A Second Trump Shock To Programs For Seniors And People With Disabilities
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 29: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump's Secretary of Health ... More and Human Services testifies during his Senate confirmation hearing. (Photo by)
The Trump Administration has cut by more than 40 percent the staff that oversees critical federal programs for older adults and younger people with disabilities who live at home. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired the staffers who manage and review federal grants to state and local governments and community-based organizations for programs such as Meals on Wheels. It also eliminated regional office positions, along with those who evaluate the benefits of those programs and communicate the office's work to grantees and the public at-large.
Those staff reductions came just four days after Kennedy abolished the office that managed those programs, called the Administration for Community Living. ACL, which had a staff of about 200 at the beginning of the year, manages critical programs such as Meals on Wheels, senior center nutrition, falls and elder abuse prevention, transportation, area agencies on aging, and family caregiver supports.
All are aimed at making it possible for people with chronic conditions to remain at home and avoid institutional care.
The result: While Kennedy says he wants to refocus health policy on chronic disease, his cuts are likely to make life worse for those with chronic conditions and end up costing the medical system more money. Addressing chronic diseases not only means prevention or treatment, it also requires supporting those living with these conditions.
Kennedy said in late March he would split ACL's responsibilities among three entities in the Department of Health and Human Services: the Administration for Families and Children, the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy and Evaluation, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. However, Kennedy also made deep staff cuts at ACF and abolished ASPE, leaving staffers uncertain about how these programs will operate.
The Trump Administration has not stopped funding the programs administered by ACL, many of which are included in the Older Americans Act. ACL also manages the RAISE Act, which helps coordinate a broad range of federal programs for older adults and people with disabilities.
However, funding for those programs is in jeopardy as the Trump Administration and congressional Republicans look to cut domestic spending to help fund planned tax cuts.
While Kennedy did not formally cut spending for the programs managed by ACL, it is hard to see how they will continue to operate without staff to manage grants and other agreements with those who run OAA programs day-to-day. For example, how will a contract get renewed if there is no staff to measure its success and review the application?
Abolishing ACL and firing nearly half its staff was part of a broader move by the Trump Administration to eliminate a total of about 20,000 HHS positions, about one-quarter of its total staff. Roughly 10,000 resigned, many under pressure, before the latest announcement.
Kennedy's purge at ACL seems contrary to his goal of refocusing HHS on chronic disease. In the press release announcing that he was abolishing ACL, Kennedy said, 'We aren't just reducing bureaucratic sprawl. We are realigning the organization with its core mission and our new priorities in reversing the chronic disease epidemic.'
Yet, all of those who will lose benefits from Kennedy's decisions are living with some form of chronic disease. It may be conditions that mostly affect older adults, such as arthritis, heart disease, dementia, or Parkinson's disease. Or it may be conditions that generally affect people at birth, such as Down's syndrome, autism, or cystic fibrosis.
By making separate cuts to National Institutes of Health funding, Kennedy is curbing research that could prevent or treat some of these conditions. By slashing offices such as ACL, he is making it more difficult for people with these conditions to live as well as possible.
At the same time, Kennedy's choices will increase government costs, not reduce them. To the degree the Trump Administration is worried about cost savings, cutting supports to people of all ages with disabilities living at home will be counterproductive.
For example, as many as half of older adults who are seen in hospital emergency departments may be either malnourished of at risk for malnutrition. The cost for treating those with malnutrition: nearly $160 billion.
Even when programs such as Meals on Wheels and senior center meals programs had support in Washington, funding shortages meant older adults often waited to receive home delivered meals. In West Virginia, for example, roughly 1000 older adults are on a waiting list for the program.
Trump's cuts to ACL will only worsen this situation, put more of those with chronic disease at risk, and increase costs to Medicare, which will pay when an older adult or younger person with a disability suffers a preventable medical event, such as a fall or malnutrition, and lands in an emergency department or is admitted to a hospital.
Abolishing ACL and firing nearly half its staff will harm millions of older adults, people with disabilities, and their families with no obvious benefit to other taxpayers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
36 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Amid fears of pending California education cuts, top Trump official says state is ‘at risk'
As concerns heighten among officials and educators about possible pending federal funding cuts to California, U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said Tuesday that the state is at risk, but did not elaborate on when a decision would be made or what the cuts could be. McMahon, in a videotaped interview with Bloomberg, was responding to a question about the possible termination of grant funding to California public universities by referencing issues related to Title IX, which prohibits discrimination based on gender. President Trump has repeatedly threatened to withhold unspecified federal funding from California because it allows transgender athletes to compete with cisgender athletes in girls' and women's sporting events. 'Well in California I think we saw pretty flagrant violations of Title IX,' McMahon said, 'and that is why this ... focus ... was put on them.... We have, you know, men participating in women's sports, which is clearly against Title IX, and the president has made it very clear that he is definitely going to uphold Title IX.' If the Trump administration did not 'address' violations 'as they occur then it's sort of by acquiescence that it's OK to continue and it's not,' she said. The remarks were made during a Bloomberg event in which McMahon addressed a variety of topics, including the mass Education Department layoffs under her leadership — halted by federal courts and appealed to the Supreme Court — and an ongoing battle with Harvard University. Trump has stripped billions of dollars from Harvard and tried to ban foreign-born students and the university has launched multiple lawsuits in response. Reports, including one Friday by CNN, have emerged in recent days that the Trump administration is preparing to withhold wide swaths of federal funding from the Golden State's universities, scientific researchers and K-12 schools. The California State University and University of California systems already face hundreds of millions of dollars in grant cuts from multiple federal agencies, including the Education and Health and Human Services departments. These cuts too are the subject of litigation, and some have been put on hold by the courts. The possibility of further cuts have alarmed some California legislators. In a letter sent Friday to the administration, Rep. Dave Min (D-Irvine) called talk of cuts 'targeted political vengeance' and said 'any significant move to cut federal funding to California would be outrageous, illegal and set a dangerous precedent. It would also have devastating impacts for our residents, whether they are Democrats, Republicans or independents.' He also raised a constitutional issue. 'Your withholding of funds that have been appropriated would constitute a direct attack on the separation of powers that is at the heart of our democratic republic,' Min wrote. The White House did not immediately respond to a request Tuesday related to McMahon's remarks, but in a statement Friday said that 'no final decisions' had been made on funding cuts. 'No taxpayer should be forced to fund the demise of our country, and that's what California is doing through its lunatic anti-energy, soft-on-crime, pro-child mutilation, and pro-sanctuary policies. The Trump administration is committed to ending this nightmare and restoring the California Dream,' the statement said. 'No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the Administration have been made, and any discussion suggesting otherwise should be considered pure speculation.' Madison Biedermann, a spokesperson for McMahon, on Tuesday affirmed the last part: No decision had been made. Biedermann said it would be incorrect to interpret McMahon's remarks as confirming imminent cuts. McMahon was restating the department's position: California is at serious risk of losing funds if it does not comply with Trump administration policies, including banning transgender athletes from women's and girls' sports. Biedermann said any reports about the timing or extent of any cuts is, at this point, 'speculation.' To date, she said, California is under investigation but has not been penalized based on its actions. Reports of imminent — but unconfirmed — cuts have appeared in Politico and the Washington Post. Among the areas of funding potentially at risk are the so-called formula funding programs that are approved and mandated by Congress. This includes Title I dollars that the federal government provides to schools to offset the effects of poverty. These funds alone are worth about $2.1 billion a year to California and about $460 million to Los Angeles Unified, the state's largest school system, where about 80% of students have family income low enough to qualify them for a free or reduced-price lunch. Aid for school meals — totaling $363 million to L.A. Unified alone — also is a potential lever of influence for the Trump administration. These dollars are administered through the U.S. Department of Agriculture, outside McMahon's jurisdiction. Another potentially affected funding stream is $1.33 billion annually to offset part of the cost of educating students with disabilities — of which $177 million goes to L.A. Unified. When asked Tuesday about withholding formula funding, McMahon again raised the issue of Title IX compliance. 'I think that is part of what we found with the state of California just blatantly refusing to be in compliance with Title IX regulations,' McMahon said. 'So that is one of the tools and the other options that we have with California and I think it's right that we make them aware that that is a risk that they run.' California officials have defended their policy as consistent with state and federal law, prioritizing rights based on gender identity. California sued the U.S. Justice Department on Monday over its demand last week that local school districts ban transgender youth from competing in sports, arguing the federal agency had overstepped its authority in violation of both state and federal law. Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi (D-Rolling Hills Estates), chair of the California State Assembly's Education Committee, told The Times that he has kept a close eye on the Trump administration's attacks on public education. 'We know that the hardest hit would be our students with special needs and our disabled students,' he said. 'Also, Title I funding for our low-income students is a big concern.' Muratsuchi said that California's 'best defense' against Trump's actions 'is our Constitution and the rule of law.... The president should not have a unilateral power to cut funding appropriated by Congress.' Muratsuchi also stressed the importance of federal funding to the UC and CSU systems. 'To have the federal research funds cut is tremendously impactful,' he said. The Times' Washington bureau chief Michael Wilner and Bloomberg News contributed to this report.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trade war resolution may require concessions from all, ECB's Lagarde says
FRANKFURT (Reuters) -Coercive trade policies fail to resolve financial imbalances and the risk of mutual economic damage is so great that all sides need to weigh policy adjustments to resolve tensions, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said on Wednesday. The United States set off global economic turmoil in April when it unveiled a raft of tariffs on most nations and trade flows have been disrupted while governments negotiate with the Trump administration. Lagarde, speaking on a rare visit to Beijing, said all countries needed to take responsibility and should tweak policies that have led to either excess supply or excess demand, otherwise trade barriers and their likely retaliation will erode global prosperity. "We have witnessed a sharp rise in the use of industrial policies aimed at boosting domestic capacity," Lagarde said at the People's Bank of China. "Since 2014, subsidy-related interventions that distort global trade have more than tripled globally." China has extensively relied on subsidies for decades, especially in the case of export-focused production, and critics argue this gives its firms an unfair advantage that is used to crowd out production elsewhere. But China is not alone in using subsidies and others, particularly in emerging markets, were resorting to such schemes, Lagarde said. The share of the U.S. in global demand has meanwhile soared in recent years, which partly reflects excessive spending in the public sector, contributing to the imbalances, Lagarde argued. A resolution in the conflict lies in more closely respecting global rules and forging bilateral or regional agreements rooted in mutual benefits, she said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
43 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda . Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles , where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition.
