Oxford woman launches nationwide recipe search
AN Oxford woman is helping to launch a nationwide recipe search.
The Big Lunch, an annual celebration for neighbourhoods and communities, is on the hunt for hidden culinary gems and the stories behind them.
Emily Connally is preparing to submit her entry and is encouraging others to do the same.
The initiative comes in response to new research revealing that many Brits are in a cooking rut, with a lack of ideas discouraging them from trying new recipes.
The survey, conducted by YouGov, found that almost one in seven UK adults never cook a completely new recipe, while a quarter of people are put off cooking from scratch due to a lack of inspiration.
The search aims to find the nation's favourite dishes to inspire people to try something new in the kitchen and share their creations at The Big Lunch events in June.
Entrants are encouraged to submit their go-to dishes, quirky childhood favourites, and top crowd-pleasers, along with the stories behind them.
Emily Connally, founder of Cherwell Collective, a community interest company working to reduce carbon footprints, plans to share her 'climatarian burger' recipe.
This dish, a mix of beef and grated mushroom, is designed to cut down meat consumption while retaining flavour.
Ms Connally said: "When I heard about The Big Lunch Recipe Search I immediately thought of my climatarian burger recipe, which is a signature dish at every Cherwell Collective Big Lunch.
"It's the perfect recipe to bring people together because it cuts a typical burger's meat in half, bringing veggies and meat eaters closer together."
The search is supported by celebrity chefs Ainsley Harriott and Dame Prue Leith.
Dame Prue said: "The Big Lunch Recipe Search is more than just a way of finding and rewarding the people behind the UK's best home recipes.
"It is an invitation to people everywhere to join in with The Big Lunch and share food and friendship together."
Harriott added: "It's all about hunting down hidden culinary gems.
"We want to hear about food that brings people together and is great for sharing."
Home cooks who submit their recipes have the chance to be featured in a Big Lunch online cookbook and shared at thousands of Big Lunch events across the UK in June.
Five finalists will be invited to a special Big Lunch event in May, with one home cook winning a hamper of goodies to help with their own Big Lunch event.
To find out more and share your favourite recipes, visit thebiglunch.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Approval Rating With Key Group Jumps, Polls Show
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating has jumped 7 percent in a week with Hispanic voters, The Economist and YouGov polls show. Why It Matters Trump has routinely touted positive approval ratings and polls during news conferences and campaign rallies throughout his political career. When the president returned to the White House in January, he coasted in with positive numbers. However, his approval ratings then dipped significantly amid sweeping tariff announcements. Trump later walked back the tariffs by announcing a 90-day pause for the majority. Slipping in polls could ultimately hinder Trump's political clout in an already highly polarized climate and potentially hurt Republican chances in the upcoming 2026 midterms. What To Know In a poll released on Tuesday, the president has a 38 percent approval rating with Hispanics. The poll was conducted from May 30 to June 2, involving over 1,600 U.S. adult citizens. The poll's margin of error is 3.2 percent. Last week, in a poll taken from May 23 to May 26, Trump's approval rating among Hispanics was 31 percent. The poll was taken among 1,660 U.S. adult citizens, too, with a margin of error of 3.2 percent. This is the highest Trump's approval rating has been with the key voting group since a poll taken from March 30 to April 1 showed him with a 43 percent approval rating with Hispanics. This poll's margin of error was 3.3 percent. Other polls have also shown the president's approval rating recently surging with Hispanic voters. An InsiderAdvantage poll of 1,000 likely voters taken from May 17 to 19 shows Trump's approval rating with Hispanics at 59.6 percent. The poll's margin of error was 3.09 percent. A previous survey from April 30 and May 1 among 1,200 likely voters showed that 38.4 percent of Hispanics approved of the job the president was doing. The poll's margin of error was 2.83 percent. President Donald Trump is seen arriving to deliver remarks at the National Memorial Day Observance at the Memorial Amphitheatre in Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia, on May 26, 2025. (Photo by SAUL LOEB /... President Donald Trump is seen arriving to deliver remarks at the National Memorial Day Observance at the Memorial Amphitheatre in Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia, on May 26, 2025. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) More What People Are Saying Political analyst Craig Agranoff told Newsweek via text message Tuesday: "The recent increase in Trump's approval rating among Hispanic U.S. adults, as reflected in the latest poll, likely stems from a combination of factors. His administration's messaging on economic opportunity and job creation may be resonating with segments of the Hispanic community, particularly those prioritizing financial stability." Agranoff continued, "Additionally, targeted outreach efforts and policy positions that align with cultural or social values held by some Hispanic voters could be contributing to this uptick. "It's critical to note that approval ratings can fluctuate due to short-term events or media cycles, and this rebound from previous months warrants closer scrutiny to determine if it reflects a durable shift or a temporary response to specific policy actions or rhetoric," Agranoff concluded. What Happens Next Weekly polls charting the president's approval rating are published frequently by numerous pollsters and media outlets.
Miami Herald
13 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Should US government screen social media of potential immigrants? What poll found
Most Americans support authorizing the government to screen the social media content of potential immigrants — though many have doubts about whether this process would be fair, according to a new YouGov/Economist poll. The survey, released on June 3, comes as President Donald Trump's administration has ramped up online monitoring of immigrants seeking to live in the U.S. — a protocol which has been in practice for at least a decade, according to The Associated Press. In April, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced it would begin considering antisemitic activity on social media as grounds for denying immigration requests. Further, the administration is considering requiring social media vetting for all international students seeking to study in the U.S., according to NBC News. At the same time, the government has ceased scheduling visa interviews for prospective foreign students. Here are the findings from the latest poll — which sampled 1,610 U.S. adults May 30-June 2 and had a margin of error of 3.2 percent. Social media monitoring A majority of respondents, 53%, said the U.S. government should be 'allowed to monitor the social media accounts of people applying to immigrate to the U.S.' Just 27% said officials should not be permitted to do this, and 19% said they were not sure. The vast majority of Republicans, 78%, favored this policy, while a plurality of Democrats, 44%, were opposed. However, more respondents than not said they had little faith in the government to fairly handle this process. A plurality, 46%, said they had no or not very much trust in the government 'to determine whether content on a person's social media account should disqualify them from immigrating to the U.S.' In contrast, 39% said they had a great deal or a fair amount of trust. Most Republicans, 62%, expressed faith in the government to handle social media screening, while most Democrats, 66%, expressed none or little. When it came to the goal of monitoring social media, Americans were divided. A plurality, 32%, said the main purpose of screening the online presence of potential immigrants is to 'improve national security,' while 23% said it is to 'suppress political dissent.' Twenty-seven percent said the goal is both of these. And, while there is widespread support for screenings, most Americans, 53%, believe that, once immigrants are in the country, they should 'have the same right to express political views online as U.S. citizens.' Thirty percent disagreed, and 18% said they were not sure. The overwhelming majority of Democrats, 75%, agreed with this statement, while a plurality of Republicans, 49%, disagreed. Respondents were also far more wary of social media monitoring when it came to U.S. citizens. More than two-thirds, 68%, said the government should be barred from surveilling the social media of citizens 'who are not being investigated for crimes.' Just 17% said the government should be allowed to do this. Here, there was agreement across the political spectrum, with most Democrats (79%), independents (66%) and Republicans (60%) saying they were opposed.
Miami Herald
15 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Should Afrikaners be accepted over other refugees? What Americans said in a poll
Most Americans take issue with the U.S. government's policy on Afrikaner refugees, according to new polling. A YouGov/Yahoo News survey found that, while a plurality of Americans are open to welcoming Afrikaners — white South Africans descended from European settlers — there is widespread opposition to prioritizing them over all others. The poll comes after President Donald Trump's administration accepted 59 Afrikaner refugees into the U.S. in early May — claiming they were discriminated against at home — while the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program has remained suspended. It also comes after Trump met with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the White House on May 21, during which he said Afrikaners were victims of genocide — a claim that has been widely disputed by experts. Views on refugees generally The poll — which sampled 1,560 U.S. adults May 22-27 — began by asking respondents for their general views on refugees, who typically flee their home country due to violence or persecution. A majority, 61%, said they approve of the U.S. accepting refugees from other nations, while 19% said they disapproved. With that said, a plurality, 43%, said they think the U.S. has welcomed too many refugees in recent years. Twenty-three percent said it accepted the right amount, and 13% said it didn't take in enough. In recent years, the U.S. has admitted between 11,000 and 60,000 refugees, according to data from Statista. Views on Afrikaners When it came specifically to accepting Afrikaners, Americans were divided. The survey posed the following question: 'Afrikaners are the descendants of white Europeans who came to South Africa centuries ago and later created its system of apartheid. Today, South Africa is more than 80% Black and some Afrikaners say they are being denied jobs and targeted with violence because they are white. Do you think the U.S. should accept Afrikaners as refugees?' A slim plurality, 36%, said yes, while 31% said no and 32% said they were not sure. A plurality, 47%, also said Afrikaners are about as deserving of refugee status as people from other countries. Twenty-four percent said they were less deserving, and 10% said they were more deserving. Views on singling out Afrikaners When respondents were informed that Afrikaners were being prioritized over other refugees, views became more negative. In late January, Trump issued an executive order that suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program, which indefinitely paused the arrival of refugees, except 'on a case-by-case basis.' A plurality of respondents, 42%, said they disapproved of this decision, while 38% said they approved of it, and 20% were not sure. Further, 52% said the U.S. should not accept Afrikaners — who were fast-tracked — 'before resuming acceptance of refugees from other countries.' A much smaller share, 22%, agreed with this policy, while 26% said they were not sure. 'White genocide' claim The poll — which has a margin of error of 3.2 percentage points — also asked respondents whether they believed Afrikaners were victims of 'white genocide.' A plurality, 40%, said they were not, while 26% said they were and 34% said they were not sure. During his Oval Office meeting with Ramaphosa, Trump showed videos and news articles alleging large-scale killings of white farmers, claiming 'a genocide' is 'taking place that you people don't want to write about.' Ramaphosa disagreed with this claim, responding, 'if there was Afrikaner farmer genocide, I can bet you these three gentlemen would not be here,' referencing white individuals on his team, including his minister of agriculture. Multiple organizations — including news outlets and nonprofits — have debunked Trump's claims of a genocide. Fact-checking by Reuters found that some of the images Trump shared with Ramaphosa were not from South Africa but came from unrelated conflicts, including in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. 'The idea of a 'white genocide' taking place in South Africa is completely false,' Gareth Newham, the head of Justice and Violence Prevention at the Institute for Security Studies, told PBS News. 'If there was any evidence of either a genocide or targeted violence taking place against any group based on their ethnicity,' he added, 'we would be amongst the first to raise (the) alarm and provide the evidence to the world.'
