logo
Trump's threats to send citizens to El Salvador aren't idle

Trump's threats to send citizens to El Salvador aren't idle

The Hill21-05-2025

The Trump administration launched a war against the Constitution and due process when it took the unprecedented step of sending immigrants allegedly present illegally in the United States to a notorious prison in El Salvador — the Center for Terrorism Confinement or CECOT. It has floated the idea of sending others to Libya — a country the State Department warns American citizens not to visit — before being blocked, at least for now, by a federal judge.
When individuals are sent to other countries, the administration has a habit of claiming it lacks the authority to bring them back. It has refused to facilitate the return of one man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, in defiance of a Supreme Court decision, and even though the administration admits he was sent there in error. The administration won't even tell the lower court overseeing Abrego Garcia's case what it has done, arguing that it is a state secret.
Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, threatened suspension of habeas corpus next, meaning the administration would refuse to answer to any court when it detains someone. This looks more like human trafficking than a lawful immigration enforcement program, and there is no telling how far it might go.
Although the administration argues these drastic measures are necessary to fight illegal immigration, American citizens would also be at risk. The administration's position is that once people are placed inside CECOT, they are under 'the sovereign, domestic authority of El Salvador,' and the U.S. lacks the authority to bring them back, even if they have been sent there mistakenly. Presumably, this same argument would apply if people were sent to Libya or other countries.
Justice Sotomayor warned against the implications of the government's position, writing that 'not only noncitizens but also United States citizens could be taken off the streets, forced onto planes, and confined to foreign prisons with no opportunity for redress if judicial review is denied unlawfully before removal.'
Trump has already indicated that he would 'love' to send U.S. citizens to CECOT and told Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele that he should 'build about five more places' because 'homegrowns are next.'
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has tried to sugarcoat Trump's comments by stating Trump 'simply floated' deporting citizens as 'an idea' and he would only send 'heinous, violent criminals who have broken our nation's laws repeatedly.' Moreover, she implausibly argued that they would only pursue 'legal' options, even though there is no legal path to sending citizens to torture camps abroad.
Leavitt's assurances are empty. The administration is already flouting the law because people in the U.S. — whether legally or illegally present — are entitled to due process before they are deported or detained.
Nor has the administration carefully selected dangerous people for removal. Approximately 90 percent of the noncitizens sent to El Salvador have no criminal convictions on their record.
If the hope is that the Supreme Court will put the brakes on the administration's efforts if they are extended to American citizens or make sure they are only limited intrusions, history offers a cautionary tale. One need look no further than America's history of pretrial detention to see the slippery slope we would be on.
More than 50 years ago, the newly elected President Richard Nixon decided he wanted to send a law-and-order message about 'dangerous' people who commit crimes.
For almost 200 years, the U.S. recognized that its constitutional commitment to due process meant that the government could not detain someone just because they had been arrested and the government claimed they were dangerous. The government had to prove them guilty at trial.
However, Nixon, like Trump, wanted to test the waters of what was 'legal.'
Nixon had a member of his administration, William Rehnquist, help draft a District of Columbia law to lock accused criminals in jail after arrest on the basis of the danger they supposedly posed.
Nixon's attorney general, John Mitchell, drafted a law review article in an attempt to create a new normal and defend the constitutionality of pretrial detention after arrest on the basis of danger to the community. Mitchell claimed that any such regime would be 'quite narrow' and result in detention in only 10 percent of cases.
This effort ultimately led to the previously unthinkable becoming law. With crime rising and the government fearmongering about the necessity of pretrial detention, perhaps it is not surprising that lower courts deferred to the government and upheld the D.C. law. States then passed their own laws modeled after the D.C. law, and Congress passed a sweeping federal version.
When the Supreme Court finally weighed in and approved pretrial detention on the basis of danger to the community, in a case called Salerno v. U.S., Rehnquist, who had become the chief justice, wrote the opinion. He ignored the Constitution's text and almost 200 years of history and instead deferred to the solicitor general's claim that detention should be viewed as a mere regulatory matter.
In making that argument, the solicitor general relied on the now-discredited case of Korematsu v. U.S., which allowed people of Japanese descent during World War II to be placed in internment camps. The solicitor general argued in Salerno that Korematsu supports the proposition that the president can deport and detain not only dangerous aliens during wartime, but also American citizens.
After the court's decision in Salerno, pretrial detention for those deemed a danger became the default. Today, a whopping 75 percent of all federal defendants are detained pretrial for an average stay of almost a year, even though the Constitution guarantees the presumption of defendants' innocence until they are proven guilty.
One can hear the echoes of Korematsu and Salerno in the claims the Trump administration is making today. Just as in those cases, the government is playing on fear and an inflated sense of presidential power to justify what had been previously unthinkable.
Benjamin Franklin warned us long ago that those 'who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.'
No one should be sent to a center of torture in El Salvador or to Libya. No one should face any punishment or deportation without due process of law. The writ of habeas corpus must remain sacred. Once the dam that holds back illegality breaks, there will be a flood of injustice, and none of us will have liberty or safety.
Rachel E. Barkow is a law professor at New York University and the author of 'Justice Abandoned: How the Supreme Court Ignored the Constitution and Enabled Mass Incarceration.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact
Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact

UPI

time22 minutes ago

  • UPI

Australia awaits American decision on AUKUS nuclear submarine pact

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Naval Base Point Loma in San Diego, Calif. in March of 2023. File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI | License Photo June 12 (UPI) -- Australian Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles announced Thursday he feels that the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal which connects with the United Kingdom and United States, will continue after the Trump administration reviews the pact. "I am very confident this is going to happen," he told ABC News, as he believes AUKUS is of strategic interest to all three nations. The Pentagon has expressed that the 2021 deal is being reassessed to make sure it's a fit with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda before he meets with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the G7 summit taking place in Canada next week. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also had met with Marles, who is also Australia's Minister for Defense, earlier this month and recommended Australia increase its defense spending to 3.5 percent of its GDP. Albanese said in a press conference Tuesday that he thinks "that Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defense" when asked about a defense spending boost, while not directly addressing if he would risk losing the AUKUS deal over that decision as questioned. The Pentagon review is being led by U.S. Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby, who in the past has been critical of the deal made under the Biden administration to arm Australia with nuclear subs that use advanced American and British technology. "In principle it's a great idea," Colby posted to X about AUKUS in August of 2024," but added he's "agnostic" about the program. However, Colby also posted that day he was "convinced we should focus on Asia, readying for a war with China" in order to avoid it. Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian announced Thursday in a press conference when asked about his nation's opinion on the possibility of an end to AUKUS that China opposes "manufacturing bloc confrontation and anything that amplifies the risk of nuclear proliferation and exacerbates arms race."

FIRST ON FOX: High ranking DOJ official resigns post to run for attorney general in red state
FIRST ON FOX: High ranking DOJ official resigns post to run for attorney general in red state

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FIRST ON FOX: High ranking DOJ official resigns post to run for attorney general in red state

FIRST ON FOX: Aaron Reitz, a top official in President Donald Trump's Department of Justice, has resigned his post in the administration to run for attorney general of Texas, entering what he is calling a "fight for the soul of Texas." Reitz, a former Marine and chief of staff to Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, served in the Trump administration under U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi as the assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Policy. Following speculation of a possible run for Texas attorney general, one of the most powerful positions in the state, Reitz resigned his position with the DOJ on Wednesday and officially launched his campaign the day after. "If we lose Texas, we lose the Republic," Reitz said in a statement sent to Fox News Digital. 205 Arrested In Fbi Child Sex Operation, Patel And Bondi Announce "This is no time for half-measures or untested cowards," he said, adding, "We are in a fight for the soul of Texas, our nation, and Western civilization itself." Read On The Fox News App "As Attorney General, I'll use every ounce of legal firepower to defend President Trump, crush the radical Left, advance the America and Texas First agenda, and look out for everyday Texans," he said. This comes as current Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is running in hopes of replacing incumbent Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, in one of the most hotly contested primary races of the year. Reitz pledged to partner with the Trump administration to "clean up the border catastrophe with mass deportations and enhanced border security, take down the Soros-backed district attorneys, obliterate woke indoctrination, expose and root out election fraud, and defend our Constitutional rights without apology." John Cornyn Scores Tim Scott Endorsement, But John Rich Calls Cornyn 'The Lindsey Graham Of Texas' Reitz touted his conservative bona fides, saying, "I've spent my entire career in the trenches with the toughest conservatives in America." He is likely to garner endorsements from some of the country's leading Republicans, with DOJ officials, including Bondi, giving him a string of fond farewells after he announced his departure. In an X post Bondi said: "I'm proud to have worked with @aaron_reitz at @TheJusticeDept. Aaron played a central role in our work to Make America Safe Again — his next chapter will surely contribute to @POTUS's mission, and I look forward to seeing what Aaron does next in his home state of Texas!" FBI Director Kash Patel also chimed in, saying "Aaron is a personal friend, great American, and a relentless advocate for law and order. Thanks for serving our country, now it's time to deliver on his next mission. Good luck." Bondi Announces One Of Largest Fentanyl Seizures In Us History Before serving in the Trump administration and on Cruz's staff, Reitz previously held the position of Texas Deputy Attorney General for Legal Strategy under Paxton. In December, Paxton spoke very highly of Reitz, saying, "he's a proven and effective fighter for our Constitution and American Values" who was "our 'offensive coordinator' leading my very aggressive Texas-v-Biden docket." Paxton said that while working in his office Reitz "spearheaded some of our agency's most consequential actions on border security, immigration, Big Tech, Covid, energy, the environment, and election integrity." Texas Republican state Senator Mayes Middleton, another pro-Trump conservative, is also running for attorney article source: FIRST ON FOX: High ranking DOJ official resigns post to run for attorney general in red state

Businesses to lawmakers: Don't mess with Energy Star
Businesses to lawmakers: Don't mess with Energy Star

E&E News

time25 minutes ago

  • E&E News

Businesses to lawmakers: Don't mess with Energy Star

Business groups are urging Congress to resist Trump administration efforts to privatize Energy Star, the efficiency program for home appliances and building materials. 'Clear legislative authorization backs ENERGY STAR as a voluntary public-private partnership run by the federal government,' more than 30 trade groups said Wednesday in a letter to lawmakers. 'We respectfully request that ENERGY STAR not be supplanted by non-governmental efforts that could significantly alter and overly complicate the program.' Led by the Real Estate Roundtable, the letter was signed by the National Association of Manufacturers; American Chemistry Council; Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers; Air-Conditioning, Heating and Refrigeration Institute; and other groups. Advertisement The letter went to Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) and ranking member Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Senate Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito ( and ranking member Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), and House Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky) and ranking member Frank Pallone (D-N.J.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store