North Korean human rights a global issue, speakers tell U.N. General Assembly
May 21 (UPI) -- Activists, officials and defectors highlighted North Korean human rights violations at a high-level meeting of the United Nations General Assembly Tuesday, with many directly tying Pyongyang's systemic abuses to its growing nuclear weapons and missile programs.
The meeting on the North's human rights violations, the first of its kind held at the General Assembly, featured testimonies by two escapees who shared harrowing stories of oppression and implored the world to hold North Korean leader Kim Jong Un accountable.
"Silence is complicity," said Kim Eun-joo, who was 11 years old when she fled with her mother and sister in 1999 to escape starvation in rural North Korea.
After crossing the Tumen River into China, Kim and her family faced years of human trafficking before finally making it to South Korea.
She pointed to North Korea's military cooperation with Russia, particularly its deployment of troops to aid Moscow in its war against Ukraine, as a "new kind of modern-day slavery."
"[The soldiers] have no idea where they are, whom they are fighting against or why," she said. "Their lives have become a means for the Kim Jong Un regime to make money."
Pyongyang has deployed around 15,000 troops to Russia, Seoul's spy agency said last month. Some 600 of the soldiers have been killed and another 4,100 injured, the National Intelligence Service told lawmakers in a briefing.
Seoul and Washington also accused North Korea of supplying artillery and missiles to Russia. In exchange, Pyongyang is believed to be receiving much-needed financial support and advanced military technology for its own weapons programs.
Participants in the U.N. meeting highlighted the close link between North Korea's human rights abuses and the regime's growing arsenal.
"The regime preserves itself through producing nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles," Greg Scarlatoiu, president and CEO of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, said.
"North Korea is no longer just a Korean Peninsula threat. The DPRK is no longer just a Northeast Asian threat," Scarlatoiu said.
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea is the official name of North Korea.
"The DPRK is exporting instability to the Middle East and to Europe," Scarlatoiu said. "And the root cause of this is the human rights violations that the DPRK perpetrates."
North Korean Ambassador to the United Nations Kim Song condemned the meeting, calling it a "burlesque of intrigue and fabrication" staged by "hostile forces" including the United States.
Kim also slammed the invitation of the North Korean escapees, calling them "the scum of the earth who don't even care about their parents and families."
Elizabeth Salmon, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on human rights in North Korea, told the General Assembly that North Korea has diverted resources toward militarization at the expense of human rights and basic necessities such as food, healthcare and sanitation.
"As the DPRK expands its extreme militarization policies, it exacerbates the extensive reliance on forced labor and quota systems, showing how peace, security and human rights are strongly interrelated," Salmon said.
She added that North Korea's border closures at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2020 worsened its human rights situation, as Pyongyang used the isolation to enact brutal new laws restricting access to information from the outside world.
A 2014 landmark U.N. Commission of Inquiry report documented North Korean crimes against humanity, including torture, rape, execution, deliberate starvation and forced labor, that were "without parallel in the contemporary world."
South Korean Ambassador to the United Nations Hwang Joon-kook echoed calls to more closely tie North Korea's human rights violations to its nuclear ambitions, which he said were "deeply interconnected."
"For far too long the DPRK's human rights violations have been overshadowed by its nuclear threats," he said. "Their nuclear program is sustained by systemic repression, forced labor, diverted national resources and total control of its people."
Hwang called North Korea "a real-life version of George Orwell's novel 1984."
"However, the DPRK's horrendous crimes do not stop at the border," he said. "If human rights violations are stopped, nuclear weapons development will also stop."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Agencies instructed to withhold funds on top of 5% budget cuts
Agencies were told that the 5% of funding in reserves "are unlikely to be released" on top of earlier budget cuts. (Getty Images) The Braun administration has directed agencies to withhold 5% of their funds from specific budget line items — rather than allowing department heads to identify areas for reserves. This is in addition to appropriation cuts already enacted in the state budget passed in April. In previous years, the Office of Budget and Management traditionally directed agencies to reserve funds but gave agency leaders more discretion in how to achieve the savings. The change appears to stem from a General Assembly addition to the 2025 budget, rather than Gov. Mike Braun. 'For the first time in recent memory, nearly every agency across all three branches of government finds itself entering the first year of a new biennium with fewer resources than it had the year before,' reads a letter from OMB director Chad Ranney dated June 2. 'At the same time, the costs for the state's major programs continue to increase at unsustainable rates. Overcoming these challenges will require each of us to place a renewed focus on fiscal responsibility as well as collective commitment to budget discipline.' The letter goes on to say that 'the amounts withheld are unlikely to be released,' meaning that agencies might need to operate with essentially a 10% budget cut. Ranney asks agencies to identify areas that could be targets for reversions, or mid-year transfers from fund to fund. Such moves were popular prior to COVID-19, when the federal government sent billions to states to avert economic disaster. That state is projected to maintain between $2.25-2.5 billion in reserves throughout the biennium. Budget line items run the gamut from the governor's office and residence to the Indiana State Fair Commission. Even agencies that got a slim budget boost in the 2025 budget — the Department of Correction and the Department of Child Services — were directed to reserve funds related to salaries and general operating funds. Braun defends IU trustee removals, appointees Those agencies were allocated scarce budget dollars due to a shortfall of funds for local jails holding state inmates and increased child caseloads. The state's higher education institutions also weren't spared. Indiana University, Purdue University, Indiana State University, the University of Southern Indiana, Ball State University and Vincennes University all will have funds held back, including specific cuts to satellite campuses. That's on top of lawmakers cutting their appropriations in the two-year budget beginning July 1. The directive follows a grim revenue forecast earlier this year that projected the state would have $2 billion less to spend in the next two-year budget, prompting lawmakers to institute 5% agency cuts largely across the board. The budget bill included another provision, instructing the state's budget director 'to withhold not less than 5% of any appropriation to a state agency to be used for salaries or other wages for state agency employees or general operating expenses of the state agency.' Agency plans are due to the Office of Management and Budget by the end of the month. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Political violence returns to Colombia
SANTIAGO, Chile, June 9 (UPI) -- An assassination attempt on presidential candidate Sen. Miguel Uribe Turbay has shaken Colombia, reviving painful memories of the political violence that has scarred the nation. In the 1980s and 1990s, Colombia endured one of the most violent periods in its recent history, marked by drug trafficking, internal armed conflict and political repression. Dozens of politicians, candidates and social leaders were killed during that time. The attack occurred Friday during a campaign event in Bogotá, where a 15-year-old gunman allegedly shot Uribe Turbay six times, leaving him in critical condition. According to the latest reports, Uribe Turbay survived a complex surgery, but remains in critical condition. When the attack occurred, he was leading the polls to become the sole right-wing candidate in the May 2026 presidential election. Uribe Turbay is the grandson of former President Julio César Turbay. His mother, Diana Turbay Quintero, a Colombian journalist and attorney, was kidnapped on Aug. 30, 1990, by the Medellin cartel group led by Pablo Escobar. She died during a failed rescue operation in Medellín on Jan. 25, 1991. President Gustavo Petro called the attack on Uribe Turbay "a day of sorrow for the nation" and pledged a full investigation to determine what happened and identify those responsible. Reports by the National Center for Historical Memory, the Truth Commission and the Center for Research and Popular Education estimate that between 5,000 and 6,000 political and social leaders were killed in Colombia between 1985 and 2002. At least 500 of them were elected officials or candidates for public office. The country has seen the assassinations of four presidential candidates. On Oct. 11, 1987, attorney and Patriotic Union leader Jaime Pardo Leal was assassinated. On Aug. 18, 1989, Luis Carlos Galán Sarmiento was killed in one of the most notorious political assassinations in Colombia's history. A vocal opponent of drug trafficking, Galán was shot while speaking at a campaign rally in Soacha, Cundinamarca. He had been widely viewed as the front-runner in the 1990 presidential election. His murder was attributed to Pablo Escobar and the drug cartels. Then, Bernardo Jaramillo Ossa was assassinated on March 22, 1990, at Bogotá's El Dorado International Airport. On April 26 that year, Carlos Pizarro Leongómez -- a presidential candidate and former commander of the M-19 guerrilla movement -- was killed aboard a commercial flight, shortly after signing a peace agreement. The Patriotic Union, formed after peace talks between the government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, a Marxist guerrilla group, suffered the highest toll from political violence. Between 1984 and 2000, more than 4,000 of its members -- including local government officials, mayors, lawmakers, community leaders and two presidential candidates -- were killed by paramilitary groups, drug cartels and state actors, according to multiple investigations. The killings have been described as political genocide and a defining case of violence against democracy in Colombia. The attack on Uribe Turbay drew widespread condemnation from across Colombia's political spectrum and sparked a wave of national and international solidarity. Opposition leaders, including former President Álvaro Uribe and lawmakers from his party, called for urgent measures to protect political candidates. International figures -- including U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and officials from Spain, Chile, Ecuador and Venezuela -- denounced the attack and expressed support. Thousands of Colombians gathered in Bogotá for marches and vigils, demanding political peace and the protection of democratic processes.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director
June 9 (UPI) -- Hundreds of scientists via the National Institute of Health signed a published letter in protest to NIH leadership and recent cuts by the Trump administration. "We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political moment over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources," more than 300 scientists wrote Monday to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya in a so-called "Bethesda Declaration" published by Stand Up For Science in rebuke to Trump administration research funding cuts and staff layoffs. They added in the letter to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress overseeing NIH that they "dissent" to Trump's policies that "undermine" the NIH mission, "waste" public resources and harm "the health of Americans and people across the globe." In the open letter, they said the current endeavor to "Make America Healthy Again" referred to "some undefined time in the past." "Keeping NIH at the forefront of biomedical research requires our stalwart commitment to continuous improvement," the letter's writers said, adding that the life-and-death nature of NIH work "demands that changes be thoughtful and vetted." According to the letter, the Trump administration terminated at least 2,100 NIH research grants since January, totaling around $9.5 billion and contracts representing some $2.6 billion in new research. "We urge you as NIH Director to restore grants delayed or terminated for political reasons so that life-saving science can continue," the letter added in part. "This undercuts long-standing NIH policies designed to maximize return on investment by working with grantees to address concerns and complete studies," it said. It further accused the White House of creating a "culture of fear and suppression" among NIH researchers. Bhattacharya, a Stanford University professor and health researcher, called the agency the "crown jewel of American biomedical sciences" and said he had the "utmost respect" for its scientists and mission during his confirmation hearing in March. On Tuesday, Bhattacharya is scheduled to testify before the Senate's Appropriations Committee on Trump's 2026 NIH budget proposal which seeks to cut roughly 40% of NIH's $48 billion budget. "This spending slowdown reflects a failure of your legal duty to use congressionally-appropriated funds for critical NIH research," the scientists penned to Bhattacharya. The letter goes on to characterize it as "dissent" from Trump administration policy, quoting Bhattacharya during his confirmation as saying "dissent is the very essence of science." "Standing up in this way is a risk, but I am much more worried about the risks of not speaking up," says Jenna Norton, a program officer at the NIH's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. "If we don't speak up, we allow continued harm to research participants and public health in America and across the globe," Norton said in a statement, adding that if others don't speak up, "we allow our government to curtail free speech, a fundamental American value."