logo
After battery plant fire, southeast Missouri town alarmed about potential contamination

After battery plant fire, southeast Missouri town alarmed about potential contamination

Yahoo17-02-2025

Jennifer Torr walks along the outside of the Critical Mineral Recovery property near Fredericktown. The plant, which recycled lithium-ion batteries, caught fire in October (Allison Kite/Missouri Independent).
FREDERICKTOWN — Jennifer Torr was at a coffee shop next door to the the Critical Mineral Recovery battery recycling plant when it caught fire in October, sending a tower of smoke into the air.
She had no idea when she and her husband, Darin, bought their blueberry farm a few miles north of town that the facility might one day pose a danger. But when she saw the building erupt in flames, she immediately thought, 'we have to get out of this area.'
'I remember my husband and I getting in our vehicle and texting my kids, 'You guys need to pack some bags,'' Torr said in an interview.
By the time they got back to the farm just over eight miles away, her family members were covering their faces to guard against the smell and fumes from the fire while they packed their car.
Since the fire, Torr and other residents have been organizing to bring their concerns to Madison County and state officials about the battery plant and a cobalt mine on the other side of town. Fredericktown lies at the heart of Missouri's old Lead Belt. After generations of contamination from lead mining, residents worry now that battery development and recycling poses yet another health hazard.
'Will my grandchildren be sitting here and saying, 'My grandma tried to stop this 60 years ago and now we're all sick because nobody would listen?'' Kimi Royer asked her state legislator, Republican Rep. Dale Wright of Farmington, on a visit to Jefferson City earlier this month.
It took days for firefighters to fully extinguish the blaze at Critical Mineral Recovery, which recycled lithium-ion batteries. The facility opened at the edge of Fredericktown in 2023. Now, only its burnt husk remains.
Parts of Fredericktown were evacuated when the facility went up in flames, and families who lived across from the plant were displaced. Lawsuits filed by neighbors of the plant say the explosion caused respiratory problems and post-traumatic stress disorder and raised heavy metals levels in some residents' blood.
Al Watkins, an attorney for Critical Mineral Recovery, said the company shares residents' concerns about the effect of the fire on their health and property values.
At the opposite end of town, U.S. Strategic Metals hopes to mine cobalt, stirring fears of the kind of environmental contamination the community suffered from lead mining, which ended in the area in the 1960s.
Residents said in interviews earlier this month that they understand the need for the battery recycling plant and the mine. Cobalt is essential for battery production, and precious materials can be recovered from lithium-ion batteries.
'We're not opposed to having this industry,' Torr said. 'What we're opposed to is having this placed in areas where they're going to be next to people, communities where there's schools and residential areas people are living.'
Melissa Vatterott, policy and strategy director for the Missouri Coalition for the Environment, has helped residents from the Fredericktown area push legislation at the Missouri Capitol that would require cobalt mines and battery plants be set back at least a mile from residential areas.
Vatterott noted communities, like Fredericktown, have seen adverse health effects from mining in the past.
'We should not be allowing more mining of a mineral for which the federal government has no standards for safe mining and make these same communities susceptible again to health harms,' she said.
The legislation would also require a permit for subsurface cobalt mining. The state currently requires land reclamation permits to mine minerals at the surface, but according to the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the state doesn't require a land reclamation permit for underground mining.
U.S. Strategic Metals mine has permits to govern wastewater discharges and mine waste.
'We want to make sure that if we're going to be doing mining of some of these minerals, which we need to be doing, that we're doing it responsibly,' said Democratic Rep. Eric Woods of Kansas City, the bill's sponsor.
State Sen. Jamie Burger, a Republican who represents the communities near the mine and battery plant, is among the lawmakers who have heard concerns from the community about their safety.
'People were displaced from their homes, which is not good — ever,' Burger said. '…Then I also heard from people that want that to be rebuilt for job creation.'
Burger said he wanted to see what a one-mile setback would look like for the mine and battery plant. He said he thought the mining could be done in a safe manner and provide quality jobs for the area.
For decades, lead mining was a pivotal industry for southeast Missouri. But it came at a high price.
Workers at mines across Madison County produced lead for more than 200 years, resulting in more than a dozen stacks of waste that has eroded and left lead in soil and water around the county. Contaminated soil was used for foundation bases, fill and topsoil, contaminating residents' properties.
The entirety of Madison County is a Superfund site under cleanup by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Now, U.S. Strategic Metals hopes to mine cobalt at one of the old lead mine sites.
The mine, situated at the edge of Fredericktown, sits on what U.S. Strategic Metals says is one of the largest reserves of cobalt in North America. Cobalt, an essential component of lithium-ion batteries, can be detrimental to human health.
The EPA is reviewing whether cobalt and cobalt compounds might cause cancer. But inhaling cobalt particles can cause damage to the respiratory system, blood and the thyroid.
Aside from the impacts of cobalt, Fredericktown residents are worried about potential health impacts from stirring up the lead and other contaminants at the site.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'When something is in a Superfund, you don't come in and dirty it up even more,' said Walter Schwartz, who lives near the mine, adding that he's worried the mine will bring groundwater, soil and air pollution.
According to a request for a permit filed with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Strategic Metals hopes to build a plant to process materials from mining tailings, the leftover material from lead mining. Then, the company plans to mine fresh material from underground.
The Department of Natural Resources said it's still waiting for further air quality information regarding cobalt from the company necessary to process the permit application.
The company did not return multiple requests for comment.
Residents near the mine have complained that following U.S. Strategic Metals' takeover in 2018, blasts from the mine shook their homes, causing drywall and foundation damage.
Schwartz moved to the area in 2022 from Michigan and is turning it into his 'sanctuary,' planting fruit trees and raising chickens in his backyard. When blasts from the mine started shaking his house, causing a shelf to fall from the wall, he became worried about his investment.
'I'm looking at a bleak future of pollution and property value running down,' he said.
The Department of Natural Resources said it had received complaints from area residents and referred them to the Missouri Department of Public Safety.
While U.S. Strategic Metals seeks a permit to expand, it's facing accusations from the EPA of violating the Clean Water Act.
The agency sued in early 2024, accusing operators of the mine of allowing pollutants — including cobalt, copper, lead and nickel — to leave the site. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri also accuses mine operators Environmental Operations Inc.; Missouri Cobalt LLC; and Missouri Mining Investments LLC, of allowing stormwater runoff to discharge through a channel not authorized by the site permit and into a nearby creek.
During an inspection by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the lawsuit says, officials saw muddy red water leaving the site and entering Goose Creek.
Lawyers for the mine did not return a request for comment.
Jonathan Klusmeyer, a spokesman for the Environmental Protection Agency, said the agency has identified metals contamination downstream of several mine waste sites in Madison County and is assessing potential cleanup strategies. He said the agency conducts free domestic well water testing for related contamination and provides alternate drinking water for affected residents.
The EPA, Klusmeyer said, does expect the return of mining operations to have an effect on the Superfund site because the operator will be required to work with the EPA and state on plans to recover critical minerals from capped mine waste. That will 'prevent recontamination of the site, protect workers during the process, restore the caps and site drainage, test and verify the effectiveness of decontamination efforts and manage any generated residues,' Klusmeyer said.
Critical Mineral Recovery was only open a year before it caught fire in October.
In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the company said it 'anticipates rebuilding the facility with a significant expansion at the same location as the previously recycling facility on 32 acres of land in Fredericktown.'
But Critical Mineral Recovery's attorney, Albert Watkins, said in an email that the 'property at which the fire occurred will be rebuilt, but not for the same purpose as originally intended.'
'The significant expansion refers to the Fredericktown area, for which evaluation of options is under way,' Watkins said.
Wakins said the company shares residents' concerns about the impact of the fire on their health and wants to rebuild 'in a more remote location away from residences and schools and more densely populated areas.'
Following the fire, he said the company provided financial support to displaced families, but declined to say how much.
Royer has led efforts to get community members to urge county or state officials to adopt legislation to insulate Frederickstown from the effects of the mine and battery plant. She traveled to Jefferson City earlier this month to present a stack of signatures on a petition asking lawmakers to support legislation that would prohibit mining, refining, manufacturing or recycling certain minerals, including cobalt and lead, within one mile of residences, schools, wildlife refuges, surface water, state or federal parks or conservation areas.
Lawmakers from the area told The Independent they're evaluating the community's concerns.
Wright, the Republican state legislator from Farmington, said he thought a one-mile setback sounded 'pretty reasonable.' He was seeking more information from the state on mining regulations and planned to speak with Woods, the bill's sponsor, before committing to support it.
'We want to make sure that people are kept safe,' said state Sen. Mike Henderson, a Republican whose district reaches close to Fredericktown. 'We also want to make sure we keep jobs in the community.'
Henderson said residents came to him concerned about safety and the air quality. He noted one resident had to evacuate with three small children.
'It's not a good situation,' Henderson said. 'No one's trying to say it is. I think right now, we're just trying to work our way through it to see what takes place from here.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration urges court not to dismiss case against Wisconsin judge
Trump administration urges court not to dismiss case against Wisconsin judge

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration urges court not to dismiss case against Wisconsin judge

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Trump administration argued Monday that charges should not be dropped against a Wisconsin judge who was indicted for allegedly helping a man who is in the country evade U.S. immigration agents seeking to arrest him in her courthouse. Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice urged a federal judge to reject a motion filed by Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan seeking to dismiss the charges against her, saying doing so would be 'unprecedented" and allow judges to be above the law. Dugan faces a July 21 trial in the case that escalated a clash between Trump's administration and opponents over the Republican president's sweeping immigration crackdown. Trump critics contend that Dugan's arrest went too far and that the administration is trying to make an example out of her to discourage judicial opposition to the crackdown. The accusations against Dugan Dugan is charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Prosecutors say she escorted Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, 31, and his lawyer out of her courtroom through a back door on April 18 after learning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were in the courthouse seeking to arrest him for being in the country illegally. She could face up to six years in prison and a $350,000 fine if convicted on both counts. Her attorneys say she's innocent. They filed a motion last month to dismiss the case, saying she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore is immune to prosecution. They also maintain that the federal government violated Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. Trump administration response Justice Department attorneys responded in a court filing Monday, saying dismissing the charges against the judge on the grounds that she is immune would be unprecedented and would ignore 'well-established law that has long permitted judges to be prosecuted for crimes they commit.' 'Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche to interfere with valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond,' Justice Department attorneys argued. 'Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are 'above the law,' and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement.' Dugan's attorney, Craig Mastantuono, did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. In her motion to dismiss, Dugan argued that her conduct amounted to directing people's movement in and around her courtroom, and that she enjoys legal immunity for official acts she performs as a judge. She also accused the federal government of violating Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. Dugan's case is similar to one brought during the first Trump administration against a Massachusetts judge, who was accused of helping a man sneak out a courthouse back door to evade a waiting immigration enforcement agent. That case was eventually dismissed. The case background According to prosecutors, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz illegally reentered the U.S. after being deported in 2013. He was charged in March with misdemeanor domestic violence in Milwaukee County and was in Dugan's courtroom for a hearing in that case on April 18. Dugan's clerk alerted her that immigration agents were in the courthouse looking to arrest Flores-Ruiz, prosecutors allege in court documents. According to an affidavit, Dugan became visibly angry at the agents' arrival and called the situation 'absurd.' After discussing the warrant for Flores-Ruiz's arrest with the agents, Dugan demanded that they speak with the chief judge and led them away from the courtroom. She then returned to the courtroom, was heard saying something to the effect of 'wait, come with me,' and then showed Flores-Ruiz and his attorney out a back door, the affidavit says. The immigration agents eventually detained Flores-Ruiz outside the building following a foot chase. Dugan, 66, was arrested by the FBI on April 25 at the courthouse. A grand jury indicted Dugan on May 13 and she pleaded not guilty on May 15. Dugan defense fund A legal defense fund created by Dugan supporters to help pay for her high-profile defense attorneys has raised more than $137,000 in three weeks from more than 2,800 donors. Her legal team includes former U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic and former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement. Both were appointed by Republican presidents. She has also hired prominent attorneys in Milwaukee and Madison. 'This is an impressive show of support for the defense fund, highlighting that the public believes in protecting a fair and independent judiciary,' former Supreme Court Justice Janine Geske, the fund's trustee, said Monday. 'The fund will continue to raise grassroots donations and uphold strict guidelines to ensure transparency and accountability.' Dugan is not required to list the donor names until she submits her annual financial disclosure form, which is due in April. Numerous people are prohibited from donating, including Milwaukee County residents; attorneys who practice in the county; lobbyists; judges; parties with pending matters before any Milwaukee County judge; and county employees.

Colorado Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take national position
Colorado Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take national position

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Colorado Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen resigns to take national position

DNEVER (KDVR) — Colorado Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen has resigned from the Colorado Senate, the senator's office announced Monday morning. His resignation was effective Monday, June 9, as he heads to the American Excellence Foundation, a national investment nonprofit focused on supporting conservative causes where he will be the next president and CEO. The organization's board unanimously approved of Lundeen in the position. 11 Colorado companies named among top workplaces in nation: US News The Republican leader has been in Colorado's Senate for seven sessions and served as minority leader since 2022. He also served in the Colorado House of Representatives four sessions and four years on the Colorado State Board of Education. 'Serving Colorado has been an honor and blessing,' Lundeen said in a press release. 'I am grateful to the people of Senate District 9 for the opportunity to fight for policies that empower individuals, protect our communities, and promote prosperity. As I transition to a national platform, I am eager to continue advocating for personal freedom, economic opportunity, and common-sense conservative values.' According to a press release, Lundeen's achievements in Colorado's General Assembly include co-leading an effort to rewrite Colorado's public education funding formula, playing a key role in successfully cutting the state income tax rate, and sponsoring bills that have since become law to combat human trafficking. Colorado Senate Republicans in a statement congratulated Lundeen for his next steps. 'We are grateful for his many years of dedicated public service and thank him for his leadership over the years fighting for students, economic freedom, and safety for all Coloradans,' the statement read. 'We wish him well and are excited to see him succeed in his next endeavor.' The Senate Republican Caucus will hold a meeting on Thursday to elect its new minority leader. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Bipartisan lawmakers seek to reverse Trump's staff cuts at program that helps Americans afford heat, air conditioning
Bipartisan lawmakers seek to reverse Trump's staff cuts at program that helps Americans afford heat, air conditioning

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bipartisan lawmakers seek to reverse Trump's staff cuts at program that helps Americans afford heat, air conditioning

A bipartisan set of lawmakers is introducing a bill that seeks to reverse the Trump administration's staffing cuts at a program that helps Americans afford heat and air conditioning. Reps. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) and Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) are introducing legislation aimed at undoing staff cuts at the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). The Trump administration fired every staffer who works on the program as part of larger staff cuts at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and has proposed zeroing out LIHEAP's budget. The Lawler-Gottheimer bill, which was first shared with The Hill, requires HHS to have at least 20 people working on the program, 60 percent of whom cannot be contractors. In an emergency, 30 people would have to be employed as part of the program. It's not entirely clear whether the legislation could actually pass or whether it might be attached to any larger bills. However, it represents a signal that the Trump administration's move to fire the LIHEAP staffers is generating at least some Republican pushback. 'Nearly 6 million families nationwide — and 240,000 in Jersey — rely on LIHEAP to keep the heat on in the winter and the AC running in the summer,' Gottheimer said in a written statement. 'President Trump is hell-bent on dismantling this critical program, firing its entire staff back in April and proposing to eliminate LIHEAP completely in his budget to Congress. My new bipartisan bill will stop these reckless cuts and ensure that no family is left in the cold or heat without help.' 'I'm proud to co-lead this bipartisan bill to fix LIHEAP's staffing crisis, ensuring Hudson Valley families get the energy assistance they need to stay warm this winter,' Lawler said in a written statement. 'With minimum staffing requirements and smart use of contractors, we're tackling inefficiency and protecting our most vulnerable who depend on it.' Asked about the cuts of the program during a recent congressional hearing, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. argued that cost savings from President Trump's energy policies would make it redundant. 'President Trump's rationale and OMB's rationale is that President Trump's energy policies are going to lower the cost of energy so that everybody will get lower costs…and in that case this program would simply be another subsidy to the fossil fuel industry,' he said, referring to the Office of Management and Budget. 'If that doesn't happen and Congress chooses to appropriate the money, I, of course, will spend it,' he added. The introduction of the legislation also comes as Gottheimer is running for governor of New Jersey in a crowded Democratic field. Both lawmakers currently represent swing districts. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store