Why Kansas Reflector filed a complaint about stonewalling by the Senate efficiency panel
Sen. Renee Erickson listens at a hearing on March 31, 2025, at the Kansas Statehouse. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
The Kansas Open Records Act makes clear demands of state and local government.
This vital law requires timely release of public records within three business days of receiving a request. If officials can't fulfill that timeline, they're required to explain why, in detail.
The Kansas Senate Committee on Government Efficiency claims to be working for the good of all by ferreting out waste and bloat in state government. Perhaps it should start with itself, or at least with chairwoman Renee Erickson, R-Wichita. She led the effort to stonewall news media requests for public recommendations submitted to COGE through its online portal. Kansas Reflector requested the records from her on Feb. 25. They weren't released until April 9 — more than six weeks later.
By that time, our reporter Anna Kaminski had already examined a leaked copy of public feedback.
That batch of public comments suggested why Erickson pushed the public release until after the legislative session ended. Kansans blasted the committee with messages calling for Medicaid expansion, legalized cannabis and tolerance for LGBTQ+ youths. They show, in short, how anti-government narratives miss the mark in Kansas, where right-wing ideologues have poisoned the well of state government for years.
On Wednesday, Kansas Reflector editor in chief Sherman Smith submitted a complaint to the state Attorney General's Office about this delay. Erickson's committee did not respond to our request in a timely manner, and the broader public suffered because crucial information was hidden from them. COGE members could access the messages in mid-March, but their constituents could not. We believe that government officials should be held responsible for delay and obfuscation.
We heard attempts to justify the delays at a COGE meeting May 13. There were just so many messages. We had to screen them all. We didn't delete anything.
Gordon Self, a legislative staff member, opined: 'Once the KORA requests were received and a response was made, there was a review of the records, all 2,000, to determine if any of the records did contain information. After a thorough review, there were some identified that did have some sensitive information in them.'
Erickson harumphed: 'At the end of the day, there are none that have been deleted, there are none that are not available for review. But as was said, we wanted to make sure that we were not including information that was not appropriate for such a situation.'
Forgive me for rolling my eyes. These self-satisfied excuses don't add up.
None of the messages reviewed by Kansas Reflector staff appear to include sensitive information that the government had to shield from prying eyes. As noted earlier, a tranche of unredacted submissions was leaked to us in late March. We have compared the two versions. There's no there there.
In one message, for instance, Statehouse staff omitted a profane phrase. That didn't protect anyone's personal or private information.
In another case, the same suggestion was apparently submitted in two categories. The messages mention Senate President Ty Masterson's lucrative side hustle at Wichita Stare University, where he earns more than $150,000 a year as 'director of GoCreate, a Koch Collaborative.' In one of them, Masterson's name has been redacted, along with that of the author. In the other, neither Masterson nor the author has been redacted.
Only a few dozen of the thousand-plus messages saw any redactions at all.
Perhaps Statehouse staff don't have the slightest idea what they're doing. Perhaps they made a few random edits to the messages to justify the month-plus delay. Neither option should fill Kansans with confidence in their legislators or the work of COGE.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, he COGE web portal includes the warning that 'Portal submissions are public records that are subject to the Kansas Open Records Act.' Those sending in feedback have to check a box next to that warning. Why even bother to do that if you're going to screen the material afterward?
Like other public records conflicts, this runs the risk of sounding petty. So what, I can hear some readers ask. You got the information anyway. Why fuss?
My answer remains the same as when I wrote about Emporia Stare University's unconscionable response in turning over information to Kansas Reflector. This information belongs to everyone. Lawmakers don't get to pass a law and then arbitrarily decide whether to follow it. If they expect town and county governments to follow KORA, if they expect other state agencies to follow KORA, they can damn well follow it themselves.
That's what justice and fair play demands. That's what their fellow Kansans deserve. And it's what we're going to do, no matter Erickson's sanctimonious claptrap.
COGE kora complaint
Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' narrowly passed the House by a single vote and is now stalled in the Senate. We take a closer look at this massive tax plan that gives permanent breaks for the wealthy while slashing Medicaid, food assistance, and clean energy programs. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, it would add at least $2.4 trillion to the national deficit–hardly a win for fiscal conservatives. Even Elon Musk slammed it as a 'disgusting abomination.��
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Idiocy': Sac PD must rectify situation with Sen. Sabrina Cervantes
'Sacramento police must apologize for harming a California state senator | Opinion,' ( May 30) My wife and I live down in Riverside County, in Sen. Sabrina Cervantes' district. We know her and we believe in her. We believed immediately in the senator's protest because the allegation that she was driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol was so preposterously out of character. Aside from the city budget deficit, is this idiocy an example of what the Sacramento Police Department is wasting their time and taxpayers' money on? To Sacramento Police Chief Kathy Lester: Shame on what your officers have been encouraged or taught to do. It just may backfire on the department when the city takes up the budget for next year. Brian Finander Moreno Valley 'Nine California Republicans voted for Trump's cruel budget bill. Remember them,' ( May 22) Rep. Kevin Kiley claims to support Medicaid, but his vote for a congressional budget that guts the program tells another story. By backing cuts that threaten healthcare for millions — including over 100,000 of his own constituents — Kiley is turning his back on children, seniors and people with disabilities who rely on this essential lifeline. He blames Medi-Cal expansion for the strain, but that's no excuse for dismantling a program that serves our most vulnerable. Even more galling, the same budget that slashes social safety nets hands massive tax breaks to the wealthy — ballooning the national debt while sacrificing essential services. You can't claim to support Medicaid while voting to destroy it. John Bergmann Lincoln 'Nine California Republicans voted for Trump's cruel budget bill. Remember them,' ( May 22) Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley just voted for the largest ever transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich in American history. The budget bill they passed insures that the richest 0.1% percent will gain while the rest of us will lose vital services such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid. The most vulnerable among us — hungry and uninsured kids and seniors — will be directly affected; but the middle class will also see increasing home electric bills, health care premiums and costs and higher interest rates. These cuts don't reduce the debt, they exist so billionaires can pay even less in taxes and buy more yachts. Republicans are solely focused on enriching billionaires, no matter the cost to you, me or the country. Kiley's priority should be his constituents, not his wealthy donors. Edward Farinsky Browns Valley 'How Newsom wants to fill 'Trump slump' fueled $12B deficit,' ( May 14) With annual state funding, the California Peer-Run Warm Line has been providing free emotional support to residents statewide 24/7 via phone, text or chat since 2019. Its success has enabled more growth: the CalHOPE and Spanish Warm Lines. March and April each saw nearly 40,000 contacts — about double their monthly average. Why would we give up on such a vital resource seeing skyrocketing demand? The cuts in Gov. Gavin Newsom's May Revise are so severe that we would only be able to answer about 5% of requests for help, leaving tens of thousands to suffer in silence. We wouldn't be able to stay open. We urge the Legislature to prioritize mental health and to fully fund the warm lines. Such investments often prevent people from going into crisis, which require more expensive treatment. Mark Salazar Mental Health Association of San Francisco
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Look to Wisconsin for Medicaid reform
Medicaid was created to help people living in poverty have access to health care. Under ObamaCare, it was expanded to include able-bodied, working-age adults without children. That was wrong. When I was governor of Wisconsin, we opted not to take the expansion. First, we could create our own plan for covering everyone living in poverty. We did — and it worked. My predecessor had raised the income requirements for Medicaid, but did not fund the gap. That left many impoverished people on a waiting list. Once I was in office, we restored the limits to cover those living in poverty and eliminated the waiting list. Today, my state is the only one in the nation to have no gap in insurance coverage despite not having taken the expansion. Second, I did not want to put more people on government assistance. For those who are able, public assistance should be more like a trampoline than a hammock. True freedom and prosperity do not come from the clumsy hand of the government. They come from empowering people to control their own destiny through the dignity of work. When I first took office, the Cabinet member who oversaw labor issues asked what my priorities were for the agency. He told me that the prior administration said their goal was to bring in as much federal assistance as possible to the state. I told him my goal was the opposite. I wanted to receive less federal funding because more people were working. During my tenure as governor, we pushed for work requirements for those who were able. We funded worker training and addiction recovery programs to get people into the workforce. It was a success. More people were employed during my years in office than had been at any point in our past. Third, I was concerned the federal government would not be able to sustain its commitments to the states. Unlike Wisconsin, which had a budget surplus each year I was in office, the federal government continues to have massive deficits and debt issues. Things have only grown worse since my early warnings. Initially, opposition to expanding Medicaid under ObamaCare was strong. Over the years, however, the appeal of 'easy money' from the federal government became too tempting for many state leaders — saddling private payers with higher costs as well. Thankfully, Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin remembered my concerns. With federal cuts increasingly likely, the Badger State will be one of the few not facing a major budget crisis. One of the proposals being circulated by congressional leaders is a plan to cut the rate of reimbursement to the states for the Medicaid expansion population from 90 percent to less than 60 percent. States that looked to the federal government to balance their budgets in the past will now experience significant shortfalls due to these reductions in federal funds. The reduced reimbursement rate being considered by Congress would have cost Wisconsin taxpayers an additional $154 million each year had the state taken the expansion funds according to a recent study by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty. This is for a program that already represents about 30 percent of the state budget. Overall, Medicaid is a program that should provide assistance for children, families and seniors living in poverty. It should not be a barrier to able-bodied, working-age adults entering the workforce. These reforms will help provide true savings while ensuring the program serves the population it was intended to serve when it was established 60 years ago. Looking ahead, officials in the federal government as well as states would be wise to look at the Wisconsin model as they consider reforms to Medicaid. We showed that conservative reforms work. Scott Walker was governor of Wisconsin from 2011 to 2019. He is currently president of Young America's Foundation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
