
Delay-ridden South Western becomes first train company to be renationalised under Labour's 'new dawn for railways' - but don't expect any cheaper tickets
Delay-ridden South Western Railway has become the first train company to be renationalised by Labour.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander hailed it as a 'new dawn for railways' as she stepped on board the first train under Government control.
But she stopped short of promising lower ticket prices despite passengers saying all they wanted was 'cheaper fares'.
The carriages were the first to be adorned with Great British Railways livery with the Department for Transport now responsible for the service.
SWR was recently voted one of the worst rail operators coming third bottom in a recent study by watchdog Transport Focus.
The operator was previously owned by FirstGroup and MTR Corporation. Two other rail firms - C2C and Greater Anglia - will be brought under public control later this year.
A further seven other companies will be renationalised by 2027 with Labour previously saying simplifying the rail network would save taxpayers £2.2billion.
Boarding the 6.14am service from London Waterloo to Shepperton in Surrey, Ms Alexander said: 'Today marks a new dawn for our railways.
'Moving away from 30 years of inefficiency, delayed services and failing passengers, and moving confidently into a new era - the era of Great British Railways.
'That's why I was so adamant I had to be here at Waterloo this morning, alongside all these other excited passengers and rail aficionados, for what really is a watershed moment.
'Most rail users don't spend much time thinking about who runs the trains, but they do want them to work, and that's why there's a genuine excitement here today at the generational opportunity we have to completely transform train travel in this country.
'As the 6:14 service leaves Waterloo, I'll be sat on it with a sense of pride but also a determination to get this right and deliver a railway Britain can be proud of again.'
But some passengers weren't even aware the service had be renationalised as they boarded trains.
Maggie Smith, from Wokingham, told the BBC: 'I haven't heard any information at all and I haven't been given any information about what the impacts might be.'
While John Major told the corporation that he thought it was a 'dreadful' and feared it the service would no longer be reliable.
'British rail were a standing joke and stand-up comedians thoroughly enjoyed British rail,' he said.
All other services run by private companies will be renationalised as contracts reach the end of their minimum terms.
Britain's railway services were privatised in the mid-1990s.
Office of Rail and Road (ORR) figures show the equivalent of 4 per cent of services in Britain were cancelled in the year to April 26. For SWR, the figure was 3 per cent.
Renationalised services will be integrated into Great British Railways (GBR), a new public sector body which will also oversee rail infrastructure.
Legislation to enable the creation of GBR is expected to be introduced in Parliament later this year.
Shadow GBR has been established to ensure closer collaboration within the industry.
Richard Bowker, former boss of the Strategic Rail Authority, which was a public body providing direction for the industry between 2001 and 2005, said it is 'quite easy to be sceptical' about the overhaul but he believes there is 'real potential here for things to get better'.
Mr Bowker, who presents rail podcast Green Signals, went on: 'It has become overly complex, and I think bringing together track and train more now is a pragmatic and sensible thing to do.
'The key with this will not really be who owns it. Are the people that are going to be running it day to day... going to be genuinely empowered to make the right decisions to run the railway?
'We've got plenty of very, very able managers, but over the last five years - particularly since Covid when franchises effectively went bust and national rail contracts were put in place - there has been a huge amount of centralised control, and it's quite stifling.'
Johnbosco Nwogbo, of public ownership campaign group We Own It, said: 'Today is a great day for passengers because our railway is finally beginning its journey back to putting us, our communities and our planet before the profits of private shareholders.
'But the job is not yet done. The Government still has to get public ownership right, so that it really delivers for people.'
Analysis by PA news agency found the renationalisation of SWR means a third of journeys are on publicly owned services.
That is based on passenger journey data for 2024 from the ORR.
Operators that were already under public ownership are LNER, Northern, Southeastern and TransPennine Express.
GBR branding has been added to one SWR train.
It features part of a Union flag, the double arrow symbol that is synonymous with Britain's railways, and the words 'Great British Railways coming soon'.
More trains will be given the branding over the coming months and years.
But the DfT said publicly owned services 'will need to meet tough performance standards to be rebranded Great British Railways'.
These standards will cover factors such as punctuality, reliability and the experience of passengers.
The DfT said its renationalisation policy will save taxpayers up to £150 million per year in fees previously paid to private companies that ran services.
The first SWR service under public ownership was a rail replacement bus.
After the implementation of renationalisation at 2am, passengers travelling on the 5.36am service from Woking to London Waterloo had to change to a bus at Surbiton because of engineering work.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Auto Express
15 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog
Consumers have been advised to steer clear of using car finance claim firms, as the UK's top financial watchdog says they could be spending money unnecessarily. The Financial Conduct Authority has begun setting out advice surrounding a possible redress scheme with regard to the ongoing car finance scandal which, according to experts, could see billions of pounds made available for potential claims. Advertisement - Article continues below However, with countless companies now popping up to assist potential claimants, the FCA is keen to remind motorists that in using one 'they may end up paying for a service they do not need and having to pay up to 30 per cent in fees out of any award they may receive'. Rather than utilise one of these paid services, consumers can submit timestamped complaints and claims themselves. Tools such as those on the MoneySavingExpert website can help people search for previous finance agreements, while the site also provides a template in order to draft a letter of complaint. With the Supreme Court set to make its judgement next month in regard to whether 'discretionary commission arrangements' (DCAs) were illegal in the first instance, the FCA is also advising finance firms on how they should calculate claims for disgruntled clients. The FCA is keen for a redress scheme to strike a balance between being fair to consumers, but at the same time not disrupting the market by putting finance firms out of business. In its latest release, the FCA says that the latter scenario could 'reduce competition and could make it more expensive for consumers to borrow money to buy a car in the future'. Such a scheme will fall under one of two arrangements: 'opt-in' and 'opt-out'. With the former – considered the most likely scenario – claimants would be required to notify their finance provider prior to a specified date if they wish to be considered for redress. 'Opt-out', on the other hand, would mean that everyone who is eligible will automatically be included, unless they contact their firm to be taken off the list. Consumers can expect the FCA to announce within six weeks of the Court's judgement in July as to whether a full redress scheme will be implemented, and how exactly it will operate. Tell us which new car you're interested in and get the very best offers from our network of over 5,500 UK dealers to compare. Let's go…


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Magic circle executive banned for sexual misconduct at karaoke bar
A former employee at one of London's most prestigious law firms has been banned from working in the legal profession after touching a junior colleague's bottom in a karaoke bar. Vivek Ramsaroop has been punished after the solicitors' watchdog found that he grabbed a fellow worker's waist and started 'rubbing himself' against her while on a work night. At the time, he was an employee at the magic circle firm Linklaters. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has ruled that the incident, which took place in November 2022, amounted to 'serious sexual misconduct' and banned him from working for other law firms in Britain. As part of its findings, the SRA said Mr Ramsaroop harassed a junior colleague, referred to only as 'Employee A', at a social event organised for Linklaters' London office. The SRA said: 'Whilst at the karaoke bar, Mr Ramsaroop approached Employee A and stood closely to her talking and said the words 'you're gorgeous' and 'you're amazing'.' He then put his arms around her waist and kissed the side of her face for several seconds, the regulator said. 'Shortly afterwards, Mr Ramsaroop started dancing directly behind Employee A, grabbed her waist with both hands and touched her bottom,' the SRA added. Mr Ramaswoop then 'started rubbing himself against' his colleague on the dancefloor 'with his pelvis pressed against Employee A's bottom,' the watchdog said. During his time at Linklaters, Mr Ramaswoop – whose last known address was in Johannesburg – was involved in Linklaters' legal practice but not employed as a solicitor. He specialises in mergers and acquisitions. The SRA said Mr Ramaswoop's conduct constituted 'serious sexual misconduct' as it involved repeated physical contact directed towards a junior colleague. As a result, the regulator issued a so-called 'Section 43' notice against Mr Ramaswoop, which restricts firms from employing individuals deemed to have committed misconduct, even if they are not working as lawyers. Mr Ramaswoop was also ordered to pay a portion of the SRA's £1,350 legal bill. The regulator says it expects law firms to take a 'zero tolerance' approach to sexual misconduct, which covers any abuse of a person's 'professional position to initiate or pursue an improper sexual or emotional relationship'. Linklaters is one of Britain's four 'magic circle' law firms. Last year, it paid its partners an average £1.9m, while its newly-qualified lawyers received starting salaries of £150,000. A Linklaters spokesman said: 'This relates to an incident involving a former employee who had joined the firm a few weeks prior. We had reported the matter to the SRA and the individual left the firm with immediate effect.'


BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Kent County Council Doge head quit due to 'doubt' over project
The tech entrepreneur who quit heading up Reform UK's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) says he did so because the resignation of the party's chairman left him with "a bit of doubt" about the future of the 11 months in the role, Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf resigned on Thursday alongside Nathaniel Fried, who was said to be leading the unit. Speaking to Politics South East, Mr Fried said the outgoing chairman was "spearheading" the Doge initiative and expressed concerns that the scheme "might not turn out how I wanted it to" without councillors at Kent County Council (KCC) have said it is "business as usual" following the double resignation. KCC deputy leader Brian Collins said "absolutely nothing's changed" following the double departure."We have a focus, we have a mission, that mission hasn't changed, business as usual," he told BBC South East on Friday Mr Yusuf and Mr Fried were part of the Doge team which attended its first meeting at KCC on said the meeting was "very productive" but the party admitted it did not know how long it would take for the unit to produce scheme, modelled on the Doge unit created by billionaire Elon Musk as part of Donald Trump's second term as US president, aims to identify and eliminate wasteful to claims that the "engine room" of the unit had now been lost, Mr Collins said: "The engine room is the 57 councillors that have been elected to run this council." 'Circus coming to town' Conservative councillor Sarah Hudson described the current situation as a "mockery".She said: "It's like a circus coming to town, and then you've got various clowns, and they've thrown their toys out of the pram at the first issue that's come along."Mr Fried said he took on the project for free because he felt the "social contract between tax payers and the British government has been a little bit broken".Asked what people in Kent would make of the resignations, just four days into the project, he said he was sure they were "disappointed"."I have great confidence in the local councillors who are working very hard at the moment, especially the head of the council," he said."I'm sure that people are disappointed but thus is politics."A spokesperson for Reform UK said: "The work of the Reform UK Doge unit will continue. The team is larger than just one man."Many Reform-controlled councils already have their respective Doge cabinet members, so this work was happening before and will continue after."