logo
‘Take away this pain': Families speak on proposed Nebraska medical cannabis regulations

‘Take away this pain': Families speak on proposed Nebraska medical cannabis regulations

Yahoo09-05-2025

Nebraska advocates for medical cannabis have worked for more than 12 years, and continue to wait, for a safe, regulated system in Nebraska, after winning voter approval in November. Pictured are many longtime advocates for the effort. (Photos courtesy of Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana)
LINCOLN — At just 7 years old, Teddy Bronson of Omaha has faced six brain surgeries, been prescribed 14 different drugs and used about half a million dollars in medical hardware to fight his drug-resistant epilepsy that at one time had him enduring an average of 3,800 seizures each month.
Matt Bronson, a disabled U.S. Air Force veteran, and Liz Bronson, a nurse practitioner at Children's Nebraska, say that each day is a fight for their 'beautiful little son,' Teddy, including any measures possible to reduce his seizures. That included a groundbreaking half-day neurosurgery at Children's just a few years ago with a robotic surgical assistant.
At a public forum this weekend for medical cannabis regulations, which the Bronsons say could help ease Teddy's pain, Matt Bronson said his son is at 85% higher risk of losing his life each night. But each morning, Liz and Matt greet their son.
'I get to see my son smile, I get to hear him babble, and damn it, he is seven and a half years old and he's walking,' Matt Bronson told an often raucous, cheering public forum crowd in Omaha on May 4. 'Three years ago, he was in a wheelchair.'
Data shows Teddy is improving, 'but any seizure can take him,' Liz Bronson said. Quoting the family's California-based epileptologist, Liz Bronson said, 'We can either pass evidence-based, well-regulated legislation, or we can sign more death certificates.'
'We come here before you today to say that, 'I'm sorry, but Teddy matters,' and that our family matters and that the suffering individuals in this state matter,' Liz Bronson said.
In a more than decade-long fight for medical cannabis in Nebraska, through three election cycles, numerous legislative bills and multiple court fights, the Bronsons are among those who have consistently fought for access to the medicine.
Voters overwhelmingly approved legalizing medical cannabis in November. It was approved by 71% of voters, and just a slightly smaller percentage, 68%, approved the basic outlines of a regulatory system.
The Bronsons were among hundreds of Nebraskans who attended public forums May 3 in La Vista, May 4 in Omaha or May 5 in Lincoln. Most shared a similar message: Medical cannabis is legal in Nebraska, and the 'will of the voters' must be implemented.
But how the state should do so differed among the dozens of speakers who addressed a bipartisan group of 13 state senators spread between the three events on Legislative Bill 677, from State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair, a bill meant to clarify regulations. Senators estimated at least 300 attendees.
Some speakers linked the fight with legislative efforts to water down minimum wage and paid sick leave protections passed in the 2022 and 2024 statewide elections.
Others linked LB 677 to LB 316, from State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha, a priority of Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers, who has escalated his opposition to LB 677 and all products containing tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. LB 316 essentially reclassifies 'hemp' as 'marijuana.' Opponents call it a 'de facto ban' on nearly all THC or hemp products.
Hilgers said Wednesday that it was never his intention to use LB 316 against the ballot measures. Hansen is working to make explicit in Kauth's bill that it does not conflict with the ballot measures or LB 677.
Nebraska attorney general steps up medical cannabis opposition, regulatory bill awaits debate
Hilgers said his 'heart goes out' to anyone in pain who feels they can't access something they feel could alleviate the hurt. However, he said he must uphold federal laws against marijuana despite dozens of states approving medical or recreational cannabis.
'I think two plus two is four, even if everyone else says two plus two is five,' Hilgers said this week when he launched a law enforcement campaign against LB 677.
Speakers at this month's forums blasted LB 677 for its compromises, including prohibiting smoking cannabis, specifying 15 'qualifying conditions,' allowing no more than 30 medical dispensaries and requiring a patient or caregiver to pay up to $45 for a registry card under the new state regulatory system.
Among those was Ethan Stankus of Bellevue, who said that if he'd known there would be a smoking ban, conditions list or other 'needless compromises,' he would have voted 'nay.'
'This is not what we voted for,' Stankus said, holding up a breakdown of the amendment to LB 677, asking why Nebraskans needed to take time to reexplain their vote.
For Hansen and supporters, the need for the bill is complicated, illustrated, for instance, when many attendees criticized the regulations for being housed in a new Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission that shares resources and staff with the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission.
That was part of the ballot measure, partly in response to consistent opposition to medical cannabis from the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services. Across the dozens of speakers, only one, the state's former longtime state epidemiologist in DHHS, Tom Safranek, raised hesitation about the voter-approved laws, for a 'potential for societal damage.'
DHHS also opposes LB 677.
Due to constitutional constraints with ballot measures — including the need to stick to a 'single subject' — supporters were limited in what they could present to voters. Supporters of LB 677 say it would provide clearer guidance before the commission acts.
The proposal also seeks to aid a voter-enacted deadline for the commission to write the regulations, which is currently July 1. The commission, in court filings, has said the ballot measure provided 'no ability to carry out any duties' set forth in the new laws, particularly with its lack of funding.
State Sen. Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue, chair of the Legislature's General Affairs Committee, who worked with Hansen on the bill, said Sunday there is 'no way' the measure's required regulations can be completed in time.
LB 677 seeks to delay the required regulations by three months, while also more explicitly setting the parameters of the new regulatory system. The voter-passed laws' wide flexibility to let the commission draft all regulations could end up with a system stricter than LB 677 proposes.
For instance, one of the governor-appointed members, Lorelle Mueting of Omaha's Heartland Family Service, said in an online comment against a separate LB 705 this year that her agency does not support legalizing marijuana 'in any form for medical purposes' without federal approval.
Mueting opposed LB 677 at its hearing.
Hansen said the time is right 'to get off our butts' and unite Democrats and Republicans and reach the 33-vote threshold needed to pass LB 677 and help Nebraskans.
The system needs to start right and show 'the world hasn't ended,' Hansen said. 'Everyone's not dying. People aren't smoking doobies on the corner like a lot of my conservatives think.'
'We're not going to eat 100% of the apple,' Hansen said Saturday of the efforts. 'We get 75%, 80%, make sure the people who need it, you get it.'
Marie Reed of Blair, one of Hansen's constituents, spoke of her 12-year-old son Kyler, who has epilepsy and takes six medications a day. Since 2019, the family has prepared to use a rescue medication for Kyler, a controlled substance, if Kyler's seizures last more than five minutes.
'You don't ever get it until you're in that situation,' Reed, who worked on the recent cannabis ballot measures, said. 'One day, somebody you love might have epilepsy or cancer, and I think that if you truly think about it, you will realize you wish that you could have this to give to your loved one and not keep fighting for it.'
While tense at times, the weekend also brought moments of levity, such as Shannon Coryell of Omaha, a self-described 'bleeding heart liberal' who said that 'pigs must be flying' because she agreed with Hansen, a Republican with a Libertarian bent.
Tom Becka, a former host on conservative talk radio in Omaha and a longtime broadcaster, spoke to Hilgers and Ricketts, saying that the movie-musical 'Reefer Madness' wasn't a 'documentary.'
'More people have died from the onions on the McDonald's hamburger than have died from medical cannabis,' Becka said to a laughing crowd.
No deaths from overdoses of marijuana have been reported, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, though some edibles have led to an increasing number of emergency room visits.
Multiple Nebraskans also encouraged lawmakers to act quickly, as some patients who could have gotten help or tested out the medication have died in 12 years of legislative waiting.
Jill Hessing of Lincoln spoke of her mother, an open-minded Republican and licensed practical nurse who died of cancer in 2006. While some speakers said they would just go to Missouri for marijuana anyway, Hessing said that wouldn't be the case for her mother, a 'kind, compassionate, law-abiding woman.'
Lia Post of Springfield read a written letter Monday on behalf of her friend Angie Cornett of Norfolk, who missed the meeting to bury her mother.
Cornett, a nurse, wrote that her mom endured severe and chronic pain for decades. When she tried cannabis for the first time 25 years ago, at age 50, it eliminated the severe burning pain in her feet caused by severe nerve damage from her back and apathy from diabetes.
Cornett said her mom described the new pain relief as 'stepping on cold slushy watermelon.'
A 'cocktail' of addictive pain relief medications was part of her mom's medical regimen, Cornett said, adding she couldn't help but wonder how her mom's life could have changed with medical cannabis.
'She knew exactly what she was voting for, and as I bury my mom today, I want you to know that she is just one of many patients who have died waiting for the right to access plant-based medicines in Nebraska and access to a God-given plant that was used medicinally since the ancient times,' Cornett wrote Monday.
Post, a frequent medical cannabis advocate at the Nebraska State Capitol, said she is one of a handful of longtime advocates who have been told by lawmakers to mind their interactions and cool frustrations or methods of advocacy, such as Post telling Republicans that patients are dying.
Even so, Post said the roadblocks won't make her back down from a disease — complex regional pain syndrome — that will one day take her life.
'Fight for us. Fight like our lives matter,' Post said Saturday. 'None of you are God, and you do not deserve to play God in this anymore.'
Dominic and Shelley Gillen of Bellevue have been in the fight for 12 years, similar to the Bronsons, for their now 23-year-old son Will, who similarly has a severe form of drug-resistant epilepsy and is referred to by friends and family as 'God's Will.'
In that time, Dominic Gillen estimated, his son has faced more than 450,000 seizures and 'a body littered with scars.'
Dominic Gillen said he considers Hilgers' efforts against the medical cannabis campaign and its many volunteers, patients and caregivers, the type of 'lawfare' that Republicans lamented under former President Joe Biden. At each event, Gillen told senators to see the patients, 'not look through them.'
'Will has never spoken a word, but he's touched countless lives in this state and other states through his story,' Dominic Gillen said. 'Will is truly the greatest of blessings. He's perfect even in his imperfection.'
Hansen, too, urged Nebraskans to share their stories and photos with lawmakers, particularly Republicans. 'Out of curiosity,' he asked Sunday whether those in attendance would support recreational marijuana if LB 677 failed and the regulations became too restrictive.
Nearly everyone raised their hands. Hansen said he's telling his colleagues to pass LB 677 and regulate medical cannabis, or the voters will end up legalizing recreational marijuana. Hilgers and other opponents of medical cannabis and recreational marijuana have said LB 677 would open the door to recreational use already.
Court battles continue in front of the Nebraska Supreme Court and in courts in Hall County, against a notary, and Lancaster County. The Nebraska Attorney General's Office has argued the laws are preempted by federal law and threatened to sue the Medical Cannabis Commission if it issues dispensary licenses.
Notaries targeted in those cases have pledged innocence, including Jacy Todd of York, a notary who faces first-of-their-kind criminal charges in Grand Island. None of the four notaries targeted in the case before the Nebraska Supreme Court has been criminally charged, though a lower-court judge tossed some of their signatures. Hilgers said the lack of charges shouldn't be 'read into.
Hilgers, joined by various sheriffs on Wednesday, said that medical cannabis and LB 677 are 'going to make Nebraska less safe, more dangerous. It's going to handcuff the good men and women here that are in front of you and all their colleagues around the state.'
Todd, a disabled veteran, was among those asking lawmakers to act and include post-traumatic stress disorder in the list of acceptable conditions for use, the removal of which Hansen said was one of the 'negotiating factors' that was needed to get LB 677 out of the General Affairs Committee.
Two amendments from State Sen. John Cavanaugh of Omaha would add PTSD to the list. The first directly, the second by removing the list altogether and leaving the decision between doctors and patients.
Matt Bronson, who served in the military, left for war at age 19. He said he broke his back in 2007, struggles with PTSD, is a recovering alcoholic and has lost most sensation in his legs. He was given many options, including opiates and other addictive pain medications. Before Teddy was born, he said he tried to take his life.
Medical cannabis is not about Matt Bronson or Teddy getting high — 'I give two s— about getting high,' his father says.
However, Bronson says he can't take the addictive medications, get significant back surgery or be put in a wheelchair for 18 months because he and Liz Bronson need to care for Teddy at a moment's notice, who comes first above his own health.
'Let's take away this pain,' Matt Bronson said. 'I don't want to remember those brothers and sisters I lost in war. I don't want to remember every single damn casket I put on the back of C-17 flying home covered in the damn flag. I love my country, but God damn, Uncle Sam, let's do something about this s—.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem says "we're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem says "we're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown

CBS News

time30 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem says "we're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown

Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Sunday that the administration won't allow a "repeat of 2020" to occur after President Trump called for the National Guard to enforce order in the Los Angeles area amid protests over activity by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. "We're not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen," Noem said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," referring to the unrest in Minneapolis following the killing of George Floyd. At the time, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz made the controversial decision to deploy the state's National Guard amid the 2020 riots in Minneapolis, but Noem on Sunday criticized Walz for what she said were "very bad decisions," claiming he "let his city burn for days on end." Mr. Trump also deployed the National Guard in June 2020 to Washington, D.C, to quell protests. And as California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom urged that the state had things under control after protests broke out in L.A. in reaction to ICE operations in recent days, Noem claimed Newsom "has proven that he makes bad decisions." Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 8, 2025. CBS News "The president knows that [Newsom] makes bad decisions, and that's why the President chose the safety of this community over waiting for Gov. Newsom to get some sanity," Noem added. "And that's one of the reasons why these National Guard soldiers are being federalized so they can use their special skill set to keep peace." Mr. Trump signed a memo Saturday using Title 10 authority to order the deployment of at least 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles County following clashes between immigration authorities and demonstrators in Paramount, California, and large-scale protests elsewhere in the county. It marks the first time since 1965 that a president has "sent troops into a state without a state request," said Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Program. Newsom claimed in a post on X that the move by the Trump administration was "purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions," adding that "there is currently no unmet need." "The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles — not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle," Newsom said in another post, adding "Don't give them one." The California governor called Mr. Trump and the two spoke for about 40 minutes Saturday night, a spokesperson for Newsom told CBS News. Noem said the National Guard soldiers being engaged Sunday are "specifically trained for this type of crowd situation" and will "provide safety around buildings and to those that are engaged in peaceful protests, and also to our law enforcement officers so they can continue their daily work." "They're there at the direction of the president in order to keep peace and allow people to be able to protest, but also to keep law and order," Noem said, adding that "unfortunately, we've seen some violent protests happen, and that's why these National Guard soldiers are being utilized to help with some security in some areas." Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Saturday that "if violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized," adding that "they are on high alert." On the issue of sending in active-duty military personnel to police a domestic disturbance, Noem said she's hopeful "that we work with local leaders that would do their jobs," saying in L.A., the mayor "has refused to recognize the dangerous situation that she's perpetuating." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told KCAL late Saturday that she is "confident in our law enforcement partners here in Los Angeles, that we can handle the situation" saying "there is no need for 2,000 National Guard troops." When pressed on the idea of sending U.S. troops, Noem said "ICE and Homeland Security are running these operations right now," while noting that Mr. Trump "makes the decisions." Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who also appeared on "Face the Nation" Sunday, defended the ability of governors to "make their own decisions based on the situation." "When you look at where the American people are, they want to make sure you follow the law and that there's due process, and you don't want to inflame things by threatening to bring in the Marines or deporting people based on a mistake," Klobuchar said. The developments come as a new CBS News poll, conducted just prior to Saturday's protests in L.A., found that more than half of Americans approve of the Trump administration's deportation program, though large percentages of Americans continue to say it is not acceptable if legal residents are mistakenly deported as part of the program.

The Legal Issues Surrounding Trump's Plan to Use Troops to Suppress Protests
The Legal Issues Surrounding Trump's Plan to Use Troops to Suppress Protests

New York Times

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Times

The Legal Issues Surrounding Trump's Plan to Use Troops to Suppress Protests

Setting up a rare use of military force on domestic soil, President Trump ordered the Pentagon on Saturday night to send at least 2,000 National Guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles set off by his immigration crackdown. Mr. Trump has long mused about using military force on domestic soil to crush violent protests or riots, fight crime and hunt for undocumented migrants — a move that his aides talked him out of during his first term. Between his two presidencies, he said that he would do so without the consent of state governors if he returned to power. The order is a significant step in that direction, but for now it stops short of invoking the most expansive power Mr. Trump could claim a right to use. It remains unclear how matters will play out on the ground — and, potentially, in court. Here is a closer look at the legal and policy issues. What did Trump's order do? Mr. Trump called up National Guard troops to be put under federal control. He authorized Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to use troops to protect immigration enforcement agents, buildings and functions from interference by protesters. As justification, the White House cited recent protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles. The order called for at least 2,000 National Guard troops to be deployed for at least 60 days. Mr. Trump also authorized Mr. Hegseth to use regular federal troops 'as necessary' to augment the work of the federalized National Guard units. The National Guard consists of state-based military forces, largely part-time troops who have separate, full-time civilian jobs. Normally, each state's governor controls its guard and can direct it to deal with a disaster or civil disorder. But under certain circumstances, federal law allows the president to take control of a state's guard. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump's Response to L.A. Protests: What We Know
Trump's Response to L.A. Protests: What We Know

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Response to L.A. Protests: What We Know

President Donald Trump announced his is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers arresting people the federal government alleges are undocumented immigrants. In his memo deploying the National Guard, Trump left the door open for the Pentagon to deploy active duty military to Los Angeles. Trump wrote that 'the Secretary of Defense may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that the Department of Defense would mobilize active duty Marines stationed at Camp Pendleton 'if violence continues,' describing the Marines there as 'on high alert.' The last time Marines were deployed to assist with law enforcement was in 1992 when George Bush, responding to the California governor's request, sent Marines from Camp Pendleton to subdue riots following the acquittal of four white police officers who severely beat Rodney King, a Black man pulled over for a traffic violation. California Gov. Gavin Newsom responded to Hegseth's words by writing in a post on X, formerly Twitter, 'The Secretary of Defense is now threatening to deploy active-duty Marines on American soil against its own citizens. This is deranged behavior.' Reacting to Trump's order to deploy the National Guard, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told KTLA on Sunday, 'I have talked to officials high up in his administration, and I expressed to them that things were not out of control in the City of Los Angeles. Paramount had some issues, but I doubt very seriously that there is a need for the National Guard there either.' 'To me, this is just political,' Bass added. Newsom said Trump's decision move was 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions [and] erode public trust.' As of early Sunday morning, Bass and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said the National Guard was not yet deployed in the city. 'Just to be clear, the National Guard has not been deployed in the City of Los Angeles,' Bass said in a statement issued around midnight local time. But that did not stop the president from claiming victory and taking credit. 'Great job by the National Guard in Los Angeles after two days of violence, clashes and unrest,' he wrote on Truth Social a couple hours after Bass' statement. 'These Radical Left protests, by instigators and often paid troublemakers, will NOT BE TOLERATED.' NBC4 Los Angeles reported at 8 A.M. local time that National Guard troops had arrived in the city. Protests began Friday as ICE executed immigration raids at several workplaces in the Los Angeles area, including the city of Paramount in south L.A. County, where ICE arrested at least 44 individuals for alleged immigration violations, and Compton. Police arrested more than a dozen people during the protests for allegedly impeding federal agents. Some protesters, according to Reuters, threw what looked like chunks of concrete at law enforcement who responded with tear gas, pepper spray, and 'flash-bang' grenades. 'We will continue to arrest anyone who interferes with federal law enforcement,' U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli wrote on X, naming four individuals arrested by federal agents and attaching their photos. 'Now they know that they cannot go to anywhere in this country where our people are, and try to kidnap our workers, our people — they cannot do that without an organized and fierce resistance,' protester Ron Gochez, 44, told Reuters. On Friday, another protest took place surrounding a federal building in downtown L.A. where protesters believed detainees were being held after showing up for their ICE check-in appointments. Attorneys for those detained said immigrants who came to their check-ins were escorted to the basement of the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and detained. Attorney Lizbeth Mateo told CBS News that a married couple — including a U.S. citizen — and their children were held overnight in a room without beds and with only limited access to food and water. The wife along with the children were released Wednesday evening because she required medical attention for her high-risk pregnancy. Her husband, an immigrant who Mateo said previously received a stay of removal preventing him from being deported, was still in custody as of early Friday. Bass said Sunday that immigrants who were detained downtown have likely been transported to an ICE facility in Adelanto. 'This is something I've never seen before,' Mateo said. 'Under the first Trump administration, I represented clients with very difficult cases, but never anything like this. Under any other circumstance, he would have been released.' In Paramount, federal agents deployed non-lethal munitions toward protesters, said L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna, according to CBS News. 'We will protect your right to peacefully protest, but we will not tolerate violence or destruction of property,' Luna told reporters. 'I urge the community to approach the situation peacefully, as we do not want anyone to be harmed.' The sheriff's department stated that it 'was not involved in any federal law enforcement operations' and instead 'was focused solely on traffic management and crowd control.' Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown Law professor, wrote that because Trump did not invoke the Insurrection Act in his Saturday night order, the National Guard troops 'will not be allowed to engage in ordinary law enforcement activities.' Instead, he said, they will only be able to 'provide a form of force protection and other logistical support for ICE personnel.' Anonymous White House sources confirmed to Reuters that Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, which allows the president to deploy U.S. military forces to enforce laws and quell civil disorder. The last time it was invoked was 1992 during the Los Angeles riots at the California governor's request. 'There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves,' Vladeck wrote. Instead of using the Insurrection Act, Trump invoked Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which grants the president authority to deploy members of the National Guard into federal service in certain situations, including during 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' He justified his actions by stating in his order: 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Essentially, he is saying the protesters' interference with ICE's immigration roundups amount to a rebellion against the government. It's important to note, however, that California officials did not request federal support. 'For the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling,' Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the law school at the University of California, Berkeley, told The New York Times. 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent.' The White House previously considered invoking the Insurrection Act at the U.S.-Mexico border but has not yet done so. During his first term, Trump deployed the National Guard when he asked several states to send troops to Washington, D.C. in response to protests following the murder of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis. While some governors did send their troops, those who did not comply with Trump's request were not forced to do so. This time, however, Trump is clearly going against Newsom's wishes in deploying California's National Guard. More from Rolling Stone The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Donald Trump Is Destroying the Economy and Waging War on the Poor Trump Moves to Deploy National Guard to L.A. Over ICE Protests Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store