Two shot after dispute at Philadelpha Eagles Super Bowl 59 parade
Another Super Bowl celebration has gone awry.
Multiple reportes indicate two people were shot on Friday at the Philadelphia Esgles' Super Bowl celebration.
Those wounded are in stable condition.
Police are searching for a person in a gray Eagles jersey.
The shooting took place after a dispute.
This happens a year after the fatal shooting in the horrible incident at the Kansas City Chiefs' Super Bowl celebration.
🚨#BREAKING: Multiple people have been shot during the Eagles Super Bowl celebration parade during a dispute
📌#Philadelphia | #Pennsylvania
At this time, numerous police officers are on the scene after a shooting during the Eagles' Super Bowl celebration parade, where… pic.twitter.com/23yuDwsOgB
— R A W S A L E R T S (@rawsalerts) February 14, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Where KC's mayor travels isn't the problem. It's who pays, and what they stand to gain
Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas delivers his State of the City address in February 2024 (photo courtesy of the City of Kansas City). How honest should elected officials be with the public? It's not a rhetorical question. In Kansas City, recent decisions by the mayor suggest a level of opacity that warrants closer scrutiny — not outrage, necessarily, but concern. Mayor Quinton Lucas has sidestepped ethics rules, not by breaking them outright, but by rerouting gifts through a nonprofit shielded from disclosure. His lavish trips, funded by interests with business before the city, now appear routine. The problem isn't where he travels. It's who pays, and what they stand to gain. A series of reports by The Missouri Independent outlined a troubling pattern in the mayor's conduct — one centered on secrecy, donor influence and potential retaliation against a whistleblower. At issue: his ties to politically-connected contractors, campaign finance maneuvering and the use of a nonprofit to obscure gift-giving — all while pushing a publicly subsidized downtown stadium. Kansas City mayor accused of skirting city gift ban by using nonprofit to pay for travel At the center is the Mayors Corps of Progress for a Greater Kansas City Inc., a 501(c)(4) nonprofit with a vague mission. During Lucas's first term, the organization covered more than $35,000 in travel, lodging, meals and tickets — including a $23,518 trip to the 2023 Super Bowl for Lucas, his then–chief of staff, and two police officers. The day after the game, the Heavy Constructors Association (commonly called the Heavies), a major construction lobbying group, wired $24,000 to the nonprofit. City ethics rules prohibit gifts over $1,000 to elected officials. Lucas claims these were work-related trips, yet he sought no city reimbursement and offered no public accounting. Instead, his team accepted dark-money donations from entities with business before the city, then kept the details quiet. We only know of them because a whistleblower came forward. The pattern repeated in 2024 and 2025, when Lucas again hit the Super Bowl circuit — without a whistleblower to reveal who paid the bill. In the following months, an anonymous investigation request was made to the Kansas City Municipal Ethics Commission, which just recently refused to engage, finding 'no justification' warranting it. Lucas, just back from a junket to Qatar, spoke about the issue with Kansas City radio host Pete Mundo. 'Big business exists around sports,' he told Mundo, 'it is the reason that so many of us are spinning our wheels to see where the teams play.' Lucas went on to say: 'I will be in any room where I can share what is happening with Kansas City… with a bunch of rich people who have money to invest in Kansas City.' The problem is not what room, or rather owner's box, the mayor is in. Nor is the problem his rubbing elbows with wealthy people. The problem isn't money from afar; it's money in the mayor's back yard. Lucas isn't accepting gifts from people who want to invest in Kansas City; he (or rather his nonprofit, but that's a distinction without much ethical difference here) is taking checks from businesses that want Kansas City to invest in them. Specifically, the Royals, which donated $15,000 to the Mayors Corps in 2022, and the Heavies, with its $24,000 donation around the Super Bowl, benefit mightily from any taxpayer funding. Lucas has presented himself as the man to make it happen — while refusing to disclose the terms of any deal. It's a huge potential conflict of interest that could be addressed with a little disclosure. Despite that, the mayor has doubled down on concealment, not transparency. A cynic would say none of this is surprising, probably least of all to Lucas himself, who said: 'I think the ethics commission got it right, I always knew they would.' Kansas City mayor accused of retaliating against whistleblower who revealed nonprofit spending The commission currently has five members, all appointed by Lucas. To its credit, the commission recommended changes to the city's code of ethics to clear up reporting requirements. But disregarding the complaint demonstrates the problem with dark money contributions. Because the Mayors Corps does not have any business before the city, the commission reasoned, there is no reporting requirement. But the Mayors Corp got the money from people with business before the city. That starts to look like the nonprofit functions as a vehicle to launder donations — something that, again, could be addressed with a little disclosure and that, you'd think, the group would be eager to clear up. Mark Funkhouser, Kansas City's mayor from 2007 through 2011, said when he entered office that the Mayors Corp, 'was explained to me as a slush fund that mayors had been using for many years to do just this sort of thing. Needless to say, I didn't have any fat cats willing to set up and contribute to such a fund for me.' Lucas does. In the radio interview, Lucas argued that by getting donations to pay for his trips, he was being a good steward of the city's finances. He called the idea that the city should cover his expenses, 'preposterous.' Taxpayers take note: If you're not paying for what your elected officials are up to, then there's a pretty good chance you're the product, not the customer. Advocating for taxpayer-funded development is one thing. Accepting undisclosed corporate gifts while doing so is another. It's not just a bad look; it undermines the city's ethics framework and public trust. The public deserves transparency, not evasive answers and twisted reasoning. And they deserve a mayor who respects rules, and the spirit of them.
USA Today
18 hours ago
- USA Today
Keyshawn Johnson suing NFL agent for $1 million in finder's fees
Keyshawn Johnson suing NFL agent for $1 million in finder's fees Show Caption Hide Caption NFL keeps 'Tush Push' in play The NFL won't ban the 'Tush Push', keeping the Eagles' high-success play in the game—for now. Former NFL wide receiver Keyshawn Johnson is suing agent Chris Ellison for nearly $1 million in damages. Johnson argues he recruited several NFL players to sign with Ellison following an alleged agreement the two made years ago that Johnson would receive payment for his efforts. Johnson filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court on May 23 and alleges he 'was to identify players, make the initial contact with them, and recruit them to be represented by' Ellison. The suit was first reported by TMZ. Johnson named four players that the lawsuit that he recruited to sign with Ellison: The suit states that Ellison promised to pay Johnson a third of the 3% commission he made on each of the players' salaries. The suit states that the total comes to $962,335. Ellison told TMZ Sports he denies Johnson's claims in this lawsuit. If the two had an agreement and the named players were not aware of it, that could cause issues for Ellison. Per Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio, agents are required to disclose those types of agreements to both their clients and the NFL Players Association.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
John Harbaugh talks about 'complex,' 'complicated' decision to cut Justin Tucker amid sexual misconduct allegations
John Harbaugh spoke with media on Wednesday about releasing Justin Tucker for the first time. () (Content warning: This story contains depictions of alleged inappropriate sexual behavior.) The Baltimore Ravens released five-time All-Pro kicker Justin Tucker on May 6 amid allegations from 16 women that he engaged in sexual misconduct during massage therapy sessions. Advertisement On Wednesday, head coach John Harbaugh addressed the decision for the first time while speaking with media. Like with the team's official statement, Harbaugh declined to directly address the allegations. He described the process as "complex" and "complicated" and ultimately characterized Tucker's release as a "football decision." "It was a complex decision-making process," Harbaugh told reporters. ... "You're talking about arguably the best kicker in the history of the game. Like we said, it's multi-layered, it's complicated. "In the end, it all comes back to what you have to do to get ready for your team to play the first game. I think if you step back and you take a look at all the issues and all the ramifications, you can understand that we've got to get our football team ready. And we've got to have a kicker ready to go. "That was the move that we decided to make. In that sense, it's a football decision." Tucker is accused of engaging in sexual misconduct on separate occasions between 2012-16 at eight different spas in the Baltimore area. The allegations first surfaced publicly in January in a report from the Baltimore Banner. From the Banner, in reporting subsequent allegations: "Their allegations are largely similar to those of the women who came forward earlier, including that he had an erection for most of the massage, intentionally and repeatedly exposed his genitals and brushed some of the therapists' thighs with his fingers. One of the seven new women said he left what appeared to be ejaculate on the massage table after his session." Advertisement Tucker does not face criminal charges and has denied the allegations. 'I maintain I did not act inappropriately at any point before, during, or after a professional bodywork treatment session," Tucker wrote in a statement addressing the allegations. Tucker is regarded as one of the greatest kickers in football history and had been with the Ravens for his entire 12-season career after connecting on 90.9% of his field-goal attempts as a rookie during Baltimore's run to the Super Bowl championship in 2012. Before the allegations, he was a well-respected member of the Baltimore community. Tucker is also coming off the worst season of his career in which he connected on a career-low 73.3% of his field-goal attempts, well below his career success rate of 89.1%. When the Ravens released him earlier in May, general manager Eric DeCosta described the call as a "football decision." "Sometimes football decisions are incredibly difficult, and this is one of those instances," DeCosta said, per a Ravens statement. "Considering our current roster, we have made the tough decision to release Justin Tucker." Nine days before releasing Tucker, the Ravens selected Arizona kicker Tyler Loop in the sixth round of the NFL Draft. They've since brought in undrafted rookie John Hoyland out of Wyoming for competition.
