In an age of abundance and ceasefires, Gaza starves, and the war won't stop
Gaza City – Israel and Iran fought for 12 days, firing bombs, drones and missiles at each other, with the United States even joining in the bombing. Then, earlier this week, it stopped.
Last month, India and Pakistan attacked each other, and the world feared the outbreak of an all-out war between the two nuclear powers. But then, after four days, it stopped.
In Gaza, we haven't been so lucky. The word 'ceasefire' doesn't apply to us – even after 20 months of slaughter, death, and starvation.
Instead, as wars erupt and end elsewhere, Gaza is neglected, slipping down the news agenda, and disconnected from the internet for days.
World leaders that can end wars decisively can't deliver medicine to Gaza, can't bring in food aid without daily bloodshed.
That inadequacy has left us Palestinians in Gaza isolated, abandoned, and feeling worthless. We feel humiliated and degraded, as if our dignity has been erased.
We prayed that the end of the war between Israel and Iran would perhaps help end the one that is being waged on us.
But we were wrong. Even as Iran's missiles rained down on Tel Aviv, Israel never stopped bombing us. Its tanks rolled on, its evacuation orders never ceased. And the daily charade of 'humanitarian aid' has continued to kill starving Palestinians as they wait in line at distribution sites.
As Israel's bombs continued to fall on us, as they have done since October 2023, we watched as Israelis wept over their own bombed hospitals, damaged cities, and disrupted lives.
'What did we do? Why are we being bombed?' they asked, at the same time as they continued to attack Gaza's hospitals, kill Gaza's children, and murder those trying to get food.
Hating food
In Gaza, we don't have wishes any more. I don't dare to dream about surviving – my heart can no longer bear the sorrow of being in this world, the absence of any future.
We're exhausted from being stories people read, videos they watch. Every minute: bombing, death, and hunger.
Especially hunger. During three months of siege and starvation, Israel initially steadfastly refused to allow food in and then allowed distribution only through a shady and militarised organisation, with Israeli forces shooting in.
The situation has made me come to hate food. My relationship with it has forever changed, twisted into resentment and bitterness.
I crave everything. I ask myself, 'What will we eat? What do we have available?'
I imagine myself at a table full of delicacies, throwing everything onto the ground in protest, screaming through tears not out of hunger, but for my wounded dignity.
It is this hunger and the basic human instinct to survive that drives tens of thousands of starving men, women and children to the daily slaughter that is the food distribution sites.
The hunger dulls every other sense. An empty stomach means an empty mind, a failing body. It makes you do things your brain tells you not to do, to risk everything for a bag of flour, or a bag of lentils.
And all of this – the starvation of 2 million people – takes place in the age of global food abundance. The age of pistachio desserts, Dubai chocolates, cheesecakes with layers of cream, gourmet burgers, pizzas, sauces, and creams.
For the rest of the world, food is a phone tap away. For us, it taunts us, reminding us of our calamity.
Taunted by the tablet
Every time I open my phone to see photos, recipes, and trending desserts, I feel a pang in my heart reminding me that we are not living in the same world.
My nine-year-old daugher Banias watches Instagram reels with me and says, 'Mom, every chef says the ingredients are easy and found in every home … but not ours.'
Her words pierce me. She says them with sorrow, not complaint.
Banias never complains. She accepts the pasta or lentils I offer. But the pain is there.
My children watch kids' shows on a device I bought at great cost, with a backup battery to offset the two-year power blackout. I did it so they could have some joy, some escape. But I didn't consider what that screen would show them.
They play songs and videos all day long about apples, bananas, strawberries, watermelon, grapes, milk, eggs, pizza, chicken, ice cream.
All the things I can't give them.
The device started playing a song: 'Are you hungry?'
My heart can't take it. What is this cursed screen doing?
I rushed out of the kitchen, where I had just finished cooking the same pasta with canned sauce – maybe for the 50th time.
I looked into my children's eyes. Iyas, turning two this month, has never tasted any of these fruits or foods.
Banias watches and casually says while eating her pasta, 'See, Mama? Even the dolls get to eat fruit and grapes and yummy stuff.'
Every moment here reminds me that the world lives in one reality, and we live in another. Even children's songs aren't made for us any more.
We've become an exception to life. An exception to joy.
The fear of what comes next
And yet, we are still among the 'lucky' ones, because others have run out of food entirely.
I felt that growing dread last week when I opened my last kilo of rice. Fear and despair overwhelmed me. Then, it was the last spoon of milk, then lentils, chickpeas, cornstarch, halva, tomato sauce, the last cans of beans, peas, bulghur.
Our stocks are vanishing. There are no replacements. Every empty shelf feels like a blow to the soul. If this famine continues, what comes next?
It's like walking step by step towards death. Every day without a solution brings us closer to a deeper mass starvation. Every trip to the market that ends empty-handed feels like a dagger to the heart.
And that is just the food struggle. What if I told you about cooking on firewood? Fetching water from distant desalination stations, most of which have shut down? Walking for hours without transport? The cash shortage? Skyrocketing fees and prices?
All this, under the shadow of constant Israeli air strikes.
We've disappeared from the headlines, but our suffering remains — layered, worsening by the day.
What did Gaza do to deserve this erasure, this merciless genocide? Wars end everywhere, ceasefires are possible anywhere.
But for Gaza, we need a miracle for the war to stop.
Gaza will not forgive the world. The blood of our children and their starving bellies will not forget.
We write to record what is happening, not to plead with anyone.
Gaza, the land of dignity and generosity, lives a daily horror to survive. And all while the world watches on.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Nike to raise costs as Trump's tariffs on China bite
Nike has said it will cut its reliance on production in China for the United States market to mitigate the impact from US tariffs on imports, and forecast a smaller-than-expected drop in first-quarter revenue. The sportswear giant's shares zoomed 15 percent at the opening bell on Friday morning after it announced the change in conjunction with its earnings report released on Thursday. US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on imports from key trading partners could add about $1bn to Nike's costs, company executives said on a post-earnings call after the sportswear giant topped estimates for fourth-quarter results. China, subject to the biggest tariff increases imposed by Trump, accounts for about 16 percent of the shoes Nike imports into the US, Chief Financial Officer Matthew Friend said. However, the company aims to cut the figure to a 'high single-digit percentage range' by the end of May 2026 as it reallocates Chinese production to other countries. 'We will optimise our sourcing mix and allocate production differently across countries to mitigate the new cost headwind into the United States,' he said on a call with investors. Consumer goods are one of the most affected areas by the tariff dispute between the world's two largest economies, but Nike's executives said they were focused on cutting the financial pain. Nike will 'evaluate' corporate cost reductions to deal with the tariff impact, Friend said. The company has already announced price increases for some products in the US. 'The tariff impact is significant. However, I expect others in the sportswear industry will also raise prices, so Nike may not lose much share in the US,' David Swartz, analyst at Morningstar Research, told the Reuters news agency. CEO Elliott Hill's strategy to focus product innovation and marketing around sports is beginning to show some fruit, with the running category returning to growth in the fourth quarter after several quarters of weakness. Having lost share in the fast-growing running market, Nike has invested heavily in running shoes such as Pegasus and Vomero, while scaling back production of sneakers such as the Air Force 1. 'Running has performed especially strongly for Nike,' said Citi analyst Monique Pollard, adding that new running shoes and sportswear products are expected to offset the declines in Nike's classic sneaker franchises at wholesale partner stores. Marketing spending was up 15 percent year on year in the quarter. On Thursday, Nike hosted an event in which its sponsored athlete Faith Kipyegon attempted to run a mile in under four minutes. Paced by other star athletes in the glitzy event that was livestreamed from a Paris stadium, Kipyegon fell short of the goal but set a new unofficial record. Nike forecast first-quarter revenue to fall in the mid-single digits, slightly better than analysts' expectations of a 7.3 percent drop, according to data compiled by LSEG. Its fourth-quarter sales fell 12 percent to $11.10bn, but still beat estimates of a 14.9 percent drop to $10.72bn. China continued to be a pain point, with executives saying a turnaround in the country will take time as Nike contends with tougher economic conditions and competition. Looming trade deal as prices rise Nike's woes come as a trade deal with China could be on the horizon. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessett said on Friday that the administration could have a deal with Beijing by Labor Day, which is on September 1. Under the deal, the US will likely impose 55 percent tariffs across the board on Chinese goods, down from 145 percent, still a significant burden on businesses. According to a survey from Allianz Global Trade last month, 38 percent of businesses say they will need to raise prices for consumers, with Nike being the latest. In April, competitor Adidas said it would need to eventually raise prices for US consumers. 'Cost increases due to higher tariffs will eventually cause price increases,' CEO Bjorn Gulden said at the time. Walmart said last month that its customers will see higher price tags in its stores as the nation's biggest big box retailer prepares for back to school shopping season. Target, which had a bad first quarter driven by boycotts and the looming threat of tariffs, also has been hit as the big box retailer gets 30 percent of its goods from China.
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Why the Trump administration is targeting immigration courts for arrests
Why the Trump administration is targeting immigration courts for arrests A man is detained by federal immigration officers at a US immigration court in New York City on June 26 [David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters] A man is detained by federal immigration officers at a US immigration court in New York City on June 26 [David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters] Houston, Texas – Oscar Gato Sanchez had gotten dressed up for his day in immigration court. The 25-year-old wore a red button-down, black slacks and dress shoes, his dark hair trimmed short with the aim of leaving a good impression. It was a Monday afternoon in June, and Gato Sanchez, a Cuban immigrant, had come to present himself before a United States immigration judge. As he sat inside the Texas courtroom, he had no reason to doubt that the court would eventually hear his case. Gato Sanchez was seeking asylum on the basis that his life would be in danger if he returned to Cuba. There, human rights groups have accused the government of repression and torture, and Gato Sanchez feared he would face repercussions for having attended recent antigovernment protests on the island. While he waited to go before the judge, his aunt, who asked not to be named for fear of retaliation, sat in the room outside. She was anxious. The clock seemed to move more slowly than usual. 'What is taking so long?' his aunt, a Houston resident, asked a friend next to her. But the two women were not the only ones waiting outside the courtroom. Near the elevators, four men sat staring at their phones, dressed in ordinary street clothes. Around 3:15pm, Gato Sanchez emerged from the courtroom with a folder of documents in his hands. As soon as he did, the four men surrounded him. It was as if they already knew Gato Sanchez's case had been dismissed. They were federal agents, and they were in the courthouse to take Gato Sanchez into custody as soon as his case was thrown out. His aunt was frantic. She tried to ask for information. But the only details the men would give her was that her nephew would be sent to Conroe, Texas, the site of the largest detention centre in the Houston area. The men did not even tell her whether they were from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or another federal law enforcement agency. 'Why, God, did they do this?' His aunt screamed, overcome with emotion. As the agents took Gato Sanchez away, his aunt's friend yelled out to him. 'You're not a bad person,' she said through tears. Gato Sanchez is one of the hundreds of people recently detained immediately after leaving their immigration hearings. Advocates fear the courthouse arrests not only violate the right to due process but also discourage immigrants from pursuing legal means to stay in the US. 'These are people that are doing the right thing,' said Cesar Espinosa, the executive director of Houston immigrant rights nonprofit FIEL. 'You're between a rock and a hard place. If you don't show up, they're going to come get you. If you do show up, they're going to come get you, which is not due process.' Federal officers lead a migrant man to an elevator in a immigration court in New York City on June 26 [David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters] Federal officers lead a migrant man to an elevator in a immigration court in New York City on June 26 [David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters] The question of whether immigration raids should take place within courthouses has gained new urgency since the return of President Donald Trump in January. In the early months of his second term, Trump has followed through on his pledge to pursue a campaign of mass deportation. Over the last month alone, his administration has stepped up its quota for immigration arrests, raising the bar from 1,000 to 3,000 per day. Part of the strategy for reaching that goal is to leverage the court system and detain immigrants after their scheduled hearings. This has led to some high-profile clashes. In April, for instance, a Wisconsin judge was arrested and charged with conspiracy and obstruction of justice for attempting to help an immigrant evade the federal agents waiting outside her courtroom. John Gihon, the vice chair of the ICE liaison committee at the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said his own clients are now scared to go to immigration court as a result of the arrests. 'It's creating a gigantic chilling effect on everybody going to immigration court. I see that every day, constantly now,' said Gihon, who previously worked as a lawyer for ICE. Immigration arrests at courthouses have long been a controversial practice. In 2011, ICE issued a memorandum identifying "sensitive locations" where arrests should be avoided, including churches and schools. Courthouses were not among them. But that changed in 2021, under former President Joe Biden. ICE issued new guidance discouraging immigration agents from conducting civil arrests in courthouses, just as they would in "sensitive" places. The day Trump began his second term, however, the Department of Homeland Security rescinded all the guidelines for "sensitive" areas. "The Trump Administration will not tie the hands of our brave law enforcement, and instead trusts them to use common sense," the department said in its statement. A man is placed in handcuffs by law enforcement officers at a New York City immigration court on June 26 [David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters] A man is placed in handcuffs by law enforcement officers at a New York City immigration court on June 26 [David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters] But advocates say the Trump administration has gone a step further, using the immigration system itself to facilitate courthouse arrests and swift deportations. The immigration court system in the US is separate from the judicial branch of government. Rather, it is run by the Department of Justice, directly under the president's authority. That allows the president to shape immigration policy and give directives to the courts. But critics accuse the Trump administration of manipulating the system to prioritise his deportation push over the right of immigrants to receive a fair hearing. Earlier this month, NBC News broke the story that the Trump administration had issued a memo calling on immigration judges to quickly dismiss the cases on their dockets. In the past, the Department of Homeland Security could request a case be dismissed, but immigrants would still have about 10 days to respond before the judge rendered a decision. But in the new memo, the Trump administration called on immigration judges to grant dismissals on the very same day they were requested. That meant immigrants would lose their protections against deportation immediately. Individuals who have been in the country for less than two years are often eligible for expedited removal from the country, meaning they have little chance of appealing their deportation. And advocates say ICE agents are now stationed right outside the courtrooms, waiting to sweep up the immigrants whose cases were dismissed. Bianca Santorini, a Houston-based lawyer who took Gato Sanchez's case pro bono after his courthouse detention, said that ICE is taking advantage of the immigration system 'to trick people to come to court". 'I'm not asking that every case is won. What I'm asking is that they give people their day in court,' Santorini said. 'They are taking that away from people unjustly.' ICE declined to confirm the number of agents at immigration courts in recent weeks but said that its enforcement at courthouses 'is wholly consistent" with its longstanding practices. 'ICE officers and agents seek to conduct enforcement actions at an alternate location when practicable," a spokesperson told Al Jazeera. "However, when no other location is feasible or when the alternate location increases the risk to public safety or the safety of our officers, ICE will seek to effectuate the arrest in the location that is least likely to endanger anyone's safety." A federal immigration officer patrols the hallway at a Manhattan immigration court on June 26 [David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters] A federal immigration officer patrols the hallway at a Manhattan immigration court on June 26 [David 'Dee' Delgado/Reuters] A dismissal in immigration court, however, does not mean an immigrant's rights are exhausted. They can still seek alternative pathways to legal status by appealing their case or applying to a government programme like Temporary Protected Status. Gihon, the Florida-based immigration lawyer, explained that immigrants like Gato Sanchez will have a chance to seek asylum again if they choose. But being detained often disincentivises them from continuing their cases. That is part of the Trump administration's strategy, according to Gihon. 'The whole point is to detain as many people as possible because it's much less likely that they're going to be successful in winning their cases and less likely that they're going to fight,' Gihon said. 'They're just going to accept deportation.' Advocacy groups like FIEL are now advising immigrants not to come to court without legal representation, if possible. If a lawyer is not available, FIEL has circulated guidance about what to say to oppose a dismissal and keep a case open. "Your honour, I reserve the right to appeal," one line reads. Another suggests explaining, "Your honour, before dismissing my case, I respectfully ask you to hear my side of the story. I am afraid to return to my country because I will face harm, danger or death." In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security justified its policies by blaming the Biden administration for allowing unfettered immigration into the country. 'ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been,' a spokesperson said. Narel Lopez comforts her daughters on June 25 after her husband and a son were detained at an immigration court in San Antonio, Texas [Eric Gay/AP Photo] Narel Lopez comforts her daughters on June 25 after her husband and a son were detained at an immigration court in San Antonio, Texas [Eric Gay/AP Photo] Despite the controversy, authorities have continued to target immigration hearings for arrests. The day after Gato Sanchez was arrested, immigration agents were once again in the waiting room of the Houston immigration court. Some wore ski masks and glasses. One approached a Venezuelan immigrant named Daniel, who had shown up to court alone. The agent explained that they would be taking him into ICE custody. 'Understand?' the agent asked. 'Don't understand,' Daniel answered, his grasp of English still minimal. After a lawyer spoke to Daniel to take his information, immigration agents took him into the lift. Moments later, another Venezuelan man and a Mexican man exited the courtroom with Santorini, their lawyer. The three of them were standing by the lift when a plain-clothed agent approached. 'We have a warrant,' he told Santorini. She questioned why ICE would detain one of the men again if he had already been released on a $7,500 bond. 'Where is the warrant?' she asked. 'I don't have it,' the immigration agent responded. He declined to identify which agency he worked with. Santorini said she and her clients would wait until he could produce a warrant. They took a seat in the waiting room. After a few minutes, another man, who identified as an ICE agent, returned with an administrative warrant dated for that day. 'Who are you scared of?' one of Santorini's clients asked in Spanish as he was handcuffed. 'We're just here to work.' As the men were ushered into the lift, the ICE agent assured Santorini that her clients would still have the chance to seek asylum if they feared returning to their country. But Santorini scoffed at the comment and held back tears, knowing that her clients would have to repeat a legal process they had already begun, this time behind bars. 'All we want is that they give us our right to a day in court,' Santorini said. 'Arresting someone at court is not the correct thing to do here in the US.'
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump vows to push ahead with ending birthright citizenship
Trump vows to push ahead with ending birthright citizenship NewsFeed US President Donald Trump is vowing to push ahead with his attempt to end birthright citizenship after the Supreme Court ruled that lower court judges had overstepped in blocking Trump's executive orders nationwide. Video Duration 00 minutes 25 seconds 00:25 Video Duration 00 minutes 39 seconds 00:39 Video Duration 01 minutes 49 seconds 01:49 Video Duration 00 minutes 39 seconds 00:39 Video Duration 02 minutes 43 seconds 02:43 Video Duration 02 minutes 39 seconds 02:39 Video Duration 02 minutes 20 seconds 02:20
