
The real obstacle for Trump's campaign against DEI isn't Democrats. It's demography
The escalating drive from President Donald Trump and other Republicans against programs to promote greater diversity in education and employment is on a collision course with fundamental changes in the nation's demographic make-up, particularly among the young.
Conservative opponents of diversity initiatives have clearly seized the momentum in the policy debate. In 2023, the six Republican-appointed Supreme Court Justices joined in a decisive ruling to virtually eliminate the consideration of race of college admissions. Since taking office, Trump has followed with a flurry of executive orders to end 'diversity, equity and inclusion' programs within the federal government and to penalize private employers that utilize them — even to the point of potentially seeking criminal prosecutions. Facing this pressure, prominent companies in recent months have publicly renounced efforts to increase diversity in hiring or contracting. Democrats have been tentative and divided over how hard to push back against the conservative drive to eradicate the so-called DEI programs.
But this diversity counteroffensive is advancing precisely as kids of color have become a solid majority of the nation's youth. Since the start of the 21st century, young Whites have been rapidly declining not only as a share of the overall youth population, but also in their absolute numbers — to an extent possibly unprecedented in American history. This tectonic reshaping of the American population means that demography, not Democrats, will likely emerge as the biggest obstacle to Trump's campaign to uproot DEI programs across US society.
Democratic Senator Cory Booker tells Dana Bash the Trump administration is trying to distract the American people while "making us less safe, making government more corrupt and violating people's privacy." These demographic trends ensure that in the years ahead, the nation will increasingly rely on non-White young people as an increasing portion of its students, workers and taxpayers. Yet today, minority young people remain tremendously underrepresented at the most exclusive colleges and universities and in high-level, well-paying jobs across the private sector.
Abandoning diversity programs even as the nation continues to grow more diverse could expose US society to two distinct risks. One is that as minorities make up a growing share of the future workforce, failing to equip more of them with advanced academic and technical skills could leave the nation short of the highly trained workers it will need as it transitions further into the information-age economy.
'The future of the nation's labor force productivity and economic well-being will rely heavily on the success and integration of today's and tomorrow's increasingly multiracial younger population,' William Frey, a demographer at the center-left Brookings Metro think tank, wrote recently.
The other big risk is that under current trends the US could harden into a more overtly two-tier society, with a widening gap between the growing overall presence of minorities in the population and their limited representation in the most prestigious educational and employment opportunities. That could be a formula for even more social turbulence and alienation than the US has already experienced around current racial disparities.
The pushback against diversity programs 'is an attempt to entrench racial discrimination and disparities at every level of society and to horde power and influence among what will soon be a minority population of White people and the wealthy,' said Janai Nelson, president and director-counsel of the Legal Defense Fund, a leading civil rights organization.
'Relegating … marginalized groups to second-class citizenship will upend the American experiment of multiracial democracy and reinstate a caste system — and that is the point. Indeed, if unchecked, these efforts will create levels of disenfranchisement and disillusionment yet unseen in our modern history,' Nelson said.
Opponents of diversity programs argue there's no reason for concern even if White people hold on to most of the prestigious educational and employment opportunities as their overall numbers shrink. 'I think we need to get away from being concerned about the skin color of those who are occupying those positions,' said Jonathan Butcher, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation. 'I think we need to move to a point where we are concerned about what the individuals accomplish once they are there.'
But civil rights advocates argue Trump and his allies are brewing a recipe for both social and economic strain by hobbling efforts to expand opportunities for minorities exactly as they represent more of the nation's future workforce. To these critics, the drive by Trump and his Republican allies to dismantle diversity programs at this transitional moment amounts to raising the castle walls of privilege against a rising tide of demographic change.
'If institutional gatekeepers don't ensure equal access to opportunity, this country will become even more dangerously stratified by race and future generations of Americans will be wholly incapable of meeting the challenges of an increasingly global landscape,' said Nelson. 'This is a recipe for disaster.'
In this century, the change in the demographic composition of America's youth population has been swift and sustained. Kids of color increased their share of the nation's total under-18 population from 39.1% in 2000 to 51.6% in 2023, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data provided to CNN by Frey.
This change has been broadly felt. Over that period, the minority share of the youth population has increased in all 50 states, according to Frey's calculations. In 18 states, kids of color already constitute more than half of the youth population. In six other states, minority kids make up at least 46% of the youth population, suggesting they will become the majority group before long.
The change in the absolute numbers of the youth population may be even more revealing than these shifts in its proportions. Since 2000, the number of non-White kids has increased by just over 9.3 million, Frey found. Over that same period, the number of White kids has declined by nearly 8.8 million. In 47 of the 50 states, not only has the share of Whites younger than 18 declined since 2000, but so has their absolute number. The only states that have more White kids today than at the turn of the 21st century are Utah, Idaho and South Carolina — and even they have seen only small increases, totaling about 120,000 between them. By contrast, 30 states have at least 75,000 fewer White kids today than they did in 2000.
Frey has calculated from Census data that the number of White kids shrank from 2000 to 2010 and from 2010 to 2020, and continued to fall from 2020 to 2023. He says there is likely no precedent in American history for such an extended decline in the number of White young people. Something similar may have happened 'during the Great Depression for a few years,' Frey told me. 'That's possible. But for most of our history as a country we've been growing. It's fair to say that this is the first time we've seen a decline like this for this length of time.'
Nor does Frey see much possibility that the decline in both the share and absolute number of White kids will reverse any time soon. 'I don't see this decline reversing, because the White population is older and women in their child-bearing ages are getting to be a smaller share of that group,' Frey told me. Immigration, he adds, isn't likely to add many more White kids since most legal migrants, come from predominantly non-White countries. The Census projects the minority share of the youth population will reach 53% by 2030 and 60% by 2050.
All of this guarantees that non-White kids will represent the principal source of workers for the 21st-century economy. As recently as 2000, White kids still represented nearly 70% of all high school graduates, according to the federal National Center for Education Statistics. But in the 2021-22 school year, young White people, for the first time, fell below the majority of high school graduates (at 49.4%), and their share has continued to tumble: The National Center projects that Whites will slip to 46% of all high school graduates next June and to as little as 43% of the graduating class in 2031. The NCES projects that 300,000 fewer White kids will graduate high school this year than in 2008.
Enrollment in postsecondary education is moving along the same track. The Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce reported in a study last year that the number of White students attending colleges and universities plummeted by 375,000 from 2009 to 2019, the latest year for which they calculated detailed figures by race; the number of Black students tumbled by nearly 100,000 as well. All the growth in postsecondary attendance over that period came from Latino students (up about 190,000) and, to a much lesser, extent Asian Americans (up nearly 20,000).
Yet kids of color continue to face systemic inequities at each stage of the journey from education into the workforce. Research, for instance, has consistently shown that student performance lags in elementary and secondary schools where poverty is pervasive; today, about three-fourths of Black and Latino students, compared to only about one-third of their Asian American and White counterparts, attend schools where at least half of students qualify as poor under federal definitions, according to the National Equity Atlas published by PolicyLink, a research and advocacy group, and the Equity Research Institute at the University of Southern California.
Higher education likewise remains substantially stratified by race. About two-thirds of both Black and Latino students, Georgetown found, attend so-called open-access colleges, which are the least competitive in admissions and spend less than half the money and employ less than half the faculty per student as more selective schools. Though Black, Latino and Native American students have grown to 37% of the total postsecondary student body, they hold only 21% of the seats in roughly the 500 most selective schools. White and Asian American students, by contrast, still constitute nearly three-fourths of all those attending the most selective institutions, the Georgetown center found, far beyond their three-in-five share of the total postsecondary student population. While about four-fifths of students at the selective colleges finish their degrees, that's true for less than half of those at the open-access institutions.
'Open-access institutions educate the vast majority of college students, but, unfortunately, do so with the fewest resources and have the lowest success rates,' the Georgetown Center concluded in its 2024 report. 'The American postsecondary system, in other words, tends to provide the highest-quality education to those who need it least: students who are primarily wealthier than the median and who attended well-resourced high schools that smooth the transition into the most-selective colleges.'
This pipeline of educational inequality ultimately terminates in widely unequal outcomes in the job market. The average hourly wages of Black and Latino workers remain about 11% lower than the wages for White workers — a wider gap than in 1979 for both minority groups, according to an analysis of federal data by the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal think tank. Ben Zipperer, an EPI senior economist, has calculated that although Whites make up about 58% of all workers, they represent 68% of those whose wages put them in the top fifth of highest earners. Black and Latino workers, though nearly one-third of all workers, are just a little more than one-sixth of those at the top, wage-wise.
Nelson of the LDF points to other measures of enduring inequality. Across the 100 largest companies listed on the S&P stock index, Black, Latino and Asian Americans hold less than one-fourth of upper management jobs, according to a Harvard Law School analysis.
'Black and Latinx people,' she added, 'make up fewer than 1% and 2% of Venture Capital entrepreneurs, respectively, according to a Harvard Business School analysis.' Despite some gains, women remain significantly underrepresented on both fronts, too, she noted. Though women obtain about 60% of all four-year undergraduate degrees and nearly two-thirds of all post-graduate degrees, the Harvard Law analysis found they hold only slightly more than one in four of those upper management jobs in large companies, little more than racial minorities.
Less precisely quantifiable, but potentially just as important, these educational inequities also yield enduring racial disparities in what could be called the C-suite of American life —the positions that wield decision-making power in our major public and private institutions. Zack Mabel, director of research at the Georgetown Center, notes that the elite universities where Black and Latino students remain systematically underrepresented have long functioned as the conveyor belt producing most of the people who occupy those roles.
'There's so much concentrated power in decision making that grows up out of these selective institutions and as a society I would argue we are in desperate need of diversifying access to those bastions of power,' Mabel said. 'The only realistic way we are going to do that is by diversifying our selective institutions.'
Despite these entrenched disparities, polls for years have shown that most Americans, including many racial minorities, express opposition to 'affirmative action' or diversity programs that explicitly elevate racial considerations above ostensibly neutral concepts of merit in employment or college admissions.
And after a campaign in which Trump relentlessly attacked diversity efforts, his election day gains compared to 2020 among Latinos, Asian Americans and Black men, demonstrated at the least that his hostility to such programs was not a deal-breaker for many non-White voters.
Daniel Cox, director of the Survey Center on American Life at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Trump's gains with non-White voters didn't surprise him. Trump's improvement on that front showed that the argument over diversity programs 'is part of the elite discourse that working- and lower-middle-class families of color typically aren't that bought into,' Cox said. 'Your average working-class kid, the idea of going to Harvard is like the idea of going to the moon. It's a long shot; that's not the thing that is going to be life-changing or game-changing for them. Better opportunities where they live, cheaper housing where they live, lower crime — those are the things that are going to be game-changing for them.'
Manuel Pastor, director of the Equity Research Institute at USC, agreed that Trump's gains with minority voters came in part because diversity programs in education and employment don't 'always reach working-class people of color in real, concrete material ways.' And Pastor believes that the backlash against diversity programs intensified because too many morphed into formulaic workplace trainings that 'became often more symbolic and about discourse and how about how people feel than they were about recognizing historic disparities and giving people a leg up into the workplace.'
But, Pastor argues, none of that erases the core demographic reality that the US will increasingly rely for its future workers on kids of color who are on the wrong end of compounding disparities in educational and employment opportunity. Abandoning diversity programs now, he argues, 'means wasted talent. It means lost Einsteins. It means not investing in the productivity that we need for the future.'
Like other critics of diversity programs, Butcher, the Heritage Foundation senior fellow, argues that trying to channel more minority students into elite educational institutions 'is a dangerous policy to engineer from the top. I think there is no centralized control or bureaucracy that could effectively engineer those kinds of outcomes without serious unintended consequences.' Even if the rollback of diversity programs widens the gap between White and non-White young people, Butcher said, 'I don't believe that just because there would be different outcomes for individuals based on race that it necessarily represents racism.'
Amid the furious counteroffensive against diversity programs from conservatives wielding such arguments, defenders of these efforts are likely to shift their arguments over time more from equity to economic grounds.
One of the defining demographic realities of modern America is the enormous racial divergence between America's youngest and oldest generations, a dynamic Frey has called the 'cultural generation gap' and I've described as the contrast between 'the brown and the gray.' Even as minorities have grown into a majority of the youth population, and advance toward becoming most of the working-age population, about three-fourths of seniors remain White (primarily because the US virtually shut off immigration from 1924 to 1965).
This racial transformation has been occurring even as the number of seniors, as Frey has documented, has been growing more than nine times as fast as the working-age population. That means, to pay the payroll taxes that fund Social Security and Medicare, a rapidly growing population of White seniors will depend on a workforce that is increasing only modestly in numbers but rapidly becoming more diverse.
That creates a shared interest across racial and generational lines that is rarely discussed in American politics. If kids of color continue to face the educational disparities evident today, the danger isn't just that the economy overall will face shortages of skilled workers as those kids become a larger share of the future workforce. Ultimately, the mostly White senior population also needs more kids of color to ascend into well-paying jobs where they can be taxed to meet the growing cost of the big federal programs for the elderly. Ending diversity programs now increases the risk that the US will fail to produce as many skilled minority workers as it needs on both fronts, advocates argue.
'The people we overlook for investments is going to shipwreck the future for America writ large, but especially for a whiter, older retired population that is counting on this (diverse) younger population to contribute' to their retirement costs, Pastor said.
Frey said that sooner or later, the US will recognize that it must open more educational and employment opportunities for non-White young people because there simply will not be enough White kids available to fill all the skilled jobs the economy will demand. 'To talk about getting rid of DEI is just being blind to demography,' Frey says. 'Sooner or later, we are going to run out of (White) people even in those top jobs.'
In the meantime, though, the politics of diversity are now moving in the opposite direction of the demographic and economic imperatives of an irreversibly diversifying nation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
There's nothing ‘spontaneous' about radical ICE protests — here are the groups behind them
The same media who told you in 2020 that the violent Black Lives Matter riots were 'fiery, but mostly peaceful' are at it again, pretending that your eyes are lying to you: No, they claim, there are no rampaging throngs or marauders waving foreign flags and attacking the forces of order. And the peaceful protests in Los Angeles are spontaneous. Nobody is organizing them. Advertisement Or so pretends the media. 'The Trump administration's immigration raids in the California city prompted mostly peaceful protests,' blared the leftwing British paper The Guardian. Of course, these supposedly perfectly serene public gatherings then 'escalated when the president sent in the National Guard — and then the US Marines,' added the Guardian. So, no, the scenes of mayhem and invasion that played on TV for days before the first National Guard unit arrived in the City of Angels didn't prompt Trump to act — don't believe your lying eyes. Advertisement It's like Guardian writer Chris Michael has no idea of the mockery that CNN correspondent Omar Jimenez has succumbed to since August 2020, when he went on air in front of a building engulfed in flames and complete chaos behind him, and a chyron with the 'mostly peaceful' claim. One other key thing that the left-wing media is not telling you is who is organizing the disorder, and who is funding it. Ignoring this aspect leads the public to believe two things that aren't true: that the violence is spontaneous, and that it reflects true national discontent with the deportation raids. Advertisement In fact, the opposite is true. A Polling Insights newsletter that the pollster Scott Rasmussen sends out reports that, 'In the current stand-off, 57% approve of efforts by immigration officials to find and arrest illegal immigrants in Los Angeles. Fifty-two percent approve of President Trump's decision to send in the National Guard.' Other opinon surveys support this trend. So, if the American people largely support the deportation raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), who is organizing the riots against them? Advertisement We can see, from the placards and signs captured in photographs, that one key group organizing the protests comes from what one can call the list of usual suspects: the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL). The PSL, a communist party, has been involved with BLM and pro-Hamas terrorism violence. The PSL has organizational ties with the ANSWER Coalition, which the Network Contagion Research Institute says has ties with the Chinese Communist Party. ANSWER was involved with organizing a rally in sympathy with the Los Angeles rioters on June 10 in Columbus, Ohio. The PSL is an old-style communist party that will seize on any crises to try to dismantle the United States. It says that 'the United States today is a dictatorship of the capitalist class. This reality will not change without a socialist revolution.' It is funded indirectly by donations from Neville Roy Singham, an American millionaire with close ties to the CCP who lives in Shanghai. Advertisement Elias Rodriguez, the terrorist who shot and killed the couple at the Jewish Museum in Washington, DC, in late May, was a member of both the PSL and ANSWER. Another group involved in organizing the LA riots is the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a radical leftist American union with extensive overseas ties. It is a regular attendee at the conferences and workshops held by the Foro de Sao Paulo, a hemispheric network of Marxist parties founded by Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and Brazilian President Inazio Lula da Silva. Advertisement The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights LA (CHIRLA), also an organizer, received $33 million in government grants in FY2023. Then there are the 'charities' helping the rioters, such as Mutual Aid Los Angeles Network, Operation Healthy Hearts, LA Poverty Department, and Mutual Aid/Social Therapy. These riots are sure to expand in the days to come, which means that it is a good thing that some congressmen are looking to investigate who these groups are, and why they are seeking to destabilize our streets. Mike Gonzalez is a senior fellow at The Heritage Foundation and co-author of 'NextGen Marxism: What It Is and How to Combat It.'
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Several anti-Trump ‘No Kings Day' rallies planned in WV this weekend
Hundreds showed up to the West Virginia Capitol in Charleston on Saturday, April 5, 2025, to take part in a nationwide Hands Off rally to protest the actions of the Trump administration. (Zachary Hiser | West Virginia Watch) As the nation's capitol prepares for a massive military parade to mark the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary and President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, organizers in several West Virginia cities are planning to mark the day with anti-Trump protests. 'No Kings Day of Action' rallies are planned for cities around the country, including Berkeley Springs, Bluefield, Buckhannon, Charleston, Elkins, Huntington and others. The events are in response to what the organization calls 'increasing authoritarian excesses and corruption' from the president and allies. 'In America, we don't do kings,' reads a statement on the website for a grassroots organization made up of hundreds of local groups. 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services. The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings.' An estimated 200,000 attendees, 150 military vehicles and 50 aircraft are expected for Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C. Saturday, according to news reports. The spectacle will cost an estimated $45 million, including $16 million to repair the streets of D.C. following the event. A spokesman for the West Virginia National Guard said Wednesday that the agency will not send personnel or equipment to participate in the military parade, but they do plan to send 200 members of the CERF-P team to support the Nation Capitol Region, at its request, as part of the Guard's standing missing to support events of its size. Trump has defended the cost of the event, calling it 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it,' in a recent interview with NBC News. 'We have the greatest missiles in the world,' Trump said. 'We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it.' To Dr. Kate Waldeck, one of the organizers for Saturday's rally in Huntington, the parade is another example of the 'massive' amount of money that Republicans want to divert from people who need it. The Trump-backed, 'big, beautiful bill' that passed the House of Representatives and is making its way through the Senate would cut billions in funding to Medicaid and food assistance to low-income Americans. 'We're seeing, increasingly, that our social safety net is going to be stripped away,' Waldeck said. 'And obviously, we hope that this political situation is temporary, but in the meantime, the reality is that we're going to have to build new networks for our people. So our theme for this [rally] is 'No Kings,' but we are taking that and extending it to just to… 'No kings, just community.' Huntington's event will include speakers, music, guided meditation for kids, bystander and Narcan training as well as a goods drive for Lily's Place, Harmony House and the local city mission, she said. 'We want to have a good time with our community, and we want to show our neighbors, especially even the ones that don't feel safe coming to events like this, so people who are minorities or noncitizens, that we're thinking of them,' Waldeck said. She added that everyone is welcome at the nonpartisan, nonviolent protest event 'as long as they adhere to the ground rules of no racism, no homophobia and transphobia.' Debra Kilgore of Mercer County Indivisible, is helping organize the event in Bluefield. 'I couldn't stay silent any longer,' Kilgore said of her reasons for protesting. 'I couldn't hope that someone else will take care of these issues and make and hold our representatives accountable, because it's not happening, especially in our state, where we have our Republican representatives in the federal government who are going along with everything. The Constitution grants Congress the power to levy tariffs, but they've allowed Trump to 'run the tariff show,' she said. 'They're letting it happen,' she said. 'And so, watching, I'll call them the enablers. I can't rely on somebody else to do something anymore.' While Mercer County, like the rest of West Virginia, voted overwhelmingly to elect Trump to a second term, Kilgore said as the year wears on, she's hearing from people that they no longer support the president. 'More and more people are saying, 'You know, I may have voted for Trump, but I didn't expect this,'' she said. 'Or people who never voted for Trump but in this area are afraid to say 'I'm not a Trump voter,' are starting to make their presence known.' The events Saturday come as protests against Trump's immigration policies continue in Los Angeles. The Trump administration is sending nearly 5,000 National Guard troops and Marines to the city, against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Newsom, a Democrat, called Trump's move a 'brazen abuse of power,' according to news reports. In Texas, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott deployed the National Guard across the state as more demonstrations are expected there Wednesday. 'Peaceful protest is legal,' Abbott wrote on the social media platform X. 'Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest. [The Texas National Guard] will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order. Waldeck said she's concerned about the National Guard being deployed to respond to protests against Newsom's will, but she's not concerned about the protests themselves becoming violent. 'We are aware of the national situation obviously, and [host organization] 50501 is unwavering in its commitment to peaceful protest, so we will have event staff there trained in de-escalation in the event there are counter protestors etc,' Waldeck said. Cindy Stemple, chair of the Randolph County Democratic Executive Committee, said the event they're planning for Elkins will be a 'peaceful celebration of our country and flag.' The event will feature speakers and musicians. Anyone who wants to sing or play an instrument will be allowed to do so. 'I think the protests are generally going to be peaceful unless Trump and everybody incites the people,' Stemple said. 'That's kind of my feeling. Now, I'm not in LA, I don't know. I'm not in Texas. I'm not in D.C., but when you have somebody threatening a first right, First Amendment right, which is a right to peaceful protest, there's a problem.' Stemple said Saturday's event will be the Elkins community eighth anti-Trump and 'pro-Democracy' rally. At each one, they've also collected donations for community needs like flood relief for Southern West Virginia or contributions to the local food pantry, she said. 'We are trying to do something good most every time that we hold one of these — and I call it a celebration,' she said. 'We become friends [and] allies just standing up for our country and enjoying the time together.' The rallies are planned for: Noon to 1:30 p.m. at the Morgan County Courthouse in Berkeley Springs Noon to 1:30 p.m. at the corner of King and Queen Streets in Martinsburg Noon to 3 p.m. Saturday at Bluefield Downtown Park, Federal and Commerce Streets in Bluefield Noon at Hart Avenue and Kanawha Street in Buckhannon 10 a.m. at WVU Coliseum in Morgantown 1 to 4 p.m. at Heritage Station in Huntington Noon to 2 p.m. at the state Capitol in Charleston Noon to 2 p.m. at Washington Street West and Jefferson Street in Lewisburg Noon to 1:30 at the Randolph County Courthouse in Elkins 1 to 3 p.m. at the Hampshire County Courthouse in Romney 3 to 4:30 p.m. at McMurran Hall in Shepherdstown 12:30 to 2:30 p.m. at Madison Elementary School in Wheeling More information is available at SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State leaders warn of crackdown if ‘No Kings' protests take a turn toward violence
Porchse Miller, an organizer with Black Lives Matter Grassroots Atlanta takes part in a peaceful immigration protest against LA ICE raids in Atlanta on Monday. State leaders are warning protesters to avoid violence during planned weekend protests. Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder Georgia leaders say they are prepared to respond if weekend protests turn violent. 'My office remains in close contact with state and local law enforcement and stands ready to take whatever appropriate action is needed to safeguard our communities from crime and violence while also respecting the constitutional right to peaceful assembly,' Gov. Brian Kemp said in a statement on social media. 'My support for public safety officers and the rule of law is unwavering, and any violence against those who protect and serve will be met with quick and heavy accountability.' Organizers around the country are planning demonstrations Saturday against the Trump administration as part of the 'No Kings' events. More than two dozen protests are planned in Georgia, from Dalton to Valdosta, according to organizers. Tensions are high across the country as photos and footage from Los Angeles depict smoldering vehicles and clashes between protesters and police – fallout from protests over tactics used in raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The situation in California intensified after President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass, who said local law enforcement was sufficient to keep the peace. The last time a president called up the National Guard to a state without the approval of its governor was in 1965 when President Lyndon Johnson deployed troops to protect civil rights activists against the wishes of segregationist Alabama Gov. George Wallace. The second Trump presidency has already seen numerous protests in Georgia over immigration, federal spending cuts and other actions by the administration. One of them turned violent Tuesday night when immigration protesters allegedly threw fireworks and rocks at police officers and their cars. No officers were seriously hurt, but at least six people were arrested, according to multiple news outlets. Kemp previously called in the National Guard over heated protests, including in 2020 when protests over the deaths of George Floyd and other Black Americans turned violent and in 2023 after protests over the Atlanta police public safety training facility known as 'Cop City' led to burning cop cars. Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, who is running for governor in 2026, issued a stern warning via a press release Wednesday: 'All Americans have the right to peacefully protest. No American has the right to destroy property, loot businesses, or attack law enforcement officers. It's very simple. Protesters use words. Rioters use violence. There is no gray area. In Georgia, if you engage in violence for the purpose of changing public policy, you can be charged with Domestic Terrorism. The penalty for Domestic Terrorism is 5-35 years in jail.' Many protesters say it's the tactics used by the Trump administration and ICE that should be illegal. 'I grew up in a sundown town up north, so them being able to come in and violate that sanctity of homes, schools, businesses, it triggers something in me, and it makes me so uncomfortable with what's going on,' Melissa Steach, a member of the Union of Southern Service Workers who works at Waffle House, said at a peaceful protest outside ICE headquarters Monday. 'It needs to stop,' she added. 'We're going to keep protesting until the raids stop. These people do so much for us, and I'm gonna keep standing with our brothers and sisters.' Georgia Recorder reporter Maya Homan contributed to this report.