Women still access abortion in Texas despite stict laws that prohibit them, per SXSW panel
AUSTIN (KXAN) – State and national abortion rights leaders took to a South By Southwest panel Sunday afternoon to discuss ways women continue to access abortions in Texas despite the state having some of the strictest laws in the country.
Among the women on the panel was former Texas State Senator Wendy Davis, now a senior adviser to Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, who said pregnancy can be a dangerous condition when women do not have access to life-saving abortion care.
'We've seen that time and time again since the abortion bans have been in place in Texas,' she told KXAN. 'We know that sepsis rates have increased by 50% in our state and that our maternal mortality rates and our infant mortality rates are skyrocketing.'
Even though laws that prohibit nearly all abortions have been on the books in Texas since 2022, thousands of Texans are still able to terminate pregnancies each year.
'The panel today is talking about how, in the face of abortion bans in Texas and elsewhere, people are still able to access care,' Davis said.
'People are leaving the state to get the care that they need in states that do provide it,' she said. '[Others] are able to avail themselves of telehealth medicine and get a prescription for abortion medication if they're in the weeks prior to their 13th week of pregnancy.'
#WeCount, a project from the Society of Family Planning, reported that around 2,800 Texas women monthly in the first six months of 2024 acquired abortion medications, like Mifepristone, through telehealth medicine.
'Of course, there's a lawsuit that is trying to do away with abortion medication altogether,' Davis said.
In January, a Texas judge ruled that three states could move ahead with another attempt to roll back federal rules and make it more challenging for people to access mifepristone in the U.S. Additionally, one bill filed in the Texas House of Representatives aims to add criminal and civil penalties for providing abortion-inducing drugs in Texas.
Despite these efforts, Davis said she believes a majority support more access to abortion procedures than is allowed currently in Texas. She encouraged SXSW attendees Sunday to make their voices heard at election time.
'The only way we can change policies is to change policymakers. It's that simple,' she said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
AG pushes back on federal abortion medication restrictions
BOSTON (SHNS) – Attorney General Andrea Campbell implored federal regulators Thursday to eliminate medication abortion restrictions on prescribers and pharmacies, arguing Massachusetts already has 'robust' guardrails in place to protect patient safety. Campbell, along with AGs from California, New York and New Jersey, want the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to eliminate its Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program for mifepristone — or at least stop applying certain parts of it to the four petitioning states. The program outlines certification requirements for health care providers and pharmacies to dispense mifepristone, plus paperwork that patients must sign. About 65% of abortions in Massachusetts in 2023 were medication abortions, according to the 64-page citizen petition Campbell co-filed Thursday. The FDA says REMS programs are used for drugs with 'serious safety concerns to help ensure the benefits of the medication outweigh its risks.' Campbell's office contends the mifepristone requirements impose 'burdensome restrictions on access to medication abortion while not meaningfully improving patient safety, and that these restrictions severely impede patient access by reducing the number of prescribers and pharmacies authorized to dispense this FDA-approved medication.' 'The Mifepristone REMS Program also imposes an undue burden on pregnant patients experiencing miscarriage and early pregnancy loss who seek treatment at emergency departments,' the petition says. 'For instance, the administrative requirements imposed by the REMS can effectively discourage emergency departments from carrying mifepristone in their pharmacies.' Reduced access to mifepristone can particularly impact patients in rural and medically underserved areas, the petition added. The Democratic AGs teamed up in response to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy recently instructing FDA Commissioner Martin Makary to pursue a 'complete review' of mifepristone and labeling requirements. The FDA is required to respond to their petition within 180 days by either approving, denying or dismissing it — or providing a 'tentative response' about why the agency is unable to reach a decision yet, according to federal regulations. In response to the Trump administration, Beacon Hill lawmakers are escalating their focus on shoring up protections for reproductive and transgender care. A Sen. Cindy Friedman bill (S 2522) that's gaining traction would tighten the 2022 abortion shield law, including by requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortion care and allowing provider practices, rather than specific prescriber names, to appear on medication abortion labels. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Some Texas lawmakers demand in-state tuition protections for undocumented students
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A group of Texas lawmakers called on higher education leaders in the state to protect undocumented students' access to in-state tuition, after the state agreed to end the practice earlier this week. On Wednesday, the Justice Department sued the state over the 2001 Texas Dream Act, which allowed those students to receive in-state tuition if they met certain qualifications. The lawsuit alleged this act violated federal law, and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton quickly responded that his office would not contest the suit—causing the law to be repealed through a default judgment. RELATED | Justice Department sues Texas over in-state tuition for undocumented students In a letter sent on Friday, more than a dozen Democratic state representatives called on the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to create a 'provisional classification' that could allow students who previously qualified under the law to enroll this fall 'at the rate they reasonably expected.' The letter later said, in part, 'It is especially cruel and short-sighted to apply this policy change retroactively just weeks before the start of the 2025-2026 academic year. These students made plans, accepted offers, and committed to their futures in good faith.' The lawmakers urged the board to use its rulemaking authority to create this classification — for example, 'first-generation resident tuition' — at least temporarily. They called for the board to release guidance to institutions that would 'preserve tuition equity for students during the transition period.' The lawmakers also noted the move would not override statute but would provide 'a critical bridge' until the Legislature could address the matter during the next legislative session in two years. Earlier this year, during the most recent legislative session, lawmakers considered bills to repeal the Dream Act and heard hours of testimony on it, but it was left pending and failed to pass. In 2001, the Dream Act had bipartisan support and was signed into law by Republican former Governor Rick Perry. RELATED | Texas' undocumented college students no longer qualify for in-state tuition In its lawsuit, the DOJ argues that a 1996 federal law, known as the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), preempts the Dream Act. Attorney General Pam Bondi called it a 'blatant violation' of the federal law. 'Under federal law, schools cannot provide benefits to illegal aliens that they do not provide to U.S. citizens,' Bondi said. 'The Justice Department will relentlessly fight to vindicate federal law and ensure that U.S. citizens are not treated like second-class citizens anywhere in the country.' Legal experts talked to KXAN this week about whether the move by the Trump administration and Paxton's quick agreement allowed for any way for opponents of the change to challenge the decision. Josh Blackman, associate professor of law at South Texas College of Law, said the decision appears effectively final. Barbara Hines, an immigration law professor who helped craft the initial Texas Dream Act, did not share Blackman's assessment that it was the end of the road for the law. She said that in previous lawsuits related to the Dream Act or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, other parties have been allowed to intervene. RELATED | Law professors react: Texas will no longer provide in-state tuition to undocumented students According to the Texas Higher Education Commissioner, around 19,000 students will be affected by the change. The lawmakers' letter argued that the state stands to lose talent, which could affect the workforce and the economy. It said, 'This is not just a moral failure, it's a strategic and economic blunder that will be felt for generations to come.' Economic factors proved to be a driving force behind the Dream Act's passage in 2001. According to a 2015 report by The Texas Tribune, former Governor Perry said at the time, '[Texas] had a choice to make economically: Are you going to put these people in a position of having to rely upon government to take care of themselves, or are you going to let them be educated and be contributing members of society, obviously working towards their citizenship.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Roughly 1,100 applications submitted by former federal workers amid Austin hiring campaign
AUSTIN (KXAN) — President Donald Trump's promise to cut federal workforce is starting to show in the latest jobs report from the U.S. Department of Labor, which indicated 22,000 fewer federal government jobs in the last month alone. In response to the president's letting go of some federal workforce, the city of Austin re-launched a recruitment effort its used in the past called the Get Hired campaign — this time aimed at those federal workers. 'We value public servants': Austin targeting federal staff let go by Trump administration The city said between March 21 and May 23, the duration of that campaign, the city received roughly 1,100 applications from former federal employees. Of those folks, 30 now work for the city, according to the city's human resource director, Susan Sinz. 'It is good to see that with that previous federal experience, how much we benefit from that….they understand customer service, I think they understand citizen engagement and they really understand how to be a servant leader and in our community that's what we're looking for,' Sinz said. On average, the city has 100 vacancies at any given time, though that includes everything — lifeguards, librarians, police officers — and those vacancies fluctuate greatly based on season. The city employs roughly 17,000 people, Sinz noted. Though that program targeting federal employees wrapped up late last month, Sinz hopes those folks will continue to keep their sights set on our city. 'We are excited to have them explore employment here at the city of Austin and really wish them a super long career here,' she said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
