logo
NATO Troops on Russia's Border Are Trying Not to Think About Moscow

NATO Troops on Russia's Border Are Trying Not to Think About Moscow

Newsweek25-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Squinting against the rain, Swedish and Finnish soldiers looked on at a handful of Stockholm's 155 mm Archer howitzers blasting live shells across Europe's largest training area, Rovajärvi.
Sprawled just over the line, carving out the Arctic Circle in Finland's northernmost region, Lapland, Rovajärvi has hosted Swedish and British troops learning how to fight together roughly 70 miles from Russia's northwestern border.
A few miles from the Archers, British Army soldiers launched missiles from their M270 Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS), hitting targets just over 26 kilometers to the north in well under a minute, drones buzzing overhead to scope out the terrain. Slightly further afield in Sodankylä, the United Kingdom's newly filled-out fleet of upgraded Apache helicopters test-fired more than a dozen short-range Hellfire missiles.
But soldiers representing three of NATO's members are putting Russia's proximity to one side during their stints in Rovajärvi and Sodankylä, those watching and carrying out the drills say.
Standing in the sleet, Lieutenant Colonel Kimmo Ruotsalainen, the commander of an artillery regiment in Finland's Kainuu Brigade leading the Lapland drills, said the soldiers gathered in the Arctic had been focusing on smoothing out how they work together, rather than homing in on the specifics of the threat across the border.
While "absolutely" designed with Russia in mind, Ruotsalainen said these exercises are about improving the sync between three of the alliance's members.
"Everyone knows the importance, for example, of the Allied training together—defense forces training together—and reservists rehearsals," he told Newsweek.
"They are not questioned at the moment," Ruotsalainen said. But when asked how Russia's presence is felt in Rovajärvi, he remarked, "It doesn't matter that much mentality-wise when we train, which is the threat."
Finnish soldiers stand by a Soviet-era D-30 howitzer at Rovajärvi training area, northern Finland, on May 21, 2025.
Finnish soldiers stand by a Soviet-era D-30 howitzer at Rovajärvi training area, northern Finland, on May 21, 2025.
Ellie Cook
"You cannot go on every day and think about it," one Swedish soldier at the exercises said.
Finland, with its hundreds of years of fraught history with Russia, became a member of NATO little over a year after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. Sweden joined a year later.
Helsinki's addition to the alliance doubled the length of Russia's land border with NATO. Moscow vowed to retaliate and has started intensive reforms of its forces in the northwest of the country, including expanding the military facilities a stone's throw from Finland and Estonia, a fellow NATO member just to the south of Helsinki.
Military personnel on NATO's northeastern edge say they expect the Russian troops drained from these bases close to alliance soil to return once Moscow and Kyiv ink a ceasefire deal in negotiations pushed forcefully by the United States.
Russia is a familiar threat on Finland's shoulder, far predating the bitter conflict in Ukraine, the country's soldiers say.
"The Finns are used to living next door to Russia, so everything is focused on how they're going to defend Finland from Russia," Brigadier Nick English, commander of the British Army's 1st Aviation Brigade Combat Team deployed to Lapland, told Newsweek.
"That makes it real in a way that it isn't if you're training in the U.K.," he said.
"We're all aware of it," said Alfie Giles, a 19-year-old British Army air trooper working with the Apache attack helicopters in Sodankylä. "We're just here to exercise with our NATO allies."
But the Russia of the last few decades will not be the same country or military force that emerges from the trenches of Ukraine. The Kremlin's plans to swell the number of active troops to 1.5 million will make Russia the second-largest military in the world—a battle-hardened force on the cutting edge of drone development, supported by tried-and-tested next-generation hypersonic weapons that NATO currently doesn't have.
Estonia's foreign intelligence service warned last year that NATO could stare down a "Soviet-style mass army that, while technologically inferior to the allies, poses a significant threat due to its size, firepower and reserves" by the mid-2030s.
Denmark's Defense Intelligence Service said in February it expected Russia to be able to wage a "large-scale war" against NATO in the next five years if the U.S. declines to be involved.
The Finnish exercises, dubbed Northern Strike 125, are part of a set of drills across the eastern edge of NATO territory, sweeping down from Scandinavia, through the Baltic States pressed up against Russia and Belarus and further south.
"From the skies over Poland, to the northern reaches of Finland the U.K. is standing shoulder to shoulder with our allies in leading the way in defending NATO's eastern flank," said British armed forces minister Luke Pollard.
"I would anticipate future activity both here and across the Baltic States," British Army Major Joe Wooldridge told Newsweek.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Trump administration eases EPA regulations, Houston could pay a price
As Trump administration eases EPA regulations, Houston could pay a price

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As Trump administration eases EPA regulations, Houston could pay a price

Washington — Since President Trump took office in January, his Environmental Protection Agency has been both slashing and reconsidering dozens of rules designed to fight pollution. The White House is also firing many of the EPA staffers who enforce the rules that remain. This week, CBS News visited a Houston neighborhood that's near an NRG Energy coal-fired power plant, the largest in Texas. When CBS News visited the same neighborhood in December, Mr. Trump had just been elected to a second term, promising the energy industry that he would roll back environmental regulations that protect air quality. "I think of pollution as a silent and invisible killer," Dr. Winston Liaw, chair of the Health Systems and Population Health Sciences Department at the University of Houston, told CBS News. Liaw treats patients who run a higher risk of lung disease, asthma and heart attacks due to emissions from oil refineries, chemical plants and coal plants in the Houston area. He explained how the air in Houston can impact human health. "There are these tiny particles, and they're so small that they bypass a lot of our defenses," Liaw said. "And then they start injuring all sorts of tissue in our body." A 2018 study from Rice University found that pollution from the NRG plant contributes to 177 premature deaths per year. In April, the Trump administration gave 68 plants — including the NRG plant in the Rice study — a two-year exemption from complying with federal regulations intended to lower mercury emissions, a powerful toxin that can affect the brain. CBS News analyzed the Trump administration's exemptions and found that nearly 65% of these plants are located within 3 miles of low-income, minority communities. "Bottom line is, who's more at risk are poor people," said Ben Jealous, executive director of the Sierra Club, an environmental advocacy group that has led an effort to try and close almost two-thirds of the nation's coal plants. "When you start increasing production of coal-fired power plants, you're going to kill more people, and you're going to cause more heart attacks, and you're going to cause more asthma attacks," Jealous said. In a statement provided to CBS News, NRG Energy said its "coal units operate in compliance with the current Mercury Air Toxics Standards (MATS) and will operate in compliance with any future MATS requirements." In a separate statement, the Trump administration said Biden-era coal plant regulations "stacked burdensome regulations on top of the longstanding Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, raising the risk of coal-fired plants shutting down – which would eliminate thousands of jobs, strain our electrical grid, and undermine our national security by leaving America vulnerable to electricity shortages." Jealous argues that coal is not a more reliable energy source than renewable energies. "The argument that coal gives you more reliable energy isn't valid," Jealous said. "Solar, wind and batteries gives you the most reliable, the most resilient grid." More importantly, he said, for the people of Houston and across the country, renewable energy means less pollution. January 6 defendant refuses Trump's pardon Sneak peek: Where is Jermain Charlo? Baldwin grills McMahon on unallocated funds for students, schools, approved by Congress

Trump administration rescinds guidance on emergency abortions in hospitals
Trump administration rescinds guidance on emergency abortions in hospitals

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration rescinds guidance on emergency abortions in hospitals

The Trump administration announced on Tuesday it is rescinding Biden-era guidance that uses a federal law to require hospitals to stabilize patients in need of emergency care -- including by providing an abortion. In July 2022, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued guidance that, under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), doctors must perform abortions in emergency departments -- even in states where the procedure is illegal -- particularly if it serves as a "stabilizing medical treatment" for an emergency medical condition. Emergency medical conditions included, but were not limited to, "ectopic pregnancy, complications of pregnancy loss, or emergent hypertensive disorders, such as preeclampsia with severe features." MORE: Biden administration announces new steps to protect contraceptives, abortion medication on Roe anniversary EMTALA, which was passed in 1986, ensures that emergency patients receive services and treatment regardless of ability to pay. Hospitals that refuse to provide "necessary stabilizing care" or "an appropriate transfer" can face civil monetary penalties. The HHS guidance was one of the attempts of the Biden administration to preserve abortion access after the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade, ending federal protections for abortion rights. However, HHS and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rescinded the guidance, as well as an accompanying letter from former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, saying they "do not reflect the policy of this Administration." "CMS will continue to enforce EMTALA, which protects all individuals who present to a hospital emergency department seeking examination or treatment, including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy," a press release from the agency read. "CMS will work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions," the press release continued. MORE: Woman sues Kansas hospital over alleged denial of emergency abortion Abortion rights groups, such as the American Civil Liberties Union, criticized the administration and accused President Donald Trump of walking back on a campaign promise not to interfere with abortion access. "By rescinding this guidance, the Trump administration has sent a clear signal that it is siding not with the majority, but with its anti-abortion allies -- and that will come at the expense of women's lives," Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, said in a statement. "The ACLU will use every lever we have to keep President Trump and his administration from endangering our health and lives." The Biden administration's guidance has faced legal challenges in the past. In January 2024, a federal appeals court ruled that Texas hospitals and doctors are not required to perform emergency abortions despite the guidance. Meanwhile, earlier this year, the Department of Justice dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Biden administration against the state of Idaho, claiming its near-total abortion ban violated EMTALA.

Trump administration rescinds Biden-era guidance requiring hospitals to perform emergency abortions

timean hour ago

Trump administration rescinds Biden-era guidance requiring hospitals to perform emergency abortions

The Trump administration announced on Tuesday it is rescinding Biden-era guidance that uses a federal law to require hospitals to stabilize patients in need of emergency care -- including by providing an abortion. In July 2022, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued guidance that, under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), doctors must perform abortions in emergency departments -- even in states where the procedure is illegal -- particularly if it serves as a "stabilizing medical treatment" for an emergency medical condition. Emergency medical conditions included, but were not limited to, "ectopic pregnancy, complications of pregnancy loss, or emergent hypertensive disorders, such as preeclampsia with severe features." EMTALA, which was passed in 1986, ensures that emergency patients receive services and treatment regardless of ability to pay. Hospitals that refuse to provide "necessary stabilizing care" or "an appropriate transfer" can face civil monetary penalties. The HHS guidance was one of the attempts of the Biden administration to preserve abortion access after the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade, ending federal protections for abortion rights. However, HHS and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rescinded the guidance, as well as an accompanying letter from former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, saying they "do not reflect the policy of this Administration." "CMS will continue to enforce EMTALA, which protects all individuals who present to a hospital emergency department seeking examination or treatment, including for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy," a press release from the agency read. "CMS will work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions," the press release continued. Abortion rights groups, such as the American Civil Liberties Union, criticized the administration and accused President Donald Trump of walking back on a campaign promise not to interfere with abortion access. "By rescinding this guidance, the Trump administration has sent a clear signal that it is siding not with the majority, but with its anti-abortion allies -- and that will come at the expense of women's lives," Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, said in a statement. "The ACLU will use every lever we have to keep President Trump and his administration from endangering our health and lives." The Biden administration's guidance has faced legal challenges in the past. In January 2024, a federal appeals court ruled that Texas hospitals and doctors are not required to perform emergency abortions despite the guidance.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store