
Who are Menendez Brothers? convicted of the gruesome killing of parents, now eligible for parole
More than three decades after the brutal killing of their parents shocked the world,
, once sentenced to life without parole, are now eligible for parole. On August 20, 1989, the brothers stormed into the den of their Beverly Hills mansion armed with shotguns and brutally murdered their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Jose was shot multiple times, including a fatal shot to the back of the head, while Kitty was shot ten times, with a final blast disfiguring her face. Their cold and calculated crime captivated the nation and became one of the most sensational cases of the 1990s. The case has recently resurfaced through popular media, including the
docuseries 'Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story', which re-examines the case and its long-lasting impact.
Early life and education of the Menendez Brothers
Born into wealth and privilege, Joseph Lyle Menendez was born on January 10, 1968, and his younger brother Erik Galen Menendez on November 27, 1970. Their father, Jose Menendez, was a Cuban immigrant who rose to become a successful Hollywood executive. Their mother, Kitty, was a former school teacher.
The family lived in several affluent areas across the United States before settling in Beverly Hills, California.
Lyle attended Princeton University, but he was suspended for plagiarism and behavioural issues. Erik, a talented tennis player, attended Beverly Hills High School. Though he showed promise in sports, he struggled academically. Despite their privileged upbringing, both brothers had troubling behavioural histories.
Notably, Erik co-wrote a screenplay with a friend that depicted a young man killing his parents to inherit their wealth.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
How was their relationship with the parents
While the Menendez family appeared successful and stable from the outside, the brothers claimed their home life was filled with trauma. In court, Lyle and Erik alleged years of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, mainly inflicted by their father. They described their father as controlling and abusive, and said their mother enabled the behaviour and was emotionally unstable.
Prosecutors offered a different interpretation.
They argued that the brothers were angry and entitled, and that their motive was financial. According to the prosecution, the murders were committed after the brothers discovered that their father planned to disinherit them from his multimillion-dollar estate.
How Menendez brothers took this horrific step
On the night of the murders, the brothers used shotguns they had bought days earlier. As their parents watched a movie in the den, Lyle and Erik entered and began firing.
Jose and Kitty were hit multiple times. The brothers briefly left the room to reload, then returned to deliver the final, fatal shots.
After the killings, they disposed of their bloody clothing and weapons. They attempted to establish an alibi by attending a local food festival and later called 911, pretending to have just discovered their parents' bodies. The gruesome nature of the crime scene led investigators to initially consider the possibility of a mob-related hit.
However, the brothers' extravagant spending in the weeks that followed raised serious suspicions.
Investigation and conviction of the case
The investigation took a dramatic turn when Erik confessed to his psychologist, Dr. Jerome Oziel. The confession was recorded, and when Oziel's mistress alerted authorities, the tapes became crucial evidence.
Lyle and Erik were arrested in 1990. Their first trial, held in 1993, ended in a mistrial after the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict.
In a second trial, held in 1996, both were convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Why the court resentenced them now
The court decided to resentence Lyle and Erik Menendez in May 2025 after reviewing new evidence and changing legal standards related to youth offenders and long-term imprisonment. Central to the resentencing was the growing recognition of the psychological impact of childhood abuse and the brothers' age at the time of the crime—Erik was 18 and Lyle was 21.
Their legal team presented newly surfaced letters and testimonies suggesting prolonged sexual and emotional abuse by their father, José Menendez.
Additionally, the brothers had shown evidence of rehabilitation during their three decades in prison, including participation in educational programs and inmate support initiatives. These factors, combined with California's evolving laws on
for young offenders, led the judge to reduce their sentence to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole for the first time.
Now in their mid-50s, the Menendez brothers are awaiting a parole hearing scheduled for June 2025. Their case has re-entered public discussion, thanks to renewed media attention and evolving perspectives on trauma, mental health, and justice. Whether they are ultimately released remains to be seen, but the
continues to provoke complex questions about guilt, redemption, and the long-term effects of abuse.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
21 hours ago
- NDTV
Rapper Chocolate MC Arrested After He Kidnaps Fan, Demands Cash From Him At Gunpoint
Cuban rapper Chocolate MC, whose real name is Yosvanis Sierra-Hernandez, was arrested early Wednesday morning in connection with an alleged armed kidnapping in Florida. According to Local 10 News, the rapper was arrested after he allegedly kidnapped a fan at gunpoint. The incident occurred outside a grocery store in Opa-locka, Florida, when the fan asked for a photo. Chocolate MC took the fan to the parking lot, pressed a firearm to his chest, and forced him to hand over his vehicle. Authorities said the rapper "pointed the firearm at him again and ordered the victim into the driver's seat. Yosvanis demanded cash from the victim' and "forced the victim to drive him to several locations over the course of approximately two hours before eventually releasing him unharmed." He not only kidnapped the fan at gunpoint but also attempted to rob him, forcing him to surrender his vehicle. "Yosvanis Sierra demanded cash from the victim, the victim showed him his wallet, which was empty and had no cash. Yosvanis Sierra demanded that the victim send him money via Zell (sic) and give his phone number to the victim to do so. The victim stated he did not have Zell (sic) and was unable to do the transaction," the arrest report claimed. The victim was then allegedly forced to drive to multiple locations over two hours before being released unharmed in the vicinity of 270 SW 11th Avenue. Surveillance footage from the store supported the victim's account, corroborating the details of the alleged incident. A flyer was then circulated in Miami-Dade County to aid in Sierra-Hernandez's capture. Deputies eventually located him, and he was taken into custody after being found with a grey and black gun. He faces charges including kidnapping with a firearm, armed robbery, and written threats to kill or injure. Notably, Chocolate MC has faced previous legal issues. In May 2024, he was accused of kidnapping and raping his ex-girlfriend, taking her from Miami-Dade to Palm Beach County. He was also accused of orchestrating a murder-for-hire plot, offering money on social media to harm an inmate linked to the murder of singer El Taiger.


Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Top Cuban official accuses US of trying to provoke conflict
WASHINGTON -A visiting senior Cuban official on Tuesday accused the Trump administration of ratcheting up tensions between Washington and Havana and expressed concerns that the U.S. was trying to provoke a military confrontation. Speaking to reporters at the Cuban Embassy in Washington, Johana Tablada, deputy director for U.S. affairs in Cuba's foreign ministry, said an armed clash between the two old Cold War rivals was "not a good idea" and that the Cuban government was trying to ease the situation but that the U.S. appeared determined to further damage relations. Tablada said new Trump administration measures targeting Communist-ruled Cuba intend to rupture relations "to create conditions, in my opinion, for, if necessary, a military confrontation." Republican U.S. President Donald Trump and his top officials have taken a hardline approach to Cuba since he took office in January, returning longtime foe Cuba to a U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism, tightening rules on remittances, and shutting off migration programs that allowed some Cubans to work in the U.S. legally. Trump officials have not publicly threatened any military action. A State Department spokesperson said the Trump administration had "no indication" that the Cuban government was ready for a "meaningful" dialogue with the U.S. "We call on the regime to release the American citizens, return U.S. fugitives, and free the hundreds of Cuban political prisoners who remain imprisoned and used as bargaining chips," the spokesperson said in a statement. U.S. Chief of Mission Mike Hammer - the top U.S. diplomat in Havana - has traveled the island widely in recent months to meet with political dissidents, raising the ire of the Cuban government, which accuses him of seeking to foment unrest. Cuba's foreign ministry last week issued a verbal warning to Hammer, saying he had incited "Cuban citizens to commit serious criminal acts, attack the constitutional order, or encourage them to act against the authorities," calling his actions a violation of the Vienna Convention norms on diplomatic relations. Tablada accused Hammer of channeling U.S. humanitarian funds to undermine the Cuban government and said Cuban diplomats would not be allowed to engage in similar behavior in the U.S. 'To push both countries into scenarios of confrontation and collision is not a good idea,' she said. Just days before Trump took office in January former President Joe Biden's administration removed Cuba from its terrorism blacklist, effectively reversing sanctions from Trump's first term. After returning to office, Trump quickly returned Cuba to the blacklist and also reinstated many of the restrictions on trade and travel that Biden had eased.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 days ago
- First Post
US Supreme Court clears Trump's move to end legal status for 500,000 migrants
The court put on hold Boston-based US District Judge Indira Talwani's order halting the administration's move to end the immigration 'parole' granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden read more Law enforcement officers, including HSI and ICE agents, take people into custody at an immigration court in Phoenix, Arizona, US, on May 21, 2025. Reuters File The US Supreme Court on Friday let President Donald Trump's administration revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants living in the United States, bolstering the Republican president's drive to step up deportations. The court put on hold Boston-based US District Judge Indira Talwani's order halting the administration's move to end the immigration 'parole' granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, potentially exposing many of them to rapid removal, while the case plays out in lower courts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As with many of the court's orders issued in an emergency fashion, the decision was unsigned and gave no reasoning. Two of the court's three liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, publicly dissented. The court botched its assessment of whether the administration was entitled to freeze Talwani's decision pending the litigation, Jackson wrote in an accompanying opinion. The outcome, Jackson wrote, 'undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending.' Immigration parole is a form of temporary permission under American law to be in the country for 'urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit,' allowing recipients to live and work in the United States. Biden, a Democrat, used parole as part of his administration's approach to deter illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexican border. Trump called for ending humanitarian parole programs in an executive order signed on January 20, his first day back in office. The Department of Homeland Security subsequently moved to terminate them in March, cutting short the two-year parole grants. The administration said revoking the parole status would make it easier to place migrants in a fast-track deportation process called 'expedited removal.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The case is one of many that Trump's administration has brought in an emergency fashion to the nation's highest judicial body seeking to undo decisions by judges impeding his sweeping policies, including several targeting immigrants. The Supreme Court on May 19 also let Trump end a deportation protection called temporary protected status that had been granted under Biden to about 350,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, while that legal dispute plays out. In a bid to reduce illegal border crossings, Biden starting in 2022 allowed Venezuelans who entered the United States by air to request a two-year parole if they passed security checks and had a U.S. financial sponsor. Biden expanded that process to Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans in 2023 as his administration grappled with high levels of illegal immigration from those nationalities. The plaintiffs, a group of migrants granted parole and Americans who serve as their sponsors, sued administration officials claiming the administration violated federal law governing the actions of government agencies. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD GuerlineJozef, executive director of Haitian Bridge Alliance, one of the plaintiffs, expressed dismay at Friday's decision. 'Once again, the Trump administration blatantly proves their disregard for the lives of those truly in need of protection by taking away their status and rendering them undocumented. We have already seen the traumatic impact on children and families afraid to even go to school, church or work,' Jozef said. 'I cannot overstate how devastating this is: the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to unleash widespread chaos, not just for our clients and class members, but for their families, their workplaces and their communities,' added Karen Tumlin, director of Justice Action Center, one of the groups representing the plaintiffs. Talwani in April found that the law governing such parole did not allow for the program's blanket termination, instead requiring a case-by-case review. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to put the judge's decision on hold. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In its filing, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court that Talwani's order had upended 'critical immigration policies that are carefully calibrated to deter illegal entry,' effectively 'undoing democratically approved policies that featured heavily in the November election' that returned Trump to the presidency. The plaintiffs told the Supreme Court they would face grave harm if their parole is cut short given that the administration has indefinitely suspended processing their pending applications for asylum and other immigration relief. They said they would be separated from their families and immediately subject to expedited deportation 'to the same despotic and unstable countries from which they fled, where many will face serious risks of danger, persecution and even death.' Talwani on Wednesday ordered the administration to resume processing applications for work permits or more lasting immigration status from migrants with parole status from Afghanistan, Latin America and Ukraine.