Cruise passenger stuck in hospital after nightmare trip
What started out as a fun-filled holiday at sea turned into a dangerous nightmare for a man now stranded in a Darwin Hospital unable to get home to Western Australia.
Peter Jackson and his wife Amanda set sail from Sydney to Fremantle on the Crown Princess and were having the time of their lives celebrating their 40th wedding anniversary until 63-year-old Mr Jackson fell backwards while re-embarking the vessel after ANZAC celebrations in Darwin.
He suffered a bleed on the brain and was rushed to the ship hospital – but when the ship had to set sail, Mr Jackson was taken to Royal Darwin Hospital where he has since undergone two surgeries for brain bleeds.
'He was unconscious for two days and we were told he was in trouble, and to prepare ourselves,' Mr Jackson's daughter Chloe Moloney told news.com.au.
'We were told Dad was too unwell to be transported and he needed to be stable for an airlift. Once he was stable, an airlift was to be done. Dad came around and improved and was moved to a ward.'
But for reasons unknown to the anxious family, the medical transport back to WA was cancelled.
'We couldn't understand why. Dad needs to be admitted to a neuro-rehab facility once a bed becomes available back home,' Ms Moloney said.
'Dad's speech has been impacted quite severely, he is quite hard to understand now. He also has issues with his right arm, and his high-level balance. Flying home commercially is not an option for us, with his condition.'
Ms Moloney is desperate for answers and a solution.
'On Wednesday last week we were told that neither the WA or NT governments wanted to pay for dad to get home, even though he needed to be admitted to a neuro-rehab facility,' she said.
'They said we needed to pay to get him on a commercial flight. From the research I have done I'm sure this falls under the national health form agreement, where the national government pays or they split the cost.
'The Royal Flying Doctor Service quoted $80,000 to fly Dad home. Mum and Dad have premium Ambulance cover which covers Air Ambulance but the health fund advised mum that St Johns Ambulance in Darwin do the patient transfers,' Ms Moloney said.
'When called, St Johns gave mum a flat no, with no reason why.
'Mum had another quote that will provide a nurse on a commercial flight to sit in business class with dad and that costs $15,000.
'Where is she supposed to get all this money from when she has already spent thousands on accommodation so far to stay with dad?
'It's been a nightmare. We just want to get him home safely and get the ongoing care he needs,' Ms Moloney said.
'My dad is the most beautiful man. When he was of sound mind he would go out of his way to help anyone. Well now he needs help and we just can't get it.'
Both the NT and WA Governments and the Federal Government have been contacted for comment.
A spokeswoman for St John NT said 'this type of patient transport would need to be arranged by NT Health. If requested by NT Health, St John NT may facilitate the transport but we cannot initiate it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
What to know about sunscreen, SPF and protecting yourself from the sun all year round
For many Australians, the first port of call for sun safety is sunscreen. However, a new Choice report found 16 from a sample of 20 widely available sunscreen products failed to meet the SPF level on their label. But experts say there's no need to panic. Here's everything they say you need to know — from how sunscreen is tested, what to look out for when shopping and what else you can do to protect yourself from the sun. SPF stands for Sun Protection Factor — how well something protects you against ultraviolet radiation (UV). The higher the number, the less UV passes through to your skin. SPF measures how much time it takes for an individual to burn while wearing a particular sunscreen. If someone normally burns after 10 minutes in the sun, an SPF of 10 should allow them to spend 100 minutes in the sun before burning, says Melanoma Institute dermatologist Dr Linda Martin. In percentages, that means the difference between an SPF50 and SPF30 might not be as much as you think. If applied correctly, an SPF50 lets through just 2 per cent of UV rays, whereas an SPF30 allows 3.3 per cent through, Dr Martin says. But Michelle Wong*, a cosmetic chemist and science communicator, says the gap in effectiveness grows, the less you apply. "So instead of just 2 per cent or 3.3 per cent of UV getting in, you will be getting either 4 per cent or 6.7 per cent," she said. Most of us only apply around a quarter of what is used in testing conditions, Dr Martin says. An SPF rating is calculated through testing on humans in an accredited laboratory. It can't be done in the sun because the conditions would be variable and dangerous. Instead, an instrument called a solar simulator that imitates sunlight is used. Researchers measure the time it takes for the skin to redden in an area where sunscreen has been applied, versus an area that has no sunscreen on it. Australia follows the international standard for sunscreen testing, which mandates testing on 10 volunteers. Many sunscreen brands sold in Australia test in labs overseas. In most cases, yes — sunscreens are very effective and the Choice results shouldn't make you lose faith, Dr Wong says. Australia has some of the strictest sunscreen regulations in the world and all are regulated by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). But the TGA says SPF results can vary between different laboratories because of the reliance on human testing. For example, Dr Wong says the redness of skin can be interpreted differently by testing staff, and results can differ depending on ethnicity and where testing is done. "Someone in Australia that's just come out of our summer is also going to have much more sun-tolerant skin than someone in, let's say, Europe," she says. Dr Wong said the best one is the one you will apply generously and regularly, and fits in with your budget. She says most of the time, an SPF30 is going to provide enough protection if you apply the right amount. The higher the SPF, the better — but remember if you only apply a quarter of the right amount of SPF50, you're essentially wearing an SPF 12.5, Dr Wong says. The TGA says SPFs in the range of 30 to 59 provide "high protection", while a SPF of 60 or higher provides "very high" protection. While SPF filters what's called UVB rays, you also need to protect from UVA radiation. UVB rays typically causes sunburn, while UVA penetrates deeper into the skin and can get through glass. So, make sure your sunscreen says something like 'UVB and UVA protection' or 'broad spectrum'. Also, if you're going to be spending a lot of time in the water (or just sweating heaps) then go for a water-resistant sunscreen. Dr Wong said there's a lot of debate about chemical versus mineral sunscreens, but at the end of the day they offer similar protection. You'll know you have a chemical sunscreen if the ingredients include things like octocrylene or aobenzone. You'll see zinc oxide or titanium oxide if it's a mineral sunscreen. She says in general, chemical sunscreens are lighter but have a higher chance of stinging your eyes, while mineral ones will have a more matte texture but may leave more white residue. Sunscreen can be applied underneath moisturisers and make-up, but Dr Wong says research shows they can be more effective when put over the top of skincare. The general recommendation is that when the UV index is forecast to reach 3 or above you should apply sunscreen as part of your daily routine. While UV radiation is generally higher in summer than winter, it's still there all year round. You might even need to wear sunscreen indoors, depending on your circumstances. For example, if you spend a lot of time driving, remember that untinted windows don't completely block UVA radiation. However, the latest advice, which you can read here and is backed by the Australasian College of Dermatologists, reflects the fact that people with darker skin tones need different sun safety advice. There's a lot we could cover here, but the most common mistakes are: You remember slip, slop, slap, right? Since that campaign was rolled out in 1981, two more have been added: seek shade and slide on sunglasses. In full, the Melanoma Institute's five rules for greater sun protection are: "Remember sunscreen is a filter. It's not a coat of armour and it's not the only step," Dr Martin says. "Skin cancer is the most common, the most expensive and the most preventable cancer in Australia." *Michelle Wong says in 2022 she did one-off sponsored posts with some of the brands tested by CHOICE.
SBS Australia
5 hours ago
- SBS Australia
SBS News in Easy English 12 June 2025
Welcome to SBS News in Easy English. I'm Biwa Kwan. The future of the AUKUS security alliance between Australia, the US and the UK is uncertain, after the US announced a review into the deal. The Pentagon has launched a review of the agreement to ensure it aligns with President Donald Trump's policy agenda. Defence Minister Richard Marles has dismissed speculation the United States may back out of the deal, saying it is important to stick to the plan to ensure the defence capability is acquired. The Opposition's spokesman for defence, Angus Taylor says actions must be taken to ensure the AUKUS deal is maintained. "We have been consistent in providing bipartisan support to AUKUS. And we will continue. It is hugely important that it succeed for peace in our part of the world. This US review came out of the blue. We need to know to what extent was the review triggered by Labor's failure to fund defence in this country to a level that the US and other partners think is appropriate." Greens defence spokesperson David Shoebridge says the US review shows the AUKUS deal makes Australia a junior partner in America's military strategy, not an equal ally. Some of Australia's most popular sunscreens - including some made by Bondi Sands, Banana Boat and the Cancer Council - are not delivering on the claims made on the level of skin protection. Independent testing by consumer group Choice found more than three-quarters of SPF 50+ sunscreens did not have the advertised protection Choice CEO Ashley de Silva says only four of the 20 sunscreens tested in an accredited sunscreen lab actually met their claims of SPF 50 or 50+ protection. The Cancer Council says its test results shows their sunscreens meet their SPF ratings, but they have submitted the products for further testing. Several other popular brands have indicated they plan to do additional testing, following the findings. The chief executive of Monash IVF has resigned, after the fertility clinic revealed a second instance of an error involving an embryo transfer - two months after the first mix-up. Michael Knaap, who had been the chief executive since 2019 has resigned. Earlier this week, in a statement to the stock exchange, Monash IVF revealed the mix-up took place on June 5 at its Melbourne laboratory. An Australian sperm donor, caught up in a cyber security data breach, has told S-B-S he is unsure how he and his donor-conceived child will be affected. Isaac chose to use Genea Fertility, which was later hacked by cyber criminals in a data breach. The family histories of medication and mental illness of some of the clinic's donors are now being shared on the dark web. Isaac says he is worried his own sensitive medical information could be weaponised. His response has been voiced up by a journalist to protect his privacy: "What happens if I get a job which is relatively high profile or dealing with sensitive activity, could this open me up to not getting employed because an employer might've found my internet history, and maybe they have had ethical concerns or concerns with my health record. It's taken away my agency and my choice to disclose that information if I want to. That's only compounded further by the lack of information that I've been provided about this investigation and the data breach." In a statement, Genea told SBS its cyber teams are working hard to understand the nature and extent of the data that has been published, and to identify affected individuals. The Filipino community in Australia is marking Philippines Independence Day, with festivities to showcase the country's heritage, culture and community spirit. June 12th commemorates the declaration of Philippine independence from Spain in 18-98, and has been the country's National Day since 1978. Filipino-Australian Siegfrid Bacani was born in the Philippines and came to Australia as a teenager. He told SBS Filipino it is important that his son knows his heritage. "I read storybooks to him. Not that my Tagalog is that great, but it is important to celebrate culture."
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
WA nurse Gary Shane Stevenson deregistered for repeated theft of painkillers
A former West Australian nurse has been deregistered for repeatedly stealing controlled medication, which led to patients being deprived of the pain relief they were prescribed. The Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia's (NMBA) application to the WA State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) found Gary Shane Stevenson stole medication 34 times in eight months. Tribunal documents show that between September 2021 and April 2022 Stevenson administered less pain relief than prescribed to multiple patients at Dongara Health Centre in the state's Midwest. In other instances painkillers were removed from the safe and incorrectly recorded as being for a patient, but were not prescribed or administered. The SAT documents state that in October 2021 patient JD went to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain, leading to a telehealth doctor prescribing morphine to be administered via a drip. The prescription stated JD was to be given morphine in 2.5 milligram increments four times overnight, but the records showed the patient only received three doses. At the same time an additional 10mg of morphine went missing from the safe. On another occasion Stevenson administered less morphine than prescribed to patient LW and later took an extra 10 milligrams of morphine from the safe, which was never prescribed or received by LW, and later forged the records. The tribunal documents stated that Stevenson "misappropriated" 240mg of morphine and also took more than 100 tablets of a prescription-only painkiller commonly known as Panadeine Forte. Stevenson held a senior position as clinical nurse at the Dongara Health Service and mostly worked in the emergency department. He was frequently the highest-ranking nurse on duty and he was responsible for a monthly audit of the drug registers. In April 2022 the NMBA received a tip-off about the mishandling of medication and that July Stevenson's nursing registration was suspended. In October 2022 he resigned from the clinic. In multiple instances Stevenson ignored a WA Country Health Service (WACHS) policy requiring a second professional to monitor the recording, administration or disposal of certain high-risk medications. Tribunal documents state that Stevenson "made acknowledgements" of his misconduct and that his actions had been "below the standard" expected of a registered nurse. Stevenson's nursing registration was cancelled at the tribunal on Tuesday after almost three years of suspension. The years of suspension were considered when handing down the disqualification and Stevenson cannot apply to re-register as a nurse for another 18 months. He has also been ordered to pay $5,000 towards the NMBA's legal costs. WACHS acknowledged the SAT's decision and emphasised that the "former employee" had not been associated with the organisation for years. "The individual concerned has not been a WA Country Health Service or WA Health employee since 2022," WACHS said.
