logo
Israel killed at least 14 scientists in an unprecedented attack on Iran's nuclear know-how

Israel killed at least 14 scientists in an unprecedented attack on Iran's nuclear know-how

Independenta day ago

Israel 's tally of the war damage it wrought on Iran includes the targeted killings of at least 14 scientists, an unprecedented attack on the brains behind Iran's nuclear program that outside experts say can only set it back, not stop it.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Israel's ambassador to France said the killings will make it 'almost" impossible for Iran to build weapons from whatever nuclear infrastructure and material may have survived nearly two weeks of Israeli airstrikes and massive bunker-busting bombs dropped by U.S. stealth bombers.
'The fact that the whole group disappeared is basically throwing back the program by a number of years, by quite a number of years," Ambassador Joshua Zarka said.
But nuclear analysts say Iran has other scientists who can take their place. European governments say that military force alone cannot eradicate Iran's nuclear know-how, which is why they want a negotiated solution to put concerns about the Iranian program to rest.
'Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon," U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told lawmakers in the House of Commons.
Here's a closer look at the killings:
Chemists, physicists, engineers among those killed
Zarka told AP that Israeli strikes killed at least 14 physicists and nuclear engineers, top Iranian scientific leaders who 'basically had everything in their mind.'
They were killed 'not because of the fact that they knew physics, but because of the fight that they were personally involved in, the creation and the fabrication and the production of (a) nuclear weapon," he said.
Nine of them were killed in Israel's opening wave of attacks on June 13, the Israeli military said. It said they 'possessed decades of accumulated experience in the development of nuclear weapons' and included specialists in chemistry, materials and explosives as well as physicists.
Targeted killings meant to discourage would-be successors
Experts say that decades of Iranian work on nuclear energy — and, Western powers allege, nuclear weapons — has given the country reserves of know-how and scientists who could continue any work toward building warheads to fit on Iran's ballistic missiles.
'Blueprints will be around and, you know, the next generation of Ph.D. students will be able to figure it out," said Mark Fitzpatrick, who specialized in nuclear non-proliferation as a former U.S. diplomat. Bombing nuclear facilities "or killing the people will set it back some period of time. Doing both will set it back further, but it will be reconstituted.'
'They have substitutes in maybe the next league down, and they're not as highly qualified, but they will get the job done eventually,' said Fitzpatrick, now an analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London think tank.
How quickly nuclear work could resume will in part depend on whether Israeli and U.S. strikes destroyed Iran's stock of enriched uranium and equipment needed to make it sufficiently potent for possible weapons use.
'The key element is the material. So once you have the material, then the rest is reasonably well-known,' said Pavel Podvig, a Geneva-based analyst who specializes in Russia's nuclear arsenal. He said killing scientists may have been intended 'to scare people so they don't go work on these programs.'
'Then the questions are, 'Where do you stop?' I mean you start killing, like, students who study physics?" he asked. 'This is a very slippery slope.'
The Israeli ambassador said: 'I do think that people that will be asked to be part of a future nuclear weapon program in Iran will think twice about it.'
Previous attacks on scientists
Israel has previously long been suspected of killing Iranian nuclear scientists but didn't claim responsibility as it did this time.
In 2020, Iran blamed Israel for killing its top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, with a remote-controlled machine gun.
'It delayed the program but they still have a program. So it doesn't work,' said Paris-based analyst Lova Rinel, with the Foundation for Strategic Research think tank. "It's more symbolic than strategic."
Without saying that Israel killed Fakhrizadeh, the Israeli ambassador said 'Iran would have had a bomb a long time ago' were it not for repeated setbacks to its nuclear program — some of which Iran attributed to Israeli sabotage.
'They have not reached the bomb yet,' Zarka said. 'Every one of these accidents has postponed a little bit the program.'
A legally grey area
International humanitarian law bans the intentional killing of civilians and non-combatants. But legal scholars say those restrictions might not apply to nuclear scientists if they were part of the Iranian armed forces or directly participating in hostilities.
'My own take: These scientists were working for a rogue regime that has consistently called for the elimination of Israel, helping it to develop weapons that will allow that threat to take place. As such, they are legitimate targets,' said Steven R. David, a professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University.
He said Nazi German and Japanese leaders who fought Allied nations during World War II 'would not have hesitated to kill the scientists working on the Manhattan Project' that fathered the world's first atomic weapons.
Laurie Blank, a specialist in humanitarian law at Emory Law School, said it's too early to say whether Israel's decapitation campaign was legal.
'As external observers, we don't have all the relevant facts about the nature of the scientists' role and activities or the intelligence that Israel has,' she said by email to AP. 'As a result, it is not possible to make any definitive conclusions.'
Zarka, the ambassador, distinguished between civilian nuclear research and the scientists targeted by Israel.
'It's one thing to learn physics and to know exactly how a nucleus of an atom works and what is uranium,' he said.
But turning uranium into warheads that fit onto missiles is 'not that simple,' he said. 'These people had the know-how of doing it, and were developing the know-how of doing it further. And this is why they were eliminated.'
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Islamic Republic's authority is a casualty of its war with Israel
The Islamic Republic's authority is a casualty of its war with Israel

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

The Islamic Republic's authority is a casualty of its war with Israel

Over a week has passed since the war between Israel and the Islamic Republic began, with hostilities now paused in a fragile ceasefire. Senior regime officials who haven't been killed are nowhere to be seen. There is no trace of the fiery speeches made by Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders to crowds of 'millions'. Public statements have been reduced to a few remarks by Abbas Araghchi, a handful of MPs, and Mohsen Rezaei – the perennial presidential candidate who did not even make it onto Israel's assassination list. Since the war started, there have only been two pre-recorded messages from Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, delivered from an undisclosed location, both promising continued war and further destruction. Meanwhile, Masoud Pezeshkian, the Islamic Republic's president – who failed to implement even basic safety measures like shelters or warning sirens – dismissed the threat by saying Israel will be 'pitiful'. At the same time, his spokesperson urged citizens to ignore Israel's evacuation and attack warnings. State broadcaster IRIB, the regime's main propaganda tool, even aired footage of Israeli strikes on Iran while falsely presenting it as footage of Iran's missile attacks on Israel. This was after IRIB's headquarters came under attack. This dark comedy truthfully depicts a regime that, after 46 years of threats, repression and killing its own people, has dragged its defenceless hostage citizens into war. The crumbling of the Islamic Republic's edifice is now seen not only by Iranians but by its neighbours and the wider world. And this is truly could be a point of no return. A regime that called itself the 'superpower of the region' and claimed its proxies would set the Middle East ablaze should it come under attack, has left its own west, east, south, north and centre completely unprotected for over a week. At the same time, it launched missiles at Israeli civilian areas, effectively inviting more airstrikes on Iranian soil. These Israeli attacks, regardless of how precisely they target the Islamic Republic's military, security or nuclear assets, inevitably harm ordinary people. Millions of Iranians experienced their second war [after the horrors of the Iran-Iraq war in the 80s]. In a blackout caused by deliberate internet and phone disruptions, they wait, anxious and distressed, hoping for a future of a free and prosperous Iran. Even the youngest generations have not been spared the nightmare of war under this regime. This war brings the end of the Islamic Republic closer than ever. And that ending began when the Iranian people rose up nationwide, rejecting both the reformists and hardliners of the Islamic Republic, as Independent Persian has documented. CBS reports that Western diplomats are privately discussing a post-Islamic Republic future and potential replacements. Some major media outlets, which have been deliberately ignoring figures like Prince Reza Pahlavi for four decades, have begun to shift their stance. Time magazine, which featured Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi on its cover just months before their downfalls, has now chosen a fading image of Ali Khamenei for its latest cover. Saddam was captured by US forces nine months after his Time cover, on December 13, 2003, hiding in a hole underground. But in reality, his regime began to end twelve years earlier when he invaded Kuwait and was met with Operation Desert Storm – a US-led coalition that decimated Iraq's infrastructure. The gap between Gaddafi's Time magazine cover and his death at the hands of protesters was just six months. Although Time never featured Bashar al-Assad on its cover before his downfall, his was a different fate. The Syrian president – a close ally of the Islamic Republic and recipient of billions of dollars taken from the Iranian people – fled to Russia in the dead of night at the last moment, leaving even his closest allies stunned and bewildered. Whether the war between Israel and the Islamic Republic results in the regime's collapse or Tehran officials manage to find a lifeline in the shaky ceasefire, the image of the Islamic Republic – and of the Middle East – will never return to what it was before the early hours of Friday, June 13. The true victors of this war are the people of Iran.

Iran retaliation fears as hospitals and power plants on high alert for cyberattacks
Iran retaliation fears as hospitals and power plants on high alert for cyberattacks

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Iran retaliation fears as hospitals and power plants on high alert for cyberattacks

American hospitals, water dams, and power plants are reportedly on high alert for potential Iranian cyberattacks after President Donald Trump attacked the nation's nuclear sites. Hospital executives have contacted the FBI about the potential threat level from Iran, while the U.S. power grid's cyberthreat-sharing center is monitoring the dark web for Iranian-linked activity, CNN reports, citing sources familiar with the situation. Iranian-backed hackers have previously targeted American hospitals and water facilities, according to CNN. 'Iran's kinetic retaliation is already in motion, and the digital dimension to that may not be far behind,' said Adam Meyers, senior vice president of cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike. 'This cyber element is what lets them extend their reach, and there's an air of deniability to it.' These concerns come after Trump's administration attacked the nuclear sites Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan late Saturday. Trump claimed the attacks 'obliterated' the sites, but an early intelligence report from the Pentagon suggests it only set back Iran's nuclear program by a few months. On Tuesday, Trump announced a ceasefire deal between Iran and Israel. 'It was my great honor to Destroy All Nuclear facilities & capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Israel first launched attacks against Iran on June 13, claiming the country was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran then retaliated with its series of airstrikes. The two countries have continued to trade attacks since. Throughout the 12-day war, an estimated 28 people were killed in Israel while 1,000 were wounded, according to the Associated Press. In Iran, at least 1,054 people were killed and 4,476 were hurt, the AP reports, citing the Human Rights Activists group. Trump then compared the attack to the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings on Japan in 1945, which killed an estimated 150,00 to 246,000 people, mostly civilians. 'That hit ended the war. I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing, that ended that war. This ended that with the war,' Trump said from the NATO summit on Wednesday. Trump went on to downplay the report that contradicted his claim that the strikes 'obliterated' the nuclear sites. 'The intelligence says, 'We don't know, it could have been very severe.' That's what the intelligence says,' he said. 'So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know'. It was very severe. It was obliteration.'

Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds
Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Trump says US and Iranian officials will talk next week as ceasefire holds

The fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding on Wednesday while President Donald Trump asserted that US and Iranian officials will talk next week, giving rise to cautious hope for longer-term peace even as Tehran insisted it will not give up its nuclear programme. Mr Trump, who helped negotiate the ceasefire that took hold on Tuesday on the 12th day of the war, told reporters at a Nato summit that he was not particularly interested in restarting negotiations with Iran, insisting that US strikes had destroyed its nuclear programme. Advertisement Earlier in the day, an Iranian official questioned whether the United States could be trusted after its weekend attack. President Donald Trump speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato summit in The Hague, Netherlands (Alex Brandon/AP) 'We may sign an agreement, I don't know,' Mr Trump said. 'The way I look at it, they fought, the war is done.' Iran has not acknowledged any talks taking place next week, though US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff has said there has been direct and indirect communication between the countries. Advertisement A sixth round of negotiations between the US and Iran had been scheduled for earlier this month in Oman but was cancelled when Israel attacked Iran. Earlier, Mr Trump said the ceasefire was going 'very well', and added that Iran was 'not going to have a bomb and they're not going to enrich'. Iran has insisted, however, that it will not give up its nuclear programme. In a vote underscoring the tough path ahead, its parliament agreed to fast-track a proposal that would effectively stop the country's co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN watchdog that has monitored the programme for years. Advertisement Ahead of the vote, parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf criticised the IAEA for having 'refused to even pretend to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities' that the United States carried out on Sunday. 'For this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend co-operation with the IAEA until security of nuclear facilities is ensured, and Iran's peaceful nuclear programme will move forward at a faster pace,' Mr Qalibaf told legislators. Damage at Fordo enrichment facility after strikes in Iran (Maxar Technologies via AP) IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi said he had already written to Iran to discuss resuming inspections of their nuclear facilities. Among other things, Iran claims to have moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the US strikes, and Mr Grossi said his inspectors need to reassess the country's stockpiles. Advertisement 'We need to return,' he said. 'We need to engage.' French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country was part of the 2015 deal with Iran that restricted its nuclear programme but began unravelling after Mr Trump pulled the US out in his first term, said he hoped Tehran would come back to the table. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear programme was peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. Advertisement However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon. Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons, which it has never acknowledged. Workers clear rubble of a damaged building in Tehran, Iran (Vahid Salemi/AP) The Israel Atomic Energy Commission said its assessment was that the US and Israeli strikes have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years'. It did not give evidence to back up its claim. The US strikes hit three Iranian nuclear sites, which Mr Trump said 'completely and fully obliterated' the country's nuclear programme. At the Nato summit, when asked about a US intelligence report that found Iran's nuclear programme has been set back only a few months, Mr Trump scoffed and said it would at least take 'years' to rebuild. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei confirmed that the strikes by US B-2 bombers using bunker-buster bombs had caused significant damage. 'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, while refusing to go into detail. Mr Baghaei seemed to suggest Iran might not shut out IAEA inspectors for good, noting that the bill before parliament only talks of suspending work with the agency, not ending it. He also insisted Iran has the right to pursue a nuclear energy programme. A heavily damaged building in a residential area in Beersheba, Israel (Ariel Schalit/AP) 'Iran is determined to preserve that right under any circumstances,' he said. Mr Witkoff said on Fox News late on Tuesday that Israel and the US had achieved their objective of 'the total destruction of the enrichment capacity' in Iran, and Iran's prerequisite for talks – that Israel end its campaign – had been fulfilled. 'The proof is in the pudding,' he said. 'No-one's shooting at each other. It's over.' Mr Grossi said he could not speculate on how bad the damage was but that Iran's nuclear capabilities were well known. 'The technical knowledge is there, and the industrial capacity is there,' he said. 'That no-one can deny, so we need to work together with them.' An Israeli official said the ceasefire agreement with Iran amounted to 'quiet for quiet', with no further understandings about Iran's nuclear programme going ahead. In the Fox News interview, Mr Witkoff said Mr Trump is now looking to land 'a comprehensive peace agreement that goes beyond even the ceasefire'. 'We're already talking to each other, not just directly, but also through interlocutors,' Mr Witkoff said, adding that the conversations were promising and 'we're hopeful that we can have a long-term peace agreement'. However, Mr Baghaei said Washington had 'torpedoed diplomacy' with its attacks on nuclear sites, and that while Iran in principle was always open to talks, national security was the priority. 'We have to make sure whether the other parties are really serious when they're talking about diplomacy, or is it again part of their tactics to make more problems for the region and for my country,' he said. China, a close Iranian partner and major buyer of Iranian oil, said it hoped a 'lasting and effective ceasefire can be achieved so as to promote' peace and stability in the region. China has blamed Israel for starting the war and destabilising the region. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters that China is willing to 'inject positive factors to safeguard peace and stability in the Middle East'. Mr Grossi said Iran and the international community should seize the opportunity of the ceasefire for a long-term diplomatic solution. 'Out of the … bad things that military conflict brings, there's also now a possibility, an opening,' he said. 'We shouldn't miss that opportunity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store