Harvard University, under pressure from Trump administration, renames its DEI office
Harvard University is renaming its diversity, equity and inclusion office in a move that appears to bend to the Trump administration's demands to abolish DEI programs across the country and comes as the university faces off against the White House over political ideology in American higher education.
The office has been renamed Community and Campus Life, an internal email to the Harvard community says.
The email does not detail what further changes would be made as a result of the renaming but states the change 'requires us to find new ways to bring people of different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives together as one community, focusing on the unique experiences and contributions of the individual and not the broad demographic groups to which they belong.'
Its release came the same day lawyers for Harvard and the Trump administration met for the first time in a lawsuit Harvard filed over the $2.2 billion freeze in its federal research funding. The Trump administration on Monday also announced it was launching investigations into the university and the Harvard Law Review, saying authorities have gotten complaints about race-based discrimination.
Harvard sued after the Trump administration announced it was putting a hold on billions of dollars in grants and contracts following what the White House said was a breakdown in discussions over combating antisemitism on campus. The White House also has cited discrimination probes in slashing funding for other universities – including Cornell and Northwestern – and sent letters to 60 institutions of higher learning, warning them of potential punishment if they fail 'to protect Jewish students.'
Monday's letter to the Harvard community was from Sherri Ann Charleston, who signed off as the Chief Community and Campus Life Officer; since 2020, she had served as the Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer.
'It seemed like the right time to adjust my title to better reflect what the offices under my direction do for our campus community,' Charleston wrote Monday in the message released with a internal survey conducted in 2019 and last fall that seeks to gauge the climate around inclusion and belonging of the campus community.
Her letter also cited a reference, from Harvard's president's April 14 open letter, to the need to be in compliance with the Supreme Court's landmark 2023 decision ending affirmative action in American colleges. A case at the heart of that ruling involved Harvard.
'(W)e must continue 'to work together to find ways, consistent with law, to foster and support a vibrant community that exemplifies, respects, and embraces difference' and, in doing so, 'also continue to comply with Students For Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which ruled that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act makes it unlawful for universities to make decisions 'on the basis of race,''' Charleston wrote.
Harvard also announced Monday it would no longer host or fund affinity group celebrations during commencement, according to the school's student-led newspaper, The Harvard Crimson, citing an email sent to affinity groups Monday. The decision was made after the Department of Education threatened funding cuts if Harvard did not cancel graduation celebrations that could separate students based on race, it reported.
Harvard's president this month said the school would not make key policy changes the White House demanded of colleges across the country, including eliminating its diversity, equity and inclusion program. 'The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,' Harvard President Alan M. Garber wrote at the time.
CNN has reached out to Harvard for comment.
Harvard's decision to rebrand its DEI office follows similar reorganizations at government agencies, schools and companies across the country amid President Donald Trump's crackdown on such programs. The White House has decried DEI practices – designed to advance racial, gender, class and other representation in public spaces – as 'illegal and immoral discrimination.'
In addition to freezing federal funding to Harvard, the White House has threatened to rescind Harvard's tax-exempt status and its eligibility to host foreign students.
Harvard, one of the oldest and wealthiest universities in the country, argues in its lawsuit the funding freeze measure is not only the Trump administration's 'attempt to coerce and control Harvard' while disregarding 'fundamental First Amendment principles,' and also that Washington violated an arcane 1946 law governing administrative policies.
In particular, the Administrative Procedure Act 'requires this Court to hold unlawful and set aside any final agency action that is 'arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law,'' the Harvard lawsuit says.
Trump administration attorneys have not responded to the allegations in the lawsuit, but White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said April 22: 'The president has made it quite clear that it's Harvard who has put themselves in the position to lose their own funding by not obeying federal law, and we expect all colleges and universities who are receiving taxpayer funds to abide by federal law.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
22 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
US Ambassador Pete Hoekstra Says Canada's Economic Hopes Align With Trump's Goals
U.S. President Donald Trump's goal of enhancing American power aligns with Prime Minister Mark Carney's aim of making Canada's economy the fastest-growing in the G7, Trump's envoy to Canada said Friday. 'It's going to continue to be a very strong and friendly relationship,' Ambassador Pete Hoekstra told The Canadian Press in an interview Friday, adding the two leaders are in frequent contact.


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump warns of 'serious consequences' if Elon Musk funds Democrats
President Donald Trump warned on Saturday that there would be "serious consequences" for Elon Musk if he were to fund Democratic candidates. The president made the remark during a phone interview with NBC News. "If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that," Trump told NBC News. However, according to the outlet, Trump did not detail what the consequences would be. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff's praise
Elon Musk appeared to jokingly reconsider his stance on the Big Beautiful Bill after a California Democrat came to his defense. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., wrote on X that "I can't believe I'm saying this – but [Elon Musk] is right." However, that seems to be the last point on which the two agree. They both object to the Big Beautiful Bill, viewing it as full of pork. Musk opposes the bill because he believes it raises government spending too much, while Schiff objects to what he calls its "far-right" content, which he describes as "dangerous." Musk fired off a response rejecting Schiff's alleged praise of the tech billionaire's position on the bill. "Hmm, few things could convince me to reconsider my position more than Adam Schiff agreeing with me!" On May 30, Musk's time with the administration came to an end, and he seemed to leave things on good terms. President Donald Trump thanked Musk for his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and gave him a symbolic "key to the White House" as a parting gift. Following his departure from the White House, Musk said he was looking forward "to continuing to be a friend and adviser to the president." However, things took a sharp turn as a feud between Trump and Musk quickly heated up after the Tesla founder began publicly criticizing the Big Beautiful Bill. After the legislation passed the House, Musk said that the "massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Musk's criticisms received mixed reactions from Republicans, with some — such as Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. — agreeing with him. Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was "surprised" by Musk's reaction and claimed the two of them had a good discussion about the bill. Trump and Musk then began slugging it out on their respective social media platforms — X and Truth Social — as well as TV. The president told reporters in the Oval Office that he was "very disappointed" with Musk and claimed that the former DOGE head knew what was in the bill, something that Musk denied. The heated exchange led to two explosive tweets, both of which were later deleted. In one post, Musk claimed Trump was mentioned in files relating to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased sex offender and disgraced financier. In his other post, Musk endorsed a message that called for Trump's impeachment and said that Vice President J.D. Vance should take over. While it's unclear whether Trump and Musk will reconcile, for now it seems unlikely. Trump told Fox News chief political anchor Bret Baier that he was not interested in talking to Musk and that "Elon's totally lost it."