Philippine Senate returns VP Sara Duterte's impeachment case to lower house
Philippine senators on Tuesday voted to return an impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte to the lower house to clarify its constitutionality, in a surprise move just hours after convening a trial that could end her political career.
After heated debates among members that included efforts by a Duterte ally to dismiss the case, the senators agreed not to terminate the trial, but first send it back to the lower house to certify that its handling of the process had been lawful.
The impeachment of the daughter of firebrand former President Rodrigo Duterte follows an acrimonious falling out last year with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr, with whom she ran on a joint ticket that won the 2022 election in a landslide.
The Senate's late-night move could provide a lifebuoy for presidential contender Duterte in her make-or-break trial and impact the policy agenda and succession plans of former ally Marcos.
.
Marcos is limited to a single term in office and has created a powerful enemy in Duterte. He is expected to try to retain influence and protect his legacy by grooming a successor capable of fending off his rival in the next election should she be acquitted.
"I think we have upheld our oath to be politically neutral," said Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, a Duterte loyalist who presented the motion to return the case to the House of Representatives.
The lower house in February voted to impeach the vice president for high crimes and betrayal of the public trust, alleging budget irregularities, amassing of unusual wealth and a threat to the lives of Marcos, his wife, and the house speaker. She has denied all allegations.
The unprecedented move by the Senate could add fuel to fierce public debate on what is already an emotionally charged issue in the Philippines, with the spectre of discord in the bicameral legislature and more legal action to try to dismiss the case against the popular Duterte.
The trial will officially proceed, according to senators, who issued a summons to Duterte to respond to the charges, despite sending the case back to the lower house until a time when a Congress newly-formed after last month's midterm elections is "willing and ready" to pursue the impeachment complaint.
Duterte will have 10 days to comply. A new Congress will convene at the end of July.
Duterte's office late on Tuesday reiterated an earlier statement that said she was ready to "expose the baselessness of the accusations".
"The impeachment process must never be weaponised to harass, silence, or eliminate political opponents," it said.
Duterte is the fifth top official in the Philippines to be impeached, only one of whom, Renato Corona, a former Supreme Court chief justice, was convicted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
9 hours ago
- The National
Argentina's embassy to move to Jerusalem in 2026, President says
Javier Milei, who made the announcement in the Knesset, has been supportive of Israel amid the war in Gaza and votes in its favour at the UN
The National
14 hours ago
- The National
Will Trump forgive Elon Musk after 'regrets' post?
Mercurial tech tycoon Elon Musk retracted some of his criticism of President Donald Trump early Wednesday morning, after the Tesla chief and the US leader had a public falling out last week. "I regret some of my posts about President Trump last week," he posted to X, the social media platform he owns. "They went too far." Given the range of posts directed at Mr Trump last week, it is not entirely clear which ones he is sorry for. Several days ago, however, Mr Musk did delete one of the more controversial posts in which he claimed Mr Trump was named in the Epstein files and that was why he had not released them. The documents, which have not been made fully public, concern the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and have long been the subject of speculation by Trump supporters, who have demanded their full release in the belief that they contain the names of high-ranking Democrats. Inclusion in the files does not necessarily imply any wrongdoing. Last week, shortly after Mr Musk announced his plans to step away from his role in the Trump administration, he used his social media platform to blast Mr Trump's much touted 'big, beautiful' tax bill, describing it as a 'disgusting abomination' that would blow up the national debt. The abrupt turn against Mr Trump's signature legislation came after the disintegration of the partnership between the two men that lasted more than a year and saw Mr Musk donate hundreds of millions of dollars to Mr Trump's presidential campaign. Many argue that crucial funding was the difference between victory and defeat for Mr Trump, who faced off against Democratic candidate Kamala Harris, who was then vice president. After Mr Trump's win, Mr Musk's remit was to cut federal waste through the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency. But within the first few months of the Trump administration, reports indicated Mr Musk's presence had begun to grate with the President. Some have argued that the partnership began to fracture when Mr Trump's advocacy for tariffs put a strain on the various entrepreneurial endeavours of Mr Musk. Mr Trump also sought to cease electric vehicle subsidies that had previously boosted Tesla's bottom line. Regardless, as of last week, there appeared to be no love lost between the two men, both of whom have a large social media presence. After the series of posts to X by Mr Musk, Mr Trump alleged that the Tesla chief had "lost his mind". So while it's unclear what caused the sudden, quasi-apology from Mr Musk, it probably all comes down to money. Mr Trump had posted to his own social media platform, Truth Social, that as a result of Mr Musk betraying him, he would try to halt all federal contracts with his various companies, such as Starlink, SpaceX and others. If that comes to fruition, Mr Musk could lose billions. Last week's posts also hurt the already wounded Tesla, whose stock dropped after Mr Musk began his tirade. Tesla has since recovered most of the value lost. On Wednesday morning, it was up more than 2 per cent shortly after the opening bell. What many are still wondering, however, is whether Mr Trump will forgive Mr Musk. He has yet to post anything in response, and it should be pointed out that Mr Musk has not exactly changed his mind and endorsed Mr Trump's tax and spending bill, seen as the culmination of many of the President's campaign promises.
Filipino Times
20 hours ago
- Filipino Times
House members decry Senate's return of impeachment articles as ‘unconstitutional, insulting'
Incoming House prosecutors and several lawmakers strongly criticized the Senate's decision to return the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte to the House of Representatives, calling the move 'unconstitutional,' 'insulting,' and a dangerous precedent. Akbayan Rep.-elect Chel Diokno and Mamamayang Liberal Rep.-elect Leila de Lima, both set to join the prosecution team, condemned the remand, accusing the Senate of violating constitutional principles. 'This is a blatant abandonment of the Constitution,' said Diokno. De Lima questioned the legal foundation of the Senate's actions: 'Where does a court dismiss a complaint without first hearing both sides?' Members of the Makabayan bloc echoed these sentiments. ACT Teachers Rep. France Castro argued that the Senate had no authority to return the articles, stating, 'Our role is done. The Senate, as a co-equal chamber, cannot demand explanations from the House.' Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas warned that the move would further erode public trust in democratic institutions, while Kabataan Rep. Raoul Manuel accused the Senate of shielding corrupt officials through political maneuvering. House Assistant Minority Leader Gabriel Bordado Jr., a signatory to the impeachment complaint, said the remand was deeply disappointing. 'This has never happened before. It's insulting to the House, which fulfilled its constitutional duty,' he said. The Senate, sitting as an impeachment court, opted not to dismiss the case outright. Instead, 18 senators voted in favor of Senator Alan Peter Cayetano's amended motion to return the articles to the House, without terminating the proceedings. In February, the House impeached Vice President Duterte with 215 votes, citing graft, betrayal of public trust, and other high crimes.
