
Inside the Chaotic Map of Doom
Illustration by Michael Villegas / Ikon Images
There's nothing that kicks Westminster back into action after recess like a new poll. No, not one forecasting the local elections taking place in just nine days' time, but something looking a little further ahead, to the next general election. More In Common chose the Easter weekend to release a new MRP poll (that's multilevel regression and poststratification – the technique that aims to make predictions on a seat-by-seat basis and has proved more accurate than other polling methods). The results will shock you… maybe.
More In Common puts three parties – Labour, the Conservatives and Reform – equal on vote share at 24 per cent. This is in line with what most polls this year have indicated: essentially a three-way tie, with Reform nudging ahead of the Tories and sometimes Labour by a few points. The shock factor is that, translated into seats in England, Scotland and Wales, the MRP model has Reform in first place with 180. Labour the Conservatives are tied on 165 each, with 67 going to the Liberal Democrats, 35 to the SNP, five to Plaid Cymru and four to the Greens – as well as ten independents (one taking Wes Streeting's seat). Cue panic.
First, the obligatory disclaimer that any poll four years out from when an election might actually be held is of limited value. You could argue (especially if you're a Labour MP) that there is little point whatsoever in speculating this much now, when all kinds of things – from decent economic growth and a restoration of public services through to global economic collapse, war, or another pandemic – could happen between now and polling day. Equally, knowing this is not about to stop the speculation. So let's continue.
A big question with polls like this is how much voter behaviour could be driven by wanting to keep a particular party out. Tactical voting was the key story of the 2024 election, and is how Labour was able to win 63 per cent of seats with 34 per cent of the vote. So how likely is it that, in seats where Reform is tipped to have a fighting chance, supporters of other parties group together to keep them out?
According to Rob Ford, politics professor and political commentator (who catchily refers to models like this as 'Chaotic Maps of Doom'), the answer is very. In a Bluesky thread casting a sceptical eye over the MRP poll, he suggests the 'keep Reform out' incentive is being overlooked: that in Reform-Labour contests, for example, Reform's lead would be squeezed by Green and Lib Dem voters. Individuals' preferences for who they don't want to win matter as much as who they do, Ford argues, and 'any MRP conducted now cannot capture them because voters won't start thinking tactically until election is close.'
That's one view. But others are available. In this case, the counter-point to Ford was offered by Dylan Difford, a data journalist YouGov, who is sceptical about the impact tactical voting could have in 2029. Not because he doesn't believe it will happen, but because, unlike in the 2024 election, its impact will no longer be asymmetric. ''The spectre of Farage as PM will save us' is overblown,' Difford argues, 'purely because there are enough Tories sympathetic to Farage to largely nullify any LD/Grn tactical voting in Lab vs Reform contests.' In other words, we can and should take the MRP poll seriously, because while tactical voting will happen, the pro-Reform and anti-Reform trends will cancel each other out.
This is the essence of a debate we can expect to keep having for the next four years. But here are a couple of things to keep in mind. First, Reform is aware that, the bigger its profile grows, the most risk there is of a counter-movement. One Reform insider told me recently of the party's strategy to make the Labour government (which, they hoped, would be obviously failing) the main dividing line at the next election, as Tory disaster was in 2024. 'If Reform become the issue of the next election, rather than the incumbent government, all bets are off,' they admitted.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Second: where are the Conservatives in all this? Nearer the time, whoever is leader may have a big choice to make. Can the party survive if Reform overtakes them in parliamentary seats? Might there be some potential for informal cooperation with the Lib Dems or even Labour to keep Reform out? The kind of 'national unity' pact seen in some European countries between the two main parties to lock out insurgents seems outlandish – not least given the present chatter about a Tory-Reform deal. But it's hard to see how the Conservatives come back – ever – if they let Reform become the default party on the right.
Finally, the results of the model can be summed up in one word: chaos. Looking at More In Common's map projection, there is no way to see a stable government being formed. A minority Reform government? A Labour-Tory grand coalition? A Reform-Conservative merger? It's hard to imagine any of these lasting a month, let alone a parliament. While the MRP poll may have limited use predicting the result of the next election now, it does illuminate the perils of a two-party voting system in an electorate split three, four, five ways.
That doesn't give MPs returning to Westminster today much to plan their strategies around. But this Chaotic Map of Doom gives them plenty to think about.
This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here
[See also: Don't blame the OBR for Britain's economic woes]
Related

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'