An American Airlines flight turned around after a passenger tried to drag a flight attendant down the aisle, an affidavit says
American Airlines passengers experienced a flight-to-nowhere on Tuesday.
An affidavit said a 24-year-old assaulted a flight attendant and tried to drag them down the aisle.
The captain turned the plane around and landed back in Connecticut an hour after taking off.
An American Airlines flight turned around after a passenger assaulted a member of the cabin crew, an affidavit from an FBI agent says.
Flight 3359 took off from Hartford, Connecticut, on Tuesday, bound for Chicago.
According to data from Flightradar24, it departed four and a half hours later than scheduled — but there was further disruption in store.
Around thirty minutes into the journey, a passenger stood up, started to take off his shirt, and ran to the back of the plane shouting, "Help me," per the affidavit, which was made by FBI special agent Alan Szulwach.
It adds that the passenger, 24-year-old Julius Jordan Priester, then grabbed a flight attendant by the collar and "forcefully brought the victim to the ground."
The affidavit says Priester then tried to drag the flight attendant up the aisle while ignoring the crew's instructions to stop.
Another flight attendant notified the captain, who declared an emergency and diverted the Embraer 175 back to Hartford.
The affidavit says other passengers intervened to stop Priester, who was returned to a seat.
It adds that he then "continued to act in an erratic manner," and made "incoherent statements."
According to Flightradar24, the E175 landed back at Bradley International Airport just over an hour after taking off from there.
Priester was removed from the plane by state police and taken to a local hospital for evaluation, where he was arrested by FBI agent Szulwach.
The Justice Department said Priester appeared in a Hartford court on Wednesday and has been detained pending a bond hearing scheduled for Friday.
Priester was charged with one count of interference with a flight crew. If found guilty, he faces a maximum of 20 years in prison.
American Airlines did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent outside US working hours.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
British businessman ‘spied for Beijing and tried to smuggle weapons into China'
A British businessman tried to smuggle missiles and drones into China and attempted to silence critics of Xi Jinping, according to an indictment. John Miller is accused of spying for the Chinese Communist Party and faces extradition to the US after his arrest in Serbia. The 63-year-old allegedly referred to Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, as 'The Boss' in intercepted phone calls and conducted surveillance on an artist who created statues mocking the country's leader. In April, Mr Miller was arrested along with 43-year-old Chinese national Cui Guanghai, in Belgrade, Serbia, on the orders of the FBI and is now awaiting extradition to the US where he could be jailed for 20 years. Over two and a half years, Mr Miller and Mr Cui allegedly employed a wide range of tactics to harass, intimidate, stalk and threaten a Los Angeles resident, known only as 'the victim', who is a public critic of President Xi. 'As alleged, the defendants targeted a US resident for exercising his constitutional right to free speech and conspired to traffic sensitive American military technology to the Chinese regime,' said Todd Blanche, the US deputy attorney Miller is a long-time resident of the US, but also owns a £1.5 million home in Tunbridge Wells in Kent. Companies House records show Mr Miller has held roles in at least five UK companies, including TEFL Jobs China Ltd, which seemed to facilitate English language teaching jobs, but is now dissolved. A few months before the case began in June 2023, Mr Miller went to China where he met with Chinese government officials in Beijing and Liaoning, a province in north-east China that borders North Korea. He also met someone who works for the governor of Liaoning. During the trip, Mr Cui reportedly introduced Mr Miller to two people, who Mr Miller later referred to as 'big mother------s.' Upon his return, he reportedly boasted that 'the trip couldn't have gone better'. The first incident referred to in the indictment occurred shortly after he returned. In October 2023, Mr Miller and Mr Cui approached two individuals who, unbeknownst to them, were working for the FBI. They enlisted the undercover agents to stop 'the victim' from protesting against Xi's appearance at the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit the following month. Mr Miller and Mr Cui allegedly installed tracking devices on 'the victim's' car and paid the undercover agents to slash their tires. Mr Miller and Mr Cui also devised a complex plan to destroy a set of statues created by 'the victim'. These depicted President Xi and his wife bare-chested, kneeling with their hands tied behind their backs, and were potentially going to be displayed at a protest. The 'victim' had previously displayed the statues in Times Square electronic billboards and broadcast the display on X, according to court documents. Initially, Mr Miller had wanted to steal the statues and 'remove the heads' as evidence, but later decided to pay the undercover FBI agents to 'smash up' them up. In 2025, Mr Miller paid the agents $36,500 (£27,100) to convince 'the victim' to desist from showcasing the new statues at an upcoming protest, after 'the victim' had displayed the statues on a 24-hour live feed online. Beyond the intimidation schemes, Mr Miller also allegedly tried to purchase millions of pounds worth of military equipment on behalf of the Chinese military. Mr Miller reportedly tried to buy a £37,000 Stinger portable missile launcher, two military drones valued at £148,000, a £668,000 AGM-88E anti-radiation missile system and a £1.5 million air-defence radar system. He also allegedly tried to procure a cryptographic device, which is used for secure communication of classified and sensitive information. At one point, the Briton suggested that the device be smuggled from the US to China by hiding it inside a food blender or a motor starter, having shipped it first via DHL or FedEx to Hong Kong, according to court documents. Several times in Mr Miller's conversations, he mentions a 'boss' or at times a 'big boss' that seems to be the one giving orders. According to the special FBI agent who submitted the affidavit, Mr Miller's use of the phrase 'boss' 'refer[s] to President Xi' and 'demonstrates [Miller's] awareness that he was acting at the direction and control of the [Chinese] government.' Mr Blanche said: 'This is a blatant assault on both our national security and our democratic values. This Justice Department will not tolerate foreign repression on US soil, nor will we allow hostile nations to infiltrate or exploit our defence systems. 'We will act decisively to expose and dismantle these threats wherever they emerge.' Bill Essayli, attorney for the Central District of California, said: 'The indictment alleges that Chinese foreign actors targeted a victim in our nation because [they] criticised the Chinese government and its president. 'My office will continue to use all legal methods available to hold accountable foreign nationals engaging in criminal activity on our soil.' Akil Davis, the assistant director in charge of the FBI's Los Angeles field office, said: 'The FBI will not tolerate transnational repression targeting those in the United States who express dissenting opinions about foreign leaders. 'Both defendants face serious stalking charges in Los Angeles and my office intends to hold them accountable for bullying a victim, a critic of the PRC [People's Republic of China], and targeting him with violence.' If convicted, Mr Miller could also face the maximum penalties of five years in prison for conspiracy, five years in prison for interstate stalking, and 10 years in prison for smuggling. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
New York Times
7 hours ago
- New York Times
Unease at F.B.I. Intensifies as Patel Ousts Top Officials
Before being confirmed as the director of the F.B.I., Kash Patel made clear his intent to remake it in his own image, reflecting a larger desire by the White House to bend the agency to its will. 'The F.B.I. has become so thoroughly compromised that it will remain a threat to the people unless drastic measures are taken,' he wrote in his book 'Government Gangsters,' asserting that the top ranks of the bureau should be eliminated. Behind the scenes, his vision of an F.B.I. under President Trump is quietly taking shape. Agents have been forced out. Others have been demoted or put on leave with no explanation. And in an effort to hunt down the sources of news leaks, Mr. Patel is forcing employees to take polygraph tests. Taken together, the moves are causing worrisome upheaval at the F.B.I., eliciting fear and uncertainty as Mr. Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, quickly restock senior ranks with agents and turn the agency's attention to immigration. Their persistent claims that the bureau was politicized under previous directors, in addition to their swift actions against colleagues, have left employees to wonder whether they, too, will be ousted, either because they worked on an investigation vilified by Trump supporters or had ties to the previous administration. The actions have obliterated decades of experience in national security and criminal matters at the F.B.I. and raised questions about whether the agents taking over such critical posts have the institutional knowledge to pursue cornerstones of its work. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why are airlines changing check-in rules?
If you're traveling this summer, brace yourself for an important shift in airport check-in rules. Airlines are updating their check-in deadlines in real-time, signaling a new era of tighter airport schedules in hopes of improving on-time departures. But what exactly do these new check-in policies mean for you as a traveler? Why are they happening now? And what can you do to make sure you don't miss your flight? Earlier this year, Delta Air Lines adjusted its domestic check-in cutoff from 30 minutes to 45 minutes before departure for most U.S. flights. International flights still require check-in at least 60 minutes before departure, but the window to check bags has also tightened in some airports. This week, United Airlines silently updated their check-in policy: passengers must now check in no later than 45 minutes prior to takeoff for domestic flights. The airline said the change aims to bring greater consistency across its operations and align more closely with other major carriers. These aren't isolated updates. Other carriers, including American Airlines and Alaska Airlines, have also been reinforcing existing policies or sending reminders to travelers about the importance of early arrival, indicating a broader industry push toward punctuality. The move to stricter check-in policies isn't arbitrary. Airlines are facing mounting pressure to improve on-time performance and reduce costly delays, especially as travel rebounds post-pandemic. Here's why it matters: Tighter schedules, bigger crowds: With more flights and fuller planes, a few late passengers can trigger a domino effect of delays, costing airlines money and frustrating travelers. Gate congestion: Airlines want to avoid last-minute baggage drops and rebookings that cause congestion at gates and customer service desks. On-time performance metrics: The Department of Transportation (DOT) tracks and publishes on-time arrival rates. Poor performance can damage an airline's reputation and customer loyalty. In short, when passengers check in late, it doesn't just affect their own flight; it can ripple across the entire day's schedule. With airlines enforcing stricter policies, it's more important than ever to arrive early and understand the fine print of your carrier's rules. Here are a few traveler-friendly tips from Gate Access: Most airlines allow online check-in 24 hours before departure. Doing this ahead of time reduces time spent at airport kiosks and lets you spot any travel alerts. Try setting a calendar reminder on your phone to send you a notification to check in early. Doing so can also improve your boarding group for some airlines. Airlines recommend arriving at least two hours before domestic flights and three hours before international flights. This is especially critical if you're checking bags. And don't forget: TSA screening lines can be a major variable. Even with TSA PreCheck, some airports report wait times as long as 30–45 minutes during peak hours. Regular security lines can take even longer. To avoid surprises, visit your airport's website ahead of your flight; most now offer real-time TSA wait time estimates. Knowing this data can help you better plan your arrival time and reduce stress. Even if you're checked in online, bag drop counters close at the same time as check-in deadlines. Showing up late with a bag means you could be denied boarding. These apps often send push notifications with updates on gate changes, boarding times and policy changes. Ultimately, early arrival isn't just about airline check-in deadlines — it's about building in margin for TSA and other variables that can't be controlled once you step into the terminal. Awareness is key The worst time to find out you've missed the check-in window is when you're standing in front of a closed bag-drop counter. With check-in rules becoming stricter across the board, travelers can no longer believe in 'airport theory'. If you're flying Delta, United or any major U.S. carrier this year, assume you need to be checked in at least 45 minutes before departure — and ideally, much earlier. The days of rolling up to the airport 30 minutes before your flight are officially over. For families, seniors and those who need extra assistance, services like TSA Cares can help smooth the experience, offering personalized security support and expedited help through the airport. Ultimately, being informed is your best defense against delays. A few extra minutes in arrival can mean the difference between a relaxing trip and a travel nightmare.
