logo
What to Know About Aid Getting to Gaza

What to Know About Aid Getting to Gaza

A controversial new aid center in Gaza began its work on Tuesday, with chaos and confusion marring the first days of operation. The group running it was conceived by Israelis and the plan was backed by Israel, but the United Nations and many other humanitarian organizations are boycotting it, criticizing its lack of independence.
The criticism is another sign of Israel's growing isolation. Britain, France, and Canada issued a rare public reprimand of Israel on May 20, demanding that it cease its widening military offensive in Gaza. That laid bare growing rifts between Israel and its traditional Western allies, and prompted a furious Israeli response. Much of the criticism has focused on Israel's decision to block aid to Gaza for more than two months beginning in March, exacerbating already dire conditions in the enclave.
Jonathan Whittall, a senior U.N. humanitarian official, said nearly 50 people had been injured in the chaotic fray on Tuesday. He called the Israeli attempt to take control of humanitarian aid distribution for Palestinians in Gaza part of 'an assault on their human dignity.' On Thursday, the group running the new aid operation said warning shots and smoke bombs were fired to disperse crowds at a distribution hub it had just opened in central Gaza.
Is any aid getting into Gaza?
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the new group running aid distribution, said on Thursday that about 17,200 food boxes had been distributed in the enclave so far, with each one feeding '5.5 people for 3.5 days,' totaling more than 1.8 million meals. The flow of aid is expected to increase daily, it added.
But the United Nations said the supplies constitute a mere trickle of assistance in face of the needs of a population of about two million people at risk of famine.
Where tent camps are filling up again
in Gaza
Following fresh evacuation orders, people have fled
once again to Mawasi, a small strip of land where
Israel has repeatedly instructed Palestinians to go
during the war.
Feb. 15
Detail
May 17
500 ft.
Where tent camps are filling up again in Gaza
Following fresh evacuation orders, people have fled again to Mawasi, a small strip of land
where Israel has repeatedly instructed Palestinians to go during the war.
Feb. 15
Detail
May 17
500 ft.
Source: Satellite images by Planet Labs
By Samuel Granados
Israeli military ground activity
in Gaza in the past week
A
B
Gaza City
Mediterranean
Sea
GAZA STRIP
C
Khan
Younis
ISRAEL
F
D
E
Rafah
EGYPT
Near Gaza City
A
B
Graded
area
Recently
cleared areas
Cleared
areas
New
vehicle
tracks
Near Khan Younis
C
D
Cleared
areas
Cleared
areas
New vehicle
tracks
Near Rafah
E
F
Cleared
areas
Cleared
areas
Israeli military ground activity in Gaza in the past week
Near Gaza City
A
B
A
Graded
area
B
Gaza
City
Cleared
areas
Recently
cleared areas
New
vehicle
tracks
GAZA
STRIP
C
Near Khan Younis
Khan
Younis
C
D
D
E
Cleared
areas
F
Cleared areas
Rafah
New vehicle
tracks
Near Rafah
E
F
Cleared
areas
Cleared
areas
Source: Satellite images taken on May 25 by Planet Labs
By Samuel Granados
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song
Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song

It was billed by the president as a press conference.. But that was accurate only to the extent that there were a few select reporters asking questions in the Oval Office. They were part of the 'pool', a chosen group of journalists on a rota to cover the president's movements each day. The rota used to be drawn up by the White House Correspondents Association on a rotating basis. The administration has changed that. They now compile the pool. And today, as it happens, the media seemed particularly compliant. The questions were soft. Painfully so. Read more: There was one on whether the president had any marital advice for his French counterpart - who appeared to be shoved by his wife the other day. Another was about whether Mr Musk thought it was harder to colonise to Mars or reform government. There were one or two about the pressing issues of the day, like Gaza, but nothing that could be described as probing or doing what we are supposed to be there to do - hold power to account. And Musk, under Trump, has without question wielded immense power over the past few months; unprecedented for an unelected official. He upended the workings of federal government, slashing thousands of jobs. He forced the closure of whole departments like USAID, changing America's global footprint. He did it all with a sense of enjoyment. The literal chainsaw to bureaucracy was memorable. There is little debate in America about the need to cut government bureaucracy or cut the debt. America, more than any country I have lived in, is a place full of bloat and waste. Yet it was Mr Musk's methods which caused so much unease among his many critics. They argued that where a scalpel was definitely needed, Musk instead deployed a sledgehammer. At times, his flamboyant style was a neat distraction from the substance of Trump's sweeping policy changes. But none of that was interrogated in this 'press conference'. Instead, the inane questions went on. Trump was asked if he would pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs should he be convicted - he didn't say 'no', but there was no follow up to examine why. He was asked if he wished he'd become a judge given that they are blocking so much of his legislation. He laughed. There was a moment when irony appeared to have died altogether. In the same breath as trumpeting his success in cutting government waste - when he has, in fact, achieved a fraction of the $2 trillion savings he promised - Musk congratulated Trump for deploying so much gold around the Oval Office. The presidential office has had an extensive, gaudy gold makeover costing undisclosed sums. One reporter did ask about Musk's alleged drug use. But by attributing the story to the New York Times - who have made the allegations - Musk had an easy out. "Why believe that fake news," he essentially said. Surely the obvious question was "Mr Musk, when was the last time you took ketamine or ecstasy?" It never came. Read more: We did get the answer to one burning question, trivial though it was, given what's going on in the world. But it took 41 minutes for any of the reporters to ask it: Why was Elon Musk sporting a shiner on his right eye? His 4-year-old son, X, whacked him, he said. Maybe young X has some sympathy for the thousands of federal workers - ordinary Americans - who Musk fired at his president's pleasure.

How controversial US-Israeli backed Gaza aid plan turned to chaos
How controversial US-Israeli backed Gaza aid plan turned to chaos

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How controversial US-Israeli backed Gaza aid plan turned to chaos

The masked and armed security contractor atop a dirt mound watches thousands of Palestinians who have been kettled into narrow lanes separated by fences below. He makes a heart shape with his hands and the crowd responds - the fence begins to bend as they push against it. This jubilant scene was filmed on Tuesday, the opening day of an aid distribution centre - a vital lifeline for Gazans who haven't seen fresh supplies come into the strip for more than two months due to an Israeli blockade. But by that afternoon, the scene was one of total chaos. Videos showed the distribution centre overrun by desperate civilians trampling over toppled barriers; people flinched as sounds of gunshots rang out. This was the disorderly start to a controversial new aid distribution scheme operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a newly created body backed the the US and Israel. GHF has been tasked with feeding desperately hungry Gazans. The UN said more than two million are at risk of starvation. The foundation, which uses armed American security contractors, aims to bypass the UN as the main supplier of aid in Gaza. It has been roundly condemned and boycotted by aid agencies and the UN. But Israel has said an alternative to the existing aid system was needed to stop Hamas stealing aid, which the group denies doing. To get a picture of the first few days of this new aid delivery system, BBC Verify has authenticated dozen of images at distribution sites, interviewed humanitarian and logistics experts, analysed Israeli aid transport data and official statements released by the GHF, and spoken with Gazans searching for supplies. GHF said it aimed to feed one million Gazans in its first week of operations through four secure distribution sites. A foundation spokesperson said on Friday, its fourth day of operations, that it had distributed two million meals. The BBC has not been able to verify this figure, which would be less than one meal per Gazan over the course of four days. GHF did not respond to our inquiries about how it was tracking who had been receiving them. In a video filmed at GHF's northern site near Nuseirat on Thursday, Palestinians can be seen being running away from a perimeter fence after GHF contractors threw a projectile that exploded with a loud bang, a flash and smoke. GHF in a statement said its personnel "encountered a tense and potentially dangerous crowd that refused to disperse". "To prevent escalation and ensure the safety of civilians and staff, non-lethal deterrents were deployed—including smoke and warning shots into the ground," it said. "These measures were effective", it added, "and no injuries occurred." BBC Verify cannot independently confirm this. Later that evening, GHF warned Gazans via Facebook that it would shut down any site where looting occurred. The GHF is not the only aid organisation facing serious challenges. The night before the GHF warning, a World Food Programme (WFP) warehouse was looted, resulting in several deaths which are still being investigated. In response to the incident, the WFP said humanitarian challenges "have spiralled out of control" and called for "safe, unimpeded humanitarian access" to Gaza immediately. The WFP did not respond to BBC questions about how it would implement further security measures at its warehouses. Palestinians seeking aid have characterised the GHF-led operation as disorganised, saying a lack of communication has contributed to the chaotic scenes seen this week. Things have been further muddied by misinformation. BBC Verify has seen at least two Facebook profiles purporting to be official GHF accounts, sharing inaccurate information about the status of the aid distribution centres. One page with more than 4,000 followers posted inaccurate information, sometimes alongside AI-generated images, that aid had been suspended or that looting at GHF centres had been rampant. A GHF spokesman confirmed to BBC Verify that both these Facebook accounts were fake. He also said that the foundation had launched an official Facebook channel. Transparency information online showed the page was first created on Wednesday, the day after distribution operations started. Aid organisation Oxfam and local Gazan residents have told the BBC that residents are instead relying on word of mouth to circulate information when aid was available. "All of the people are hungry. Everyone fights to get what they want, how are we supposed to get anything?" said Um Mohammad Abu Hajar, who was unable to secure an aid box on Thursday. Oxfam criticised the location of the GHF distribution sites, telling BBC Verify that it imposed "military control over aid operations". It's policy adviser, Bushra Khalidi, also questioned how vulnerable people, such as the elderly, would be able to reach these sites, which are located some distance away from some population centres. When the UN had been delivering aid before Israel's humanitarian blockade, there were 400 distribution points spread across Gaza. Under the present GHF distribution system there currently are four known sites. "By and large, its designed to dramatically increase the concentration of the population by having the only sources of food remaining in a very small number of places," said Chris Newton, a senior analyst at the brussels-based think tank Crisis Group. "You either follow all their rules and probably survive in a small radius around these sites or you are very unlikely to survive." The presence of armed security and Israeli soldiers at or near the distribution sites has also alarmed experts, who said it undermined faith in aid operations. "Distributing assistance in this kind of environment is extremely difficult. [It's] much more effectively done when you are trying to work with, and through, the people there… rather than at the point of a mercenary's gun," said Prof Stuart Gordon at the London School of Economics. A GHF spokesperson said: "Our ability - and willingness - to act under pressure is exactly why GHF remains one of the only organisations still capable of delivering critical food aid to Gaza today." Images and videos taken by eyewitnesses and the Israeli military showed the GHF boxes appeared limited to canned food, pasta, rice, cooking oil and some biscuits and lentils. "Humanitarian aid is not just a food box that you slap humanitarian on and you call it humanitarian aid," Ms Khalidi said. The supplies being given to families should be accompanied by medical support, hygiene and water purification kits, said Prof Gordon. A 14-page document from GHF, seen by the BBC, promised to hand out water and hygiene kits at the sites. On Friday, only one of the four GHF sites was distributing aid. It opened for less than an hour after which GHF announced on Facebook that it had closed because all its supplies had been "fully distributed". When asked by BBC Verify why only a single site was operational and why its boxes ran out so quickly, a GHF spokesperson said supply "will vary day by day". "Good news is we have provided two million meals in four days and will be ramping up in the coming days and weeks," the spokesman said. But many are still returning from distribution sites without boxes for their families. "I am empty-handed like God created me," said Hani Abed outside the centre near Netzarim on Thursday. "I came empty-handed and I left empty-handed." Additional reporting and verification by Emma Pengelly, Rudabah Abbass, Alex Murray, Thomas Spencer, Benedict Garman and Richard Irvine-Brown. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate? Gaza warehouse broken into by 'hordes of hungry people', says WFP Hamas official says it will reject new US Gaza ceasefire plan backed by Israel Security breaks down in Gaza as desperate people search for food

Trump vowed to remake aid. Is Gaza the future?
Trump vowed to remake aid. Is Gaza the future?

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump vowed to remake aid. Is Gaza the future?

President Donald Trump has slashed US aid and vowed a major rethink on helping the world. A controversial effort to bring food to Gaza may offer clues on what's to come. Administered by contracted US security with Israeli troops at the perimeter, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) is distributing food through several hubs in the war-ravaged Gaza Strip. An officially private effort with opaque funding, the GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for over two months, sparking warnings of mass famine. The organization said it had distributed 2.1 million meals as of Friday. The initiative excludes the United Nations, which has long coordinated aid distribution in the war-ravaged territory and has infrastructure and systems in place to deliver assistance on a large scale. The UN and other major aid groups have refused to cooperate with GHF, saying it violates basic humanitarian principles, and appears crafted to cater to Israeli military objectives. "What we have seen is chaotic, it's tragic and it's resulted in hundreds of thousands of people scrambling in an incredibly undignified and unsafe way to access a tiny trickle of aid," said Ciaran Donnelly, senior vice president of international programs at the International Rescue Committee (IRC). Jan Egeland, head of the Norwegian Refugee Council, said his aid group stopped work in Gaza in 2015 when Hamas militants invaded its office and that it refused to cooperate in Syria when former strongman Bashar al-Assad was pressuring opposition-held areas by withholding food. "Why on earth would we be willing to let the Israeli military decide how, where and to whom we give our aid as part of their military strategy to herd people around Gaza?" said Egeland. "It's a violation of everything we stand for. It is the biggest and reddest line there is that we cannot cross." - Sidelining UN - The UN said that 47 people were injured Tuesday when hungry and desperate crowds rushed a GHF site -- most of them by Israeli gunfire -- while a Palestinian medical source said at least one person had died. The Israeli military denied its soldiers fired on civilians and the GHF denied any injuries or deaths. Israel has relentlessly attacked Gaza since Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel has vowed to sideline the UN agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA, accusing it of bias and of harboring Hamas militants. UNRWA said that nine out of thousands of staff may have been involved in the October 7 attack and dismissed them, but accuses Israel of trying to throw a distraction. John Hannah, a former senior US policymaker who led a study last year that gave birth to the concepts behind the GHF, said the UN seemed to be "completely lacking in self-reflection" on the need for a new approach to aid after Hamas built a "terror kingdom." "I fear that people could be on the brink of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good instead of figuring out how do we take part in this effort, improve it, make it better, scale it up," said Hannah, who is not involved in implementing the GHF. Hannah, a senior fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America, defended the use of private contractors, saying that many had extensive Middle East experience from the US-led "war on terror." "We would have been happy if there were volunteers from (other) capable and trusted national forces... but the fact is, nobody's volunteering," he said. He said he would rather that aid workers coordinate with Israel than Hamas. "Inevitably, any humanitarian effort in a war zone has to make some compromises with a ruling authority that carries the guns," he said. - Legitimacy issue - Hannah's study had discouraged a major Israeli role in humanitarian work in Gaza, urging instead involvement by Arab states to bring greater legitimacy. Arab states have balked at supporting US efforts as Israel pounds Gaza and after Trump mused about forcibly displacing the whole Gaza population and constructing luxury hotels. Israel and Hamas are negotiating a new Gaza ceasefire that could see a resumption of UN-backed efforts. Aid groups say they have vast amounts of aid ready for Gaza that remain blocked. Donnelly said the IRC had 27 tons of supplies waiting to enter Gaza, faulting the GHF for distributing items like pasta and tinned fish that require cooking supplies -- not therapeutic food and treatment for malnourished children. He called for distributing relief in communities where people need it, instead of through militarized hubs. "If anyone really cares about distributing aid in a transparent, accountable, effective way, the way to do that is to use the expertise and infrastructure of aid organizations that have been doing this for decades," Donnelly said. sct/nl

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store