PMO won't say if Carney raised India's alleged role in killing of Canadian Sikh leader with Modi
Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree says Ottawa continues to have 'difficult conversations' with New Delhi about the 2023 killing of a Canadian Sikh leader, but the Prime Minister's Office has declined to say if the matter was raised earlier this week in talks between Mark Carney and his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi.
Mr. Carney ducked a question Tuesday about whether he and Mr. Modi had discussed the killing of the Sikh leader, Hardeep Singh Nijjar, during a one-on-one meeting that day at the G7 leaders' summit in Kananaskis, Alta.
The Globe and Mail pressed the PMO on Wednesday about whether Mr. Nijjar's slaying and Indian foreign interference were part of the discussions. Sikh organizations and human-rights activists have also sought clarification on the content of the discussion.
Press secretary Audrey Champoux would not comment on Wednesday. She referred The Globe to a statement the two leaders released Tuesday: 'Prime Minister Carney raised priorities on the G7 agenda, including transnational crime and repression, security, and the rules-based order.'
After the meeting, the two leaders announced that they would designate new high commissioners and restore regular diplomatic services to citizens in both countries.
Bilateral relations went into a deep freeze in 2024, after then-prime minister Justin Trudeau and the RCMP said there was evidence linking agents of the Modi government to Mr. Nijjar's slaying.
Canada expelled the Indian high commissioner and five other diplomats over the killing. India denied any role and responded with similar diplomatic expulsions.
On Wednesday, the Public Safety Minister was asked to explain why Canada is resetting relations with the Modi government despite the Nijjar killing, and when Canada's spy agency is saying India is one of the top perpetrators of foreign interference in this country.
Mr. Anandasangaree told reporters that Canada has 'had difficult conversations with the Indian government and that will continue.'
'There is no way in which a third country can come into Canada and … using proxies be involved in the murder of a Canadian, and we have expressed our concerns over many months, and we will continue to do so,' he said.
A year after Hardeep Singh Nijjar's death, mysteries remain about how he really lived
Gurpatwant Pannun, general counsel for Sikhs for Justice, said the Prime Minister needs to publicly tell Canadians whether he questioned Mr. Modi about the role of Indian agents in the killing of Mr. Nijjar. The FBI foiled an alleged Indian plot to kill Mr. Pannun, a dual Canadian-U.S. citizen, in New York City last year.
'Accountability for Nijjar's killing cannot be sidestepped in the name of diplomacy or trade. Diplomatic normalization with the Modi regime must not come at the expense of justice and transparency,' Mr. Pannun said.
NDP MP Jenny Kwan, an outspoken human-rights activist, said in a June 17 letter to Mr. Carney that re-establishing diplomatic normalcy with India when it has yet to account for its role in the death of Mr. Nijjar 'sends a deeply painful message to Sikh Canadians who continue to live under threat.'
Major Sikh organizations and human-rights advocates also wrote a separate letter to Mr. Carney on Tuesday, saying the Nijjar killing was part of a co-ordinated campaign of transnational repression that 'continues to violate Canadian sovereignty.'
'Sikhs across the country are still receiving warnings from intelligence agencies about active threats to their lives,' the open letter states. 'To extend an invitation to the architect of these policies who proudly boasts that India 'enters the homes of its enemies and kills them' − without any public commitment to justice or accountability, undermines the very principles Canada is meant to uphold.'
However, foreign policy and security experts say Mr. Carney made the right decision to restart diplomatic relations with the world's most populous country and fourth-largest economy, while still pursuing accountability for the Nijjar killing.
If the Prime Minister is serious about diversifying trade away from the United States then he can't ignore India or China, said Jonathan Berkshire Miller, senior fellow and director of foreign affairs, national defence and national security at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
'We cannot afford diplomatic silence with a country so vital to the Indo-Pacific and global affairs,' he said. 'Diplomacy is not about agreeing on everything – it's about managing differences.'
Alan Jones, a former assistant director at the Canadian Security Intelligence Service who is executive adviser at the University of Ottawa Professional Development Institute, said there's no excuse for India going rogue and plotting murder.
But Mr. Carney is right not to take a 'sanctimonious' position and ignore the geopolitical and trade role that India plays in the world, he said.
'Carney is a businessman at heart and this is a business decision. I'm sure he knows full well that he will take some heat and be criticized for it. But at some point, you have to turn the page.'
Mr. Jones said Mr. Carney campaigned on fixing the economy and getting the country on stable economic, defence and security footing. 'I think most Canadians understand that,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada Standard
3 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Canada's intelligence agency CSIS confirms Khalistani extremism on its soil
Ottawa [Canada], June 19 (ANI): For the first time ever, Canada's premier intelligence agency, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) officially acknowledged that Khalistani extremists are using Canadian soil to promote, fundraise, and plan violence in India. CSIS released its annual report on Wednesday, outlining some key concerns and threats to Canada's national security. Canada intelligence agency CSIS report categorically states, 'Khalistani extremists continue to use Canada as a base for the promotion, fundraising or planning of violence primarily in India.' India has been raising concerns about Khalistani extremists operating from Canadian soil for years, but Canada had largely turned a blind eye to the issue. The CSIS report confirmed that Canada has become a safe haven for anti-India elements, validating India's concerns that have been raised for years. This comes a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney 'agreed to take calibrated steps to restore stability to the relationship' and decided to restore High Commissioners to each other's capitals. At the G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney held talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and both leaders agreed to designate new high commissioners, with a view to returning to regular services to citizens and businesses in both countries, according to a press release from the Prime Minister of Canada. The Politically Motivated Violent Extremism (PMVE) threat in Canada has manifested primarily through Canada-based Khalistani extremists (CBKEs) seeking to create an independent nation state called Khalistan, largely within Punjab in India. The report noted that since the mid-1980s, the PMVE threat in Canada has manifested primarily through CBKEs. 'A small group of individuals are considered Khalistani extremists because they continue to use Canada as a base for the promotion, fundraising or planning of violence primarily in India. In particular, real and perceived Khalistani extremism emerging from Canada continues to drive Indian foreign interference activities in Canada,' the report reads. This revelation, part of CSIS's latest annual report, has reignited concerns about foreign interference and extremist activity within Canada, particularly in the context of its sensitive diplomatic relationship with India. Canada's own intelligence security has confirmed what New Delhi has long maintained -- Canada has become a safe haven for anti-India elements. The report called for sustained vigilance against both external influence campaigns and domestic extremist financing networks 'These activities attempt to steer Canada's positions into alignment with India's interests on key issues, particularly with respect to how the Indian government perceives Canada-based supporters of an independent homeland that they call Khalistan,' added the report. Tensions escalated further when former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau claimed that his government had 'credible allegations' of India's involvement in the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada in 2023. India has strongly denied the allegations, terming them 'absurd' and 'motivated,' and has accused Canada of giving space to extremist and anti-India elements. In the aftermath, India recalled six diplomats from Canada after they were declared 'persons of interest' by Canadian authorities investigating Nijjar's killing. Nijjar was shot dead outside a gurdwara in Surrey, British Columbia, on June 18, 2023. 'Links between the Government of India and the Nijjar murder signals a significant escalation in India's repression efforts against the Khalistan movement and a clear intent to target individuals in North America, Wednesday's report read. 'Real and perceived Khalistani extremism emerging from Canada continues to drive Indian foreign interference activities in Canada, the report added. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney faced criticism for inviting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit, with some Sikh advocates and his own MPs expressing disapproval. However, Carney defended his decision, citing India's significance in global affairs. Carney emphasized India's status as the world's fourth-largest economy and most populous country, making it a crucial player in addressing global challenges. (ANI)


CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
Markstay-Warren sees first draft of hen bylaw
While backyard chickens have been debated for years in several northern Ontario communities, Markstay-Warren has drafted a new bylaw.

Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Most Liberal government bills unlikely to pass before House of Commons summer break
Most of the minority Liberal government's legislative agenda is unlikely to pass before the House of Commons breaks for summer on Friday, as bills on affordability and border security face strong criticism over privacy-related elements. Prime Minister Mark Carney clearly prioritized Bill C-5, which pledges to eliminate federal barriers to interprovincial trade and sets up a system to fast-track major infrastructure projects, saying the legislation must be approved before summer. That is expected to happen based on current schedules, though the bill is also generating strong criticism that it grants the government excessive powers. Critics also say the bill weakens requirements related to Indigenous consultation and environmental protection. The Official Opposition Conservatives supported procedural moves to speed up C-5's approval. On Tuesday, the House adopted two other bills, C-6 and C-7, that approve federal spending through what is known as the estimates process. On those spending bills, the Conservatives voted against while Bloc Québécois, NDP and Green Party MPs voted with the Liberals. What federal Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, is all about However, no other government bill appears to be on track to become law before summer, barring any last-minute deals among the parties. Bloc House Leader Christine Normandin confirmed this in a statement to The Globe and Mail. The list of bills that are unlikely to pass before summer includes C-2, the Strong Borders Act, which includes new border-security measures but is facing criticism over elements that would allow new powers for police to obtain information without a warrant. There are also privacy concerns related to Bill C-4, the Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act, introduced by Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne. The minister promoted the bill as being focused on affordability as it includes campaign promises to cut income taxes, remove the GST on new homes priced at up to $1-million for first-time homebuyers, and eliminate the federal fuel charge. The tax changes can proceed even though the bill is not yet law because the measures were supported in an earlier vote by MPs. Mr. Champagne is facing criticism over the fact that the bill includes a fourth element unrelated to affordability that would shield federal political parties from provincial privacy laws. Several senators are expressing concern with that aspect of the bill and questioned why it wasn't introduced separately. During an appearance before the Senate Tuesday evening to defend the bill, Mr. Champagne said the privacy elements are about creating a common standard across the country and informing the courts about the federal government's intentions. Last year, B.C.'s Supreme Court ruled against the federal Liberal, New Democratic and Conservative parties, saying they are subject to the investigative powers of provincial privacy commissioners. The three national parties were challenging the legality of an investigation by the B.C. Privacy Commissioner. The matter is currently before the B.C. Court of Appeal. 'We need to provide predictability. We need to tell the courts the intent of the House. This time, it's not only the intent of one party, but it's the unanimous support of all members of Parliament,' Mr. Champagne said, in reference to last week's 335-0 vote in favour of the bill at second reading, which sent it to committee for further study. Conservatives raise privacy concerns over powers in government's border security bill Senator Paula Simons said the effect of C-4's privacy element is to create a lower standard for privacy protection than is currently in place under some provincial laws. 'I'm not surprised that all parties agreed. This is a question of foxes in the henhouse, because it is in the interests of those parties to be able to exploit that voter information,' she said. Senator Pamela Wallin said political parties are involved in 'a bit of an arms race' when it comes to how to profile Canadian voters. 'We can understand, of course, why you would all vote for this, but it doesn't necessarily improve – in fact, I think it distorts – democratic participation when you protect the political parties and allow them to micro-target and use that data in such a specific way," she said. Bill C-4 has been referred to the House of Commons finance committee for further study, but no meetings are scheduled to take place this week before the House is set to rise on Friday. The other House of Commons government bills introduced in the current Parliament are Bill C-3, which reintroduced legislation to grant citizenship to 'Lost Canadians' who were born abroad to foreign-born Canadians, and C-8, introduced Wednesday, related to cybersecurity. Neither bill has advanced beyond the initial stages. In addition, the government introduced S-2 in the Senate, which is similar to Bill C-38 from the previous Parliament, which was not adopted. The bill aims to address concerns related to registration under the Indian Act. It has not advanced beyond second reading in the Senate. On C-5, the bill concerning interprovincial trade and infrastructure projects, Conservative MP and intergovernmental affairs critic Philip Lawrence said Wednesday the legislation should have gone further. 'We believe, directionally, it's the right idea,' he said, pointing to support for building more projects and reducing barriers to interprovincial trade. 'But we certainly would have wanted to see a lot more.' Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet, who opposes C-5 as an intrusion into provincial jurisdiction, said Wednesday that the debate around the bill won't be going away. 'If they think shutting down debate on C-5 puts a lid on it, that will prove that there are people in this government who don't understand Parliament,' he said. Marie-Justine Torres, a spokesperson for Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon, said in an e-mail that the government bills are based on the mandate the Liberals received in the recent election. 'We are firmly committed to delivering on this mandate and will continue moving forward in the House in the fall sitting,' she said.