West Belfast: Fire service in attendance at 5G mast blaze
The Northern Ireland Fire Service (NIFRS) is currently attending a fire at a 5G mast in west Belfast.Two fire appliances and one aerial appliance were dispatched to the blaze on the Colin Road.There have been a series of arson attacks on 5G masts in west Belfast, with the fire service recording 13 incidents between January 2023 and December 2024.The MP for the area, Sinn Féin's Paul Maskey, said it's "shameful that another vital phone mast has been vandalised tonight."
"This will only cause more issues for local residents who will lose even more phone signal," he added.
The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said a fire at a mast on the Stewartstown Road on Wednesday, and a fire on a different mast at an industrial estate in Dunmurry on Saturday were both deliberate.Maskey said the attacks "are causing serious harm to our community and putting lives at risk"."Those involved in targeting vital infrastructure in west Belfast must end this reckless and destructive behaviour."He said his party "completely condemn these attacks. They must end now".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves has bet all our money on Wes Streeting saving the NHS
The thinking behind Rachel Reeves's spending plans for the next three years was revealed in her statement on Wednesday. It is crude and probably correct. Of the government's three priorities, there is only one that ministers can control so she will throw money at that one. The voters care about the cost of living, immigration and the NHS. There is not much the governmen t can do about the first. It has to talk about growth and hope for the best. We are at the mercy of Donald Trump, various wars and the bond markets. Nor do ministers think, in their heart of hearts, that there is much they can do about the Channel crossings. They have to talk about falling legal immigration, a trend they inherited from the Conservatives, while getting cross with the French for not doing enough to stop the small boats – but not so cross that the gendarmes shrug and fold their arms. That leaves the NHS. The chancellor has put all her chips on the blue and white oblong on the casino table. The health service received the most generous settlement on Wednesday, planned to grow by three per cent more than inflation over this parliament. There are those – and Nigel Farage is one of them – who will mutter 'bottomless pit' and 'good money after bad'. Those of us who are a bit more sophisticated will mention the NHS productivity crisis. Before the spending review, for example, I pointed to figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies showing huge increases in the numbers of doctors and nurses in the NHS over the past five years, and small increases in the number of patients seen. But I also cited evidence that NHS productivity was improving after the one-off shock of the pandemic and now there is more hopeful news to share. Reports are beginning to emerge about what is in the 10-year plan for the NHS to be published by Wes Streeting, the health secretary, next month. It sounds like a good and ambitious plan to shift incentives so that patients are kept out of hospitals and needless in-person appointments are abolished. Speaking to The Times, Streeting said: 'Much of what's done in a hospital today will be done on the high street, over the phone, or through the app in a decade's time.' It might seem a bit slow. He has been in government for nearly a year and is only now coming up with a plan? Government is slow – Keir Starmer has taken to asking repeatedly, 'Why not today?' – but it is important to get big changes right, and Streeting has thrown himself at a lot of the less visible work in his first 11 months, including abolishing the NHS England bureaucracy and taking the NHS back under the direct control of his department. He has learned the lessons from the last time Labour saved the NHS under Tony Blair, including bringing back some of the key people who did it: Alan Milburn, Blair's health secretary, and Michael Barber, the head of his delivery unit. The blueprint is all there in a new book, The Art of Delivery by Michelle Clement, my colleague at King's College London. It is based on Barber's diaries and is the fullest account of how the public services were turned around in Blair's second term as prime minister. The book makes clear what ought to be obvious, which is that it takes time for the combination of more money and reform to start to change measurable outputs, and even longer before the general public notices an improvement. Nor is improvement a steady upward gradient, because there are policy mistakes and personality clashes along the way. One of Barber's greatest strengths was his ability to manage relationships put under strain by politicians' impatience for delivery. When one permanent secretary ranted at him for giving his department a traffic-light rating in a note to Blair without consulting him, Barber said: 'This has always happened. I'm just telling you.' Now it is happening again. The good civil servants and NHS managers will realise that it helps them to have objective performance indicators and stretching targets if the whole service is starting to move in the right direction. Barber had to persevere for two years before the indicators started to shift, but in the NHS the momentum of change gathered pace thereafter. By 2004, Barber told the cabinet that an episode of EastEnders showed Ian Beale complaining that 'people spend at least five hours in A&E', to which Jane, his wife, responded, 'It's a lot better nowadays.' Barber began to talk confidently about how the changes in just three years were becoming 'irreversible' – a claim that was mocked by the parsimony and incompetence of the Tory years, which managed to reverse the Labour gains eventually. The point is that the NHS can be changed in a single parliament. The challenges are different now, and so are the technologies. But the principles are the same: more money accompanied by devolution of power to successful managers and aligning staff incentives with the interests of patients. Time is already running out for this government, and the stakes are high. Most cabinet ministers understand that. One of them was quoted anonymously by The Times today. If it wasn't Streeting himself, it was someone who thinks just like him: 'The truth is there are a lot of people whose lives have been shit for a long time. They rolled the dice with Brexit, they rolled the dice with Boris and then they rolled the dice again with us. They need to see results otherwise they will roll the dice again with Reform.' Time is running out, but Streeting is one of the few cabinet ministers to have made good use of it so far.
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's Chagos surrender ‘will cost £5bn more than feared'
Sir Keir Starmer's deal to hand over the Chagos Islands will cost taxpayers £5 billion more than previously feared, the Tories have claimed. The Prime Minister last month signed the agreement to cede the archipelago to Mauritius and then rent back the military base on Diego Garcia, its biggest island. It had been calculated that the lease for the airbase, to be paid over the course of almost a century, would set the UK back at least £30 billion. But ministers have now admitted that the inflation figure they are using to calculate payments for future years is higher than previously thought. Mauritius, which has a GDP roughly the size of Leicester's, is going to use the huge windfall to deliver massive income tax breaks for its people. Sir Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said: 'Rachel Reeves has been unmasked as the 'spend today, tax tomorrow' Chancellor. 'It's a damning indictment of this government that not only are British taxpayers footing the bill for Mauritians to have their income tax cut but the costs of this terrible deal grow day by day. 'It is yet another kick in the teeth for hard-pressed British taxpayers who are already preparing for another tax raid later this year thanks to Labour's incompetence.' Downing Street has claimed Treasury calculations show the total cost of the Chagos deal will come in at £3.4 billion in real terms over 99 years. However that figure has been widely disputed, with critics saying the true tally once inflation and other payments are taken into account will top £30 billion. Those calculations were based on inflation averaging out at the Bank of England's target rate of 2 per cent across the entire century of payments. But this week Darren Jones, the chief secretary to the Treasury, said that for most of the period the Treasury is assuming inflation will run at 2.3 per cent. That would add £4.8 billion more than expected, according to Tory calculations, taking the final bill to the taxpayer up to just over £35 billion. Ministers have confirmed in response to written questions that the cash will come out of the Ministry of Defence and Foreign Office budgets. It could therefore count towards the Government's aim of spending at least 3 per cent of GDP on defence by the middle of the next decade, as well as any Nato targets. Under the deal, the UK has given up sovereignty over the Chagos, a remote Indian Ocean archipelago, to Mauritius after 200 years of British rule. Mauritius has agreed to lease back Diego Garcia, the biggest island in the chain and home to a British-US airbase, for the next century. The agreement has been criticised over both the cost and security implications, with Mauritius growing closer to China, Iran and Russia in recent years. Ministers have justified the pact by arguing the UK could have lost a future international court case brought by Mauritius, which claimed sovereignty. They said that would have put the future of the base, which was used by jets operating during both Gulf wars and the Afghanistan war, in doubt.
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Campaigners consider legal action against Scottish government after supreme court gender ruling
For Women Scotland, the group responsible for April's landmark supreme court ruling on biological sex, is considering further legal action against the Scottish government as they warned the key motivation for bringing the case was being lost amid debates about toilets policy. At a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, the gender critical campaign group's co-director Susan Smith said there had been 'extraordinary pushback' since five judges ruled unanimously that the legal definition of a woman in the Equality Act 2010 did not include transgender women who hold gender recognition certificates. Speaking to reporters afterwards, Smith said: 'We don't want to go back to court, we really, really don't, but if we don't see some action that may be something we will have to consider.' She said she was concerned about lack of action by the Scottish government on prisons and schools guidance. 'We have spoken to the Scottish government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance, just to say that it's under review – they don't have to re-issue anything at this point – (but) because it's clearly unlawful, we really do need some action. They're telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' Since April's ruling and subsequent interim advice issued soon after by the equalities watchdog, which amounted to a blanket ban on transgender individuals using toilets of their lived gender, much of the public discussion has focused on bathroom facilities, although the ruling has wide-ranging implications for service providers, public bodies and businesses. Smith said: 'I wish we could stop talking about toilets all the time, because that wasn't really the reason we went to court. We went to court about the prisons, about the rape crisis centres, about the hospitals, where people are uniquely vulnerable'. She also encouraged individuals to 'keep pressure on MSPs and MPs', and make use of the fighting fund announced by the writer and activist JK Rowling to launch their own actions. 'We really need people to start challenging where they feel that organisations, local councils are not implementing the law. We're very fortunate to have the fighting fund that JK Rowling set up and that will make a massive difference because when people start to realise that there's a cost maybe they will start to apply the law.' Many organisations are awaiting the EHRC's updated code of practice for public bodies, which is not expected to be ready until November, although others – including the Scottish parliament – have already changed policy to reflect the ruling. Leading charities including Refuge and Mind this week wrote to the watchdog saying the current consultation timetable is too rushed for proper engagement. The Scottish Prison Service guidance states that transgender women prisoners are not eligible to be housed in the female estate if they have been convicted of serious offences, although recent reports suggest a number continue to be housed there under segregation rules. A Scottish Prison Service spokesperson said: 'We have received the supreme court's judgment and are considering any potential impact it may have.' The Scottish government have been approached for comment.
