logo
Trump cuts come for Kansas City arts community: A ‘dangerous departure'

Trump cuts come for Kansas City arts community: A ‘dangerous departure'

Yahoo2 days ago

Juan Diego Gaucin, an oil painter, moved around his studio on Wednesday afternoon as he prepared for an exhibition at the Mexican Consulate in Kansas City. A few doors down, Erin Dodson showed off a jar of dye made from a walnut tree she's been using to draw.
Gaucin and Dodson both hold two-year residencies at Charlotte Street Foundation, a Kansas City-based organization that supports contemporary artists across the metro. They're one of 30 artists with residences at any given time, a distinction that affords them studio space and a built-in community of fellow artists.
President Donald Trump's administration in early May terminated grants to Charlotte Street and a host of other groups across the country awarded by the National Endowment for the Arts, or NEA. Charlotte Street lost $25,000 in federal support that helps fund residencies like the ones enjoyed by Gaucin and Dodson and other aid for area artists.
The residency has been an 'enormous blessing for me,' Dodson said, adding that she estimates renting similar studio space would cost $600 a month. But the space itself isn't the only value of the residency.
'It's not the square footage, it's all the other stuff that's in here – being with all the other artists and all the programs and galleries,' Dodson said.
NEA grant cuts threaten to tear at Kansas City's arts and culture community, where federal support plays a vital role.
While no single list of cuts exists, ArtsKC, which aids arts organizations, estimates the region lost potentially $300,000 to $400,000 in reimbursable NEA grants, according to president and CEO Dana Knapp. She cautioned that the actual financial impact may be different because some organizations were able to successfully invoice costs before their grants were pulled.
The NEA cuts also come after the National Endowment for the Humanities has made reductions, along with the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
'Those three agencies really are at the heart of ensuring our arts, culture heritage is both preserved and celebrated,' Knapp said. 'And so the removal of those three agencies, either partially or wholly, moving forward, will be utterly devastating.'
Charlotte Street and arts organizations across the country began receiving emails on May 2 from NEA informing them that their grants had been cancelled. The emails appeared to contain similar messages, with each saying the endowment was 'updating its grantmaking policy priorities to focus funding on projects that reflect the nation's rich artistic heritage and creativity as prioritized by the President.'
Trump's budget proposal calls for eliminating the NEA, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which has provided funding to the World War I Museum, the Kansas City Public Library and other local cultural institutions. He also supported eliminating the NEA and NEH during his first term.
A White House document outlining the proposed agency eliminations calls the plans 'consistent with the President's efforts to decrease the size of the Federal Government to enhance accountability, reduce waste, and reduce unnecessary governmental entities.'
NEA, created by Congress in 1965, receives about $180 million in funding each year and distributes about 80% of that amount in grants and awards to organizations and individuals. The agency represents a minuscule percentage of the federal budget, about 0.003%.
But the grants play an outsize role in holding up arts communities in Kansas City and across the nation. The funding often serves as a key starting point for artists and arts organizations, allowing them to draw matching funds from private donors. An NEA grant can lend credibility to a project or group.
'One could say that if the NEA is defunded, let's just say next year, theoretically it could have a far greater impact on the ability for arts and culture organizations to fund their programming and their operations well beyond the actual dollar amount afforded by the federal government,' Knapp said.
At Charlotte Street, located on Wyoming Street near Southwest Boulevard, the foundation's leaders weighed how to respond to the NEA cut. The organization appealed the decision, but it also decided to speak publicly.
It posted a statement from interim executive director Lane Czaplinski calling the decision to rescind the grant a 'dangerous departure from long-standing public cultural policy.'
'It was the kind of action that trades principle for showmanship, and public service for political gain,' Czaplinski wrote.
The withdrawn grant helped fund Charlotte Street's residency and studio programs, along with support for up-and-coming arts organizations by paying rent and utilities for those groups. Amanda Middaugh, co-executive director, said NEA's email came with few specifics and felt like a 'brush off' to organizations.
While $25,000 may appear like a modest sum for an established organization like Charlotte Street, Middaugh said it's actually 'really huge.' The loss directly affects artists, but beyond the grant's monetary value, Charlotte Street's ability to demonstrate that it enjoys support at the federal level has been important, she said.
'The NEA supports so many organizations across the country that we know that this is just the start,' Middaugh said. 'Directly, we've received this cancellation, but we will all be feeling the effects for a long time.'
Charlotte Street's connection to individual artists becomes clear moments after entering its headquarters. A gallery show, Geometrica Pop y Rucas, that explores 'the social parallels of midwestern and generational Latine identity' runs until June 14. A library that doubles as a shared working space houses a variety of books focused on the arts in Kansas City.
Studios also accommodate a variety of artists and performers, including musicians and dancers.
When The Star visited Wednesday afternoon, Charlotte Street residents Gaucin and Dodson had their doors open, giving a peek into their workspaces (while the residencies offer workspace, the residents don't live at Charlotte Street).
Inside Gaucin's studio, at least 10 paintings hung or sat in the room. After immigrating to the United States early in life, Gaucin is drawn to work exploring the hardships of migrants in general and the Latino community in particular, according to a Charlotte Street bio.
Gaucin said his work, which will be on display in early June at the Mexican Consulate, will be a 'little bit more pointed.' Current events over the last few months have influenced his work, he said, as Trump aims to carry out mass deportations.
If the Charlotte Street residency hadn't been available, Gaucin said he likely wouldn't have secured the consulate show or been able to have his work displayed at the Nelson Museum of Art. He said he would probably still be teaching.
'My goal here was to get some shows, push out a lot of work and kind of help establish myself in the Kansas City area and I feel like I've accomplished those goals,' Gaucin said.
In a nearby studio, Dodson worked on a painting – bright yellow on a white canvas – that rested on top of a table. She spoke about the dye she had made from a walnut tree next to Charlotte Street.
'All winter I made drawings just from this,' Dodson said. She's now moved on to mixing it with other colors. The walnut dye offers a way to try to make something related to the location, while using garden and nature-related imagery.
Dodson expressed gratitude for the residency. 'I almost think this is the biggest financial opportunity, just because of how much it costs to rent your own studio in the city,' she said.
Charlotte Street hopes to attract more individual donors and location foundations to help fill funding gaps – both for it and others, Middaugh said. But she emphasized that funding diversity is important for every nonprofit.
'When we're losing this source of federal funding, it really does impact the whole ecology of our funding,' Middaugh said.
Knapp, the ArtsKC president and CEO, said private and local funding cannot simply fill the gap of federal cuts. While the Kansas City arts community enjoys strong private individual and foundation funding, the burden can't wholly fall to private donors, she said.
Echoing Middaugh, Knapp stressed the importance of balanced financial support – from private foundations, businesses and corporations, local governments and others. A diverse mix helps ensure funding and intent 'is democratized across our community,' she said.
Additionally, other areas like health care, immigration and food access that receive private funding have also been hit or could be hit by federal cuts. That, in turn, forces private funders to potentially make difficult decisions about where to allocate limited dollars.
Knapp, who has worked in the arts since the late 1980s, said she's never witnessed anything quite like the current moment.
'This is, frankly, the most kind of systematic degradation of the support of arts, culture and heritage across the U.S. that I've really seen,' Knapp said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Mexico appeals court rejects lawsuit against oil and gas regulators
New Mexico appeals court rejects lawsuit against oil and gas regulators

Associated Press

time40 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

New Mexico appeals court rejects lawsuit against oil and gas regulators

SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — A New Mexico appeals court rejected a lawsuit alleging that the nation's No. 2 oil-producing state failed to meet constitutional provisions for protecting against oil and gas industry pollution, in an opinion Tuesday. Environmental advocates vowed to appeal the matter to the state's top court. A panel of three judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals found that it was beyond the judiciary's authority to weigh whether the pollution controls are adequate, writing that they'll defer to the Legislature to balance the benefits of environmental regulation with natural resources development. The 2023 lawsuit from a coalition of environmental groups was the first to invoke the constitution's pollution-control clause, a 1971 amendment requiring that New Mexico prevent the contamination of air, water and other natural resources. 'While plaintiffs correctly observe that, as the 'Land of Enchantment,' the state's beauty is central to our identity, we cannot ignore the long history of permitting oil and gas extraction within our borders,' the panel wrote, invoking the state motto. 'If anything, the law, history, and tradition of our state demonstrates that resource extraction must be considered alongside, and must coexist with, pollution control legislation.' Gail Evans, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity and lead counsel on the case, said Tuesday's opinion would dismiss the case entirely if unchallenged and 'displays a fundamental misunderstanding of our constitution and constitutional rights.' She said plaintiffs intent to appeal to the state Supreme Court. 'Fifty years ago, New Mexico voted to amend the constitution and to provide protections from industry pollution and the court has found today that the amendment — the pollution control clause — is essentially meaningless, and that has to be wrong,' Evans said. The court challenge comes as New Mexico's state government rides a wave of record income from development in the Permian Basin, one of the world's most productive, oil-producing regions. Oil-related revenue collections underwrite a considerable amount of the state's budget, including public education. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's administration is policing the industry with regulations that target methane and other emissions. But the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups say these efforts are not enough and that the state is failing to enforce existing pollution-control measures. Attorneys for the Democratic-led Legislature and environmental regulators said the lawsuit threatened their constitutional authority. Appeals Judge Katherine Wray issued an additional concurring opinion, expressing further limitations of the pollution control clause.

Great tablet deals from Apple and Amazon!
Great tablet deals from Apple and Amazon!

Android Authority

time40 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Great tablet deals from Apple and Amazon!

Are you thinking of getting a tablet that is good but won't break the bank? My two favorite picks in the budget tier category are the Apple iPad A16 and the Amazon Fire Max 11. Both are on sale today, making them even more affordable! Get the Apple iPad A16 for $299 ($50 off) Get the Amazon Fire Max 11 for $174.99 ($55 off) These offers both come from Amazon. The Apple iPad A16 is available in four colors: Blue, Pink, Silver, and Yellow. All color versions are discounted equally. Apple iPad A16 If you want something more capable and much more mainstream, the Apple iPad A16 strikes the perfect balance. It's more than good enough for most users, but the price stays very reasonable. I can confidently say it offers the best value in the world of tablets. While this is technically Apple's 'lower-end tablet,' you wouldn't assume this if you didn't know its price. It looks, feels, and performs pretty much like a higher-end pad, offering an outstanding experience. I would recommend this one at full price, so the $50 discount is a really tasty cherry on top. As the name implies, this iPad has an upgraded Apple A16 chipset. It also features 4GB of RAM. While that may not sound too exciting, I can tell you it will be more than good enough for most apps and games. I use the 10th-generation iPad and have yet to see it slow down, so this one should do even better! The only downside here is that this iPad won't get Apple Intelligence. That requires an Apple A17 Pro chipset. The design is nearly identical to that of the previous generation iPad. It even has the same 9.79 x 7.07 x 0.28in dimensions, as well as an identical 1.05lbs weight! Honestly, you'll have a hard time telling them apart side to side. Another nice benefit is that the Apple iPad A16 gets twice the base storage at 128GB, as opposed to 64GB on the previous version. That means you'll be able to store twice as many apps, files, photos, and more. This is great news because we know many of you believe 64GB is too little for today's standards. The display is nearly the same, but there is technically an ever-so-slight upgrade here. This iPad display measures in at 11 inches, instead of the 10.9-inch screen in the Apple iPad 10th Generation. That said, the 0.1-inch difference is really negligible. Regardless, the definition is 2,360 x 1,640, so it's pretty sharp. If you're into hand-written notes or drawing, the Apple iPad A16 also supports both the Apple Pencil USB-C and the Apple Pencil First Generation. Battery life is pretty nice, too, at about 10 hours per charge. Amazon Fire Max 11 Amazon Fire Max 11 Amazon Fire Max 11 Competing with the big dogs in the tablet market Amazon has been in the tablet game for years, but the Fire Max 11 might be their first tablet to truly compete in the 11-inch tablet segment. A high-resolution display is backed by big battery life and enough storage for all of your apps and games. See price at Amazon Save $55.00 Limited Time Deal! The Apple iPad A16 is excellent, but it isn't for everyone. Maybe you want to spend even less, if the tablet is for a kid, or a very casual user. If I were to recommend a cheaper tablet, I would say go for the Amazon Fire Max 11. It's the best tablet Amazon has to offer, and you can currently get it for just $174.99. The Amazon Fire Max 11 is great if you want something to watch movies, do some general browsing, or even play some games! IT has a large 11-inch screen, and the resolution is actually quite nice at 2,000 x 1,200. The stereo speakers are also pretty decent. Amazon That said, most of the tablet is more modest. It has a MediaTek MT8188J octa-core processor and 4GB of RAM. Nothing impressive, but it can handle casual tasks just fine. Despite its much lower price, it still has some cool features, like a fingerprint reader and a 14-hour battery life. If you want to improve the experience, you can even get an optional keyboard case and a stylus. This turns it into a bit of a powerhouse for anyone who wants to work on documents, browse the web, draft emails, take notes, or even draw. Are you getting one of these? Make sure to act quickly! We don't know how long these offers will stick around. And if you need some alternatives, here is our list of the best Android tablets.

Business leaders must prioritize employee well-being
Business leaders must prioritize employee well-being

Fast Company

time43 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Business leaders must prioritize employee well-being

As I've been watching deep cuts unfold across the federal government and nonprofit sectors, I can't help but feel deeply sad for the work that is at risk or has been cancelled, the knowledge that will be lost, and for the people who did the work. I know firsthand what it means to be on both sides of the equation. I've been the leader tasked with executing layoffs, and I've also been the one laid off. Both experiences gutted me. They made me reflect on what leadership really means and what we should be measuring when we define success. The problem is that we often gauge success by revenue, efficiency, and productivity while completely overlooking a key factor:the well-being of the people doing the work. A 2024 Gallup report revealed that only 21% of employees strongly agree that their organization cares about their overall well-being. While I agree that there are inefficiencies in every bureaucracy and organization, leaders have a responsibility to balance financial performance with other measures of success. At Catapult Design, a social impact design firm, we've made well-being a non-negotiable metric—on equal footing with financial performance and creative excellence. Because if an organization's work is meant to improve lives—whether in social innovation, government services, or private enterprise—how can we ignore what's happening inside our own walls? Well-being is the missing metric I worked at one consultancy that had indicators for measuring the quality of work and the financial health of the company. I thought that was amazing. It really kept the company on track because both were reported quarterly. The work was consistently good by many measures, and the company was very healthy from a financial perspective. When I left there to take a CEO position, I suggested to my new board that we measure the quality of our work and financial health but also add another indicator around team well-being. At first, this was around ensuring that we had the best benefits that a small business could offer. We were thoughtful around vacation time, sick leave, training days, and professional and personal stipends. But over time, we realized that well-being isn't just about benefits or hours worked—it's about how people experience their work. We started paying closer attention to overwork—not as the cause of burnout, but as an early signal. Research shows that burnout is less about working too many hours and more about things like lack of clarity, autonomy, or alignment with values. Still, sustained overwork often points to deeper systemic issues. We use it as a 'check engine' light of the well-being of the team. That's why we've built a practice that if anyone is consistently working more than 45 hours a week, they message me directly. Then we talk about why. Is it a broken process? Poorly scoped projects? Is someone quietly drowning? We bring those issues to the board and leadership meetings, treating them as seriously as financial projections. As we've deepened our approach to well-being, we've also learned it's shaped just as much by leadership behavior as by organizational policy. A few months ago, my team asked to formally review me. Their feedback was honest, thoughtful, and generous. One thing they shared was that when something seems obvious to me, I tend to move forward without discussion. But what's clear to me isn't always clear to others—and they wanted more transparency and space for shared decision making. That feedback was a gift. One small but meaningful change I made was to begin sharing my weekly board emails with the entire team. It's helped remove ambiguity and reduce stress about what's happening behind the scenes. We all know at Catapult Design that we are not immune to what is happening in the U.S. government right now. While I'm happy to see efforts for efficiency in financial performance, I worry about what's being lost in the process. As budgets shrink and priorities shift, how will the quality of government services be measured? And what happens to the well-being of those providing—and relying on—those services if we fail to track what really matters? 4 ways to prioritize employee well-being Prioritizing well-being isn't just a leadership philosophy; it's a strategic decision. We're always refining what this looks like, but here's how organizations can make it real: Make well-being a key performance indicator. Measure engagement, workload balance, and psychological safety as rigorously as revenue. Normalize feedback loops. If leaders aren't being reviewed by their teams, they're missing critical data about what's working (and what's not). Recalibrate workloads. If overwork is the norm, the problem isn't employees—it's leadership. Project scoping must align with reality, not just ambition. Champion transparency. When teams understand the organization's financial health and strategic direction, they feel more invested—and less anxious. Well-being matters more than ever We're in a moment of reckoning. Layoffs are making headlines across industries—from tech to media to government—and many organizations are under pressure to do more with less. It's not surprising that burnout and questions about leadership are surfacing more often in the process. In a world where talent is mobile and exhaustion is widespread, the best organizations won't just be those that survive financially—they'll be the ones that create workplaces where people want to stay, grow, and thrive. I've learned the hard way that leadership isn't about having all the answers. But I do wonder, if we don't prioritize the people who make the work possible, will anything else matter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store