Uber is launching a shuttle bus service at the Atlanta airport
Uber is launching Uber Shuttle bus service to Atlanta's Hartsfield Airport. The low-cost option will initially charge riders just $10 each way and will not top $18.50, the company says. Service will begin in May.
Uber is expanding its options for people flying out of the Atlanta airport.
The ride-share service will launch its Uber Shuttle service at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport in May. This follows the introduction of routes to JFK and LaGuardia airports in New York City some time ago.
The shuttle will be considerably cheaper than a solo Uber. Early riders of the shuttle will pay just $10 to get to the airport. That price will increase, the company said, but will never be more than $18.50. Passengers will be able to book up to five seats one week before their departure.
The shuttle will run every 30 minutes from 6:00 a.m. through 10:00 p.m. seven days a week. Uber has not yet said where the shuttle will stop, however. (Passengers can also take the shuttle back to wherever those locations will be when they return home.)
The focus on Atlanta travelers comes as Uber and Delta Air Lines kick off their previously announced ride-share partnership. Beginning today, Delta Sky Miles members will be able to early points for every dollar spent on Uber Eats orders, Ubers to the airport and premium and/or reserve trips.
Later this year, SkyMiles members who log in to Delta Sync Wi-Fi will receive a special offer for reserving an Uber ride when they land.
'Our new partnership with Uber not only expands the value of loyalty and makes it easier than ever for our Members to get rewarded,' Prashant Sharma, vice president of loyalty at Delta, said in a statement.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Airlines hate this sneaky travel hack that can save flyers serious money when booking flights, expert says
Although prices are way down for airfare this summer — there's no harm in wanting to save an extra buck where you can. Founder of the Cheap Holiday Expert and podcast host, Chelsea Dickenson, recently shared on an episode of her pod, Passports Please!, that 'skiplagging' is a travel hack that allows travelers to fly for cheap to long-haul hotspots. 'Skiplagging is when a passenger books a flight with a layover but intentionally gets off at the layover city instead of continuing to the final destination,' Dicksenson explained to her co-host, James Robinson, in a clip from the episode that was posted to TikTok. Advertisement 'And that is because the layover city is usually cheaper to fly to as part of a longer route.' For instance, booking an indirect flight from New York to California, with a layover in Texas, is cheaper than flying directly from NYC to the Lone Star State. Advertisement So a traveler would book the longer flight to California, get off the plane in Texas, stay there and just miss the second flight to California — since they intended to stay in Texas originally. While this is a smart hack — it's not foolproof and airlines 'absolutely hate it cause you're wasting a seat on one of their flights.' And as a result, there are consequences. Travelers can entirely skip a flight and just stay in the layover city — which is often cheaper than booking a direct flight somewhere far. luengo_ua – Advertisement 'You can get blacklisted by doing it. Some people have been totally told they cannot book with airlines if they've done it repeatedly,' Dickenson said on her podcast. Many people in the comment section seemed to support this travel tip — and brought up valid points regarding airlines' snooty attitude towards it. 'If airlines hate it, then make the prices make sense…' someone pointed out. 'You can get blacklisted by doing it. Some people have been totally told they cannot book with airlines if they've done it repeatedly,' Dickenson said on her podcast. John N – Advertisement 'You are not wasting a seat cause you paid for it,' quipped someone else. 'Delta all the time. Know folks who live in Atlanta and always book Delta to anywhere because the layover is 95% of the time in Atlanta,' a comment read. A few others were concerned about luggage when skiplagging. 'My first thought is. This would only work for passengers with hand luggage only,' one person wrote. 'Obviously, people who do this don't have checked-in luggage,' chimed in someone else. And someone else offered some great advice to avoid getting in trouble from an airline for making skiplagging a habit. 'To avoid being blacklisted show up late to the gate and pretend to be upset that you missed your connecting flight,' a person wrote. 'The airline will cancel your return flight if you do this,' someone hypothesized.
Tom's Guide
12 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
These are the 10 prompts in DeepSeek to help you create a budget
Creating a home budget doesn't have to always involve an Excel spreadsheet and coffee to keep you awake during the process. Instead, AI bots can guide you through a budget and make it much easier to track your income and expenses. I should know — I avoid the topic as much as possible. For years, I calculated most of my expenses in my head and hoped it all worked out. Roughly about 10 years ago, I started relying on apps like Mint to help me and even the tools provided by my bank. Recently, I tried using DeepSeek to guide me through the process. It's amazing how these 10 prompts can help you figure out where all of the money is going. Here are the best ones to try. Before diving into the details of a home budget, you can start by asking DeepSeek which home budget works best for you. Fortunately, this prompt provides a wealth of information, no pun intended. DeepSeek presents several options for home budgets including the popular Zero-Based Budget' that helps you track income, expenses and savings down to the last dollar. In that home budget, you put money into savings first, then allocate money to other things. This prompt really narrows things down, because it means you'll need to budget more aggressively. DeepSeek recommends several budgets but two of them are worth calling out. The first one is a percentage system called an Aggressive Savings plan. 50% goes to needs, 20% to savings, 10% to debt, and 20% to wants. DeepSeek also recommended the zero-based budget, which prioritizes savings even more — but maybe a little too much for me. I decided to try the Aggressive Savings plan because it looked practical and achievable to me. I was impressed with all of the detail DeepSeek provides here, listing a full table of expenditures with suggestions for how much to set aside for groceries, gas, and credit card debt. Using this budget means I could save $192 per week — reaching my $10,000 per year goal. So far the prompts and suggestions have all been generic — they could apply to anyone. I decided to make it more personal. I asked about customizing for my income level and DeepSeek then guided me through the entire budget process. The AI asked for my annual income and expenses including car payments and student loans. DeepSeek also asked where I sometimes slip up — say, by overpaying for Uber Eats. I inputted all of this info. (Truth be told — I made up some details. I am not yet comfortable adding actual data to an AI bot yet.) I noticed my final home budget required saving about $833 per month, which seemed a little high. I asked DeepSeek to adjust my budget to save a little less, and suddenly it all seemed more practical. I was allocating more money to eating out and gas/groceries without having to sacrifice so many things that I'd end up failing. I was happy with the results so far. I knew at this point that a home budget would not be useful if it was just contained within a chatbot. I asked DeepSeek to generate an Excel file and was a little surprised when it generated a CSV file instead. (I'm sure there are copyright issues with providing an Excel file.) No matter — I imported the file into Google Sheets using the comma-separated values. A home budget is not just about the numbers and creating a spreadsheet. What works the best is when you have an action plan each month that helps you adhere to the budget. I was surprised, though, when DeepSeek offered some unusual suggestions to help. The bot said I could consider doing a side gig to help generate more income, which seemed smart. Another surprise is that the bot suggested a temporary pause on some charitable donations. Mint is a popular home finance app and I've used it many times. Ironically, I had never actually important a spreadsheet before and DeepSeek noted that is not even possible. Instead, the chatbot suggested inputting all of the info manually, which seemed clunky. And guess what? The bot actually used that word. DeepSeek said 'If this feels clunky…' to try some competing apps that do support imports. DeepSeek also offered to show screenshots of Mint to help me see where to input the budget info. This process took several minutes, though. And, they were not real screenshots — instead, DeepSeek created text-based guidelines. I asked DeepSeek for more guidance, and the bot covered quite a few practical tips for managing my money — one involved using a cash-based budget where you put money into envelopes for different spending categories. Another tip was to wait 24 hours before spending X amount of money (say $5) if it is an impulse buy. Lastly, I asked DeepSeek to save my home budget and all of the tips. It turns out, DeepSeek can't save anything as a text file, so the bot suggested I copy all of the text and paste it into Google Docs or another word processor. That worked just fine for me! Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Uber vs. Carvana
The world's mobility landscape is changing in several different ways. There may be room and reason to own both of these companies right now. One of these stocks, however, is experiencing oversized growth for reasons that aren't apt to persist. 10 stocks we like better than Uber Technologies › Uber Technologies (NYSE: UBER) and Carvana (NYSE: CVNA) aren't just two different companies. They're seemingly polar opposites. Ride-hailing giant Uber is thriving largely because owning and driving a car is an increasingly expensive hassle. Used car dealer Carvana, conversely, makes it easy and affordable to own your own automobile. One could reasonably argue there's solid -- even growing -- demand for both businesses. But it's difficult to deny the contrasted underpinnings of what make these two companies tick. Investors could understandably be confused. The good news is, one of these names is a clearly better bet than the other -- now and for the foreseeable future. You almost certainly know the companies. Uber Technologies isn't just a major personal mobility name, after all. It largely brought the domestic ride-hailing industry into existence, and now controls three-fourths of the U.S. market, according to data from Bloomberg. It's developing an international presence as well, even if it's not quite as dominant overseas. As for its fiscals, the $175 billion company's drivers provided over 11 billion rides last year, up 18% year over year, turning that into nearly $44 billion in revenue and almost $3 billion worth of operating net income. Nearly half of its revenue, however, came from deliveries and freight services rather than passenger trips. Carvana isn't quite as big, although its growth is just as impressive. The used car dealer reported $13.7 billion worth of revenue for 2024, up 27% year over year, generating a record-breaking $404 million in net income. Most of that profit came from sales of used vehicles to retail consumers, although wholesaling accounts for the bulk of its total unit transactions. A rebound from a inflation-crimped slide in demand after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic helped drive these top and bottom lines higher. Last year's forward progress, however, also extends a choppy trend that's been in place for some time thanks to Carvana's clever marketing, and brilliant use of technology to establish scale. And yet, these two seemingly growing companies' stocks aren't exactly performing in tandem. Carvana shares are up by more than 200% for the past year, and testing their peak reached in 2021. Uber shares haven't made any real net progress since March of last year, upended multiple times by earnings reports marred by one modest shortfall or another. The market has largely lost its bigger-picture perspective on both companies, however. Take Uber Technologies' recent quarterly results as an example. Yes, since early 2024 either sales or earnings or guidance haven't always lived up to expectations. The company's never failed to make actual forward progress at any point during this stretch, however. Again, last year's revenue improved 18%, and is expected to repeat the feat this year. Although its sales growth rate is slowing, that's a purely mathematical matter. On an absolute basis, it's chugging along as well as it ever has. It's apt to continue doing so well into the foreseeable future, too. Uber is plugged into a serious secular trend. That is, although plenty of people still own and drive cars, there's a growing segment of the domestic and foreign population that doesn't want to do either anymore. A recent survey performed by Deloitte indicates that only 11% of people living in the United States over the age of 55 would consider giving up their vehicle, whereas 44% of people living in the U.S. under the age of 35 would consider doing so. And the disinterest is greater the younger the crowd. Thirty years ago roughly two-thirds of eligible teenagers held a driver's license. Today that figure's about one-third. The advent of a viable alternative like Uber is a key reason for this paradigm shift that's likely to remain in motion for years, as younger non-drivers grow up and pass along these new norms to their children. To this end, Straits Research believes the global ride-hailing market is set to grow at an average annual pace of more than 11% through 2033. Uber is well positioned to win more than its fair share of this growth. The food delivery industry is also set to grow at an annualized pace of 17%, by the way, according to an outlook from Precedence Research. This is another big growth opportunity for Uber, which already enjoys a strong presence within the market. But is Carvana just too promising to pass up? The bullish arguments hold water, to be sure. Chief among them is the sheer cost of a new car. Data from Kelley Blue Book indicates that as of April the average new automobile in the United States was being sold for a hefty $48,699. That puts the monthly payment well over $700, and subsequently, out of reach for most would-be buyers. Used cars are considerably more affordable though. Kelley Blue Book reports April's used car sales rolled in at an average price of $25,547 apiece, roughly halving the monthly payment as well. There's an important footnote to add to this dynamic, however. That is, the car business is incredibly cyclical. Once the current wave of updates and replacements has run its course, don't be surprised to start seeing Carvana underperform. Making matters even more challenging is the lack of new cars manufactured and sold in the U.S. between 2020 and 2022. As Edmunds points out, a three-year-old car (plus or minus a year) is Carvana's sweet spot, so to speak, where affordability and value intersect. Available inventory of these vehicles now stands at more than a decade low though, making it difficult for Carvana to offer what most consumers want. Never say never, of course. It's possible Carvana will continue to consolidate the country's highly fragmented and largely inefficient used car business, achieving growth through greater scale. There's certainly plenty of room for it. As it stands right now, Carvana estimates it only accounts for about 1% of the used car business. It's also possible Uber will run into an unexpected headwind sooner rather than later, even if it's not clear what that headwind might be. Be realistic though. Increasingly crowded urban and metropolitan streets and parking lots paired with car prices that aren't apt to abate anytime soon works in Uber Technologies' favor. Meanwhile, Carvana's recent sales strength doesn't reflect a new long-lived norm as much as it reflects the fact that the average vehicle being driven on U.S. roads is now 12.6 years, according to S&P Global Mobility, an age at which replacing it makes more sense than repairing it. The resulting demand for quality used cars isn't apt to last forever though. Now throw in the fact that Carvana's shares are currently trading 14% above analysts' consensus price while Uber's stock is 16% below analysts' (most of whom rate Uber as a strong buy at this time) average price target of $97.39, and there's little doubt that the ride-hailing powerhouse is a better stock to buy right now than the used car dealership chain's. Before you buy stock in Uber Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Uber Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Best Stock to Buy Right Now: Uber vs. Carvana was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
