Nigel Farage uses visit to Scotland to double down on attacks on Anas Sarwar
Mr Farage claimed the Scottish Labour leader has a 'record of obsession' – citing a speech he gave in Holyrood in 2020 as evidence of this.
His comments came as he unveiled a new defection to his Reform UK party, with councillor Duncan Massey, who had been a Conservative representative on Aberdeen City Council, now a member.
Mr Farage also promised another defection, this time from Labour, would come on Monday afternoon as he visits Hamilton, where a Holyrood by-election is taking place.
That by-election has been dominated by a row over a Reform advert which has been branded 'racist' by Reform's opponents, and which claims that Mr Sarwar will 'prioritise' the Pakistani community in Scotland.
Asked about this, Mr Farage insisted Reform UK 'don't talk about race at all'.
He pointed out his party's chairman, Zia Yusuf, was someone who 'is Scottish born, but comes from parents who come from the Indian subcontinent'.
Mr Farage continued: 'We think everybody should be treated equally. We object, very strongly, to the segmentation of people into different types.'
Adding that the Scottish Labour leader has a 'record of obsession on this issue', he went on to reference a speech Mr Sarwar gave in 2020 where he noted that key figures across Scotland, from the judiciary, to council chief executives to head teachers, were all white.
Mr Farage said: 'I think that speech he gave was sectarian in its very nature – we are the south Asian community, we are going to take over the country and take over the world.
'We believe what he said was a form of sectarian politics and we don't like it one little bit.'
His comments came after First Minister John Swinney claimed the Reform UK leader 'doesn't care about Scotland'.
Welcome to Lower Deeside Councillor Duncan Massey ✅
Scotland needs Reform.
Be part of it ➡️ https://t.co/o8emOfA1dc pic.twitter.com/27zwgsLKQX
— Reform UK Scotland (@ReformUKScot) June 2, 2025
With an opinion poll having suggested Reform could be the second-largest party at Holyrood after next May's Scottish elections, the SNP leader spoke about the 'deeply concerning rise in support for Farage'.
Mr Swinney added: 'Be in no doubt, Nigel Farage doesn't care about Scotland. He poses a threat to our values and must be stopped, and only the SNP can do that.'
Mr Farage however declared that his party had 'made remarkable strides in Scotland over the past year'.
Speaking as protesters gathered outside, the Reform UK leader said if the polls are to be believed 'we are beginning to eclipse Labour to be the second most popular party in Scottish politics'.
Mr Farage again spoke out about the 'madness' of the net zero policies being pursued by the governments at Holyrood and Westminster.
He told reporters these had left the oil and gas industry, which is centred in Aberdeen, 'in serious decline'.
This 'to a large extent… is wholly unnecessary', the MP insisted, hitting out at the taxes imposed on the oil and gas sector, and also at the Labour Westminster Government's opposition to licensing new fields.
Mr Farage continued: '2025 will be a year of record consumption of fossil fuels.
'We can con ourselves as much as we like, there will be more coal burnt this year than has ever been burnt in the history of mankind, and the same applies to gas and oil.
'Even the most ardent proponent of net zero has to accept the world will still be using oil and gas up until 2050 and beyond.
'And yet we have decided to sacrifice this industry as a consensus around net zero has emerged.'
As a result of this he said parts of Scotland, England and Wales were 'literally deindustrialising before our very eyes'.
Mr Farage said: 'The madness of this is almost completely and utterly beyond belief.'
Asked about the upcoming Hamilton by-election, Mr Farage said he was confident his party would place at least third, but if Reform won it would be the 'biggest earthquake Scottish politics has ever seen'.
Responding to the Reform UK leader's latest comments on Monday, Mr Sarwar said: 'Today the chief clown Nigel Farage finally found his way to Scotland and showed just how totally out of touch with our country he is.
'Nigel Farage turned up, admitted he can't win the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, and pledged to cut funding for Scotland's NHS and public services.
'Nigel Farage is a dangerous clown and the people of Scotland see right through him.'
In an interview with the Scottish Sun on Monday, Mr Farage described Mr Swinney as 'anti-English' following his outspoken attacks on the Reform leader.
'Swinney's words are deeply provocative, which suggests the SNP leadership has learned nothing,' he told the newspaper.
'It suggests there is still that sort of quite unpleasant anti-Englishness.
'Why on earth would the top man in Scottish politics today come out with those sort of insults?'
Speaking to the PA news agency on Monday, Mr Swinney rejected the claims.
'I've always taken forward my politics on the basis of inclusion, of welcoming people, of working with others – that's what I'm about,' he said.
'Nigel Farage is the opposite of that.
'Nigel Farage stokes division, he seeks to put people against each other and we're bringing people together in Scotland to create the best future for our country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
18 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Politicians making final push for votes ahead of Holyrood by-election
Scotland's political leaders will hit the campaign trail for the final time today ahead of a Holyrood by-election. With voters in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse going to the polls on Thursday June 5, parties are making their final push for votes – with both First Minister John Swinney and the Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar expected in the constituency on Wednesday. 🗳️ Less than 2 days before polls open in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse! Fab to speak to so many folk who are excited to vote for @KatyLoudonSNP this Thursday 💛 #ActiveSNP #TeamSNP #VoteSNP — Sarah Masson (@_sarahmasson) June 3, 2025 It comes in the wake of a campaign which has been, for the most part, dominated by the rise in support for Reform UK – and a row over one of the party's online adverts. The ad alleged that Mr Sarwar would 'prioritise' the Pakistani community – but it was quickly branded racist by Labour, who together with rivals in the SNP demanded it should be taken down. Great to have @Nigel_Farage in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse today. Vote Reform. Get Reform. ✅ — Reform UK Scotland (@ReformUKScot) June 2, 2025 SNP leader and Scottish First Minister John Swinney meanwhile urged voters in the constituency to back his party in a bid to 'stop Nigel Farage'. His plea comes after an opinion poll in Scotland last month indicated Reform could come second in next year's Holyrood elections, ahead of both Labour and the Tories. On the doorstep, it is clear the SNP is completely failing communities in Scotland. Only Scottish Labour can beat the SNP in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. 🗳️Vote @DavyRussell4HLS on Thursday! — Elaine Stewart MP (@ElaineStewartMP) June 3, 2025 Speaking ahead of the by-election, which is taking place after the death of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie, Mr Swinney said that the campaign 'has made it crystal clear that the SNP is the only party listening to people and taking action on what matters to them'. The First Minister claimed: 'The Labour Party has lost its way and Keir Starmer's abject failure to deliver on his promises has led to the concerning rise of Nigel Farage across the UK – something that will worry many across Scotland. Just two days to go until the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election on Thursday 5th June 🗳️ It was great to be out yesterday in Larkhall to support @ScotTories candidate Richard Nelson. — Alex Burnett MSP (@AJABurnett) June 3, 2025 'Farage does not care about Scotland, and he also poses a threat to many of the things that we hold dear – our NHS, our parliament, and transformative policies like free tuition.' Mr Swinney insisted: 'This by-election is an opportunity to reject the politics of Farage and make sure Scotland's interests are front and centre, and only a vote for the SNP will do that.' However, Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie insisted: 'The Reform circus is nothing but a convenient distraction for the SNP – this by-election is a direct fight between Scottish Labour and the SNP.' A lot of people are frustrated that they have been let down by the SNP, Conservatives and Labour but it's the Liberal Democrats who are offering real change, not Reform. Last year's general election shows that we are winning again. If you want change, come with us. — Scottish Lib Dems (@scotlibdems) June 2, 2025 She said that Thursday's poll gives voters 'the chance to put this incompetent SNP government on notice and chart a new direction for the whole of Scotland'. Ms Baillie stated: 'The SNP's woeful record is plain to see here – chaos in local NHS services, high streets in decline, and a generation of young people let down. 'The SNP government has failed this community and Katy Loudon has made it clear she will toe the party line no matter what – but Davy Russell will be a tireless champion for the community he calls home.'
The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scots tourism chiefs 'very sceptical about visitor levies'
City of Edinburgh Council leader Jane Meagher has previously declared the levy, capped at five nights in a row, will provide a 'once in a lifetime opportunity to invest tens of millions of pounds towards enhancing and sustaining the things that make our city such a great place to visit – and live in – all year round'. Businesses will be required to apply the levy to any advance bookings made from October 1, 2025, for stays on or after July 24, 2026. While council chiefs agreed to push the start date back by three months to give businesses more time to prepare, the prospect of visitors being taxed on overnight stays, and hotels being handed the responsibility of collecting the tax, is continuing to rankle within the tourism and hospitality industry. Industry chiefs wrote to Minister for Public Finance Ivan McKee last week warning that legislation allowing councils in Scotland to introduce tourist taxes will 'fail at the first hurdle' and harm Scotland's economy and businesses. The letter, spearheaded by the Scottish Tourism Alliance, urged the Scottish Government to change the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Act to remove from businesses the burden of collecting the tax by introducing a QR code system paid directly to local authorities. 'We share the Scottish Government's ambitions to build a stronger economy and to make Scotland a world-leading visitor destination but are frustrated and very concerned that the visitor levy in its current form risks undermining that success,' the letter states. 'Taking a different approach to the rest of the UK on this policy is putting the sector at a competitive disadvantage and causing considerable complexity and unnecessary cost to businesses. Unfortunately, it is another example of a well-intentioned policy being badly implement.' Preparations for the levy are being made as hotels, bars, restaurants, and visitor attractions are continuing to battle a cost of doing business crisis which was recently exacerbated by sharp increases in employer national insurance contributions and national living wage that came into in April. Domestic tourism in Scotland has also failed to recover from the pandemic as strongly as the overseas market, as UK consumers continue to feel the pressure of the cost of living crisis. Read more: Leon Thompson, director of UK Hospitality Scotland, told The Herald that the industry is concerned the levy will undermine the competitiveness of Scottish tourism on the world stage, and highlighted the burden it will place on businesses at a time when they are grappling with high costs. 'Our position has always been that we are very sceptical about visitor levies, not just in Edinburgh but generally,' he said. 'The reason for that is just around costs [and] price competitiveness. It is possible for destinations to price themselves out of the market. We are very keen we don't see that happening anywhere in Scotland. 'The levy also comes with some costs for our businesses as well. They will have to collect the money on behalf of the council so therefore I think it is really imperative there is some financial benefit coming to businesses. The most obvious way to do that is to ensure that there is a steady flow of visitors coming to the city so that there are opportunities to increase revenue right across hospitality but particularly for the accommodation businesses that are going to need to collect the money.' Marc Crothall, chief executive of the Scottish Tourism Alliance, raised concern over the cost of the levy due to be introduced in Edinburgh, and shares Mr Thompson's concerns about the responsibility to administer the scheme being delegated to businesses. He told The Herald: 'Whilst there is a recognition that there is a need for more monies to be invested in the tourism and visitor experience and a transient visitor levy is a means to raising such monies, it is all about striking the right balance – both in the timing of the introduction of a levy, the amount that would be charged to the person staying overnight, and fully assessing the economic and competitiveness risk before introducing it. 'The 5% levy charge being applied on top of the accommodation rate is being mooted by many as too much, [as] most had expected a levy fee to be circa £3-£4pp [per person]. Nor is the percentage methodology approach acknowledged as being simple and easy for business and the visitor to work with, as well as it being costly to administrate. 'It is the firm view of many in the sector and among some local authorities that a much better approach to the charging and collection of a levy would be to apply a flat rate per person and for the levy to be paid via a digital-first approach, using QR code technology. In adopting this approach, the visitor pays straight to the authority, which takes away the cost, time burden and VAT (valued added tax) implications for the accommodation business, and benefiting the authority, who gets the money into their account quicker to spend. Read more: 'Most importantly, when levies are raised, they should only be used for investing in projects that directly enhance the visitor experience. Currently there remains concern [held] by many about where monies will be spent, the cost of administration and that the levy will be too much on top of already high costs, especially for Scottish and domestic visitors but not excluding international tourists, who may well go elsewhere or have a reduced stay. 'We also continue to be concerned that without more weight being given to the visitor levy forums, set up to advise on how the monies raised will be invested in enhancing the visitor experience and made up of representatives from both the sector and communications, then there is a risk that Edinburgh councillors could spend the revenue on local vote winners rather than on how the legislation intends.' Neil Ellis, group operations director Places Hotels in the capital and chair of Edinburgh Hotels Association, agreed that it is vital any revenue raised by the tax is used to enhance the visitor experience in the city. 'Business, leisure and event visitors are all contributing significant sums over the next few years so Edinburgh must communicate its intentions as loudly as possible,' he told The Herald. 'The majority of visitors to a destination don't mind paying as long as they know and can see where their money is being spent. I'm confident the new Visitor Levy Forum will succeed in ensuring a balanced approach is taken when reviewing and proposing levy projects.' Mr Ellis, who runs the Place Hotel on York Place, highlighted business rates and the recent rise in employer taxation were among other challenges currently facing the industry, noting that business rates are higher in Scotland than England, where relief is in place for hospitality firms. Michael Golding, chief executive of the Association of Scottish Visitor Attractions, said a recent survey of businesses had underlined the depth of concern about financial pressures in the sector. Some 78% of Scottish attractions said they were being affected by financial challenges, including the rising cost of energy, staff and reduced funding for the public sector and charities that make up a large portion of the sector. Just over half (51%) of attractions highlighted challenges around transport as a barrier to progress, following by staffing (35%), and seasonality (20%). Mr Golding said: 'There is widespread recognition across Scotland that investment is needed in our infrastructure as well as to fund the ambition of our national tourism strategy to be world leaders in 21st century tourism. However, we are in a post-pandemic economy, with high cost pressures, a lack of funding, staffing issues, seasonality, transport and more. 'Focussing on the combination of the cost of business, and the ability of our visitors to spend, making Scotland more expensive does create a risk that less people visit, or that they stay less long, and most importantly for attractions that visitors ability to spend on activities is reduced. So, we must seek to balance our need for investment, while mitigating the risks, that should be underpinned by a well evidenced economic impact study to show that the benefits.' One other ongoing challenging facing tourism and hospitality operators in the city concerns is access to labour supply. Mr Thompson hopes that the UK and EU reach agreement on a youth mobility scheme which would allow young people from countries within the bloc to sample life and experience work in Scotland. The UK and EU recently agreed to work towards agreement on a youth experience scheme that would make it easier young people from the bloc to work and study and vice versa. 'We still have some issues around workforce supply, so it is quite heartening to see the UK Government is looking very favourably upon an extension to the youth mobility scheme to help ensure our businesses can access young people from the EU to come and work here,' he said. 'I think a place like Edinburgh would do very well from being able to attract that talent from across Europe. That's a positive development in that space. If it does happen, certainly Edinburgh will be well placed to take advantage.'
The Herald Scotland
28 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kate Forbes has 'full confidence' in Ferguson Marine 'quality' bids
Ms Forbes declared businesses had indicated 'they feel…we're on their side in navigating these choppy waters'. On the Ferguson Marine yard at Port Glasgow, which has been owned by the Scottish Government since 2019, she declared she had 'full confidence in the ability of the yard to submit quality tenders' for future work. Ms Forbes added: 'I would like to think that all parties in the Scottish Parliament want to see Ferguson Marine succeed and survive, which is why we need to build confidence, not knock it.' Ferguson Marine revealed last month that delivery of the Glen Rosa for CalMac's Arran route would be delayed further. Delivery of the vessel is now expected in the second quarter of next year. The Port Glasgow yard lost out earlier this year in the tendering process for seven small, fully electric ferries to be built for CalMac. Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL), which is responsible for the procurement process and like CalMac and Ferguson Marine is owned by the Scottish Government, chose Polish shipbuilder Remontowa after a tendering process for the first phase of the small vessel replacement programme. The second phase of this programme, comprising another three fully electric ferries, will be the subject of a separate competitive tendering process later this year, CMAL has said. Asked if she believes Ferguson Marine can submit a competitive bid for the next phase of the small vessel replacement programme or whether she thinks that will come too soon for the yard, Ms Forbes replied: 'In terms of the next phase of the small vessel replacement programme, that is one of a number of opportunities for Ferguson Marine. 'And I have been crystal clear that Ferguson Marine's future relies on them being able to competitively bid in the open market for new work. Ferguson Marine said that the feedback they got in the procurement for the first phase of the small vessel replacement programme was really positive. They talked about the quality of the bid, that it was competitive in terms of quality, and that speaks to the skills and the ability of the workforce at Ferguson Marine. Obviously, we have then separately talked about the need to improve productivity with investment in facilities and equipment at the yard. But I have full confidence in the ability of the yard to submit quality tenders for work.' Asked if she had been unhappy with recent progress at Ferguson Marine, in terms of the latest delay in delivery of the Glen Rosa, Ms Forbes said: 'I, of course, was really disappointed with the delay to the Glen Rosa and the budget implications of that delay. And I was very clear in public at the time that I thought it was unacceptable. 'I felt that we need to deliver these vessels for the sake of the islanders, yes, but also because we need to restore confidence in the yard and those delays don't help with the public narrative about the yard, and it's hard enough for the yard to secure work with all of the political noise that goes on about Ferguson Marine.' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes (Image: Colin Mearns) The Scottish Government's relationship with the business community has been sharply in focus in recent years. Ms Forbes, who became Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic in May last year when John Swinney became First Minister, flagged her belief that the relationship with business had improved. Asked if she believed the overall relationship between the Scottish Government and business had improved in the last year, she replied: 'I think so. I mean, the first meetings I had when I became Economy Secretary was with all the business organisations one by one, to understand what their top asks were.' Ms Forbes declared the Scottish Government had since then worked through the first programme for government, then the Budget last December, and now the most recent programme for government 'to try and deliver against those asks'. Read more She said: 'And I think the business community understand that we can't do everything overnight, but we can either stop doing things that would otherwise have made the cost of business higher, or do things that lower the cost of business. The most recent programme for government led with economic growth and prosperity. So our sentiment, my sentiment is pro-economy, pro-prosperity, pro-business. 'And that underpins all of our other objectives. So without economic growth and prosperity, you don't raise the revenue to reinvest in resilient public services. Without a strong growing economy, you can't get to net zero because you have to partner with innovative enterprising businesses to develop the solutions that we need. And then you can't tackle child poverty unless parents in particular have access to well-paid secure employment created in many cases by the private sector. So I see their role as underpinning our other three objectives and my job is to try and make Scotland as successful and as prosperous as possible.' In an interview with The Herald last June, Ms Forbes said the greater income tax burden for higher earners in Scotland relative to the rest of the UK would be kept 'under review', taking into account 'how easy it is for taxpayers to shift'. The Scottish Government last December, in the first Budget since Mr Swinney and Ms Forbes took up their current posts, did not increase further the disparity in the income tax burden between higher earners in Scotland and those elsewhere in the UK. On the question of future income tax decisions, Ms Forbes said yesterday: 'The First Minister was very clear when he became leader that he didn't believe that you could continually raise income tax, and that we should provide certainty. And that's what last year's Budget delivered - the Budget announcement last year for this financial year. And the programme for government then built on that in May - being very clear that there wouldn't be further divergence from the rest of the UK on income tax for the remainder of this parliament. 'And the reasons for that is because certainty matters in a world that seems to be constantly in flux with lots of global headwinds and challenges of recruitment for businesses. The more certainty that we can provide, the better. And the only changes to income tax was essentially a small reduction for the basic and intermediate rate-payers because of the above-inflationary increase to the thresholds.' Asked about the reaction of business to the income tax stance, given this had been an issue that had been highlighted previously, Ms Forbes replied: 'I think we have seen a lot of positive comments from the business community.' She said: 'They have indicated that they feel the Scottish Government is listening, that they are taking any concern seriously and that we're on their side in navigating these choppy waters. Now, we obviously only…have limited powers over taxation. What's really hit them hard this year was the increase to employers' national insurance contributions, which is essentially a jobs tax, and it was, for many of them, a total surprise because it hadn't been flagged in Labour's manifesto. 'So I think in that context, the more that the Scottish Government can do to provide stability and certainty, the better, and the strong signals from the business community is they feel they are getting that now from the Scottish Government.'
