
All eyes on Scotland – and Nigel Farage's new insurgency
Photo byHolyrood by-elections don't usually make headline news in Westminster – but pay attention to what happens on Thursday. The contest is a microcosm of trends swirling around the UK's political landscape: the fracturing of the electorate, the Labour government's sharp fall in popularity, the so-called 'incumbency curse', the parties' efforts to set the narrative ahead of next year's Scottish Parliament elections, support for independence, the rise of Reform and the emergence of net zero as a key political battleground.
The by-election was triggered by the death of Christina McKelvie, who had held the seat – once considered firm Labour territory – for the SNP since 2011. When it was last contested in 2021, the SNP had a majority of 4,582, with Labour second and the Conservatives in distant third. It should be a key target for a Scottish Labour party looking to retake Scotland after 19 years of SNP rule: Thursday is (or, at least, was) a bellwether of Anas Sarwar's chances of becoming First Minister in 2026. A year ago, when the SNP was haemorrhaging support and John Swinney took over from Humza Yousaf as caretaker leader, that looked pretty likely. Now, not so much.
But 2026 isn't just a major test of Labour and the SNP. While Wales is the big Reform target, Nigel Farage has also had his eye on Scotland, with the Holyrood elections another chance for Reform to show it can translate support in the polls into concrete results. Fresh from claiming a Westminster seat off Labour in Runcorn and Helsby last month by a dramatic six votes, Reform is looking to upset the status quo by throwing everything it has at Hamilton – a Holyrood seat that, just to add extra spice, is roughly covered by the Westminster constituency of Hamilton and Clyde Valley, currently held by Labour MP Imogen Walker, who is married to Keir Starmer's infamous chief of staff Morgan McSweeney.
Reform has been getting personal. First, the party put out an advert of clips from a Sarwar speech, incorrectly claiming the Scottish Labour leader had said he would prioritise Pakistani communities. Challenged on this at his press conference last week, Farage doubled down and played the video to a room full of journalists, accusing Sarwar, who was born in Glasgow to Pakistani Muslim parents, of 'introducing sectarianism into Scottish politics'. This weekend saw a second attack ad, this time claiming 'Anas Sarwar is the one obsessed about race' and again taking clips out of context, with Farage suggesting at a press conference in Aberdeen on Monday (more on that in a moment) that Sarwar wanted South Asians to 'take over' Scotland.
The backlash has been fierce. Sarwar has branded Farage a 'poisonous, pathetic and toxic little man', while Swinney has backed him, accusing Farage of bringing 'racism and hatred' to the by-election race. Keir Starmer, who made attacking Reform his focus last week, said the party was creating a 'toxic divide'. Some Labour figures believe the race row is helpful, as it highlights the most distasteful side of Reform and will remind people tempted to back Farage as a protest vote exactly what they are supporting. But there is also a worry that Farage is using Hamilton to experiment with how far he can go in this direction, treating the race as a 'sandpit' for Reform to test out how effective personal attacks like this can be.
Reform is testing out something else too: its attacks on net zero. Farage's speech on Monday was in Aberdeen, a three-hour drive on the opposite side of Scotland from where the by-election is taking place. Here, in the 'oil capital of Europe', the Reform leader dubbed net zero 'the next Brexit', calling out the 'madness' of policies pursued both in Westminster and Holyrood. One of Reform's main strategies for 'evolving' from a protest party into a serious contender is to branch out from focusing primarily on immigration and Brexit. Farage, I was told by a Reform source, believes he has 'banked' the immigration issue, and is looking for other policy areas where his party can differentiate itself from the Westminster consensus. Net zero is the next hot-button issue. And the Hamilton by-election is a chance to see how well this anti-deindustrialisation message plays in Scotland.
Reform sources are playing down their chances of actually winning the seat. In 2021, the party won 58 votes there, so even a second-place finish would be a remarkable result. But this is about momentum. On Monday, Farage revealed two councillors who had defected to Reform – one formerly Conservative and one (the first to do so) formerly Labour. Reform was also the only party to put their candidate up against the SNP for a debate on STV's Scotland Tonight on Monday, with Labour making the strange decision to sit this one out. What was supposed to be an SNP-Labour contest has now turned into what looks like a two-horse race between the incumbent SNP and Reform.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Reform is currently the bookies' second favourite in Hamilton, behind the SNP, while polling last month put Farage's party on track to become the official opposition in Holyrood next year.
Three-way races are a headache to predict in a system where the vote can be split. But here are two wild-card factors to consider looking ahead to Thursday and what the result might mean. First, pollsters are still finding it next to impossible to estimate the backlash effect against Reform if it looks like it could actually win power. Farage may be building support for his party north of the border, but he himself remains deeply divisive. A Reform surge now could be good news for both Swinney and Sarwar, who will be fighting the incumbency curse next year.
Second, it could also have an impact on the independence cause. A new poll at the weekend suggested support for independence in Scotland would shoot from 54 to 58 per cent were Farage to become Prime Minister. That's a powerful message for dejected Scottish nationalists hoping for a revival. If Reform does well on Thursday, you can see the SNP adverts writing themselves.
Whatever happens in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse in two days' time, it will help set the political agenda in Westminster for the next year. Stay tuned.
This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here
[See also: Robert Jenrick is embarrassing himself]
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
31 minutes ago
- Sky News
Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election: Polls open as public cast votes to replace late MSP
The polls are now open in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. It comes following the death of SNP government minister Christina McKelvie. The MSP died in March at the age of 57, having last year taken medical leave to undergo treatment for secondary breast cancer. Ms McKelvie, the minister for drugs and alcohol policy, had been an MSP since 2007 and represented the Central Scotland region up to 2011 before going on to serve Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. There are 10 candidates standing in the Holyrood by-election: • Collette Bradley, Scottish Socialist Party • Andy Brady, Scottish Family Party • Ross Lambie, Reform UK • Katy Loudon, Scottish National Party (SNP) • Janice MacKay, UK Independence Party (UKIP) • Ann McGuinness, Scottish Green Party • Aisha Mir, Scottish Liberal Democrats • Richard Nelson, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party • Davy Russell, Scottish Labour Party • Marc Wilkinson, Independent The contest takes place less than a year before the Scottish parliament election, with the result potentially offering a snapshot of how the political landscape north of the border will look in 2026. Polls will close at 10pm on Thursday, with the votes set to be verified and manually counted at South Lanarkshire Council headquarters in Hamilton. Sky News will be covering the count and result.


Scotsman
31 minutes ago
- Scotsman
It's becoming obvious how little Reform understands Scotland
Reform UK has suggested the Barnett Formula and block funding grant from Westminster should go to be replaced with more tax powers for the Scottish Parliament We'll know early tomorrow morning who has won the Hamilton by-election, but during the campaign we have learned a lot more about Reform in Scotland, and it's becoming more obvious how little its leadership understands Scotland. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Even with defecting opportunist councillors hoping to win a seat in the Scottish Parliament – the latest jumping from Labour – it looks like we'll have to wait for anything resembling a coherent plan, and First Minister John Swinney's so-called special summit just gave them a credibility they didn't deserve. The only party benefitting from the rise of Reform is the SNP and in their usual haste to virtue signal, Labour and the Lib Dems were suckered into trooping along for what was just a promotional vehicle for John Swinney. That being said, the Reform attack on Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was unwarranted, and no one who knows him thinks his main goal is to increase Muslim influence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But it was Nigel Farage's declaration that the Barnett Formula should go, and with it the block grant from Westminster, made up by devolving more taxation powers to Holyrood, which really exposed how little he understands, or cares, about Scotland. The Barnett Formula is not some financial sleight of hand designed to rip off English taxpayers, but a means to ensure the distinct needs of country in which a tenth of the UK population scattered across a third of the landmass are properly met. Scrapping the formula is not the same as arguing for more efficient spending, and there is no shortage of examples of how the SNP squanders public money, the botched ferries being symbolic. But whoever told Nigel Farage that telling Scottish people they should receive less money was a vote winner needs to be kept away from sharp implements. And his suggestion that Holyrood's taxraising powers should be increased could only come from someone who has not studied what has happened with the extensive powers devolved after the 2014 referendum. Maybe more financial power could be contemplated if it meant lower taxes, but the chances of that happening are slim to non-existent, certainly not from Reform which says it supports higher welfare spending. Reducing personal taxation through more efficient services and the use of artificial intelligence, freeing up resources for infrastructure investment, and cutting the burden on businesses are all goals which plenty of people would agree with, but the back-of-Nigel's-fag-packet Reform approach would be disastrous for us all. What has been confirmed in the space of only a few days is that Reform is not really about reform at all, but con artists telling people what they want to hear; increase benefits but cut tax, give Holyrood more power but slash its budget. Get Royal Marines to stop the boats? What, by opening fire? It's all hokum designed to fool, and like a fairground charlatan, Nigel Farage doesn't care. The 'plague on all your houses' motivation for voting Reform is all very well, but like Labour's do-good MPs voting for Jeremy Corbyn to create a contest they thought he had no chance of winning, people need to be very careful what they wish for. The last thing those voting Reform want is an SNP victory, but I strongly suspect when the good folk of Hamilton wake up tomorrow that's what they'll get. Sue Webber is a Scottish Conservative MSP for Lothian


Scotsman
31 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Sheriffhall junction upgrade no further forward
An artist's impression of the proposed Sheriffhall roundabout flyover It's only seven years since the Edinburgh City Region deal was signed, with the support of all the local authorities and both the Scottish and UK governments. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Now worth £1.6 billion, the agreement should accelerate economic growth and prosperity, and one element was upgrading the Sheriffhall junction on the City Bypass, with long jams now virtually round the clock. Designs for a much-needed flyover are available, funding was in place, but in seven years we are no further forward, because both the Scottish Government and Edinburgh City Council are in such a thrall to the Green Party's anti-car agenda. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A review of the project was ordered in 2020, when Edinburgh's SNP-Labour administration was drunk with power during lockdown, blocking streets and narrowing roads in a hidden agenda to make driving as difficult as possible. Having already accepted the need for the improvement in the City Deal, the SNP Scottish Government then bent to the Green Party's will by agreeing to a public inquiry in 2023. The resulting report was delivered to SNP minsters a year ago and since then, nothing. Except we now know some £6.4 million has been spent on consultants to produce designs. My colleague Miles Briggs has launched an online petition for work to start without further delay, and I hope it persuades transport secretary Fiona Hyslop to get a move on. She's only got a year left in Holyrood, so it would be a nice way to sign off by delivering something of genuine benefit to the Lothians. Sue Webber is a Scottish Conservative MSP for Lothian