New "Nightly News" anchor spent time in Columbus
The newest face in national evening news has ties to Columbus, and says his time in Ohio will affect his approach to filling some of the biggest shoes in the game.
Why it matters: Tom Llamas took the reins of "NBC Nightly News" from legendary broadcaster Lester Holt on Monday, becoming anchor and managing editor of one of the longest running and highest rated news shows on TV.
The intrigue: Llamas, 45, is also anchor of "Top Story with Tom Llamas," and has worked as an intern, production assistant, reporter and correspondent.
He'll be just the fourth permanent "Nightly News" anchor in the last 40 years.
Flashback: As a young reporter, Llamas spent time in Columbus embedded with candidate Howard Dean during the 2004 presidential race.
"I'll never forget it," he tells Axios, reminiscing about Hoggy's BBQ.
Columbus introduced Llamas, a Miami native and graduate of Loyola University New Orleans, to a Midwestern audience — one he wants to ensure remains part of his national work.
"I'm a firm believer that your newsroom should look like the community you cover," he says. "So if we're a national newsroom, we need to have voices from the Midwest, the South and the West. … The last thing you want is a national newscast telling you about your own community."
Zoom in: Llamas says keeping tabs on communities like Columbus is key in a post-pandemic world, as many of the fastest-growing areas in the country are now in states like Ohio, Florida and Texas, rather than the coasts.
Impacts made on those areas will be key to understanding national trends, he says.
"Ohio is one of those places where you think about the tariffs and what's going to happen — if they stick and people reinvest, or if it doesn't work at all and does more harm."
The bottom line: Replacing Holt, one of the country's most visible anchors, isn't an easy task, but Llamas says he's excited to "keep his legacy alive" while putting his fingerprints on the show and staying hands-on as a reporter, not just an anchor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Democrats' delusions go far deeper than Biden — but will the party ever learn?
If you haven't read the new book by CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios's Alex Thompson, 'Original Sin,' you should. The book details how former President Biden's top aides, advisers and media contacts lied to the American people about the president's fitness for office and his suitability as a candidate, and argues that this series of cover-ups is ultimately responsible for President Trump's 2024 victory. If its revelations are even half true (and there is every reason to believe they are truer than that), this book should chill and sober Democrats, independents and anyone else who would prefer an alternative to Trump's GOP. 'Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again' raises one profound question with implications that extend far beyond 2024 or even 2028: Why did top Democrats think that they not only could but should shoehorn a sadly diminished and dangerously unfit Biden into a second presidential term? Here's one answer: Democrats' perception of their own virtue has somehow become inextricable from their unwillingness to acknowledge reality as it actually is, rather than as they would like it to be. It would have been quite convenient if Biden circa 2024 was in fact indistinguishable from Biden circa 2016 or even 2020. The fact that this was obviously not the case did not deter Democrats' insistence on it as not just true but unquestionable. The depth of this problem for the party cannot be overstated. The definitional tic of today's Democrats is a belligerent unwillingness (which ultimately seems to beget a helpless inability) to acknowledge any truth that they find inconvenient or troubling. Here's what I'm talking about: Many Democrats will still maintain that Michael Brown had his hands up when Darren Wilson shot him. They will still argue that coronavirus could not have come from a lab in China, and they will maintain that it fully warranted the closing of schools. They hold fast to the idea that traditional masculinity and 'cisgender' normativity are social constructs that can ultimately be eradicated via progressive social programming. They will not abandon the notion that biologically male transgender athletes may fairly compete as female athletes. Many influential Democrats remain unwilling or unable to acknowledge that each of these statements has been proven demonstrably false. The sad irony, of course, is that elite Democrats' insistence on collective delusion with respect to such matters leads, inevitably, exactly where their lies about Biden did: to reactionary backlash. Because they did not insist on a timely, competitive primary to replace Biden, the U.S is stuck with Trump. Because they did not correct the lies and check the excesses of Black Lives Matter and its apologists in K-12 and higher education, we are left with decreased public safety and increased racial tensions. Because they did not ask the correct questions about COVID but parroted the mantra 'trust the science' in response to answers from those who did, we are left with an academic achievement gap that will disproportionately affect low-income, non-white students for the rest of their lives. Because they did not concede the biological facts of dimorphic sex and of characterological and psychological differences between most men and most women, we are left with decreasing societal acceptance for homosexual Americans and misogynistic attempts to regressively erase intragroup variance among women. I know that many of my fellow Democrats are primed to reply: 'But that's not fair! They are the ones who elected Trump, and who are harboring these racists and misogynists, and you blame us?' Well, yes. Here's why: By denying realities they find unsavory, Democrats leave any legitimate claim of truth to Republicans. And MAGA embraces that truth — with a literal vengeance. The Republicans' manner of denying reality is to wildly overstate it. So, for today's manosphere, for example, women are not just different from men on average, but so entirely unlike men that they should all, when possible, reflexively eschew any professional ambition in favor of 'tradwifery.' If Democrats did not deny fundamental truths altogether, fewer people would accept Republicans' bastardizations of them. Can Tapper and Thompson's book be positioned as one that uses Biden as a case study to help Democrats see that we gain nothing by denying reality, and behave accordingly? I hope so. Because the truth will out. And it would be really good for the country if that most fundamental reality of all did not so overwhelmingly favor today's patently cruel and often incompetent Republican Party. Elizabeth Grace Matthew is based in Philadelphia. She writes about books, education, and culture, including on Substack.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Trump-Newsom feud boils over during immigration protests in LA
The immigration protests in Los Angeles are the latest flashpoint in a simmering battle between the Trump administration and California with the federal government repeatedly threatening to cut funding to the state. The big picture: Clashes over progressive ideologies on climate, transgender rights and immigration are at the center of President Trump's issue with the Golden State — but California's Democratic leaders are putting up a fight. The president has repeatedly threatened the state with funding cuts and a continued federal immigration crackdown despite recent protests in California cities including Los Angeles and nearby Paramount. The latest: Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard members to California on Saturday in response to protests sparked by recent federal immigration sweeps in Los Angeles County. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass advocated for immigrants targeted in the sweeps and said her office was in "close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations." Trump lambasted Bass and the state's governor, further deepening the ongoing divide. California plans to sue the administration for federalizing the National Guard. How Trump has threatened California's funding? The president recently threatened to cut funding to California if it continues allowing transgender athletes to compete in women's sports, doubling down after a trans high schooler won state championships. He's poised to toss out California's stringent auto emissions standards. His move to halt student visa interviews and revoke visas for Chinese students jeopardizes California universities, which have more international students than any other state. And Trump has clashed with Gov. Gavin Newsom over the state's response to the Los Angeles-area fires and previously threatened to withhold federal aid if the state doesn't agree to the president's demands. What they're saying: Amid reports of funding cuts to the state, White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Axios in an emailed statement Friday: "No taxpayer should be forced to fund the demise of our country, and that's what California is doing through its lunatic anti-energy, soft-on-crime, pro-child mutilation, and pro-sanctuary policies." The Trump administration, he said, "is committed to ending this nightmare and restoring the California Dream." "No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the Administration have been made, and any discussion suggesting otherwise should be considered pure speculation," Desai said. How California Gov. Newsom responded Newsom responded to the report Friday that alleged Trump would cut funding, making a threat of his own to stop paying the state's federal taxes. "Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back." Tagging Trump, he added, "Maybe it's time to cut that off." Zoom out: The state is suing the administration and is doing so at nearly double the rate of Trump's first term — with no plans to slow down, per CalMatters, a nonprofit news outlet.
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Scoop: Dems fight Trump's budget bill with "Big Betrayal of Women" forum
The top women in Senate and House Democratic leadership will host a forum this week on how women are affected by President Trump's "big, beautiful bill," Axios has learned. Why it matters: Democrats argue the GOP's proposed cuts to programs like Medicaid and SNAP, and restrictions on reproductive health services, disproportionately affect women. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Min.), the No. 3 Senate Democrat, and House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-Mass.) will host the "Big Betrayal of Women" forum Wednesday on Capitol Hill. Shalanda Young, formerly a top Biden administration official, will give witness testimony at the forum. The big picture: The forum is part of Democratic efforts to define the bill on their own terms, with the minority party holding little leverage to actually stop its passage. Klobuchar and Clark are joined by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nv.) and Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) in hosting the forum. Other women lawmakers are expected to join the event. Three women — identified as "Nancy" from Iowa, "Felecia" from Kansas and "Katina" from Virginia — will also testify at the forum. The women rely on SNAP and Medicaid to support themselves and their children. Young is now a distinguished scholar in residence at New York University's Tax Law Center. The bottom line: Trump and Republicans made up ground on Democrats among women voters in the 2024 election. Democrats will need strong margins with women to win in the 2026 midterm election.
