UK will end use of asylum hotels by 2029, Reeves says
The government has set out plans to end the use of hotels to hold asylum seekers by 2029, a move Rachel Reeves says will save £1bn a year.Unveiling her Spending Review on Wednesday, the chancellor pledged £200m to "cut the asylum backlog, hear more appeal cases and return people who have no right to be here".Ministers say hotels will be phased out by cutting small boat crossings and building new government-owned accommodation for asylum seekers.The announcement comes after the National Audit Office (NAO) predicted asylum housing costs will hit £15.3bn over the next decade - triple the amount budgeted by the Home Office.
Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp claimed the plans are "built on an assumption that the hotels magically empty themselves"."They still have no plan for where these people will go," he added.On Tuesday, Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle told a committee of MPs the government were looking to buy tower blocks and former student accommodation to house migrants as an alternative to asylum hotels.Dame Angela Eagle said the government was exploring new ways to house asylum seekers ahead of break clauses in major accommodation contracts coming up next year.
Labour promised in its manifesto to "end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds" but did not give a date when this would be achieved.On Tuesday, Reeves told MPs the government now expects to hit its goal "in this Parliament"."Funding that I have provided today... will cut the asylum backlog, hear more appeal cases and return people who have no right to be here," she said.An extra £150m will be spent to speed up planned reforms of the asylum system in 2026-27 and an additional £50 m in 2027-28, with the money to come from the £3.25bn Transformation Fund, aimed at modernising public services.Government estimates the reforms will reduce asylum costs by at least £1bn per year by 2028–29, compared to 2024–25 prices.Live: Follow the latest updatesSeven ways the Spending Review affects youWhat has the chancellor has announced? The key pointsWatch: Where the money is being spentAccording to the Home Office, hotels are "contingency accommodation" and only meant to be used for asylum seekers when other housing cannot be sourced.But since 2020 there has been a surge in their use - fuelled by asylum backlogs, housing shortages, and rising rental prices, according to Oxford University's Migration Observatory.The government spent £1.3bn this year to house asylum seekers in hotels, according to the NAO - covering 76% of all accommodation costs. The most recent Home Office figures show there are about 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels in the UK. That is also 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier.
Responding to the announcement, home affairs committee chairwoman Dame Karen Bradley said the cost of asylum hotels has risen to a "staggering extent".Dame Karen, the Conservative MP for Staffordshire Moorlands, said: "If hotels disappear there will still need to be stock of short-term accommodation to deal with unpredictable levels of irregular migration."Targets on their own are not enough, they need to be delivered - and for that we need to have workable solutions".Dame Karen warned that without savings, broader goals to improve policing, cut immigration and strengthen counter-terrorism will be impacted.In her spending review, the chancellor also announced up tp £280m per year extra for the Border Security Command, which leads on the UK's strategy to crack down on people smuggling and small boat crossings. This follows an initial £150m to establish the unit last year.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
US FDA puts on hold Rein Therapeutics' lung disease drug trial
June 12 (Reuters) - Rein Therapeutics (RNTX.O), opens new tab has paused patient enrollment and dosing in a mid-stage trial of its lung disease drug in the U.S. after the Food and Drug Administration placed a clinical hold, the drug developer said on Thursday. Shares of the company fell nearly 10% after the bell. The company was testing a drug named LTI-03 to treat patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The disease causes scarring of the lungs that makes it harder for them to work properly. Rein said in a filing that it is actively working with the FDA to remove the clinical hold. The FDA and Rein did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on why the hold was placed. The drug was well-tolerated and safe in an early-stage study in patients with IPF, the company said in the filing. No drug-related serious adverse events have been reported in any studies treating patients with LTI-03, it added. Rein continues to study the drug and enroll patients in Australia and Europe.
Times
14 minutes ago
- Times
KPMG fined over partner error in Carr's audit
KPMG has been fined just shy of £700,000 for not realising that a senior partner at another firm had been working on the audit of a subsidiary of Carr's, the agriculture and engineering company, for a year too long. The Financial Reporting Council determined that KPMG, as Carr's main auditor, was wrong to rely on the work of another audit firm responsible for signing off the 2021 accounts of the subsidiary because the lead partner had held that role for six years, one more than is permitted. The FRC did not name the other firm, but Companies House filings show Mitchell Charlesworth, a small accountancy group based in the northwest of England, audited the 2021 accounts of Carr's Billington Agriculture (Operations), a manufacturer and supplier of animal feed. Mitchell Charlesworth also provided tax and accountancy services to Carrs Billington Agriculture, which was another reason why KPMG should not have signed off on the group accounts. The regulator, in a 35-page report, said that KPMG had failed to 'ensure compliance with applicable independence requirements'. Lead audit partners, also known as audit engagement partners, are required to rotate every five years to prevent them from becoming too chummy with the management. Audit firms are also limited on how much non-audit work they can do for clients for fear that it might influence their decision-making. Carr's traces its roots to 1831 and a flour mill opened by Jonathan Carr to supply his Table Water biscuit factory. In 1908, the flour-milling assets were spun off into what is now Carr's Group. Carr's 2022 accounts were delayed for several months because Grant Thornton, which took over from KPMG, felt that, owing to 'independence reasons', it could not rely on the work of the auditor of one of Carr's subsidiaries. Jamie Symington, deputy executive counsel at the FRC, said KPMG's breaches were 'serious', even though the quality of KPMG's audit work was 'not brought into question'. KPMG was initially fined £1.25 million, but this was cut to £690,625 because of its 'exceptional cooperation during the investigation'. It has also paid the FRC's investigation costs of £219,755. Nick Plumb, who was KPMG's lead partner on the Carr's audits, was fined £70,000, which was cut to £38,675. Plumb, 59, retired from the KPMG partnership in 2022. The fine money goes to the Department for Business and Trade. Symington said KPMG's failings were 'basic and fundamental', adding: 'It is of fundamental importance that when seeking to rely on the work of a component auditor, the group audit firm can be satisfied that its independence is not compromised as a result of conditions that would compromise the independence of another firm on whose work it relies.' 'We accept that we did not meet the required standards in this instance,' Cath Burnet, head of audit at KPMG UK, said.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Political pawns': Morale among California National Guard and Marines deployed in LA is underwater, report claims
The 4,000 California National Guard troops and 700 US Marines sent to Los Angeles in response to the ongoing anti-immigration raid protests are reportedly suffering from low morale, according to members of the veterans community, amid allegations of a chaotic initial deployment and widespread concerns of the military being drafted into domestic law enforcement. 'Among all that I spoke with, the feeling was that the Marines are being used as political pawns, and it strains the perception that Marines are apolitical,' Marine Corps veteran Janessa Goldbeck, who runs the Vet Voice Foundation, told The Guardian. 'Some were concerned that the Marines were being set up for failure. The overall perception was that the situation was nowhere at the level where Marines were necessary.' 'The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn't the kind of national security we signed up for,' added Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative in an interview with the outlet. Controversy has followed the deployment since President Trump first federalized the California National Guard and ordered the state troops into Los Angeles on Saturday and a battalion of Marines was activated two days later. California has sued the Trump administration over deploying the Guard, alleging the decision has 'caused real and irreparable damage' to both Los Angeles and the state's larger sovereignty. Governor Gavin Newsom has also accused the White House of sending in thousands of troops without adequate provisions or training, sharing photos obtained by The San Francisco Chronicle of guardsmen sleeping head-to-foot on bare floors. 'You sent your troops here without fuel, food, water or a place to sleep,' he wrote on X. 'Here they are — being forced to sleep on the floor, piled on top of one another.' 'This is what happens when the president and (Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth) demand the National Guard state assets deploy immediately with no plan in place … (and) no federal funding available for food, water, fuel and lodging,' a source involved in the deployment told the Chronicle of conditions during the early stages. 'This is really the failure of the federal government. If you're going to federalize these troops, then take care of them.' U.S. Northern Command later said the photo showed soldiers who weren't current on a mission in what were only temporary accommodations due a 'fluid security situation.' When asked for comment, a spokesperson for U.S. Northern Command pointed to a website for Task Force 51, which is coordinating the protection mission in Los Angeles. 'The Soldiers and Marines have contracting for billeting, latrines, showers, handwashing stations, food service, full laundry service, bulk ice, and bulk fuel,' the website reads, in regards to troop conditions. 'While awaiting fulfillment of the contract, Soldiers and Marines have adequate shelter, food, and water.' Federal officials say the military members in Los Angeles will not be formally arresting protesters, though they might temporarily detain individuals to stop threats or interference against federal agents, and they have authorization to provide security to federal buildings and operations. U.S. Northern Command shared a photo Thursday showing Marines training in non-lethal tactics with riot shields, and the military has said the troops could deploy within the next 48 hours. President Trump has faced larger criticisms for allegedly politicizing the military in response to the protests, including upset over a campaign-rally style speech about the crisis in front of jeering troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. Base officials reportedly screened the crowd for those who disagreed with Trump and asked them to alert their superiors so others could be put in their place during the speech.
