logo
Todd Chrisley critiques U.S. prison system on daughter's podcast, calls for reform

Todd Chrisley critiques U.S. prison system on daughter's podcast, calls for reform

Yahooa day ago

The Brief
Todd Chrisley criticized the U.S. prison system for high incarceration and recidivism rates, advocating for criminal justice reform.
Savannah Chrisley and Lynn Patton discussed the need for improved prison conditions and the role of private prisons, while defending their support for Donald Trump.
The episode highlighted Alice Johnson's advocacy work and the Chrisley family's commitment to continued advocacy following their pardons.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Todd Chrisley made a surprise appearance on his daughter Savannah Chrisley's podcast, "Unlocked," using the platform to sound off on prison conditions, presidential pardons, and his own family's legal battles.
The episode featured former Trump administration official Lynn Patton and centered around criminal justice reform and the recent pardons of Todd and Julie Chrisley, who were convicted of bank fraud and tax evasion.
What they're saying
"This country incarcerates more individuals than any other country in the world," Todd said, after crashing the show toward the end. "We then have the highest recidivism rate of anyone else. So if we're the number one country of incarceration, shouldn't we be the number one country in lowering recidivism?"
Todd, who was released after receiving a pardon from former President Donald Trump, joined Savannah, Patton, and a group of their associates for a road trip to Memphis, where they planned to celebrate criminal justice advocate Alice Johnson's 70th birthday.
Patton, a longtime Trump ally and former Department of Housing and Urban Development official, praised Savannah's transformation into an advocate for incarcerated individuals.
"You have become one of the greatest advocates we have for the Bureau of Prisons," Patton told Savannah. "You live, breathe and eat to make a difference."
Savannah recounted a meeting with the Bureau of Prisons director, which lasted three hours and later sparked concerns about her safety after her presence was posted on an internal Facebook page.
"Even today I spoke to the director and he was like, 'I'm going to get to the bottom of this. That was totally inappropriate. That put your safety at risk,'" she said.
Dig deeper
Patton and Savannah both criticized the federal prison system, particularly its aging facilities, reliance on outdated practices, and poor conditions. They also discussed the role of private prisons and how rehabilitation can be improved through cooperation.
"We're never going to get rid of private prisons," Savannah said. "Some of them have better systems in place than the federal government."
The conversation also turned political. Patton, who is Black, defended her support for Trump amid criticism.
"Donald J. Trump does not see Black and white," she said. "What he sees is success and failure. And there's no amount of money in the world you could pay me to work for someone I thought was a racist."
The group also praised Alice Johnson, who served over 20 years in prison before receiving clemency. Johnson was described as a "hero" who spent her sentence helping others and advocating for change.
"She literally said her release date on her paperwork said 'death,'" Savannah said. "But she kept helping people."
Todd, whose appearance was unannounced, ended the episode with a pointed message for political critics who condemned the pardons.
"Don't start begging for a pardon now when you ran him in the ground," he said, referring to President Trump. "We've had mongers in the Oval Office, Hillary running the country behind her husband, and we're locking up our presidents?"
The episode closed with a promise of continued advocacy from the Chrisley family. "By pardoning them, President Trump created two more advocates, two more warriors," Savannah said. "We're not leaving the people behind."
SEE ALSO:
Savannah Chrisley speaks out on parents' release and advocacy journey
Todd Chrisley 'grateful' for Trump pardons, teases TV return
Julie Chrisley makes first public outing after Trump pardon
Todd and Julie Chrisley released from prison after Trump pardon
President Trump to grant full pardons to reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley
The Source
This article is sourced from Savannah Chrisley's podcast 'Unlocked'. This story is being reported out of Atlanta.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pritzker, governors will defend immigration policies before House panel
Pritzker, governors will defend immigration policies before House panel

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pritzker, governors will defend immigration policies before House panel

As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress are calling other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform posted a video ahead of the hearing highlighting crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally and pledging that 'sanctuary state governors will answer to the American people.' The hearing is to include testimony from Govs. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. There's no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but the term generally refers to governments with policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Courts previously have upheld the legality of such laws. But Trump's administration has sued Colorado, Illinois, New York and several cities — including Chicago and Rochester, New York — asserting their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Illinois, Minnesota and New York also were among 14 states and hundreds of cities and counties recently listed by the Department of Homeland Security as 'sanctuary jurisdictions defying federal immigration law.' The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. As Trump steps up immigration enforcement, some Democratic-led states have intensified their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting cooperation with immigration agents. Following clashes between crowds of protesters and immigration agents in Los Angeles, Trump deployed the National Guard to protect federal buildings and agents, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of declaring 'a war' on the underpinnings of American democracy. The House Oversight Committee has long been a partisan battleground, and in recent months it has turned its focus to immigration policy. Thursday's hearing follows a similar one in March in which the Republican-led committee questioned the Democratic mayors of Chicago, Boston, Denver and New York about sanctuary policies. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades. In 2017, then-Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed legislation creating statewide protections for immigrants. The Illinois Trust Act prohibits police from searching, arresting or detaining people solely because of their immigration status. But it allows local authorities to hold people for federal immigration authorities if there's a valid criminal warrant. Pritzker, who succeeded Rauner in 2019, said in remarks prepared for the House committee that violent criminals 'have no place on our streets, and if they are undocumented, I want them out of Illinois and out of our country.' 'But we will not divert our limited resources and officers to do the job of the federal government when it is not in the best interest of our state, our local communities, or the safety of our residents,' he said. Pritzker has been among Trump's most outspoken opponents and is considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate. He said Illinois has provided shelter and services to more than 50,000 immigrants who were sent there from other states. A Department of Justice lawsuit against New York challenges a 2019 law that allows immigrants illegally in the U.S. to receive New York driver's licenses and shields driver's license data from federal immigration authorities. That built upon a 2017 executive order by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that prohibited New York officials from inquiring about or disclosing a person's immigration status to federal authorities, unless required by law. Hochul's office said law enforcement officers still can cooperate with federal immigration authorities when people are convicted of or under investigation for crimes. Since Hochul took office in 2021, her office said, the state has transferred more than 1,300 incarcerated noncitizens to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the completion of their state sentences. Minnesota doesn't have a statewide sanctuary law protecting immigrants in the U.S. illegally, though Minneapolis and St. Paul both restrict the extent to which police and city employees can cooperate with immigration enforcement. Some laws signed by Walz have secured benefits for people regardless of immigration status. But at least one of those is getting rolled back. The Minnesota Legislature, meeting in a special session, passed legislation Monday to repeal a 2023 law that allowed adults in the U.S. illegally to be covered under a state-run health care program for the working poor. Walz insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, Cappelletti reported from Washington, D.C. Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Mo. Also contributing were Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y.; Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn.; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

As the Middle East teeters on the brink, Trump could be forced into war with Iran
As the Middle East teeters on the brink, Trump could be forced into war with Iran

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As the Middle East teeters on the brink, Trump could be forced into war with Iran

US president Donald Trump faces a make or break moment in his long-running confrontation with Iran. The UN's nuclear watchdog has just reached the damning conclusion that Iran is in breach of its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years. Trump has been personally responsible, in recent years, for the significant rise in tensions in Washington's decades-old feud with the ayatollahs. Having taken the decision in 2018 to end American participation in the Iranian nuclear deal, negotiated by former president Barack Obama, Trump has invested a great deal of political capital in his second term in an effort to resolve the issue once and for all. Trump's offer to reopen talks with Tehran, made in a personal letter sent to Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei shortly after the president returned to the White House this year, held out the prospect of lifting the punitive sanctions imposed against Tehran during his first term in office. This would be in return for Iran curbing her nuclear ambitions. There were even suggestions that Trump, following several rounds of talks between American and Iranian officials in the Gulf state of Oman (another session is due to take place in Muscat on Sunday), might be prepared to agree a 'soft' deal with Tehran. This would allow Iran to continue work on its nuclear programme on condition that tight safeguards were in place to prevent the production of nuclear warheads. Such an outcome would bear little difference to the deal Obama negotiated in 2015, and would be sure to cause outrage in Israel, where prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu insists that only the complete dismantling of Iran's nuclear programme would be acceptable. Trump's hopes of achieving a breakthrough, though, now appear to have been torpedoed by the alarming evidence produced by the latest report published by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN body responsible for monitoring Iran's nuclear activities. Apart from confirming the existence of three previously undisclosed nuclear sites in Iran, it says that unexplained traces of nuclear material have been found at these and another site. This suggests Tehran's nuclear activities are far from peaceful. The report has prompted the IAEA's 35-member Board of Governors (which includes the UK) meeting in Vienna this week that Iran has broken its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years, and to demand that Iran provide answers 'without delay' in the IAEA's long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. In response to the ruling, the Islamic Republic said it had no choice but to respond by establishing a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location'. Suddenly, Trump's hopes of achieving a peaceful resolution of the Iran issue lie in tatters, with fears that the IAEA's uncompromising condemnation of Tehran's conduct could ultimately provoke a regional war. Western security officials have expressed concern that Israel is preparing to launch unilateral military action to nullify Iran's nuclear facilities, while Washington has responded to the deepening crisis by ordering the removal of non-essential staff from the US Embassy in Baghdad. Other diplomatic and military missions in the region have been ordered to undertake urgent risk assessments of the vulnerability to possible Iranian attacks. The latest Iran crisis certainly means the US leader, whose natural instinct is to avoid military action, is in a difficult dilemma. Having made clear that he is totally opposed to the ayatollahs developing nuclear weapons, Trump cannot ignore the clear-cut evidence that Iran is in breach of its nuclear obligations. Indeed, there were already indications that Trump was losing patience with Tehran prior to the IAEA's demarche. The president told a US podcast on Wednesday he was 'less confident' about the prospects of a deal, and accused Tehran of adopting a hardline position during the recent negotiations in Oman. By the same token, Trump has little appetite for engaging in military action unless there is absolutely no alternative, an attitude that the Iranians have no doubt taken on board in their approach to the latest round of nuclear talks. Even if Trump is unwilling to hold Tehran to account for its constant defiance of the IAEA, there are others, especially the Israelis, who are. So the American president could soon find himself involved in a direct confrontation with Iran, whether he likes it or not. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store