments who are very dependent on it," he said.
