Fury as domestic abusers can claim compensation for UK's biggest health scandal
Abusive ex-partners of victim's of the UK's biggest health scandal could be handed thousands of pounds in compensation even if they have a conviction - and the government has admitted it has no power to stop it.
Under new legislation rolled out in March, partners, siblings, children and parents of the 30,000 people infected with HIV or hepatitis C during the 1970s and 80s can apply for Infected Blood Scandal compensation in their own right as an 'affected person'.
Campaigner Jackie Britton flagged her concerns to the government that there was nothing to stop domestic abusers applying to claim, which in some cases could see people handed up to £86,000.
She was shocked to be told that while they shared her concerns, there was 'no provision' to exclude them due to a loophole in the law. It added it had looked to prevent those with relevant convictions, but could find no practical way of doing so.
Domestic abuse campaigners said they were 'alarmed' by the issue, which they said allowed perpetrators opportunity to further exploit their victims.
A letter from the Cabinet Office to Ms Britton, seen by The Independent, confirmed the government's hands are tied. It read: 'The minister for the Cabinet Office shares the concerns that you and others have raised on abusive family members.
'That is not the loving and caring relationship upon which the claim of the affected to compensation is based. The government has considered options for how it could provide IBCA (Infected Blood Scandal Authority) with the ability to take this into account in assessing affected claims.
'Unfortunately it has not found a way of doing this in law.'
The letter continued: 'I am afraid there will be no provision to exclude abusive family members in the upcoming regulations.
'The minister has however written to the interim chair of the IBCA to emphasise the importance of protecting vulnerable applicants to the compensation service, particularly those who have suffered domestic abuse and other serious harm.
'This includes making sure that claims managers are properly trained to spot the signs of domestic abuse and embedding the necessary procedures to raise safeguarding concerns within the organisation.'
Ms Britton has called for the government to ensure each claim is stringently reviewed. The 62-year-old from Fareham, Hampshire, was diagnosed with hepatitis C in 2010 after four decades of ill health, and has been left with liver cirrhosis, which requires regular check-ups.
'Why should they get a free pass to claim thousands under the heading of 'affected' when many of them played no positive part in the lives of those that were infected?' she said.
Rachel Buckley, joint managing director at The Family Law Company, said compensation under the scheme would likely be treated in the same way as a personal injury compensation award.
She said even in cases involving domestic abuse, it would be be considered 'inequitable' to disregard a person's entitlement to claim.
' Many family law professionals including the Family Law Company agree that there needs to be change and there is growing recognition of the impact of domestic abuse, including coercive control on divorce and finances matters but the law has yet to fully evolve to reflect this," she said.
Sophie Francis-Cansfield, Head of Policy at Women's Aid, said: 'Women's Aid are alarmed to learn that because compensation is viewed as a marital asset, there are circumstances in which perpetrators of domestic abuse are entitled to the funds awarded to their ex-partners.
'This is yet another example of the way in which our society is not set up to support survivors of domestic abuse, despite the fact that 1 in 4 women will experience it in their lifetime.
'Instead of having a system that support survivors of abuse, who have also had to deal with the devastating impact of the blood scandal, we have created one that perpetrators can exploit to inflict further harm.'
A spokesperson for the Infected Blood Compensation Authority said it was recruiting 500 claim managers to support those making claims and all were trained on the safeguarding of vulnerable people and trauma.
'We are working closely with partners such as the National Domestic Violence Helpline and Respect Men to ensure support is in place for anyone who shows signs of abuse or raises a concern to their claim manager," they added.
A Government spokesperson said it acknowledged the concerns raised and the minister for the Cabinet Office had met victims in this position.
"We are committed to delivering compensation which is why £11.8bn was set aside in the Budget for this purpose. The Infected Blood Compensation Authority is working to deliver compensation as quickly as possible.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
10 hours ago
- NBC News
Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees are being reinstated
NEW YORK — More than 460 laid-off employees at the nation's top public health agency received notices Wednesday that they are being reinstated, according to a union representing the workers. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirmed reinstatement notices went out to the former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention employees, but provided few details. About 2,400 CDC employees lost their jobs in a wave of cuts across federal health agencies in early April, according to a tally at the time. Whole CDC programs were essentially shut down, including some focused on smoking, lead poisoning, gun violence, asthma and air quality, and workplace safety and health. The entire office that handles Freedom of Information Act requests was shuttered. Infectious disease programs took a hit, too, including programs that fight outbreaks in other countries, labs focused on HIV and hepatitis in the U.S., and staff trying to eliminate tuberculosis. An estimated 200 of the reinstated workers are based in the CDC's National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention, HHS officials confirmed. Staffers at a CDC lab that does testing for sexually transmitted diseases are being brought back, said one CDC employee who wasn't authorized to discuss what happened and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. Also reinstated are an estimated 150 employees at the CDC's National Center for Environmental Health, including people staffing a lab that works on lead poisoning, according to the union and employees. Layoffs at federal agencies were challenged in lawsuits, with judges in some cases ordering federal agencies to halt terminations of employees. Officials at HHS have never detailed how they made the layoff decisions in the first place. And they did not answer questions about why the notices went out, or how decisions were made about who to bring back. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the agency was streamlining operations and that 'the nation's critical public health functions remain intact and effective.' 'The Trump Administration is committed to protecting essential services — whether it's supporting coal miners and firefighters through NIOSH, safeguarding public health through lead prevention, or researching and tracking the most prevalent communicable diseases,' he said. The reinstatements don't undo the damage being done by Kennedy and the Trump administration to federal public health, said members of Fired But Fighting, a group of affected CDC workers who have helped organize rallies in Atlanta. The most recent was in the rain on Tuesday, at which some attendees called for Kennedy to resign. 'Bringing a few hundred people back to work out of thousands fired is a start, but there are still countless programs at CDC that have been cut, which will lead to increased disease and death,' one of the group's founding members, Abby Tighe, said in a statement. This is not the first time that employees at the Atlanta-based agency were told they were being terminated only to then be told to come back. After an earlier round of termination notices went out in February, about 180 CDC employees in March were told to come back.
Daily Mirror
16 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
‘I was told I had months to live at 33 but now I'm 75 and living with the virus'
Jonathan Blake was just 33 years old when he became one of the first people in the UK to be diagnosed with HIV. Little did he know that after receiving what was then considered to be a 'death sentence', he would still be living a happy and healthy life at 75. His experiences in the 1980s, along with the LGBTQ+ community which he was a part of, have since inspired both film and TV projects, including the 2014 film Pride. The film sees British actor Dominic West play Jonathan in a retelling of his work as a member of the group Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners. In an exclusive interview with The Mirror, Jonathan reflects on the moment he first received the harrowing news that he had contracted what was, in 1982, an unknown virus. He shared: 'I was told I had a virus. There is no cure. You have between three and nine months to live… I was winded and just kind of numbed by it.' He recalled the days leading up to his diagnosis and how he felt as though every single lymph node in his body had started to grow. After silently struggling with his mobility, Jonathan booked himself in with a GP. It was then that he was sent to hospital, where they did a biopsy and he was left waiting for a few long days. He shared: 'Two days later they came back, having done the biopsy, and they'd given me this news, that I had this virus, with three to nine months to live, and palliative care was available when the time comes. And then, after having been completely floored, they said that I could go home.' 'I mean, it was really frightening", he continued. "And I just decided that what was in front of me was actually so horrendous that I was going to take my own life, but I didn't know quite how I was going to do it…' The tragic diagnosis sent him, at just 33, into isolation. The lack of information around HIV at the time meant he feared passing the virus on to others through the air. 'I would forever go to the gay bars in the East End because I needed to be with people," he said. "But I would stand in the darkest corner and send out all the vibes to say 'don't come near me people' because what are you going to say? I felt like a modern-day leper because I just assumed that it was airborne. You know, it was never explained that the only way you can pass it on is by blood and fluids, none of that.' It was when he was at his very rock bottom that Jonathan found hope in a group of like-minded people where 'everyone was welcome'. With an interest in activism and politics he spotted a tiny advert in a magazine called Capital Gay in 1983 calling on people to join the Gays For a Nuclear-Free Future in a CND campaign. He said: 'I just thought, this is going to be my re-entry into society. I'm going to join that because what the little advert said was 'everybody welcome', and I just thought, 'well, that includes me.' This small decision changed the trajectory of Jonathan's life as it was here that he met late partner Nigel Young. Not only that but his work with LGSM created a legacy away from his diagnosis, for his work helping under-represented groups, which in this case was a Welsh mining town. Written by Stephen Beresford and directed by Matthew Warchus, the film Pride features a character based on Jonathan, played by Dominic West. The creation of the project helped him to reconnect with old friends and relive those spectacular years of activism while he was secretly fighting for his life. He recalls meeting the actor who would play him in the movie. It was the day before that he got the call asking him to meet the mystery actor and classic Jonathan, welcoming everyone he comes into contact with with open arms, thought "it's just enough time to make a lemon drizzle cake.' Jonathan said: 'So the next day arrives, the doorbell goes, I open the door, and this man thrusts out his hand and introduces himself as Matthew Weiler, the director. And over his shoulder I see McNulty from The Wire. And at that point I realised that it was Dom West. I was aware of him because I've watched The Wire and loved it.' Growing up in Birmingham before making the move to London later in his life, Jonathan knew from an early age he was gay. 'I already knew that I was attracted to men,' he explained. 'And I had already sussed out that that wasn't acceptable. 'You know, this wasn't something that you could just rush home and shout about as such. At an early age if I couldn't be found the headteacher would say 'if you go and look where Bert is, you'll find John'. He was the caretaker and I just followed him around. You know, pheromones, infatuation, what have you.' The stigma that came along with HIV in the 1980s was something that didn't help the problems he already faced as a homosexual man. During the first appearance of the virus, there was a widespread misconception that HIV and AIDS were solely diseases that affected gay men and it was this that fuelled fear and discrimination that still lives on to this day. 'People sort of carried this blame,' Jonathan said. 'They were blamed for their own illness. You've decided to explore this thing. You've decided to go out and have sex. You've done this to yourself. And the chief constable of Manchester, John Alderson at the time, talked about gay men who were 'living in this swirl of their own filth'. 'And what is really interesting is the way that suddenly there's been this huge focus on trans people. And the way that people talk about and dismiss the trans community is exactly the same language that was being used to attack gay men in the 60s and 70s. It's almost word for word.' It wasn't until 10 years ago that Jonathan finally started to feel a sense of freedom, at 65. He said: 'What was amazing was the turning point for me was 2015, because in 2015 they announced that on effective medication, you cannot pass the virus.' It was a powerful sentence to hear after years of questioning his own health and that of others. 'And so with it came the phrase, U = U. Undetectable equals untransmittable. And psychologically it was incredible.' Back in the 1980s, however, Jonathan famously refused to take part in the drug trials for HIV. He said: 'I was asked if I would be a part of a trial called the Convoy Trial. And they were basically trialling the very first drug that was used around HIV, which was called AZT. What nobody ever told us was that AZT was a failed chemotherapy drug… 'And so it would leave you open to opportunistic infections. That is exactly how the HIV virus works. I think one of the reasons that I'm here today is that I never touched AZT because all the people who touched AZT, if they didn't withdraw from that trial because they were so nauseous, basically died.' Thinking back to how far we'd come since the early days of this initially unknown virus, Jonathan recalled a time where two communities were forced to join together. He said: 'What was really fascinating was that in the late 80s, there was suddenly this influx of Black African women who came to drop-in centres. 'And it was really extraordinary because they were having to deal with the fact that they were mainly surrounded by white gay men. And mainly they came from Christian communities, where homosexuality was just forbidden. So suddenly they're having to deal with the fact that they've got this disease which basically 'homosexuals have'. And that, to me, is what stigma is all about.' Now he believes the way forward isthrough "raising awareness and sharing information. He said: "I think the difficulty is that there are still parts of the population that I still believe that it can't affect them. And what is amazing now is that we have this arsenal of medication.' The Terrence Higgins Trust works to support those with HIV, providing helpful resources and information for those interested in learning more about the virus or who are living with it themselves. The charity's mission is to end any new cases of HIV by 2030 and with the help of people like Jonathan Blake sharing their incredible stories, there's hope that this could be a reality. Living with HIV has opened up so many doors for Jonathan in a world that once felt so isolating to him. Alongside his part in Pride, he has been able to share insight for other documentary films, theatre performances, and written works, as well as attending talks. With endless amounts of stories to share, he is always keen to embrace , educate and connect with people through the virus that he was once told would be the end of it all.
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
How long humanity would take to go extinct if we stopped having children
'Overpopulation' is a scary word, bringing to mind a dystopian Earth where people live in grimy cities and fight over what little food is left. But the reverse of this is just as terrifying – depopulation – if humans suddenly began having fewer and fewer babies. And if that were to happen, it wouldn't take long for humanity to go completely extinct. While some people live beyond the age of 100, the human race would only be around for a few decades at a push, Professor Michael Little, an anthropologist at Birmingham University, Writing in The Conversation, Professor Little said this is because society needs young people to care for elders and drive economic growth. He wrote: 'Eventually, civilisation would crumble. It's likely that there would not be many people left within 70 or 80 years, rather than 100, due to shortages of food, clean water, prescription drugs and everything else that you can easily buy today and need to survive.' After the final human is born, a countdown would begin as everyone simply grows older until everyone dies from old age. Professor Little said: 'Eventually, there would not be enough young people coming of age to do essential work, causing societies throughout the world to quickly fall apart. 'Some of these breakdowns would be in humanity's ability to produce food, provide health care and do everything else we all rely on. 'Food would become scarce even though there would be fewer people to feed.' There are many reasons why people could stop having children, Professor Little said, such as a disease making people infertile or a nuclear war. While a few viruses, like HIV, the Zika virus and a few STIs such as HPV, can lead to infertility, they very rarely do so or only have very mild effects. So a virus wiping out the world's ability to have children is, for now, just science fiction, though male fertility rates are a worry among scientists. But a rapidly ageing population and declining birth rate are very much real. Earth is home to 8,200,000,000 human beings, with the global population increasing since the end of the Black Death around 1350. And the number of humans will keep rising until about 2080, when the UN expects the size of humanity to peak at 10.3billion, before it drops slightly. One reason for this inevitable slowdown is that people are already having fewer babies in some parts of the world, such as Japan and South Korea. These countries are now facing a new issue, an ageing population, as they're under the 2.1 children per woman rate with their population stable. In China, for example, the fertility rate is just 1.18. This is also happening in the UK, where the fertility rate fell to just 1.44 children per woman last year, down from 2.47 in 1946. Ageing population is a problem, Professor Little said, because young people are the 'engines of society' who keep new ideas flowing and work jobs that elderly people would struggle to do. He likened it to how humans, otherwise called Homo sapiens, became the dominant species on Earth over the Neanderthal. Neanderthals were humans like us, but were a distinct species that were around for about 350,000 years. Dr Little said: 'Some scientists have found evidence that modern humans were more successful at reproducing our numbers than the Neanderthal people. 'This occurred when Homo sapiens became more successful at providing food for their families and also having more babies than the Neanderthals.' There would be, however, some perks to humanity going extinct, as some campaign groups have long dreamt of. Amid climate change, caused by humans pumping out planet-warming gases, wildlife populations have fallen by 70%. Professor Little said: 'If humans were to go extinct, it could open up opportunities for other animals to flourish on Earth. 'On the other hand, it would be sad for humans to go away because we would lose all of the great achievements people have made, including in the arts and science.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page.
