Am I the Asshole if I Don't Put My Phone on Airplane Mode?
If you don't, your flight won't crash, but ignoring airplane mode uses up your battery and annoys the pilot. Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images
You little anarchist. They told you to switch to airplane mode, and you just … didn't. Maybe you were sending one last Slack; maybe you decided not to take PTO and you're in the middle of a Zoom call; or maybe you just don't like being told what to do. Either way, you're not alone. A 2017 Allianz Travel Insurance survey of over 1,500 Americans found that 40 percent admitted to sometimes skipping airplane mode. Nearly 14 percent said they had sneaked in a mid-flight call or SMS.
But does it even matter? If cell phones were such a threat to aviation, wouldn't the Transportation Security Administration confiscate your smartphone instead of that water bottle you forgot in your backpack? After all, there are no documented catastrophic incidents directly caused by someone's FaceTime. Is airplane mode just another outdated travel ritual from the flip-phone era, like applauding the landing? (Maybe we should revive that one …)
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED . Get best-in-class reporting that's too important to ignore for just $2.50 $1 per month for 1 year. Includes unlimited digital access and exclusive subscriber-only content. Subscribe Today . The Deep, Dark Truth
Your phone, when left to its own devices, is a needy little thing. It constantly pings cell towers, searching for a connection. On the ground, that's no biggie. In the air, those pings can interfere with cockpit radios, creating an incessant buzzing sound in pilots' headsets—like a mosquito in your ear. It's just a little annoying, not a problem, except that you're annoying the person who is trying to, I don't know, land the plane .
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
According to the Federal Aviation Administration, airborne cell phone use is banned because it can mess with the radio altimeter, which helps pilots gauge altitude. This is especially important during takeoff and landing. A single phone won't disrupt much, but a cabin full of them is a recipe for noise pollution and irritated pilots. The concern is bigger in the US, where 5G operates on frequencies close to those used by radio altimeters. In the UK and EU, some airlines allow 5G to use mid-flight, because their networks operate differently.
There's also a basic awareness factor. Emergencies happen most often during takeoff and landing. If there's an issue, flight crews can't afford to fight for your attention over whatever FaceTime you're on. Will They Stop You?
Refusing crew instructions is a federal offense. Depending on the airline, you could also be violating posted signage. But in reality, no one is getting frog-marched off the plane for forgetting to toggle airplane mode. If you're particularly defiant, sure, you could be removed from the flight or fined. But for most people, the worst consequence is a passive-aggressive reminder to follow all crew instructions. Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images
If you won't do it for the collective, do it for yourself. Your battery will last longer. Your phone will charge up to four times faster. You won't accidentally connect to insecure networks. Plus, if you're on a limited data plan, airplane mode keeps your usage in check.
So, are you the asshole if you don't put your phone on airplane mode? Kind of. Not because you're dooming the plane but because you're making someone's job harder for no good reason. It's the in-flight equivalent of refusing to mute yourself on a Zoom call. Don't be that person. No one likes that person.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apple introduces live translation across Messages, FaceTime, and Phone at WWDC 25
Apple is introducing Live Translation, powered by Apple Intelligence, for Messages, FaceTime, and Phone calls. 'Live translation can translate conversation on the fly,' Leslie Ikemoto, Apple's director of input experience, said Monday during the WWDC event. The translation feature is 'enabled by Apple Built models that run entirely on your device so your personal conversations stay personal.' In Messages, Live Translation will automatically translate text for you as you type and deliver it in your preferred language. Similarly, when the person you're texting responds, each text can be instantly translated. When catching up on FaceTime, Apple's translation feature will provide live captions. And on a phone call -- whether you're talking to an Apple user or not -- your words can be translated as you talk, and the translation is spoken out loud for the call recipient. As the person you're speaking to responds in their own language, you'll hear a spoken translation of their voice. 'For developers, it's easy to enable live translation for calls within your communication apps with a new API,' Ikemoto said. Apple did not yet share how many languages this would be available in. This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at


New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
Apple admits to delays in Siri AI overhaul at lackluster WWDC presentation: ‘Overall a yawner'
Apple admitted it needs more time to complete its long-delayed overhaul of the Siri voice assistant – the latest sign that CEO Tim Cook is struggling to meet investor demands for innovation in artificial intelligence. The Cupertino, Calif.-based firm revealed bumps in AI development on Monday at its Worldwide Developers Conference, a yearly event that used to represent the cutting edge with software engineers — but which lately has lost its cachet. 'This work needed more time to reach our high quality bar and we look forward to sharing more about it in the coming year,' Apple software chief Craig Federighi said regarding the delays to Siri's AI overhaul. Advertisement 5 Apple held its annual Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday. Getty Images Apple unveiled plans to allow app developers to use the large language model that powers its AI systems, dubbed 'Apple Intelligence.' Apple also announced a sweeping design overhaul of its operating systems featuring a sleek new look called 'Liquid Glass.' Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, an Apple bull, said the event showed 'slow and steady improvements' but was 'overall a yawner.' Advertisement 'WWDC laid out the vision for developers BUT was void of any major Apple Intelligence progress as Cupertino is playing it safe and close to the vest after the missteps last year,' Ives said in a note to clients. During the event, Apple touted a 'live translation' tool that works for real-time conversations. The company also plans to rename its operating systems updates based on the year they are released, rather than the sequential numbers they've used in the past. 5 Apple shares fell slightly in trading during the presentation. AP Elsewhere, Apple unveiled a 'Call Screening' in which iPhones will automatically answer calls from unknown numbers and ask the caller why they called. The company is also partnering with OpenAI's ChatGPT to add image generation to its 'Image Playground' app. Advertisement Apple shares were down more than 1% during the keynote presentation. 'Has there actually been an exciting WWDC in the last decade?' X user @MikeYelovich wrote in a post. 'This feels like what ChatGPT thinks people want from Apple.' Analysts had widely expected this year's event to be underwhelming, with minor software improvements, such as an AI-powered writing assistant, taking center stage. 5 Apple software chief Craig Federighi said the Siri enhancements 'needed more time. Getty Images Advertisement 'There's no way Writing Tools is the first apple intelligence thing they brag about at wwdc,' joked Interaction co-founder Marvin von Hagen. 'Every single time i've seen this menu was against my will.' The company also detailed enhancements to its 'Visual Intelligence' app, which allows users to seamlessly identify products through their iPhone cameras. Federighi said the plan to open up Apple's 'Foundation Models framework' to developers and users would have a transformational effect – allowing them to use an advanced AI model without even needing an internet connection. 'This will ignite a whole new wave of intelligence,' said Federighi, who cited examples such as apps using the AI model to recommend nearby hiking trails or create practice exams for students. 5 Apple CEO Tim Cook addresses the crowd at WWDC. Getty Images 5 Apple was under pressure to show progress on AI development at WWDC. AP Despite the lukewarm reception, Apple is still in an 'enviable position given its large installed base of users' and still has time to catch up to its rivals, said Paolo Pescatore, an industry analyst and founder of research firm PP Foresight. Apple is focused on ensuring its major AI products are ready for prime time rather than risk a backlash from its fans. Advertisement 'While it might seem others are leading the AI race, it is not a sought-after feature among users and there's no revenue uplift – for now,' said Pescatore. 'Considering the negative perception, Apple needs to tread carefully not to frustrate and disappoint its loyal base of iPhone users.' Apple is locked in a fierce competition with rivals like Google and Sam Altman-led OpenAI – the latter of which recently acquired famed iPhone designer Jony Ive's firm with an eye toward developing its own hardware product built specifically for AI. With Post wires
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
What the Trump-Musk Feud Means for SpaceX and NASA
Musk and Trump before the feud, at the test launch of a Starship rocket in Nov. 2024 Credit - Getty Images What happens in Washington decidedly does not stay in Washington, with practically every action taken by the richest and most powerful country in the world having a near-immediate global reaction—on tariffs, the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, global health, and more. Sometimes those reactions aren't even confined to the planet—as the recent social-media smackdown between President Donald Trump and former adviser Elon Musk illustrated. On June 5, as the feud between the two erstwhile besties escalated, Trump posted on his Truth Social Platform, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Just over 90 minutes later, in a post on X, Musk clapped back: 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' Not long after that post went wide, Musk quietly deleted it. Later that evening, an X user posted to Trump and Musk, 'This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days.' Minutes later, Musk responded, 'Good advice. OK, we won't decommission Dragon.' Read more: The Musk-Trump Implosion Can Be Seen From Space That defused the immediate emergency, but the threat and counterthreat raised questions about just how dependent America's space efforts are on the whims of two sometimes mercurial billionaires. Could a mere word from Musk ground the nation? Could a stroke of a Trump Sharpie similarly hobble SpaceX? The short answer in both cases is maybe, but not likely. There's no overstating just how central SpaceX has become in the space sector in the 23 years since it was founded as the Space Exploration Technologies Corporation. Since the inaugural flight of the company's Falcon 9 in 2010, the rocket has become the world's workhorse vehicle for rides to orbit, with 485 completed missions, including 440 acrobatic landings of its reusable first stage. The rocket and its Dragon spacecraft provide regular service to the International Space Station (ISS), carrying crews up and down, and ferrying cargo and supplies aboard uncrewed Dragons. In 2024, the company's larger Falcon Heavy launched NASA's Europa Clipper spacecraft to Jupiter's moon Europa. It is set to launch the ambitious Nancy Grace Roman Telescope in May 2027. The working relationship between SpaceX and the government is by no means limited to NASA. In April, as Ars Technica reports, the U.S. Space Force awarded the company a $5.9 billion contract, making SpaceX the leading provider of launch services for Pentagon satellites. The military is also a major customer of SpaceX's Starlink satellite constellation, with 50 military commands now using the orbiting Internet service, according to Defense News. 'We have $22 billion in government contracts,' said Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's president and COO, in a live streamed public panel last year. 'We earned that. We bid it, we were the lowest price, best bidder, we won and we execute.' If anything, the company is going to have the opportunity to execute still more, reinforcing the ties between SpaceX and the government. In 2021, NASA selected SpaceX's still-in-development Starship rocket to serve as the lander that is planned to carry American astronauts down from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon sometime before the end of the decade. In 2024, the space agency tapped SpaceX to build the vehicle that will nudge the ISS out of orbit when the program ends in 2030. And in May, Trump's so-called skinny budget called for NASA to cancel its over-budget and behind-schedule Space Launch System, the 21st century answer to the 1960s' Saturn V moon rocket, leaving Starship as the likeliest successor. Meantime, while Boeing's Starliner spacecraft was supposed to be joining Dragon in providing rides to the ISS—taking a share of the launch business revenue from SpaceX—Starliner famously failed in its inaugural flight last year. This left astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams stranded aboard the station for 8 months, on a mission that was supposed to last merely eight days. Similarly, Blue Origin, the rocket company founded by Musk's fellow mega-billionaire Jeff Bezos, was expected to provide some launch-service competition for SpaceX, but the company has managed just one, only partially successful orbital launch of its New Glenn rocket, in January 2025, and has limited most of its activity to flying popgun suborbital missions for wealthy space tourists. 'It's not a planned monopoly,' said Shotwell in the live stream. 'If our competitors could get it together…' All of this leaves SpaceX and the government mutually interdependent, with Washington counting on the company to provide services no one else currently can, and the company happy for the paying work. That's not to say neither one could foul the joint nest. Trump's nomination of private astronaut and Musk friend Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator was widely seen as a sign of Musk's influence on the president—and Trump's decision on May 31 to pull the nomination was similarly seen as the first sign of the rift between Musk and Trump. But the president has made no other moves against Musk-world, and Musk's decision to delete his provocative post on X may have cooled tempers on both sides. SpaceX investors and other customers may serve as a brake on Musk's worst tendencies, and lawmakers from space-heavy states including California, Texas, and Florida may similarly restrain Trump. None of this says that neither man is beyond acting against his own—and his government's or his company's—best interests. The scorpion in the venerable fable famously stung the frog that was its only ride across the river—explaining before they both sank and drowned that 'it's in my nature.' Trump's and Musk's natures have always been impulsive. The space and defense sectors can only hope the two men show some restraint now. Write to Jeffrey Kluger at