
Elon Musk calls Trump's tax and spending bill a ‘pork-filled Congressional disaster': White House fires back
ANI Elon Musk slams Trump's funding bill, calls it 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has launched a fierce attack on President Donald Trump's signature tax and spending bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' that will worsen the federal budget deficit. His criticism comes just days after Trump gave Musk a high-profile Oval Office farewell, marking the end of his work leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X, his social media platform formerly known as Twitter. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'
The bill, which has passed the House and is now under Senate review, aims to extend and add tax cuts while increasing federal spending by hundreds of billions, particularly on border security and national defence. However, it also includes significant cuts to subsidies and tax credits for electric vehicles, a move that could harm Tesla, Musk's electric car company. This public outburst marks a sharp shift for Musk. Last year, he poured over $250 million into supporting Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. He had even vowed to back challengers against Republicans deemed insufficiently loyal to Trump. Now, he urges voters to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' in the 2026 midterms.
Musk's full message was clear: 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.'Yet, it remains uncertain how Musk plans to translate his criticism into action. He recently mentioned he would spend 'a lot less' on political campaigns but left open the possibility of future involvement 'if I see a reason.'
The reaction among Republicans has been mixed and reveals tension within the party. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the party intends to move 'full speed ahead' despite Musk's criticism.Senator Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia put Musk's influence in perspective, stating, 'No matter what Elon Musk or anybody else says — and I don't want to diminish him because I don't think that's fair — it's still going to be second fiddle to President Trump.'Alex Conant, a Republican strategist, noted, 'It's not helpful' for Musk to criticise the legislation. Still, he doubted lawmakers would side with Musk over Trump. 'Senate Republicans are not going to let the tax cuts expire,' he added. 'It just makes leadership's job that much harder to wrangle the holdouts.' — SpeakerJohnson (@SpeakerJohnson)
Some Republicans who prioritise fiscal restraint welcomed Musk's stand. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul called the bill 'massive waste in government spending' and rejected the proposed debt increase. Utah Senator Mike Lee also expressed concerns, saying, 'Federal spending has become excessive,' adding that it fuels inflation and 'weaponises government.' — BasedMikeLee (@BasedMikeLee) Paul wrote on X, 'I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better.'Musk responded with an American flag emoji, signalling solidarity.
Despite Musk's harsh words, the White House remained unshaken. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.'Leavitt dismissed claims that the bill would worsen the deficit, accusing the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office of bias for projecting the bill could raise the deficit by $3.8 trillion over ten years.Interestingly, Democrats have found an unlikely ally in Musk's criticism. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said, 'We're in complete agreement,' holding up a large printout of Musk's post at a Capitol news conference.The legislation has drawn fierce Democratic opposition for its proposed cuts to Medicaid, food stamps, and green energy investments — cuts seen as a way to finance more than $4.5 trillion in tax breaks.Musk's departure from the Trump administration last week ended his 129-day stint as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. During his time there, he pushed efforts to reduce government waste and spending.His abrupt exit came amid rising frustration, including disagreements over technology projects like running air traffic control via his Starlink satellite system. These were reportedly blocked over concerns about conflicts of interest.Musk's objections are not just ideological. The bill threatens subsidies crucial to Tesla's growth and the electric vehicle market. Given Tesla's status as the largest electric car manufacturer in the US, the tax credit cuts could reduce consumer incentives, impacting sales.
He also heads SpaceX, which has large defence contracts. The bill's massive increase in defence spending aligns with Trump's priorities, yet Musk's focus remains sharply on the bill's budget deficit and spending aspects. Elon Musk's blistering critique of a bill championed by his former political ally highlights a deepening rift. It signals his willingness to speak out on matters affecting both his companies and the nation's fiscal future. Meanwhile, the Republican Party navigates internal divisions as it pushes forward Trump's agenda, undeterred by criticism from one of its wealthiest supporters.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Immigrant rights groups sue to invalidate Trump administration's El Salvador prison deal
A coalition of immigrant rights groups on Thursday sued to invalidate the Trump administration's deal to house detainees in a notorious prison in El Salvador, saying the arrangement to move migrant detainees outside the reach of U.S. courts violates the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C., notes that the administration has argued that those sent to El Salvador are beyond the reach of U.S. courts and no longer have access to due process rights or other U.S. constitutional guarantees. The deal, the plaintiffs allege, 'is contrary to law. And it was entered into without any legal basis.' The administration has sent hundreds of migrants to El Salvador, including some it accuses of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. The administration in March agreed to pay $6 million for El Salvador to house 300 migrants. President Donald Trump has said he'd like to eventually send U.S. citizen criminals to the Salvadoran prison, though that'd likely be unconstitutional. The lawsuit notes that the State Department has reported that inmates in El Salvador's prisons may be subject to 'harsh and life-threatening' conditions, torture and lack access to reliable food, water and medical care. The prisons are run by the government of El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, who once called himself 'the world's coolest dictator' and has posted images of detainees sent from the U.S. getting marched into his centerpiece prison, the Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In one notorious case cited in the lawsuit, the Trump administration has not returned Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man it deported to El Salvador in violation of a judge's order, saying the man is no longer in its custody. That was the administration's argument when another judge ordered it to halt deportations under an 18th century wartime act — that the deportees were on a plane to El Salvador and outside the legal reach of federal judges. The suit was filed by Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigrant Equality, the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice and Democracy Forward, which is co-counsel in a separate lawsuit over the initial flights to El Salvador. Thursday's lawsuit says the deal violates the Administrative Procedures Act, which prevents agencies like the State Department, which reached the deal with El Salvador, from undertaking unconstitutional or otherwise illegal acts. In addition to violating the constitution, the suit notes that housing prisoners in El Salvador violates the First Step Act, a law requiring federal prisons to try to house inmates close to home. That law was signed by Trump in 2018.


Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump threatens to terminate Musk's government contracts as two spar in public fall-out
Tensions between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk reached a breaking point after a flurry of online posts from both sides. President Trump took to Truth Social, writing two posts targeting Musk. 'Elon was wearing thin, I asked him to leave, I took away his EV mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. He then added that the 'easiest way to save money' through his signature tax bill was to 'terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Meanwhile, Musk intensified his attacks on X, claiming that Trump 'is in the Epstein files,' referencing government documents related to the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi had announced the release of the 'first phase' of declassified Epstein documents, though much of the information had already been public. Time to drop the really big bomb:@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk also launched a poll on X, asking his followers if there should be a 'new political party' representing 'the 80 percent in the middle.' The billionaire, who had often portrayed himself as a centrist despite frequent engagement with global right-wing leaders, had previously pledged $100 million to Trump-aligned groups—but had not delivered. Observers speculated he could redirect his vast resources into launching a new political project. The public feud comes after Musk last week officially left his government post, where he was tasked with rooting out excessive spending through DOGE.

Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Vs Musk: 'Very Disappointed' – Ex-White House Ally Turns Bitter Critic Online
/ Jun 06, 2025, 12:48AM IST U.S. President Donald Trump says he's "very disappointed" in Elon Musk over GOP tax bill criticism. Musk claims Trump would've lost the election without his help. Elon accuses Trump of 'ingratitude,' calls out GOP domestic agenda. Trump compares Musk to ex-staffers who "miss the glamour" after leaving. Watch