
Squatters took over a Baltimore County home. A proposed law in Maryland could make it easier to get them out.
David Bran's slice of the American dream is nestled in the woods near Owings Mills, Md. He and his wife bought the suburban home and fixed it up, hoping to sell and add to their retirement nest egg.
Until the squatters moved in.
"I was stunned. I was floored. I watched my life investment literally flashing before my eyes," Bran told WJZ Investigates. "Because I'm thinking the money we borrowed, the time we put into it, and these people basically just stealing possessions of our house, of our retirement, of our life savings."
It started with a call from his roofer the day before a scheduled home inspection.
"He said, 'Hey, I'm here at the property and there's a moving van and there's two people in the house,'" Bran recalled. "First thing I thought was, 'That's impossible.'"
So, he rushed there from Harford County.
"The back door was open. It was full of furniture. My for sale sign was down," Bran said. "I looked at the front door. The first thing I noticed was my key box - the lock box that held the key - was gone."
Several people were at the door, Bran said.
"They asked me what I was doing there, and I said, 'Well this is my house. This is my house. What are you doing here?' And he immediately looked at me and said, 'Well, I've rented this house," Bran said.
The person told him he had the key, a lease, "and I have possession," he said.
The fake lease
Bran said the fake lease was eight pages long and looked like the real thing.
"It was the best lease I've ever seen. It had my name, my wife's name, our home address. All the terms and conditions, the monthly rental, the terms of the lease at the back of the lease. It had their photo identification stapled to the back of it with everyone's signature," Bran told WJZ Investigator Mike Hellgren. "And of course, the signature didn't look anything like mine, but it was all fully executed."
The information is all publicly available.
"You can Google someone's name and find out their address, all that information online," Bran said.
Police came, but told Bran there was nothing they could do.
"The ultimate answer was it's a civil matter because he's provided a lease document," Bran said. "And he has a key to the property, and he had some furniture in there, which does give him possession of the house."
Police told him there was no criminal violation.
"The only option I had was to go to court and file for an eviction," Bran said. "I was furious. I was so angry, Someone just coming in and taking your life's work, your life savings away from you. It was terrifying."
Bran does not believe Maryland has the proper laws to deal with it.
Proposed anti-squatting law
That's where Ryan Nawrocki comes in.
The Baltimore County delegate introduced House Bill 202, which makes squatting a felony with penalties, including time behind bars, and gives the local sheriff the immediate ability to throw the squatter out.
"It would put much more serious penalties in place," Nawrocki said. "I think we need those because clearly whatever penalties we have in place right now are wholly inadequate. The first problem is the timeline that it takes to get someone out of a property. When someone is squatting in a property, currently, we treat them almost as if they are a tenant. And a tenant has all kinds of legal rights – as they should – to eviction proceedings and other things that can be quite extensive, and there's good reason why we have those measures in place to protect tenants."
Nawrocki told WJZ, "Currently, the fine is only $1,000 for this type of forgery. Mine would up that fine to $5,000. It would also provide up to ten years in jail for some of these folks. Because we're talking about some folks who are operating some very serious, in my opinion, criminal networks here. They're producing documents at an alarming rate that frankly look better than some of the leases that I've signed."
Opposition to anti-squatting bill
Opponents argue it is wrong to turn the local sheriff into a judge on the spot to determine the validity of documents.
"This is a dangerous bill, and that's why we're in opposition of it," Joseph Lovelace with Maryland Legal Aid said during a recent hearing on Nawrocki's bill.
Scammers are also taking advantage of legitimate renters, targeting properties, gaining access and creating fake leases for them. Then, they advertise on platforms like Craigslist and take the money from people who think they are legally renting them.
"It would effectively give them no notice, have no type of hearing in front of a judge or a court and effectively kick them out," said Albert Turner with the Public Justice Center.
One mother told lawmakers she was the victim of someone who scammed her with a fake lease, and the current system kept her from being immediately evicted.
"It was scary and confusing. I realized the person who rented me the house had never owned it and had scammed me out of a few thousand dollars," said Jessica Leggett.
She told lawmakers the small window of time that afforded her was crucial.
"If HB202 would have passed, a sheriff would have kicked me out into the streets at that time, and I wouldn't have been able to get my belongings," Leggett said. "That's terrifying for me and my family."
The Office of the Public Defender (OPD) believes "...the bill may result in approximately 450 new cases statewide for OPD each year, requiring the equivalent of three attorneys and one administrative assistant at an estimated cost of $325,948 in fiscal 2026, increasing to $443,012 by fiscal 2030. Although the Department of Legislative Services (DLS) is unable to validate OPD's precise caseload/staffing estimate without experience under the bill, it acknowledges that general fund expenditures may increase minimally to accommodate an increased workload. To the extent OPD's case volume increases meaningfully as a direct result of the bill, OPD can request additional resources through the annual budget process."
Cash for keys scam
Delegate Nawrocki believes scammers are continually taking advantage of Maryland's weak laws.
"It's easier to give people money and be extorted essentially than to kind of work through the legal process and take up to sometimes a year to get these people out," Nawrocki said. "We shouldn't be encouraging people to extort in our society."
He believes these scammers know exactly what they're doing in the "cash for keys" scam.
"They want your money, and they recognize that it is often cheaper and easier for a property owner to hand someone cash than to work through the legal proceeding," Del. Nawrocki said.
Paying up
David Bran found out firsthand why the scam is called "cash for keys" after police left, and he says, the squatters threatened to damage the property.
"I had a lot to lose, and I realized he has nothing to lose," Bran said.
So, he cut a deal and paid them $7,500 in cash to turn over the keys and leave his home.
"He agreed to it. He acknowledged it. I made him sign it on the back of the lease agreement," Bran said. "$7,500 cash to get him out on the spot."
He never saw the people again.
Bran also learned the alleged squatters had a long record of doing the same thing to other property owners over and over again.
When asked his reaction, Bran told WJZ Investigates, "I really can't say on camera."
Bran now has cameras monitoring his home, and he lives with the nagging fear that it could all happen again.
"You think you're doing the right thing, right? You know it's your property. You own the house. You've shown the police officer, you own the house," Bran said. "They're in there illegally. The police should remove them. It should be that simple."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
An Israeli soldier was taken hostage on October 7. In ceasefire plea, his mother releases video of his brutal capture
The family of an Israeli soldier held hostage by Hamas has released new footage of the moment he was pulled from his tank and captured by Palestinian militants during the October 7 attacks. The video shows the soldier, Matan Angrest, surrounded by a dozen men atop the turret of an Israeli tank. The men, whose faces are blurred in the video, then lower Angrest, head first, off the tank into the arms of Palestinian militants, who barely catch him. It is unclear whether Angrest is conscious in the video. His body is limp and tumbles forward as he is tossed off the side of the tank. One man can be seen kicking Angrest before he is thrown off the tank. Another man below appears to slap Angrest as he falls to the floor. In an interview, Angrest's mother said she decided to publish the video because she fears that her son has been 'left behind' and wants the public to know that he is in a critical situation. 'I don't feel the commitment of the government for Matan as an Israeli soldier like I felt the commitment of Trump to American citizens – a big gap,' Anat Angrest said. 'If the government wants soldiers to still serve her, she has to worry about the soldiers and to bring them home like the other citizens.' While her husband saw the video months ago, she only watched it for the first time on Sunday night. 'For me as a mother, it's the hardest thing to watch – to know about my son. Every mother knows that her kid from the first cry of a baby, we are worried about our children,' Anat Angrest said. 'It's the hardest situation for me as a mother.' This is the latest attempt by Angrest's family to sound the alarm about his deteriorating medical condition in captivity. They say he is suffering from chronic asthma, has untreated burns and has suffered infections during his captivity, according to the testimony of hostages who were held with Angrest. Keith Siegel, the American-Israeli hostage who was released in February, told CNN last month that he was extremely concerned for Angrest's physical and mental wellbeing. The two were held together for more than two months. The video released Monday appears to have been recovered by the Israeli military from the belongings of Palestinian militants, according to the watermark on the video. Angrest said her family did not release the video for months at the urging of the Israeli military, but said she now feels she has no choice as the Israeli government pushes for yet another partial deal that would see about half the remaining hostages released. 'We were quiet about it for a year and a half, but we understood that our quiet is very comfortable to leave Matan behind,' she said. Angrest is one of 55 hostages still held by Hamas and one of 20 still believed to be alive, according to the Israeli government. As a male Israeli soldier, Angrest is believed to be at the bottom of the list of hostages to be released – considered a high-value hostage by Hamas and one for whom the Israeli government will likely have to pay a steep price. Anat Angrest believes her son's concerning medical condition should be taken into account and, like many of the hostage families, called for the release of all the hostages and an end of the war. Ceasefire and hostage deal negotiations between Israel and Hamas have sputtered along in recent weeks, yielding no agreement. A framework proposed by the US would see about half the living and deceased hostages released in exchange for a 60-day temporary ceasefire. Hamas has insisted on stronger guarantees from the US that negotiations to end the war will continue – and the fighting will not resume – after that temporary ceasefire expires. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do headed to prison for COVID relief bribery scheme
Andrew Do, the former Orange County supervisor who took more than $550,000 in bribes over COVID-relief money meant to buy meals for needy, elderly constituents, was sentenced Monday to five years in federal prison. 'I just do not believe a sentence anything less than the maximum reflects the seriousness of the crime,' said U.S. District Judge James Selna. "Public corruption brings damage far beyond the monetary loss to the county." The judge expressed displeasure that the law allowed him to sentence Do to only five years. Do fled war-torn Vietnam with his family as a child to become an attorney and one of Southern California's most powerful Vietnamese American politicians. As part of a plea deal, Do admitted last year that he funneled more than $10 million in federal pandemic funds to a nonprofit that in turn steered money to his two daughters. The scandal was uncovered in 2023 by the news site LAist, which reported that Do approved contracts worth millions to the nonprofit, which promised to provide meals to the poor, elderly and disabled residents of Little Saigon but could show scant evidence of its effort. Do approved the contracts without disclosing that his 23-year-old daughter Rhiannon, a law student at UC Irvine, had signed documents identifying herself as the nonprofit's president or vice president. As accusations mounted, Do claimed he was the victim of slander, responding with defiant vitriol against the reporter who broke the story, Nick Gerda, and demanding his firing. When the Orange County Register called for Do's resignation, he accused the newspaper of spreading 'gross misinformation.' Late last year, however, Do agreed to resign from the Board of Supervisors and pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery. Federal prosecutors said the Viet America Society gave Rhiannon a job, and paid her as an employee, after her father voted in favor of the lucrative contracts. Prosecutors also said the organization steered money to Do's other daughter through an air conditioning company. 'I'm very grateful that the judge saw the case for what it is,' said Janet Nguyen, the current First District Supervisor. 'He benefitted while people suffered. He took advantage during the pandemic, when no one was watching.' She said the county is conducting an audit to better understand how Do's scheme was allowed to occur. Prosecutors accused Rhiannon Do of making a false statement on a loan application, but agreed to defer the charge, allowing her to enter a diversion agreement in exchange for her cooperation. The elder Do, a Republican, worked as a deputy public defender and a prosecutor before he won a special election in 2015 to represent Orange County's 1st Supervisorial District, which covers Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, La Palma, Los Alamitos, Westminster and Seal Beach. He became the second Vietnamese American ever to serve on the board, and was later elected to two four-year terms. He was known for his efforts to combat homelessness and for his sponsorship of a Tet Festival in Fountain Valley that drew thousands of people annually. At a time when Vietnamese immigrants face increased threats of eviction and deportation, the disgraced supervisor's behavior 'erodes the already precarious level of trust our community has in the government,' said Mai Nguyen Do, the research and policy manager for the Harbor Institute for Immigrant and Economic Justice, a community group. 'After he's released, it wouldn't surprise me if he goes about his life, and meanwhile so many working-class people in the community don't have the resources to pick themselves up again after they're incarcerated,' said Do, who has no relation to the former supervisor. Jodi Balma, a professor of political science at Fullerton College who has followed the Do scandal, wondered how the bribery scheme somehow passed through the checkpoints of the county bureaucracy. 'There are really good and smart though somewhat annoying procedures in place to verify all contracts with the county,' Balma said. 'Somebody had to say, 'Approve that payment' without any receipts or verification or services. And those people have not been held responsible.' Balma also wondered whether it was fair that Rhiannon Do was allowed to enter a diversion program. 'If there is no punishment for his daughter, that feels unfair to all the other law students who might not be accepted to the California Bar Association because of misconduct,' Balma said. 'This is huge misconduct for someone who wants to be a lawyer.' Andrew Do's defense attorneys asked that he be sentenced to 33 months in prison. In a court filing, they said he had been volunteering at a maritime institute that teaches sailing to underprivileged teens, adding that the head of the program had praised Do's 'unwavering ethical compass.' The defense attorneys said that Do had expressed 'shame' and 'deep sorrow' for his crimes, that his license to practice law had been suspended and that his life has been 'destroyed by his own acts.' Do had 'received no actual payment to himself—all significant funds were provided to his daughter Rhiannon Do,' the defense wrote in a court motion, claiming he had been 'willfully blinded to the violations by the desire to see benefit to his adult daughter.… He now recognizes how completely wrong he was in this catastrophic self-delusion.' The plea deal called for restitution between $550,000 and $730,500, with the sale of the family's forfeited house in Tustin credited against that figure. 'This episode of poor judgment stands out as unique in his otherwise commendable life,' the defense wrote. 'He had a catastrophic lapse of judgment when he failed to stop payments to his daughters, and because VAS was helping his family, he failed to see the red flags of these illegal acts.' Pleading for leniency, defense attorneys invoked Do's backstory as a man who rose to public service after a childhood in war-ravaged Vietnam. But prosecutors said his background only amplified his guilt, considering many of the constituents he victimized had similarly difficult pasts, and he was aware of their vulnerability. Do 'made the decision to abandon the elderly, sick, and impoverished during a national emergency so that he could personally benefit,' prosecutors wrote. 'When the County and nation were at their most vulnerable, defendant saw an opportunity to exploit the chaos for his own benefit and, in so doing, betrayed the trust of hundreds of thousands of his constituents,' prosecutors wrote. 'The scheme was far-reaching and premeditated, and defendant had no qualms about pulling others into his criminal enterprise, including his own children.' Do's crimes, the prosecutors wrote, were 'an assault on the very legitimacy of government.' Calling his conduct 'despicable' and his attempt to minimize his crimes 'absurd,' prosecutors said that of the more than $10 million he steered to the Viet America Society , much of it supposedly for meal programs for the elderly and disabled, only $1.4 million went to that purpose. Do's willingness to involve his family in his scheme pointed to his 'moral indifference,' prosecutors said, while his campaign of invective against the press aggravated his culpability. In connection with the Do case, the U.S. Attorneys office announced charges last week of bribery against the founder of the Viet America Society, and for wire fraud against a man affiliated with another Orange County relief group. The judge ordered that Do surrender himself to federal custody by Aug. 15 and recommended he be incarcerated in the federal prison in Lompoc. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
British girl who took life was radicalised by U.S. neo-Nazis, inquest says
By Michael Holden LONDON (Reuters) -A British teenage girl, who had said she wanted to blow up a synagogue and became fixated with Adolf Hitler, had been sucked into far-right extremism by two American neo-Nazis, a British coroner said on Monday. Rhianan Rudd, who was 16, took her own life in May 2022 at a children's home having been investigated by police and Britain's domestic security service MI5 over extremist views. Two years earlier, Rudd's mother had referred her daughter to the counter-radicalisation scheme, Prevent. She is believed to be the youngest girl to be charged with terrorism offences in Britain after she was arrested when 14, though the case against her was later dropped. At an inquest into her death, the Chief Coroner of England and Wales Alexia Durran said she had been initially radicalised by her mother's former partner, a U.S. neo-Nazi who had convictions for violence. She was further drawn into extremism by U.S. white supremacist Chris Cook, who was jailed in 2023 for terrorism over plans to attack power grids, Durran also said. Rudd, who had autism, became obsessed with fascism, even carving a swastika into her forehead, and had downloaded material about making bombs and 3D guns, Durran said. Durran concluded that both Mallaburn and Cook were each "a significant radicalising influence on Rhianan" who had "played a material role in introducing and encouraging Rhianan's interest in extreme right-wing materials". LEARNING FROM PAIN Rudd's mother Emily Carter said she believed that the police and MI5's prolonged investigation had played a role in her daughter's death. "Whilst nothing can ever bring Rhianan back, I urge all the authorities that came into contact with her to learn from what happened so that no other family has to experience the pain we have endured," Carter said in a statement. The charges against Rudd were not dropped until August 2021, four months after social workers believed she might have been a victim of sexual exploitation. However, giving her ruling at Chesterfield Coroners' Court in central England, Durran rejected the argument that the state had played a role in her death, saying it had been appropriate to investigate and prosecute her. "I am satisfied that the missed opportunities that occurred in this case were not systemic," she said. British authorities have become very concerned about the online radicalisation of young people. MI5's Director General Ken McCallum said last year that 13% of all those they were investigating were under 18, a threefold increase in the last three years. Britain's Crown Prosecution Service offered condolences to Rudd's family. "This is a tragic case," added Nick Price, CPS director of legal services. We do not prosecute young or vulnerable people lightly. Terrorism offences are extremely serious, and these are decisions our specialist prosecutors take great care over."