Who is Panchen Lama– Tibetans urge China to release spiritual leader 30 years after abduction
ANI photo
Tibetans and human rights organisations are once again demanding the release of
Gedhun Choekyi Nyima
, the 11th
Panchen Lama
, on the 30th anniversary of his disappearance. He was taken by
Chinese authorities
in May 1995, shortly after the
Dalai Lama
officially recognised him as the second-highest spiritual leader in Tibetan Buddhism.
The Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), based in India, said his abduction is one of the clearest examples of China's
human rights violations
. 'Kidnapped by Chinese authorities at the age of six, his abduction is one of the clearest examples of China's severe human rights abuses,' said CTA spokesperson Tenzin Lekshay.
US and international human rights officials also condemn China's actions. 'China vanished a six-year-old boy because he symbolised freedom for Tibetan Buddhists enduring severe oppression,' said Asif Mahmood of the US commission on international religious freedom. The Washington-based International Campaign for
Tibet
called on governments worldwide to pressure China to reveal the Panchen Lama's location and condition.
China has not shared any public information about his status, which has raised ongoing concerns about transparency and religious freedom in Tibet. The situation reflects Beijing's strong involvement in Tibetan religious matters and its efforts to manage leadership roles within the region.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
Gendun Choki Nyima Has Not Been Seen in 30 Years
Who is Panchen Lama?
The Panchen Lama is the second-highest figure in Tibetan Buddhism, after the Dalai Lama.
He plays a key role in identifying the next Dalai Lama, and the two have traditionally recognised each other's reincarnations.
Gedhun Choekyi Nyima was declared the 11th Panchen Lama by the Dalai Lama in May 1995.
Just days later, he and his family were taken by Chinese authorities.
In his place, China installed another boy, Gyaltsen Norbu, whom many Tibetans do not recognise.
The Panchen Lama's disappearance remains a deeply emotional and political issue for Tibetans worldwide.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Hindi imposition row: BJP not backing down, to ‘take truth to people'
Mumbai: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has decided not to give in to growing opposition from regional parties against its decision to make Hindi the default third language in schools across Maharashtra from Class 1. The party will instead 'set the right narrative' and 'take the truth to people' ahead of local body polls across the state later this year, according to party insiders. Mumbai, Jun 27 (ANI): Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis with Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) National Joint General Secretary Shiv Prakash, state party president Chandrashekhar Bawankule and others during the BJP Maharashtra core committee meeting, in Mumbai on Thursday. (@Devendra_Office X/ANI Photo) (Office of Devendra - X) The decision was taken during a meeting of the Maharashtra BJP's core committee on Thursday evening at the official residence of chief minister Devendra Fadnavis in Mumbai. Apart from its strategy for the upcoming local body polls, the state BJP's top brass also discussed how to tackle the issue of Marathi pride raked up by parties such as the Shiv Sena (UBT) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), which have claimed that the Mahayuti government is trying to impose Hindi in Maharashtra's schools. The BJP resolved not to fall prey to the trap and tackle it skillfully, according to a senior party leader who was present at the meeting. 'The leaders expressed the need to set the right narrative and convey the right message to citizens—that the decision to grant Marathi the status of a classical language was made possible only because of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. It was decided that the party should take up the benefits of the status for the preservation and promotion of the [Marathi] language to the people,' said the senior party leader. The decision to grant classical status to Marathi was announced by the Union Cabinet in October last year, ahead of the Maharashtra assembly elections. During the meeting, BJP leaders, including Fadnavis, said that the Opposition is spreading a misconception about the state government's decision to introduce Hindi in primary education, said the senior leader. 'Hindi has not been imposed as a compulsory language, but a misconception is being spread. The opposition parties, especially the Shiv Sena (UBT) and MNS, are likely to play the Marathi pride card in the elections, as they have been doing in previous polls. While discussing the matter, the leaders pressed for the need to take the truth to the people,' added the senior leader. While presenting the facts to the people, Fadnavis has advised BJP leaders to be cautious when reacting to the Opposition's criticism. The party leadership also expressed dissatisfaction with the stand taken by its partners, especially the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), on the issue. NCP chief and deputy chief minister Ajit Pawar has said that Hindi should be taught from Class 5. Apart from the chief minister, Thursday's meeting was attended by Maharashtra BJP chief Chandrashekhar Bawankule, working president Ravindra Chavan, joint national general secretary Shiv Prakash, former state unit chief Raosaheb Danve, higher education minister Chandrakant Patil, and Mumbai BJP chief Ashish Shelar. 'BJP is a staunch supporter of Marathi, but it also respects the other languages,' said Shelar on Friday. 'We ensured the classical language status for Marathi, and Hindi has not been made compulsory in the schools.'
Hans India
44 minutes ago
- Hans India
India has done well by not signing the SCO joint statement
By not signing a tendentious joint statement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meet, India has made it clear that it will never allow Pakistan and its supporters to peddle their narrative at international forums. The draft statement did not have any reference to the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 innocent lives were lost, but it did mention the Jaffar Express hijacking in Pakistan in March. Addressing the SCO gathering, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh spoke about the Pahalgam attack and the ensuing Operation Sindoor. He articulated Delhi's stand on terrorism in unambiguous terms: 'Peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups. Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action... Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards. SCO should not hesitate to criticise such nations.' The double standards continue because China, the wannabe superpower, keeps supporting and abetting Pakistan to chafe and fret India by whatever means possible, including jihad. Over the decades, China has provided Pakistan with military hardware, financial bailouts, nuclear assistance, and diplomatic cover on the world stage. This is not born out of altruism or ideological affinity—neither exists—but of a deliberate maneuver to keep India perpetually engaged in regional skirmishes, border tensions, and security concerns, thereby slowing down its strategic and economic ascent. Beijing's strategy is part of a broader geopolitical playbook often referred to as the 'String of Pearls' or the policy of 'encirclement.' Through this approach, China seeks to establish strong strategic footholds around India's periphery. This includes developing port infrastructure in countries like Sri Lanka (Hambantota), Pakistan (Gwadar) and Myanmar (Kyaukpyu), effectively tightening a strategic noose around India. By nurturing these relationships, China ensures that India's attention remains divided between defending its immediate borders and countering Beijing's increasing influence in the Indian Ocean region. Beijing's tacit and, at times, overt support for Pakistan's use of asymmetric warfare, including the indirect promotion of jihadist elements targeting India, is a particularly dangerous aspect of this strategy. While China officially distances itself from terrorism, it has repeatedly shielded Pakistan from international scrutiny, especially at forums like the UN Security Council, where Beijing has vetoed or stalled resolutions against Pakistan-based terrorists. This not only emboldens Pakistan but also sends signals to New Delhi that it must constantly remain on guard against cross-border terrorism and hybrid warfare tactics. By abetting Pakistan's antagonistic posture towards India, China ensures that a significant portion of India's resources—both financial and military—are tied up in managing regional conflicts, internal security threats, and defence preparedness against a two-front war scenario. This, in turn, diverts India's focus from economic reforms, infrastructure development, and global diplomatic initiatives that would otherwise propel it to great power status. Ultimately, China's aim is not necessarily to provoke a full-scale war, but to strategically annoy and frustrate India, keeping it politically and militarily overstretched. By exploiting Pakistan's historical animosity towards India and weaving it into its grand strategy, China hopes to slow down India's rise and consolidate its dominance in Asia. India's refusal to sign the statement will not make Islamabad or Beijing mend their ways, but it will make it difficult for them to sell their narrative.
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Dalai Lama reincarnation: Contest over the soul of Tibet
As the 14th Dalai Lama celebrates his 90th birthday on July 6, all eyes are on his expected announcement on his reincarnation. He, himself, stated that the 15th Dalai Lama would be found in the 'free world'. China, which 'liberated' Tibet in 1951 with a military invasion, on the other hand, declared its intention to select the next Dalai Lama through a 'golden urn' lottery process. Beijing hopes to create some confusion among the Tibetans on the issue of the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. It had done the same in the case of Panchen Lama, the second-highest monk after the Dalai Lama in Tibetan Buddhism. China expects the move will also pave the way for its unbridled influence over Tibet. Earlier, in 1995, when the Dalai Lama recognised Gedhun Choekyi Nyima as the 11th Panchen Lama, China put him under house arrest and, instead, selected Gyaltsen Norbu for the position through a "golden urn" process. Gyaltsen Norbu today occupies important political positions in communist China. He is a member of the standing committee of China's People's Political Consultative Conference and the vice president of the Buddhist Association of China. He is also seen touring Tibet and meeting political leaders of Lama @90: The monk who still scares the since President Jiang Zemin's time, stated that it will resort to the "golden urn" process in the case of the 15th Dalai Lama as well. Moreover, in August 2020, the Tibet Forum Meeting – one of the highest decision-making bodies in communist China – declared 'sinicisation' of Tibetan Buddhism to convert all aspects in Tibet into Han Chinese practices with socialist interpretations, despite the promises of it made in the 1951 17-point agreement for the autonomy of Tibetans. The Dalai Lama would not like to see Chinese-induced chaos destroying the Tibetan identity and way of life. In 2011, the Dalai Lama transferred his temporal powers to the popularly elected Sikyong (the prime minister). The exiled Tibetans, since then, took part in the elections of the Sikyong thrice, while Tibet under China had never witnessed popular elections. China's concern is also that, despite its seven decades of tight rule over Tibet since 1951 and assimilation policies, an estimated 97% of Tibetans in Tibet still revere the 14th Dalai Lama. China shudders to think of Tibet slipping from its tight embrace. Spiritually, the Dalai Lama's declaration on his 90th birthday is expected to be endorsed by the key head monks from Mongolia (the originator of the Dalai Lama institution) and those now living in India, Nepal, Bhutan and other countries. The Dalai Lama also has significant influence in the United States (which passed the Tibet Policy and Support Act of 2020 and Tibet Reciprocity Act of 2018), the European Union, Japan, Australia and other countries. Such a contest over the future Dalai Lama has ramifications for not only the Tibetan community but also to the trans-Himalayan belt. With its $19 trillion GDP, China intends to influence the region through infrastructure connectivity and military mobilisation, while the Dalai Lama wants to protect the soul of Tibet and his Lama says his successor to be born outside India, which had borders with Tibet historically, the Dalai Lama's succession creates uncertainties along the current borders, as the Galwan clashes in 2020 and the current full-scale border mobilisation indicate. India also has to factor China's 628 dual-use 'well-off society' villages in the border areas, as nearly 200 such 'villages' were constructed on the path of the Dalai Lama's flight in 1959. Besides, India is also aware of the irredentist Chinese claims on not only Tawang but also the whole of Arunachal Pradesh. India also has to cope with the fragile trans-Himalayan law and order situation. Despite heavy political and military pressure from China, India has vowed to protect and further the identity of the Tibetans living in India and termed the 14th Dalai Lama as a "spiritual" leader. New Delhi is likely to stick to its position in the case of the 15th Dalai Lama too..(The writer is a Professor of Chinese Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University)
