Tested: 2024 Polaris Xpedition Is as Fun as It Is Loud
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links."
The Polaris Xpedition side-by-side takes the formula for SUVs like the Jeep Wrangler and Ford Bronco and shrinks it down to nearly the size of a two-door Mini Cooper S. It's illegal on the streets, but an absolute freak through the creeks, and its climate-controlled cabin takes the chill and dust out of the outdoors experience.
Polaris, which introduced its first side-by-side—the Ranger RZR—in 2007, has created arguably the most luxurious experience possible for a vehicle sold with a plastic steering wheel. Available in two- and four-door body styles, the Xpedition can carry up to five passengers, and it can be equipped with either a bed that dumps or an enclosed rear cargo space. The Polaris accessory list only makes the side-by-side more extreme, opening up possibilities like swapping its wheels and tires for a snow-conquering track system.
We tested a top-trim four-door Xpedition XP5 NorthStar. Pricing starts at $37,294 for the cheaper Ultimate five-seater, but our NorthStar commanded $45,794. Thankfully, the options on our test vehicle were few, but even so the total price ended up an eye-watering $50,274. Yes, that's more than a two-door Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, but the side-by-side has meaningful extras. Ours was packed with Polaris's roof-top tent, mounted on an aluminum Rhino-Rack platform atop the cabin. At approximately 7.5 feet tall, parking the whole shebang in our garage required removing the 146-pound tent, but it's an easy process that requires loosening four nuts—extra hardware might be required should you drop it on your leg.
There's also a handy in-bed Lock & Ride Max locking system that secures a full-size spare and two Maxtrax recovery boards, though it does eat up a significant amount of the 2.5-by-3.9-foot bed. The power windows, a 4500-pound winch with synthetic rope, a JBL audio system, and Ride Command GPS navigation were included.
Keeping the wheels spinning is a mid-mounted 999-cc ProStar parallel-twin engine with 114 horsepower. Every Polaris Xpedition uses a continuously variable transmission that keeps the engine, which can rev as high as 8500 rpm, comfortably in the powerband. Though great for keeping the bugs and dust out, the enclosed cabin traps the high-revving powertrain's migraine-inducing moan. After a few minutes of buzzing at full blast on trails, we found ourselves slowing down just to drop the revs and lessen the assault on our eardrums.
At wide-open throttle, the Xpedition shook our sound meter with 121 decibels of clamor. That's as loud as the 240-hp Can-Am Maverick R we recently tested and 15 decibels louder than the 493-hp Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 RS Manthey that screams to 9000 rpm. Even at 50 mph, the Xpedition buzzes along at 91 decibels. Bring some earplugs.
On dirt, the Xpedition howled to 60 mph in 14.1 seconds, crossed the quarter-mile mark in 19.3 seconds at 63 mph, and reached a drag-limited 68-mph top speed on our dirt test track. Now, before you go pointing out that this gnarly off-roader is 1.3 seconds slower to 60 mph than the 78-hp Mitsubishi Mirage G4 we tested on pavement, know this: The speeds at which you can comfortably traverse dips in the Polaris would send the rubber duckies in your average Jeep Gladiator to the freaking moon.
Thankfully, the Xpedition approaches bumps and deep ditches like dentistry; despite the wicked sound of its drill, you won't feel a thing. The front suspension has 14.0 inches of travel, while the rear will extend an inch farther. Every Xpedition comes with 30-inch Pro Armor Crawler XP tires, but Polaris customers have already experimented with bigger 33-inch BFGoodrich KM2 truck tires (and, with aftermarket control arms, larger 35-inch rubber) to expand the Xpedition's 14.0 inches of ground clearance.
Instead of playing keep-up with how quickly the Polaris's shocks are traveling, the Fox Podium QS3 dampers adjust based on the position of the shock across three zones of travel—beginning, middle, and end. Each damper can be manually adjusted, but unless you're sending the Xpedition over jumps or approaching its 1160-pound payload capacity, there's no need to touch those dials.
The native Ride Command software on the Xpedition's 7.0-inch touchscreen saves you from having to rely on a dying phone battery for GPS, trail data, and other communication. If you're driving in a group, you can see each rider on the screen and send each other messages. All that goodness is baked into the software, and it works great to keep someone from losing the group should they fall behind.
Our off-road camping adventure took us along the Two Hearted River in Michigan's Upper Peninsula, where we couldn't help but enjoy a few local brews at a rustic camping spot we promised a friend we wouldn't mention in specifics. While the roof-top tent fits two people comfortably, it does require extra effort to uncover, unfold, and set up its poles. We're splitting hairs here, but the "just open it" approach of hardtop tents—like the ones we've sampled from Roofnest—has ruined any other type of tent for us.
The Xpedition has a 12.5-gallon fuel tank with a claimed range of 200 miles, but during our time with it across the U.P., we averaged just 9 mpg, which limits total range to about 113 miles. Still, the bigger tank—most Polaris RZRs use a smaller 9.5-gallon unit—means fewer gas station stops on big trips. And once you start driving an Xpedition side-by-side, the muddy toys, big trailers, and tents start to make a lot of sense. We crisscrossed a few hundred miles of ORV trail and county roads between Grand Marais and Pine Stump Junction and would happily do it again.
A little more horsepower would be great, especially if your HQ is at a higher elevation, but the Xpedition is a delight to toss through the woods at any altitude. Depending on personal needs, sure, it might make more sense to snag a Wrangler or Toyota 4Runner at this price point, but that likely isn't the best solution for everyone.
After our adventures, we used a garden hose to clean the Xpedition's plastic interior. We scratched racing stripes down the sides thanks to a row of blue spruce trees. And best of all, had we encountered any mechanical issues, it's a 40-mile tow back to the trailer, instead of 400 miles home. It's a loud little rascal, but even that drawback is charming to some. Side-by-sides can make us feel like our favorite cars, trucks, and SUVS do—it's all about having fun. And in the Polaris Xpedition, having a blast is as easy as going for a ride.
Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades
How to Buy or Lease a New Car
Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Denny Hamlin plays the villain in Michigan after FireKeepers Casino 400 win
BROOKLYN, MI – When asked if he had disdain for Michigan, Denny Hamlin said no. You would not know that from his post race gestures, though. 'My friend Travis … he was like, 'Man, it'd feel good if you won from that school up north right in their backyard,' Hamlin said. 'I said, 'Well, I'm going to do it for you.' And so I did it just for my buddy.' What he did for his buddy was do a little "O-S-U" chant and arm gesture as a nod to the Ohio State Buckeyes. Advertisement Hamlin might not hate Michigan, but he does love playing the villain, and this weekend was a perfect moment for that. He's on the back nine of his racing years, his company is under threat from his NASCAR lawsuit and he's waiting on the birth of his son. Hamlin had a million reasons to lose the race this weekend. Instead, he came from behind in the waning laps of the race to snatch the win from the driver who'd led most of the race right after the hometown kid suffered a flat tire. Amid yellow and red flags, Hamlin emerged victorious – much to the crowd's displeasure. He did not mind, though. 'Until the crowd shifts to mostly cheers or boos, I'm always going to antagonize the booers like that,' Hamlin said. 'Until you really get the switch, which I don't think I'm ever going to in my career, what else is there? … I got to find ways to have fun doing this.' Hamlin did not seem like the likely winner when the race began, either. Despite his starting third, many eyes were on points leader William Byron, starting fourth, or Carson Hocevar, whose hot stretch coming into the race was a topic of conversation around the pit lane. Hamlin was still in third after a relatively uneventful Stage 1 for him despite several lead changes ahead of him and a fierce battle for fourth and fifth behind his car. Denny Hamlin, driver of the No. 11 Yahoo! Toyota, celebrates winning the NASCAR Cup Series FireKeepers Casino 400 at Michigan International Speedway on Sunday, June 8, 2025 in Brooklyn, Michigan. Starting in Stage 2, however, Hamlin's performance took a dive. Though he was second at the start, he began dropping down the race order, and while battling with Kyle Larson on Lap 58, he got loose and dropped five spots down to eleventh. It was a poor moment for Hamlin, who easily could have been buried down the order with the chaos of the restarts of the second stage. Advertisement Instead, Hamlin pulled himself back up the order, and by Lap 85, he had battled back to around the fifth position. He ended the stage eighth but he was still in the fight. As the third stage commenced, Hamlin was still back in the pack, at one point sitting around eleventh. He also sustained damage after a pit incident where he was stuck between two cars attempting to leave. As the laps ticked down, a comeback seemed increasingly unlikely. But he went to work, moving up one car at a time. By Lap 175, he'd reached fifth and knew that the drivers ahead of him were in much more dire straits regarding fuel then he was. Seven laps later, Hocevar went down with a flat tire and Hamlin was suddenly in fourth. Hamlin took down Ty Gibbs on Lap 185 and passed Kyle Larson one lap later. THE RACE: Denny Hamlin wins FireKeepers Casino 400 at Michigan International Speedway in epic finish Advertisement All that was left to do was wait. Byron was nearly out of fuel and was desperately conserving while attempting to hold off Hamlin. Hamlin waited for his opportunity and began an earnest battle for the lead at Lap 196. He passed Byron on Lap 197 at Turn 3 where he had identified Byron as vulnerable and claimed victory two laps later. Byron ultimately had to pit on the second-to-last lap, out of fuel. Hamlin also ran out of fuel – it was just on his second round of victory burnouts. 'I never will assume someone's going to run out,' Hamlin said. 'And I always am going to assume when I get there to challenge for the lead, they're going to go 100%. And I think that was the case, they told me over the radio (that) they told him, 'You got to go, you got to hold the lead, and (if) we run out, we run out.' That's the right strategy to do, which in turn made it more gratifying to me to pass him when he was going all out.' Hamlin may be 44, but he's not done yet. He's already achieved something only twenty drivers ever have in competing in 700 races, but he wants more wins. He's not done showing the kids what he can do, either. 'I'm racing guys that are, you know, some of them pretty much half my age,' Hamlin said. 'And they're so good, and they're really, really good, and so it's really gratifying when I know I can run with them, and I know I can beat them. … It just feels really good to, 20 years later, still feel like this is the best that I've ever been.' Advertisement Matthew Auchincloss is a reporter with the Detroit Free Press. Connect at mauchincloss@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Denny Hamlin plays villain in Michigan win at FireKeepers Casino 400


Motor 1
2 days ago
- Motor 1
‘This Should Be Illegal': Customer Gets Approved for 2024 Jeep Wrangler. Then An Expert Exposes the Reality of Financing
Some people buy a house. Others, apparently, buy a Jeep Wrangler with a seven-year loan and enough interest to make an accountant run screaming for the hills. A TikTok clip from the descriptively named creator I'm Just A Finance Guy (@imtheautofinanceguy) shows how outrageous financing deals can get these days, especially for those with bad credit scores. The video, which has been watched more than 290,000 times, zooms-in on the paperwork of a Truth in Lending Disclosure for a 2024 Jeep Wrangler that might just be the most expensive base model in recent memory. The financing terms feel more like a cautionary tale than a dealership win: Loan amount: $74,599 Finance charge (interest): $56,931.56 APR: 17.69 percent Term: 84 months (that's 7 years) Monthly payment: $1,565.84 Odometer reading: 860 miles The paperwork shows a total repayment of $131,530.56, or the cost of a house in small-town Ohio, all for a Jeep with less than 1,000 miles on the odometer. If that's not gruesome enough, let's break it down further: $1,565.84/month × 84 months = $131,530.56. That's over $56,000 in interest paid over the life of the loan. At 17.69% APR, the buyer ends up shelling out nearly double the Jeep's sticker price by the time it's paid off. You could make the same payments on a 15-year mortgage in parts of the country. According to Zillow, the median home price in Toledo, Ohio is just under $130,000 . More Jeep Stories From Motor1 The Jeep Cherokee Is Back The Best Performance Cars of 2025 (So Far) The New Gas Jeep Compass Is Strictly Front-Wheel Drive The Recon Will Be Jeep's 'New Defender,' Says Exec Every Three-Row SUV You Can Buy in 2025 Here's Your First Look at the 2026 Jeep Grand Cherokee The Jeep Wrangler Willys 41 Edition Rules. But There's One Big Catch 2026 Jeep Compass Unveiled: Hybrid or EV With Up to 375 HP While it's tempting to treat this loan as an outlier, it's more of a warning sign. In 2025, the average APR for a new car loan in the U.S. sits between 7 and 9 percent, depending on the borrower's credit score. A 17.69-percent rate suggests a borrower in a deep subprime category or someone who secured financing through a 'Buy Here, Pay Here' dealer known for predatory terms. And then there's the matter of the loan amount itself. A base model 2024 Jeep Wrangler typically starts around $35,000. Higher trims like the Rubicon can edge toward the $55,000 range with options. So, How Do We Get to Nearly $75,000? There are a few possibilities. The dealer may have loaded the vehicle with costly add-ons like extended warranties, off-road packages, or appearance upgrades that look good on paper and pad profit margins. It's also possible the buyer traded in a previous vehicle with negative equity, rolling the unpaid balance into the new loan. And in many cases, high-interest loans like this are pitched to buyers who are told it's their 'only option,' a favorite tactic of high-risk financing outfits. Whatever the case, it's a tough look. Seven years is a long time to pay off a car, especially one that may see some serious depreciation before it's halfway through the loan term. The Rise in Long-Term, High-Interest Auto Loans Is Becoming a Serious Financial Concern According to the CFPB, Americans now carry over $1.6 trillion in auto loan debt, and loan terms of 72 to 84 months are increasingly common, even though they often leave buyers "underwater" on their loans for most of the repayment period. Financial advisors generally recommend: Keeping loan terms under 60 months, avoiding APRs over 6–7 percent unless necessary, and never financing add-ons or extended warranties unless you've calculated the long-term cost. There's no indication on the term sheet of who the dealer or financier was for the proposed loan, but commenters on the clip were ready to grab their pitchforks and torches in outrage. 'This should be illegal. Someone tag the repo man!' one of them wrote. Another offered that the proposed deal is another example of buyers being preyed upon: 'In case anyone wondered why we need a consumer protection agency. These loans should be criminal.' And another wasn't feeling great about the idea of making a mortgage payment for a depreciating asset on wheels, writing, 'I'm not paying $131k for anything except a house and I'd do that extremely reluctantly.' Motor1 reached out to the creator via direct message and to Jeep/Stellantis via email. If we hear back, we'll be sure to update this article. Now Trending 'Missed My Bonus By One': Dodge Salesman Says May Was Terrible For Sales. Here's Why Kia Mechanic Says Even a 5-Year-Old Can Fix This Common Issue Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )


Hamilton Spectator
2 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Power, range, charging … what's wrong with this EV from Toyota?
PLANO, TEXAS—The tarmac is sun-baked and the air is heavy with humidity. While the road surface isn't bad, there are some pretty aggressive expansion joints that do make themselves felt. But not as much as I would expect. That's because I'm driving the all-new Toyota bZ (formerly bZ4X) electric crossover and, boy, has Toyota ever done wonders with the ride in this version of the vehicle. As good as the ride is — even though my tester has the optional 20-inch wheels, and that kind of thing tends to affect ride negatively — it's a very small part of a much bigger picture here. A lot of massaging has been done for this mid-cycle refresh of Toyota's one-and-only full battery-electric vehicle — it is a lineup that will soon triple in size after the recent announcement of the new C-HR and bZ Woodland — to address the most pressing needs of the old model, which swirled mainly around EV range and power. There needs to be an asterisk here, because, in some ways they have addressed this, but, in others, they haven't. Just as it was previously, the bZ is available with single-motor front-wheel-drive (FWD) and dual-motor all-wheel-drive (AWD). For '26, the AWD version makes 460 kilometres of range and 338 horsepower, 25- and 50-per-cent boosts, respectively, on the previous model. That's good, but the FWD model has a smaller battery than before and less range, as a result. Toyota maintains this is a cost-saving measure (pricing hasn't yet been announced), but it's, well, a bit of a bummer. AWD models of a car do tend to outsell FWD models in Canada so the lion's share of buyers will likely be happy with this. The story of its styling is a 'Tale of Two Cities'; the front end is a vast departure from the previous model, and not much has changed in the back. The vehicle gets Toyota's new 'Hammerhead' styling, which adds cool c-shaped daytime running lights and a smooth lower fascia with seamlessly-integrated body colour bumpers. Also new for '26: you can have body-coloured fenders depending on the exterior colour choice. For '26 some colours still do get contrast-colour fenders but the ones that don't look very classy and upmarket. At the rear sit the same tail light lenses and twin roof-mounted wings, with changes for '26 amounting to little more than some new badging. Inside, the main additions include a standard 14-inch central infotainment display, as well as optional nine-speaker JBL audio, while dual wireless charge pads are standard on all bZ trims (XLE FWD, XLE AWD, Limited AWD). As was the case before, the speedometer sits atop the dash, in the driver's line of sight, without obstructing the view. It essentially takes the place of a heads-up display, and it works. I spent the duration of my test in the dual-motor AWD version and that 338 horsepower can really be felt as soon as you dip in to the throttle. At 2,065 kilograms in Limited AWD spec, the bZ is no lightweight, but the power on offer and the throttle response make up for that and they have you squirting through intersections with ease. There's no problem getting up to speed on the highway. It's properly quick, this EV CUV, and inspires driver confidence as a result. The ride is very good, even if you specify the 20-inch wheels, but the chassis and suspension tuning is only half the battle when it comes to comfort of occupants. The seats are well padded and supportive, both front and back, and, while there is a nice, deep storage bin underneath the front seat armrest and a deployable armrest in back, hips and stray limbs don't get overly squeezed. The optional full-length glass roof doesn't impinge too much on front- and rear-seat headroom, which is a bonus. The added power and range are advantages. As is the charging. For '26, all bZ models come standard with NACS charging, which means you can plug in to a Tesla Supercharger and charge from 10 per cent to 80 per cent in about 30 minutes. If you prefer to use more traditional charge ports, such as a DC fast charge, each bZ sold comes with an adapter that will allow you to plug in to those, as well as a level II home charger if you happen to have one. Yes, the FWD model makes less range than before, but the power and range on offer from the AWD version hits the nail on the head. In AWD guise, it's exactly what the doctor ordered for the bZ. Type: Five-door, mid-size crossover; all-wheel-drive Engine: Front and rear EV motors; 338 horsepower Range: 460 kilometres Transmission: Single-speed automatic Cargo: 730 litres or 26 cubic feet behind second row Price: Not yet announced