logo
California city criminalizes ‘aiding' and ‘abetting' homeless camps

California city criminalizes ‘aiding' and ‘abetting' homeless camps

Yahoo13-02-2025

A California city voted to criminalize 'aiding' and 'abetting' homeless camps Tuesday — an unusual move that advocates say could stifle help for people who need it.
In addition to making it illegal to camp on public property, the policy that the Fremont City Council voted 6-1 to adopt also makes it a misdemeanor for residents to aid or abet encampments in a city with about 600 unhoused people. Those who violate the policy, which takes effect in 30 days, could be subject to penalties of up to $1,000 and up to six months in jail.
What's unclear, however, is exactly what falls under the 'aiding' and 'abetting' umbrella, with experts saying it could criminalize any humanitarian aid to unhoused people —including by service providers, churches distributing food and street medicine teams.
'The language is broad and vague,' said Andrea Henson, executive director and legal counsel at Berkeley non-profit Where Do We Go. 'It can apply to handing out sleeping bags or to social workers. It can also apply to all non-profits, legal organizations or churches that help the homeless with their survival on the streets. A person who lets a friend camp on their own private property can be cited or arrested.'
Outreach workers may have to make a choice between potentially keeping someone alive on a cold night by providing them with a tent, or staying out of legal trouble themselves, said Vivian Wan, CEO of Abode Services, a Fremont organization that assists unhoused people.
Fremont Mayor Raj Salwan said the ordinance in the fourth most populous city in the Bay Area is a 'common sense' protection for neighborhoods, and that encampments are a barrier to homeless people getting the help they need.
'The main question is how do we balance compassion with accountability,' Fremont Mayor Raj Salwan said at Tuesday's meeting. 'Everybody should feel safe walking to your library, to your local park, to your public places.'
The new policy comes about seven months after the Supreme Court ruled that banning camping on public property does not constitute 'cruel and unusual punishment.' Since the City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson decision, over 150 cities across the US have passed laws banning homeless people from sleeping in public places – even when there is no shelter or housing available, according to the National Homelessness Law Center. Of those cities, 45 are in California.
A month after the Grants Pass ruling, California Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order directing state agencies to sweep and remove homeless encampments. Cities and counties across the state followed suit, increasing sweeps of camps and instituting 'anti-camping' ordinances.
But this is the first such ordinance that criminalizes 'aiding' and 'abetting' homeless people, experts say.
'While we can't say for sure if the Fremont law resulted from the Grants Pass ruling, it applies the same backwards, ineffective and harmful approach inherent in these laws,' said Jesse Rabinowitz, campaign and communications director at the National Homelessness Law Center. 'None of these things will solve homelessness.'
City and state officials are uncertain how to respond to a surge in homelessness and encampments that have cropped up under bridges and in city parks across the nation. People who live in those encampments and advocacy groups, meanwhile, say they are alarmed by efforts to criminalize the population rather than build shelters and affordable housing.
California was the state with the highest number of people experiencing homelessness in 2024, with more than 187,000 people, according to estimates by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. That's more than double the national rate of 23 people experiencing homelessness per 10,000. Between 2023 and 2024, California's homeless population grew by more than 5,600 people. In Alameda County, there were about 6,300 homeless individuals as of 2024.
Nationwide, more than 771,000 Americans experienced homelessness on any given night in January 2024 – the largest number since data collection began and an increase of 19% since 2007, according to the department.
Fremont's ordinance prohibits 'causing, permitting, aiding, abetting or concealing' encampments 'in or upon any public property,' including any street, sidewalk, park or waterway. It also makes it unlawful for anyone to store personal property on any public property.
'As written, the proposed law is patently unreasonable and will expose the City to legal liability,' a group of 20 organizations wrote in a letter to the city last week. 'It does not specify what types of conduct qualify as 'aiding,' 'permitting,' or 'abetting.''
Fremont City Attorney Rafael Alvarado said the law would not apply to those providing food or clothing to homeless people.
'There would be no basis to pursue criminal enforcement of someone that hands someone else food or clothing under the terms of this ordinance,' Alvarado said at Tuesday's city council meeting.
John Do, a senior attorney at the ACLU of Northern California, said that while ordinances like anti-camping and property restrictions have proliferated, this is the first that criminalizes aiding and abetting.
'This is the first with this specific language,' Rabinowitz told CNN.
Fremont officials, however, dispute that the ordinance is unique to the city.
'The general prohibition against aiding and abetting violations of municipal code ordinances is relatively common language shared by other California cities,' the city said in a document about the anti-camping law, adding that it 'was not developed specifically for camping ordinance violations nor would it apply uniquely to such violations.'
CNN has reached out to the Fremont City Attorney's Office and the mayor for comment.
Proponents of the law say it will help keep Fremont residents safe.
'Repeatedly dealing with some of these individuals can unnecessarily place firefighters and police officers in harms way,' the Fremont Police Association said before Tuesday's vote. 'The passage of this ordinance allows the public safety experts to appropriately address public safety issues while still [providing] resources to our unhoused community members.'
But the law's application could be unconstitutional, having a 'chilling effect' on those who may not want to risk punishment or who have prior offenses, Henson told CNN.
'Police will have broad discretion to enforce and this can cause a chilling effect on those who assist the unhoused due to fear of punishment,' she said.
Most organizations that provide homeless people with material support are non-profits run by volunteers and funded by private donations, Henson said. If they're unable to provide that assistance because of the ordinance, unhoused people will only be isolated further and efforts to reduce homelessness will be stifled, she explained.
'This ordinance sends a strong message of how the City of Fremont is seeking to segregate the unhoused even further to isolate them from service providers and volunteers,' Henson said. 'Individuals will be colder and more likely to suffer in unspeakable ways because local governments are taking away all the necessary tools for survival.'
Even if outreach workers are not penalized for providing basic services and supplies like food, blankets and clothes, they are still concerned they could be cited, fined or even arrested if they provide tents, as they often do during cold and wet spells, said Wan, CEO of Abode Services.
Despite the city attorney's assurances that outreach staff will not be impacted, Abode is seeking guidance from an attorney to help craft an agreement to propose to the city to ensure that its staff are not subject to this ordinance, Wan said. It would also clarify whether their clients' information will remain confidential and whether supporting people with tents is allowed 'as the language in the ordinance does seem extremely broad,' she said.
Restricting outreach could lead to worse health, housing and economic outcomes — while increasing costs to cities in policing and emergency services, Housing California communications director Alex Brown said.
'The mere threat of penalties can deter individuals and organizations from providing essential aid, leaving more people without access to the support they need to survive,' Brown said.
More cities could be empowered by Fremont's ordinance to pursue similar policies, homelessness experts say.
'Cites are going for the quick fix, which is an illusion,' Henson said.
It's part of a growing trend 'of limiting advocates' ability to support unhoused neighbors and monitor a city's enforcement practices,' Do said. That includes an increasing number of jurisdictions prohibiting activities like panhandling or providing food to people, he said.
'Targeting people who offer aid to those in need does nothing to solve homelessness,' Do said.
Henson said her organization is prepared to file a lawsuit against the city if the law violates the rights of the unhoused or those who help them, she said.
'Right now, if you are unhoused your entire existence is illegal and in the City of Fremont you are also engaged in unlawful behavior if you seek to protect someone from the cold, feed them, help them with an accessible structure, or store their personal belongings,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Billie Eilish's Brother Makes Shocking Claim About L.A. Protests
Billie Eilish's Brother Makes Shocking Claim About L.A. Protests

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Billie Eilish's Brother Makes Shocking Claim About L.A. Protests

Billie Eilish's Brother Makes Shocking Claim About L.A. Protests originally appeared on Parade. Finneas, the older brother and longtime collaborator of , says he was 'tear-gassed' while at the protests in Los Angeles over the weekend. Finneas (also known as Finneas O'Connell) has not shied away from controversial political messages since becoming famous alongside his sister. Finneas has written and produced music for his sister, including her breakthrough album, When We All Fall Alseep, Where Do We Go? and her Oscar-winning songs 'No Time To Die' and 'What Was I Made For.' He has also collaborated with a variety of other artists, in addition to his own music. And while Fineas would presumably prefer to use his platform to promote The Favors, his new duo with singer-songwriter Ashe, that wasn't the case on Sunday. Finneas was reportedly at the protests in his native Los Angeles. It's unclear whether Finneas participated in the demonstrations against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for detaining dozens across Southern California, or if he was an observer. 'Tear gassed almost immediately at the very peaceful protests [in Downtown Los Angeles],' he posted on his Instagram Story, before claiming, 'They're inciting this.' Finneas also shared many messages in support of the protestors and messages denouncing President Donald Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard. Billie and Finneas have been politically active for years. In June 2020, the 'Bad Guy' singer attended a Black Lives Matter march in Los Angeles to protest the killing of George Floyd, per The Independent. Billie also spoke out during her 2022 Glastonbury performance following the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade, per the BBC. In 2024, Billie shared a bold political message for her fans ahead of the U.S. Presidential election. Other stars, including Eva Longoria, Chrissy Teigen, Tim Heidecker, and Florence Pugh, have all posted in support of the protest and against the ICE raids. Green Day's Billie Joe Armstrong also made a bold statement on the protests, using one of the band's recently released Eilish's Brother Makes Shocking Claim About L.A. Protests first appeared on Parade on Jun 9, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.

Letters to the Editor: Amid tree house standoff, 'what options do the unhoused have left?'
Letters to the Editor: Amid tree house standoff, 'what options do the unhoused have left?'

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Letters to the Editor: Amid tree house standoff, 'what options do the unhoused have left?'

To the editor: Benito Flores' efforts in El Sereno must be commended ('Elderly man builds tree house to protest eviction from state-owned home,' June 3). Given the Grants Pass vs. Johnson ruling, Gov. Gavin Newsom's persistent encampment sweeps and local sit/lie bans, what options do the unhoused have left but to live in trees? The displacement of elders from our communities is cruel and often amounts to a death sentence. Surely Newsom is aware that an average of nearly seven people die on the streets of L.A. each day — many of them elderly. How powerful it would be to see real leadership from our governor. Why are there dozens of vacant homes on state-owned land amid this humanitarian crisis? In fact, years ago, just across the street from Flores' home, the state granted a parcel of land to the city at a discount and it is now a thriving community garden. Does Newsom truly believe he can charm his way to Washington while making negligible progress on our state's central political and moral crisis? Zach Murray, Los Angeles This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Letters to the Editor: Amid tree house standoff, ‘what options do the unhoused have left?'
Letters to the Editor: Amid tree house standoff, ‘what options do the unhoused have left?'

Los Angeles Times

time4 days ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: Amid tree house standoff, ‘what options do the unhoused have left?'

To the editor: Benito Flores' efforts in El Sereno must be commended ('Elderly man builds tree house to protest eviction from state-owned home,' June 3). Given the Grants Pass vs. Johnson ruling, Gov. Gavin Newsom's persistent encampment sweeps and local sit/lie bans, what options do the unhoused have left but to live in trees? The displacement of elders from our communities is cruel and often amounts to a death sentence. Surely Newsom is aware that an average of nearly seven people die on the streets of L.A. each day — many of them elderly. How powerful it would be to see real leadership from our governor. Why are there dozens of vacant homes on state-owned land amid this humanitarian crisis? Does Newsom truly believe he can charm his way to Washington while making negligible progress on our state's central political and moral crisis? Zach Murray, Los Angeles

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store