logo
As Trump celebrates army's founding, his critics take to the streets

As Trump celebrates army's founding, his critics take to the streets

Japan Times16 hours ago

President Donald Trump presided over a show of American military might in the nation's capital Saturday evening, a celebration of the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army that became a test of wills and competing imagery, with demonstrators around the country decrying his expansion of executive power.
Trump sat in a reviewing stand on Constitution Avenue as armored vehicles dating from two world wars and overflights of 80-year-old bombers and modern helicopters shook downtown Washington. The city was locked down, divided by a wall of tall, black crowd-control fences designed to assure that the parade, the first of its kind since U.S. troops returned from the Gulf War in 1991, was an uninterrupted demonstration of history and American power.
It went off without a hitch, but also without even a nod to the current moment. When Trump left his seat between his wife, Melania Trump, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, it was to swear in new soldiers — "Have a great life,' he told them after the brief ceremony — and then, at sundown, to recall the Army's greatest moments.
He invoked George Washington and recalled Gettysburg. Yet he spoke more to the Army's power than to its purpose. "Time and again, America's enemies have learned that you threaten the American people, soldiers are coming for you. Your defeat will be certain, your demise will be final, and your downfall will be total and complete.'
Hours before he left the White House, the day had already encapsulated the sharpness of America's divide over immigration, free speech and Trump's determination to reshape the government, universities and cultural institutions to adopt his worldview.
By design, military parades are part national celebration and part international intimidation, and Trump has wanted one in Washington since he attended a Bastille Day parade in Paris in 2017. Formally, the parade celebrates the decision by the 2nd Continental Congress on June 14, 1775, to raise a unified, lightly armed force of colonialists after the shock of the battles with British forces at Lexington and Concord. That army, which George Washington took command of a month later, ultimately expelled the far larger, better armed colonial force.
U.S. President Donald Trump (top center), flanked by first lady Melania Trump and U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, watches the Army 250th Anniversary Parade from the Ellipse in Washington on Saturday. |
AFP-JIJI
But no celebration of history takes place in a political vacuum. And protesters in large cities and small towns from Seattle to Key West, Florida, showed up in overwhelmingly peaceful demonstrations against how Trump was making use of the modern force. His decisions over the past week to federalize the National Guard and call Marines into the streets of Los Angeles, in support of his immigration roundups, have supercharged a debate about whether he is abusing the powers of the commander in chief.
It was a split-screen show of force. Roughly 2,000 protests, under the slogan "No Kings,' pushed back against what the crowds decried as authoritarian overreach. While big-city rallies attracted the attention and the cameras, smaller events were organized in rural areas, including three dozen in Indiana, a state Trump won last November by 19 points.
In Dallas, another stronghold of Trump's support, crowds of protesters stretched across a wide street for at least five blocks. The Houston protest looked more like a block party, with dances to Mexican music and cool-offs in a fountain.
But in Los Angeles, which has seen a week of demonstrations, car-burnings and episodic violence, a large crowd gathered downtown, spreading over several city blocks. As the evening wore on and an 8 p.m. curfew approached, tensions rose, with police using chemical irritants in an attempt to disperse some protesters from a complex of federal buildings and officers on horseback charging toward groups of others and swinging their batons to break them up.
Back in Washington, organizers of the America250 events, for which this is the first big production, sold a "dedicated VIP experience' to large donors, and red MAGA hats to the president's supporters. It is also Trump's 79th birthday, though he has insisted the celebration was about the Army, not him. Organizers expected veterans of the Korea and Vietnam conflicts to turn out, along with those who fought in Afghanistan and Iraq, two wars that Trump — and many Democrats — have declared were wastes of lives and money.
Demonstrators hold up signs as they march on the streets during a "No Kings" protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies, in New York City, on Saturday. |
REUTERS
Trump has defended the spending of as much as $45 million — including the cost of repairing Washington's streets from the damage expected from rolling 60-ton tanks down Constitution Avenue — as a small price to pay to stoke national pride and to remind the world of America's hard power. He told an interviewer on NBC last month that the price tag was "peanuts compared to the value of doing it.'
"We have the greatest missiles in the world,' he continued. "We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest Army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it.'
To some of Trump's critics, it was conduct unbecoming a superpower. In the first Trump term, that view was shared by military leaders who dissuaded him from replicating the French show of force. They have since been ousted, replaced by true believers like Hegseth.
Every minute was broadcast on Fox News and other conservative networks and streaming services, while the legacy cable networks kept to their ordinary programming. One Fox broadcaster declared the parade showed that "America means business,' and another argued that the show of force rolling alongside the Mall would provide "succor to our allies' and "strike a little bit of fear and a little bit of deterrence' into U.S. enemies.
But in the run-up to the parade, Trump's critics argued that such a display could do just the opposite, making the country look as if it were yearning for past glories while ignoring the risks of treating allies as if they are a burden.
Trump's political advisers bet that half the country or more would enjoy watching the display of Army history, from the World War I tanks to the twin-prop B-25 Mitchells that swept over neighborhoods in northwest Washington on their way to the flyover, as much as Trump's ever-evolving definition of what "America First' means to his presidency. Parades are pure showmanship, and Trump is the master showman.
Yet a military parade is also an unvarnished celebration of America's hard power, even if this one was dominated by huge equipment, like the M-1 Abrams tank, that seems antiquated in an age of drones and cyberweapons. (Of the 31 Abrams tanks given to Ukraine over the past two years, only a handful remain operational; most were taken out by the Russians or sidelined by breakdowns.)
And it comes at a moment the administration has been ridiculing as wasteful such efforts as providing global aid, battling HIV or backing basic research at universities that Trump has gone to war against. The parade's estimated cost will amount to about one-fifth of the annual budget of the Voice of America, which had millions of listeners around the world until Trump took it off the air this spring.
U.S. President Donald Trump stands and salutes troops during the Army 250th Anniversary Parade in Washington on Saturday. |
POOL / VIA AFP-JIJI
The protests, which organizers deliberately kept outside Washington to avoid focusing more attention on the military celebration, had been planned for many weeks as opposition to the administration's efforts to dismiss expert opinion, oust the "deep state' and silence critics have mounted.
Trump's decision to move 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines into Los Angeles asserted a role for the military at home, which was exactly what had given the Continental Congress pause about creating a colonial army at all. That same concern, 250 years later, was expected to give the weekend protests mass and weight. They were further fueled by Trump's speech at Fort Bragg in North Carolina last week, when he lumped peaceful protesters with "troublemakers, agitators, insurrectionists' and later said anyone protesting in Washington would be met with "very big force.'
In the run-up to the parade, those differences broke out on Capitol Hill, when Hegseth defended the use of troops at home and suggested preparations were under way "if there are other riots, in places where law enforcement officers are threatened,' so that "we would have the capability to surge National Guard there.'
Sen. Patty Murray lashed out at him. "You are deploying the American military to police the American people; you are sending the National Guard into California without the governor's request, sending the Marines not after foreign threats, but after American protesters; and now President Trump is promising heavy force against peaceful protesters at his D.C. military parade.
"Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented, it is unconstitutional, and it is downright un-American,' she concluded.
Organizers of the protest marches ranged from the American Civil Liberties Union to abortion rights and gun violence groups but also included the "Hands Off!' protesters who argue Trump has threatened Social Security, Medicaid and education budgets.
They folded together, though, under the "No Kings' group, which called for a "day of defiance' Saturday.
"We want to create contrast,' said Leah Greenberg, co-founder of a group called Indivisible that organized the protest in Philadelphia, where the Continental Congress met to create that first army force. "Not conflict.'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Golden Share' Served as Solution in Trump's Approval of U.S. Steel Acquisition; Solution Found but Challenges Remain
‘Golden Share' Served as Solution in Trump's Approval of U.S. Steel Acquisition; Solution Found but Challenges Remain

Yomiuri Shimbun

time4 hours ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

‘Golden Share' Served as Solution in Trump's Approval of U.S. Steel Acquisition; Solution Found but Challenges Remain

The Yomiuri Shimbun U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a U.S. Steel Corp. steel plant in Pennsylvania on May 30. With U.S. President Donald Trump having approved a partnership between Nippon Steel Corp. and U.S. Steel Corp., the Japanese company's acquisition of U.S. Steel is expected to be realized. The Trump administration appears to have concluded that by signing a national security agreement with Nippon Steel and acquiring a 'golden share' in U.S. Steel the administration can contain opposition from hard-liners who support an 'America First' policy. Eighteen months after the plan was announced, negotiations between Japan and the United States over the acquisition, a development that escalated into a diplomatic issue, are set to conclude. Change of mind Trump, who views the steel industry as a critical sector directly linked to national security, has referred to U.S. Steel — once the world's largest steel manufacturer — as a 'symbol of America' and had opposed Nippon Steel's bid to acquire it. What prompted Trump to change his mind were Nippon Steel's proposed additional investments and the Japanese company's measures to mitigate security threats. Nippon Steel increased the amount it would invest in the U.S. company after acquiring it from $2.7 billion to $14 billion (about ¥2 trillion). It is also believed that Nippon Steel promised that the majority of U.S. Steel's board members would be U.S. nationals and that the company's production capacity would not be reduced. In response to these proposals, local lawmakers and other interested parties in Pennsylvania, where U.S. Steel is headquartered, moved to persuade Trump, apparently by pointing out the economic benefits of the acquisition, such as employment and plant modernization. In addition, key U.S. Cabinet members including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — who also chairs the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, whose duties include reviewing foreign acquisitions — and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are said to have urged Trump to approve the acquisition. Trump himself began to judge that Nippon Steel's huge investment would benefit his administration and leaned toward approving the acquisition. Political risk However, the acquisition could give the impression to the American people that a symbolic U.S. company is being sold to a foreign company, which would pose a significant political risk for Trump. Even within his administration, senior officials who support his 'America First' policy position opposed the acquisition. Avoiding backlash from his supporters was also necessary with the 2026 midterm elections in mind. As negotiations between the Japanese and U.S. steel companies progressed behind the scenes, there emerged the idea of issuing a golden share to the U.S. administration to grant it veto power over important management decisions. According to sources, the initial U.S. plan was to approve the acquisition on the condition that a national security agreement was signed, but in the final stages of the negotiations, the U.S. side demanded a golden share. Trump apparently judged that acquiring a golden share in U.S. Steel as a symbol of 'U.S. control' would help persuade opponents of the acquisition and gain the understanding of Trump's supporters. The executive order that Trump signed Friday also made no mention of the fact that U.S. Steel would come under foreign ownership. Intentions of both sides It can be said the golden share proposal led Trump to be able to successfully utilize Nippon Steel's financial strength and technological capabilities without compromising his 'America First' policy stance. Meanwhile, Nippon Steel has concluded that the golden share provides no voting rights and is largely symbolic, so the U.S. administration's influence on management and investment decisions will be limited. 'We will have 100% of the voting rights in U.S. Steel, so management freedom will be maintained,' a senior Nippon Steel executive said. Nippon Steel has previously insisted that 100% ownership of shares is a prerequisite for major investments, and the U.S. government has also refused to compromise over 'U.S. control.' Amid conflicting interests between the two parties, the idea of a golden share ultimately served as a solution, but challenges remain.

U.S.-China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved
U.S.-China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved

Japan Times

time11 hours ago

  • Japan Times

U.S.-China trade truce leaves military-use rare earth issue unresolved

The renewed U.S.-China trade truce struck in London left a key area of export restrictions tied to national security untouched, an unresolved conflict that threatens a more comprehensive deal, two people briefed on detailed outcomes of the talks have said. Beijing has not committed to grant export clearance for some specialized rare-earth magnets that U.S. military suppliers need for fighter jets and missile systems, the people said. The United States maintains export curbs on China's purchases of advanced artificial intelligence chips out of concern that they also have military applications. At talks in London last week, China's negotiators appeared to link progress in lifting export controls on military-use rare earth magnets with the longstanding U.S. curbs on exports of the most advanced AI chips to China. That marked a new twist in trade talks that began with opioid trafficking, tariff rates and China's trade surplus, but have since shifted to focus on export controls. In addition, U.S. officials also signaled they are looking to extend existing tariffs on China for a further 90 days beyond the August 10 deadline agreed in Geneva last month, both sources said, suggesting a more permanent trade deal between the world's two largest economies is unlikely before then. The two people who spoke about the London talks requested not to be named because both sides have tightly controlled disclosure. The White House, State Department and Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. China's Foreign and Commerce ministries did not respond to faxed requests for comment. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the handshake deal reached in London between American and Chinese negotiators was a "great deal," adding, "we have everything we need, and we're going to do very well with it. And hopefully they are too." And U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there would be no "quid pro quo" on easing curbs on exports of AI chips to China in exchange for access to rare earths. But China's chokehold on the rare earth magnets needed for weapons systems remains a potential flashpoint. China dominates global production of rare earths and holds a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. A deal reached in Geneva last month to reduce bilateral tariffs from crushing triple-digit levels had faltered over Beijing's restrictions on critical minerals exports that took shape in April. That prompted the Trump administration to respond with export controls preventing shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods to China. At the London talks, China promised to fast-track approval of rare-earth export applications from nonmilitary U.S. manufacturers out of the tens of thousands currently pending, one of the sources said. Those licenses will have a six-month term. Beijing also offered to set up a "green channel" for expediting license approvals from trusted U.S. companies. Initial signals were positive, with Chinese rare-earths magnet producer JL MAG Rare-Earth, saying on Wednesday it had obtained export licenses that included the United States, while China's Commerce Ministry confirmed it had approved some "compliant applications" for export licenses. But China has not budged on specialized rare earths, including samarium, which are needed for military applications and are outside the fast-track agreed in London, the two people said. Automakers and other manufacturers largely need other rare earth magnets, including dysprosium and terbium. The rushed trade meeting in London followed a call last week between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Trump said U.S. tariffs would be set at 55% for China, while China had agreed to 10% from the United States. Trump initially imposed tariffs on China as punishment for its massive trade surplus to the United States and over what he says is Beijing's failure to stem the flow of the powerful opioid fentanyl into the U.S. Chinese analysts are pessimistic about the likelihood of further breakthroughs before the Aug. 10 deadline agreed in Geneva. "Temporary mutual accommodation of some concerns is possible but the fundamental issue of the trade imbalance cannot be resolved within this time frame, and possibly during Trump's remaining term," said Liu Weidong, a U.S.-China expert at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. An extension of the August deadline could allow the Trump administration more time to establish an alternative legal claim for setting higher tariffs on China under the Section 301 authority of the USTR in case Trump loses the ongoing legal challenge to the tariffs in U.S. court, one of the people with knowledge of the London talks said. The unresolved issues underscore the difficulty the Trump administration faces in pushing its trade agenda with China because of Beijing's control of rare earths and its willingness to use that as leverage with Washington, said Ryan Hass, director of the John L. Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution. "It has taken the Trump team a few punches in the nose to recognize that they will no longer be able to secure another trade agreement with China that disproportionately addresses Trump's priorities," Hass said.

Japan PM Ishiba to attend G7, eyes summit with Trump over tariffs
Japan PM Ishiba to attend G7, eyes summit with Trump over tariffs

The Mainichi

time12 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

Japan PM Ishiba to attend G7, eyes summit with Trump over tariffs

TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba will embark on a four-day trip to Canada to attend the first in-person summit of leaders from the Group of Seven nations since Donald Trump's return to the U.S. presidency. The two-day gathering will be held in Canada's Kananaskis, as a slew of challenges, both bilateral and global, loom ranging from the repercussions of the U.S. tariff policy symbolic of Trump's "America First" agenda, and a flareup in tensions following Israel's attack on Iran just days before the summit. For Ishiba, who himself is participating in his first face-to-face G7 meeting, his envisioned meeting with Trump is one of the highlights of the visit as the longtime allies have been advancing ministerial tariff negotiations to reach a deal. In a reversal of his previous stance, Trump effectively approved the takeover of United States Steel Corp. by Nippon Steel Corp., though the U.S. government will hold a "golden share," which gives it veto power over important management decisions. As the only Asian member of the G7, which marks half a century since its inception, Ishiba seeks to share views on the situation in the Indo-Pacific region where China's presence is increasingly felt. The two days of summit talks will likely cover a range of topics, from uncertainty over global growth and trade disputes stemming from Trump's tariff policy to Russia's war on Ukraine, and most likely the situation in the Middle East. The leaders are also expected to discuss ways to make supply chains more resilient and better use new technologies such as artificial intelligence. In what would be a rare move by a group known for its unity, the group, under the rotating presidency of Canada, is unlikely to issue a joint declaration to wrap up their discussions but release documents on specific points, according to sources familiar with the planning. The Ishiba-Trump summit is expected to grab attention in Japan. Higher U.S. tariffs on cars, auto parts, steel and aluminum are threatening to hurt the export-driven economy, as a key nationwide election for the House of Councillors is set to be held on July 20, a crucial test for a prime minister facing a public hit by persisting inflation. Japan has been urging the United States to rethink its tariff measures through rounds of ministerial negotiations, though tangible results have yet to be seen. In the run-up to his meeting with Trump, Ishiba has indicated that Japan will not rush to make a deal at the expense of national interests. On the fringes of the G7 summit, Ishiba is expected to explore one-on-one talks with leaders such as South Korea's new President Lee Jae Myung and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who are also expected to attend part of the multilateral meeting as non-members of the G7. The G7 consists of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States plus the European Union.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store